用户名: 密码: 验证码:
不同干扰等级下常绿阔叶次生林林分结构及树种多样性
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Forest structure and tree species diversity across a disturbance gradient in evergreen broadleaved secondary forests
  • 作者:左政 ; 郑小贤
  • 英文作者:ZUO Zheng;ZHENG Xiaoxian;The Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grasslamd Administration for Forest Resources and Environment Management, Beijing Forestry University;
  • 关键词:森林生态学 ; 常绿阔叶次生林 ; 重要值 ; 物种丰富度 ; 多样性
  • 英文关键词:forest ecology;;evergreen broadleaved secondary forest;;important value;;species richness;;diversity
  • 中文刊名:ZJLX
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Zhejiang A & F University
  • 机构:北京林业大学森林资源与环境管理国家林业和草原局重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-24
  • 出版单位:浙江农林大学学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.36;No.158
  • 基金:“十二五”国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAD22B05)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:ZJLX201901005
  • 页数:10
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:33-1370/S
  • 分类号:24-33
摘要
研究人为干扰对福建将乐林场常绿阔叶次生林林分结构及树种多样性的影响,为常绿阔叶次生林的植被恢复和生物多样性保护提供科学依据。以将乐林场常绿阔叶次生林为研究对象,通过踏查选择试验区立地条件相似且具有代表性的地段,设置25块(0.04~0.12 hm~2)固定样地,采用相对影响法将常绿阔叶次生林分为5个干扰等级,采用方差分析和LSD多重比较法分析不同干扰等级林分结构及树种多样性变化。结果表明:不同干扰等级下常绿阔叶次生林直径结构均呈倒"J"型分布,干扰等级Ⅴ各径阶个体数显著小于其他干扰等级(P=0.022),林分潜在更新能力和生产力较低;干扰等级Ⅰ~Ⅳ树高呈单峰山状曲线,干扰等级Ⅴ为多峰山状曲线,林分垂直结构不稳定。随着干扰强度的增加,角尺度(P=0.045)逐渐增大,大小比数(P=0.039)和混交度(P=0.017)逐渐减小。α多样性指数随着干扰等级的升高呈递减的趋势(P<0.05), Simpson优势度指数随着干扰等级的升高而呈上升趋势(P=0.000)。不同干扰等级林分之间物种相似度较低(Jaccard’s相似指数<47%)。不同干扰等级常绿阔叶次生林林分结构差异显著,随着干扰等级的增加,乔木多样性及林分结构稳定性降低,不利于植被恢复及多样性保护。
        To provide scientific eviden ce for vegetative recovery and biodiversity protection of evergreen broadleaved secondary forests, changes in stand structure and tree species diversity across a disturbance gradient of evergreen broadleaved secondary forests in Jiangle Forest Farm, Fujian Province were studied. The representative locations with similar site condition were selected through the field surveys, then a total of 25(0.04-0.12 hm~2)permanent sample plots were set using typical sampling methods for evergreen broadleaf secondary forests. Five disturbance gradients(Ⅰ-Ⅴ with Ⅴ having the most disturbance) were assigned based on the relative value of major disturbance indicators. Then using ANOVA and LSD multiple comparision to analyze changes in stand structure and species diversity along a disturbance gradient. Results showed that for the five disturbance gradients, individual tree diameter conformed to an inverse J-shape curve. The individual number of Ⅴ disturbance gradient was significantly lower than other disturbance gradients(P=0.022) indicating the lowest capacity of natural regeneration and productivity. The individual tree heights of Ⅰ-Ⅳ disturbance gradients conformed to a normal curve; whereas, the Ⅴ disturbance gradient conformed to a bimodal curve indicating the lower stability in the forests vertical structure. With an increasing disturbance gradient, uniform angle indexes(P=0.045) increased, but neighborhood comparison indexes(P=0.039) and mingling indexes(P=0.017) decreased. The alpha diversity measures declined(P<0.05) along the disturbance gradient as dominance increased(P=0.000). In addition, the similarity in species composition between each pair of disturbed forests was generally low(Jaccard's similarity index<47%). With an increase in disturbance gradient, average DBH, average tree height, and alpha diversity measures decreased(P <0.05), but the dominance index increased(P=0.000). Overall, as the disturbance gradient increased in the evergreen broadleaf secondary forests,the diversity index and stability of the forest structure decreased, which was not conducive to vegetative recovery and species diversity.
