用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于模糊层次分析法的生态护岸形式优选研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Study on the Optimization of Ecological Revetment Forms Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
  • 作者:樊进娟 ; 贾艾晨
  • 英文作者:FAN Jinjuan;JIA Aichen;School of Hydraulic Engineering,Dalian University of Technology;
  • 关键词:生态护岸 ; 优选 ; 模糊层次分析法 ; 综合评价
  • 英文关键词:ecological revetments;;optimization;;fuzzy analytic hierarchy process;;comprehensive evaluation
  • 中文刊名:FSJS
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering
  • 机构:大连理工大学水利工程学院;
  • 出版日期:2015-08-15
  • 出版单位:水利与建筑工程学报
  • 年:2015
  • 期:v.13;No.62
  • 基金:“十二五”水专项“面向水质改善的饮马河生态修复成套技术研究与综合示范(2012ZX07207-007-05)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:FSJS201504020
  • 页数:6
  • CN:04
  • ISSN:61-1404/TV
  • 分类号:100-104+140
摘要
以黑顶子河治理工程为例,利用层次分析法确定生态护岸各指标的权重,利用模糊综合评价法对生态护岸形式进行综合评价,优选结果表明,治理段保育区、景观区、保护区的护岸形式可分别采用生态混凝土护岸、阶梯石笼插枝护岸、石笼挡墙护岸。该方法具有较强的合理性和可靠性,能够为生态护岸形式优选提供科学的指导。
        In order to avoid the effect of subjective judgment and preferences on the optimization of ecological revetment forms,the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process which combined the merits of analytic hierarchy method and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was adopted in the analysis of Heidingzi river treatment engineering. At first the analytic hierarchy process was adopted to determine the weight of each index of the ecological revetment,and then the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was used to evaluate the forms of ecological revetment. The optimization result indicates that the revetment forms are preferably ecological concrete revetment,revetment with stepped stone cages and cuttings,revetment with stone cage retaining wall for the conservation area,landscape area and protection area in the treatment section respectively. This scheme is applicable and reliable,it can provide some scientific guidance in the optimization of ecological revetment forms.
引文
[1]卜全民,李凤英.污染河道生态修复技术研究[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(36):16084-16085.
    [2]Min H,Melachrinoudis E.The relocation of a hybrid perspectives:a case study[J].International Journal of Management Science,1999,27(1):75-85.
    [3]Ma J,Fan Z P,Huang L H.A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1999,112(2):397-404.
    [4]Jung H W,Choi B.Optimization models for quality and cost of modular software systems[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1999,112(3):613-619.
    [5]许树柏.层次分析法原理[J].天津:天津大学出版社,1998.
    [6]姜巍巍,贾亚洲.数控机床用户满意度信息处理[J].吉林大学学报:工学版,2004,34(1):154-158.
    [7]朱松岭,周平,韩毅,等.基于模糊层次分析法的风险量化研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2004,10(8):980-984.
    [8]Wang Ying-ming,Elhag Taha M S,Hua Zhongsheng.A modified fuzzy logarithmic least squares method for fuzzy analytic hierarchy process[J].Fuzzy and Systems,2006,157(23):3055-3071.
    [9]Mikhailov L,Tsvetinov P.Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process[J].Applied Soft Computing,2004,5(1):23-33.
    [10]Tiryaki F,Ahlatcioglu B.Fuzzy portfolio selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process[J].Information Sciences,2009,179(1/2):53-69.
    [11]郝晓磊.山丘区生态河道设计方法研究[D].扬州:扬州大学,2008.
    [12]张震,于天彪,梁宝珠,等.基于层次分析法与模糊综合评价的供应商评价研究[J].东北大学学报,2006,10(27):1142-1145.
    [13]常志朋,赵倩.层次分析法在河道护岸堤型护坡材料选择中的应用[J].甘肃水利水电技术,2011,47(1):41-45.
    [14]石瑞花.河流功能区划与河道治理模式研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2008.
    [15]戴琰琦.基于模糊层次的商标价值评估方法研究[J].价值工程,2010,29(11):1-3.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700