中国金融风险“突变”之源

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：The Source of China's Financial Risk “Mutation” 作者：李猛 英文作者：LI Meng;Department of Economics, the Party School of the Shanghai Municipal Committee of the Communist Party of China; 关键词：金融风险 ; 突变 ; 民间资金 英文关键词：financial risks;;mutation;;private funds 中文刊名：JSXZ 英文刊名：The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute 机构：中共上海市委党校经济学教研部; 出版日期：2019-05-20 出版单位：江苏行政学院学报 年：2019 期：No.105 基金：国家社科基金项目“中国地方政府债务博弈行为及其规制研究”(15CJL009)的阶段性成果 语种：中文; 页：JSXZ201903006 页数：8 CN：03 ISSN：32-1562/C 分类号：42-49

摘要

中央经济工作会议指出,要防范金融市场异常波动和共振。关于中国金融市场异常波动和共振的症结,本文提出了有别于"分业论"和"混业论"的第三种观点——"突变论",即金融风险出现了突变。特征之一,短期存款与定期存款的周期性波动规律被打破了,"M1增速/M2增速"先是在低位徘徊,继而在高位运行;特征之二,消费品价格指数与资本品价格指数的同涨同跌规律不复存在,前者波澜不惊,后者大起大落。究其原因,民间资金大规模地脱离了实体经济,并绕开了消费品,涌向了投资品,且在不同的虚拟部门来回游走,进而导致资产价格的繁荣与衰退景象在楼市、股市、债市、汇市、信贷等领域轮番上演。这就意味着,仅仅依靠编制更加严密的混业监管网络是不够的,不足以抵御金融监管对象由"猫"变"虎"后的冲击力,还需要更大范围、更深层次的改革。
        The Central Economic Work Conference pointed out that it is necessary to guard against abnormal fluctuations and resonance in financial markets. Regarding the causes for China's financial market and the crux of resonance, this paper proposes a third viewpoint that is different from the "division theory" and "mixture theory" — "mutation theory", that is, the financial risk has shown sudden mutation. Characteristic one, the cyclical fluctuations of short-term deposits and –fixed-time deposits have been broken. The "M1 growth rate" firstlylingered in lower position and then moved in the higher position. Characteristic two, the consumer price index and the capital price index no longer follow the rule of synchronized rise or fall, with the former remaining stable while the latter showing dramatic changes. The reason is that private funds have seceded from the real economy on a large scale, and have circumvented consumer goods to flock to investment products, wandering in different virtual sectors, which led to the prosperity and decline of asset prices in the property market, stock market, bond markets, foreign exchange markets, and credit market. This means that it is not enough to rely solely on the preparation of a more rigorous mixed supervision network. It is not enough to resist the impact of the financial regulatory object turning from "cat" into "tiger". It requires more extensive and deeper reform.

引文

[1]李猛.地方变相举债行为的发展脉络及其治理[J].天津社会科学,2018,(2).
    [2]盛松成.M1、M2增速剪刀差背后的逻辑[N].中国社会科学报,2016-09-28.
    [3]连平.M1M2剪刀差短期难收窄[N].经济参考报,2016-09-06.
    [4]沈建光.中国离流动性陷阱有多远[J].中国外汇,2016,(17).
    [5]任泽平.M1大幅上升之谜及其影响[J].股市动态分析,2016,(32).
    [6]黄益平.防控中国系统性金融风险[J].国际经济评论,2017,(5).
    [7]赵磊,肖斌.经济金融化何以可能——一个马克思主义的解读[J].当代经济研究,2013,(3).
    [8]Pau.,Sweezy:Economic Reminiscences[J].Monthly Review,1995,47(1):1-11.
    [9]谭语嫣等.僵尸企业的投资挤出效应:基于中国工业企业的证据[J].经济研究,2017,(5).
    [10]何帆,朱鹤.消失的民间投资——2016年民间固定资产投资同比快速下滑原因分析[J].国际经济评论,2016,(6).