引文
[1] SAGAR R, RAGHUBANSHI A S, SINGH J S. Tree species composition, dispersion and diversity along a disturbance gradient in a dry tropical forest region of India[J]. For Ecol Manage, 2003, 186(1/3):61-71.
    [2] ZHU Jiaojun, MAO Zhihong, HU Lile, et al. Plant diversity of secondary forests in response to anthropogenic disturbance levels in montane regions of northeastern China[J]. J For Res, 2007, 12(6):403-416.
    [3] LAMB D, ERSKINE P D, PARROTTA J A. Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes[J]. Science, 2005, 310(5754):1628-1632.
    [4]苏日古嘎,张金屯,王永霞.北京松山自然保护区森林群落物种多样性及其神经网络预测[J].生态学报,2013, 33(11):3394-3403.Suriguga, ZHANG Jintun, WANG Yongxia. Species diversity of forest communities and its forecasting by neural network in the Songshan National Nature Reserve, Beijing[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33(11):3394-3403.
    [5]鲁庆彬,游卫云,赵昌杰,等.旅游干扰对青山湖风景区植物多样性的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2011, 22(2):295-302.LU Qingbin, YOU Weiyun, ZHAO Changjie, et al. Effects of tourism disturbance on plant diversity in Qingshan Lake scenic area of Zhejiang Province[J]. J Appl Ecol, 2011, 22(2):295-302.
    [6]陈芙蓉,程积民,刘伟,等.不同干扰对黄土区典型草原物种多样性和生物量的影响[J].生态学报, 2013, 33(9):2856-2866.CHEN Furong, CHENG Jimin, LIU Wei, et al. Effects of different disturbances on diversity and biomass of communities in the typical steppe of loess region[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33(9):2856-2866.
    [7]王海梅,李政海,王珍.气候和放牧对锡林郭勒地区植被覆盖变化的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2013, 24(1):156-160.WANG Haimei, LI Zhenghai, WANG Zhen. Effects of climate and grazing on the vegetation cover change in Xilinguole League of Inner Mongolia, North China[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2013, 24(1):156-160.
    [8]周伶,上官铁梁,郭东罡,等.晋、陕、宁、蒙柠条锦鸡儿群落物种多样性对放牧干扰和气象因子的响应[J].生态学报, 2012, 32(1):111-122.ZHOU Ling, SHANGGUAN Tieliang, GUO Donggang, et al. Response of species diversity in Caragana korshinskii communities to climate factors and grazing disturbance in Shanxi, Shaanxi, Ningxia and Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2012, 32(1):111-122.
    [9] SAEKI I. Effects of tree cutting and mowing on plant species composition and diversity of the wetland ecosystems dominated by the endangered maple, Acer pycnanthum[J]. For Ecol Manage, 2007, 242(2/3):733-746.
    [10] ANITHA K, JOSEPH S, CHANDRAN R J, et al. Tree species diversity and community composition in a humandominated tropical forest of Western Ghats biodiversity hotspot, India[J]. Ecol Complex, 2010, 7(2):217-224.
    [11] MUTHULINGAM U, THANGAVEL S.Density, diversity and richness of woody plants in urban green spaces:a case study in Chennai Metropolitan City[J]. Urban For Urban Green, 2012, 11(4):450-459.
    [12]吴甘霖,黄敏毅,段仁燕,等.不同强度旅游干扰对黄山松群落物种多样性的影响[J].生态学报, 2006, 26(12):3924-3930.WU Ganlin, HUANG Minyi, DUAN Renyan, et al. Disturbing effects of tourism on species diversity in Pinus taiwanensis communities[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2006, 26(12):3924-3930.
    [13]邱扬,李湛东,张玉钧,等.火干扰对大兴安岭北部原始林下层植物多样性的影响[J].生态学报, 2006, 26(9):2863-2869.QIU Yang, LI Zhandong, ZHANG Yujun, et al. The effects of fire disturbance on the biodiversity of understory plant in virginal forest, northern region of Daxinganling Mountains, China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2006, 26(9):2863-2869.
    [14] FULBRIGHT T E. Disturbance effects on species richness of herbaceous plants in a semi-arid habitat[J]. J Arid Environ, 2004, 58(1):119-133.
    [15] PHILLIPS O L, HALL P, GENTRY A H, et al. Dynamics and species richness of tropical rain forests[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1994, 91(7):2805-2809.
