基于元分析的供应链协作信任与合作绩效关系研究

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Research on the Relationship between Supply Chain Collaboration Trust and Cooperative Performance Based on Meta-analysis 作者：张海燕 ; 王瑶 ; 孙树伟 英文作者：Zhang Haiyan;Wang Yao;Sun Shuwei;School of Business,Jiangsu Normal University;School of Management,Shanghai University;School of Mathematics and Physics,Xuzhou University of Technology; 关键词：供应链节点企业 ; 供应链协作信任 ; 合作绩效 ; 元分析 ; 金融危机 英文关键词：node-enterprise in supply chain;;supply chain collaboration trust;;cooperative performance;;Meta-analysis;;financial crisis 中文刊名：SCJJ 英文刊名：West Forum on Economy and Management 机构：江苏师范大学商学院;上海大学管理学院;徐州工程学院数理学院; 出版日期：2019-01-24 16:00 出版单位：西部经济管理论坛 年：2019 期：v.30;No.109 基金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“工作场所妒忌情绪视角的水平薪酬差距形成基础对团队成员工作角色绩效影响机制研究”(项目编号18YJC630238);; 徐州工程学院青年培育项目“团队薪酬差距的形成基础对成员绩效影响机制研究”(项目编号XKY2017216);; 江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学研究资助项目“制度信任的心理成本:制度信任偏离度对供应链协作的影响机制研究”(项目编号2016SJB630079) 语种：中文; 页：SCJJ201901011 页数：10 CN：01 ISSN：51-1738/F 分类号：93-102

摘要

[目的/意义]明确供应链协作信任与合作绩效的关系和影响程度,提升研究结论普适性,找寻到单个实证研究难以探讨和检验的实证研究情境因素和测量因素的调节效应。[方法/过程]文章基于55个有效独立实证研究样本进行了元分析。[结果/结论]分析结果表明:供应链协作信任对合作绩效具有中等程度的促进效应;不仅如此,二者间关系亦受到文化差异、市场情境差异、取样地区差异、合作绩效类型和是否引入中介变量的调节。具体来说,对于集体主义文化主导情境、金融危机爆发之后、来自发展中国家或地区的样本而言,供应链协作信任对合作绩效的促进效应均更明显;相比客观合作绩效,供应链协作信任对主观合作绩效的促进效应更明显;相比未引入中介变量情形,引入中介变量情形下供应链协作信任对合作绩效影响更明显。
        [Purpose/Significance] The paper intends to clarify the relationship and degree of influence between supply chain collaboration trust and cooperative performance,improve the universality of research conclusions,and find the moderating effects of contextual and measuring factors that a single empirical study is difficult to explore.[Method/Process] This paper conducts a meta-analysis on 55 valid independent empirical research samples.[Result/Conclusion] The results show that supply chain collaboration trust has a moderate promotion effect on cooperation performance.What is more,the relationship between the two is also moderated by cultural differences,market situation differences,the marketization level of sampling areas,types of cooperative performance,and whether or not mediators are introduced.Specifically,for the samples of collectivism-dominated culture,from developing countries or regions,after the financial crisis broke out,and the from developing countries or regions,positive effects of supply chain collaboration trust on cooperative performance are much stronger.In addition,compared with the objective cooperation performance,the overall effect on subjective cooperative performance is more obvious.Compared with the situation without considering mediator,the effect is more obvious when introducing in mediator.

引文

[1]张海燕,孙树伟.基于ISM的供应链协作信任影响因素研究[J].企业经济,2015(10):84-88.
    [2]张海燕,张正堂.制度信任偏离度对再次合作意愿影响实证研究[J].软科学,2017a,31(3):38-41.
    [3]张海燕,张正堂.我国经济转型情境下制度信任对再次合作意愿的影响研究:有调节的中介模型[J].商业经济与管理,2017b,37(6):23-36.
    [4]ANDERSON J C,NARUS J A.A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships[J].Journal of Marketing,1990,54(1):42-58.
    [5]殷茗,赵嵩正.供应链协作信任影响因素的实证研究[J].工业工程与管理,2006(3):80-85.
    [6]MAYER R C,DAVIS J H,SCHOORMAN F D.An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust[J].Academy of Management Review,1995,20(3):709-734.
    [7]MCGEE J E,DOWLING M J,MEGGINSON W L.Cooperative Strategy and New Venture Performance:The Role of Business Strategy and Management Experience[J].Strategic Management Journal,1995,16(7):565-580.
    [8]潘文安,张红.供应链伙伴间的信任、承诺对合作绩效的影响[J].心理科学,2006,29(6):1502-1506.
    [9]BRADACH J L,ECCLES R G.Price,Authority,and Trust:From Ideal Types to Plural Forms[J].Annual Review of Sociology,1989,15(1):97-118.
    [10]KRAUSE D R,HANDFIELD R B,TYLER B B.The Relationships between Supplier Development,Commitment,Social Capital Accumulation and Performance Improvement[J].Journal of Operations Management,2007,25(2):528-545.
    [11]DYER J H.Effective Interfirm Collaboration:How Firms Minimize Transaction Costs and Maximize Transaction Value[J].Strategic Management Journal,2015,18(7):535-556.
    [12]MORGAN R M,Hunt S D.The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing[J].Journal of Marketing,1994,58(3):20-38.
    [13]HOFSTEDE G.Cultures and Organizations[M].New York:Mc Graw-Hill,1997.
    [14]周怡.信任模式与市场经济秩序---制度主义的解释路径[J].社会科学,2013(6):58-69.
    [15]张旭梅,陈伟.供应链企业间信任、关系承诺与合作绩效---基于知识交易视角的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2011,29(12):1865-1874.