    [16] SCHWILK D W, KEELEY J E, BOND W J. The intermediate disturbance hypothesis does not explain fire and diversity pattern in fynbos[J]. Plant Ecol, 1997, 132(1):77-84.
    [17] WILSON S D, TILMAN D. Interactive effects of fertilization and disturbance on community structure and resource availability in an old-field plant community[J]. Oecologia, 1991, 88(1):61-71.
    [18] PILLIOS O, HALL P, SAWYER S, et al. Species richness, tropical forest dynamics and sampling:response to Sheil[J]. Oikos, 1997, 79(1):183-187.
    [19]王建国.建德山区的常绿阔叶林生态效益分析[J].植物生态学与地植物学丛刊, 1985, 9(2):112-118.WANG Jianguo. Analysis of the ecological benefits of the evergreen broad-leaved forests in the mountain area of Jiande County[J]. Acta Phytoecol Geobot Sin, 1985, 9(2):112-118.
    [20]刘伦辉,刘文耀,郑征.滇中山地主要植物群落水土保持效益比较[J].水土保持学报, 1990, 4(1):36-43.LIU Lunhui, LIU Wenyao, ZHENG Zheng. Comparison of the effects on the soil and water conservation of main communities in Tonghai County of Yunnan[J]. Acta Conserv Soil Aquae Sin, 1990, 4(1):36-43.
    [21]陈平腾.福建南平市延平区常绿阔叶次生林林分结构和物种多样性研究[D].福州:福建农林大学, 2009.CHEN Pingteng. Studies on Stand Structure and Species Diversity of Evergreen Broad-leaved Forest in Yanping District, Nanping, Fujian[D]. Fuzhou:Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2009.
    [22]杨青,丁晖,方炎明,等.武夷山大安源甜槠常绿阔叶林群落物种组成及多样性分析[J].植物资源与环境学报,2014, 23(1):44-50.YANG Qing, DING Hui, FANG Yanming, et al. Analyses on species composition and diversity of evergreen broadleaved forest community of Castanopsis eyrei at Da’anyuan in Wuyi Mountain[J]. J Plant Resour Environ, 2014, 23(1):44-50.
    [23]贺金生,陈伟烈,谢宗强,等.福建龙栖山自然保护区的常绿阔叶林类型及其群落物种多样性分析[J].生态学杂志, 1998, 17(3):1-6.HE Jinsheng, CHEN Weilie, XIE Zongqiang, et al. Types of the evergreen broadleaf forest and their community species diversity in Longqishan Nature Reserve, Fujian Province[J]. Chin J Ecol, 1998, 17(3):1-6.
    [24]丁晖,杨云方,徐海根,等.武夷山典型常绿阔叶林物种组成与群落结构[J].生态学报, 2015, 35(4):1142-1154.DING Hui, YANG Yunfang, XU Haigen, et al. Species composition and community structure of the typical evergreen broad-leaved forest in the Wuyi Mountains of Southeastern China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2015, 35(4):1142-1154.
    [25]包维楷,刘照光,刘朝禄,等.亚热带次生常绿阔叶林主要乔木种群自然恢复15年来的变化[J].林业科学,2001, 37(1):7-14.BAO Weikai, LIU Zhaoguang, LIU Zhaolu, et al. Fifteen-year change of tree populations in the secondary subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forests in southwestern China[J]. Sci Silv Sin, 2001, 37(1):7-14.
    [26]杜燕,郑小贤,罗梅.将乐县常绿阔叶次生林主导功能类型的研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报, 2013, 33(2):39-43.DU Yan, ZHENG Xiaoxian, LUO Mei. Study on leading function types of evergreen broad-leaved forest in Jiangle County, Fujian Province[J]. J Cent South Univ For Technol, 2013, 33(2):39-43.
    [27]任引.武夷山主要类型常绿阔叶次生林结构与功能特征的研究[D].南京:南京林业大学, 2008.REN Yin. Study on Structure and Function Characteristics of Evergreen Broad-leaved Forest in Wuyi Mountain[D].Nanjing:Nanjing Forestry University, 2008.
    [28]宋育红,张新文,周斌.格氏栲自然保护区常绿阔叶林群落特征[J].生态科学, 2005, 24(3):228-232.SONG Yuhong, ZHANG Xinwen, ZHOU Bin. Features of evergreen broad leaved forest community in Castanopsis kawakamii Nature Reserve[J]. Ecol Sci, 2005, 24(3):228-232.
    [29]黄建雄,郑凤英,米湘成.不同尺度上环境因子对常绿阔叶林群落的谱系结构的影响[J].植物生态学报, 2010,34(3):309-315.HUANG Jianxiong, ZHENG Fengying, MI Xiangcheng. Influence of environmental factors on phylogenetic structure at multiple spatial scales in an evergreen borad-leaved forest of China[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2010, 34(3):309-315.
    [30]罗梅,郑小贤.福建将乐林场常绿阔叶次生林主要种群种间联结性研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学报), 2016, 44(8):135-142.LUO Mei, ZHENG Xiaoxian. Iner-specific correlation of main populations in evergreen broad-leaved secondary forest in Jiangle forest farm[J]. J Northwest A&F Univ Nat Sci Ed, 2016, 44(8):135-142.
    [31]李杰,高祥,徐光,等.福建将乐林场常绿阔叶林幼苗结构分析与更新评价[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 42(5):62-68.LI Jie, GAO Xiang, XU Guang, et al. Structure analysis and evaluation of seedlings in evergreen broad-leaved forest in Jiangle Forest Farm, Fujian[J]. J Northwest A&F Univ Nat Sci Ed, 2014, 42(5):62-68.
    [32]杜燕.将乐林场常绿阔叶次生林健康评价研究[D].北京:北京林业大学, 2013.DU Yan. Health Assessment of Evergreen Broad-leaved Forest in Jiangle Forest Farm[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2013.
    [33]王琦,杜燕,郑小贤.将乐林场常绿阔叶林健康评价指标体系构建[J].西南林业大学学报, 2014, 34(5):74-78.WANG Qi, DU Yan, ZHENG Xiaoxian. Construct the health evaluation of index system for evergreen broadleaf forest in Jiangle Forest Farm[J]. J Southwest For Univ, 2014, 34(5):74-78.
    [34]周洋.福建三明将乐林场低质低效常绿阔叶次生林经营技术[D].北京:北京林业大学, 2015.ZHOU Yang. Study on Low-quality and Low-benefit of Broad-leaved Evergreen Forests Management Techniques in Jiangle, Fujian[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2015.
    [35]陈昌雄.天然常绿阔叶次生林生长潜力及择伐经营研究[D].南京:南京林业大学, 2005.CHEN Changxiong. Study on Growth Potential and Selection Cutting of Natural Evergreen Broad-leaved Forests[D].Nanjing:Nanjing Forestry University, 2015.
    [36] WU Lichao, LIU Jie, ATSUSHI T, et al. Effect of selective logging on stand structure and tree species diversity in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest[J]. Ann For Sci, 2013, 70:535-543.
    [37] CHRONOPOULOS G, CHRISTODOULAKIS D. Analysis of the adventive flora of a Greek city-the example of Patras[J]. Bot Helv, 2000, 110(2):171-189.
    [38]汤孟平,唐守正,雷相东.两种混交度的比较分析[J].林业资源管理, 2004, 4(8):25-27.TANG Mengping, TANG Shouzheng, LEI Xiangdong. Comparison analysis on two minglings[J]. For Resour Manage,2004, 4(8):25-27.
    [39]罗梅,郑小贤.八达岭辽东栎-油松混交林空间结构及其多样性[J].中南林业科技大学学报, 2012, 32(9):55-58.LUO Mei, ZHENG Xiaoxian. Study of spatial structure and species diversity of Quercus liaotungensis-Piuns tabulaeformis mixed stand in Badaling forest farm[J]. J Cent South Univ For Technol, 2012, 32(9):55-58.
    [40] BAKER W L. The landscape ecology of large disturbances in the design and management of nature reserves[J].Landscape Ecol, 1992, 7(3):181-194.
    [41] MAROZAS V, RACINSKAS J, BARTKECICIUS E. Dynamics of ground vegetation after surface fires in hemiboreal Pinus sylvestris forests[J]. For Ecol Manage, 2007, 250(1):47-55.
    [42] COLLINS S L, GLENN S M, GIBSON D J. Experimental analysis of intermediate disturbance and initial floristic composition:decoupling cause and effect[J]. Ecology, 1995, 76(2):486-492.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700