摘要
目的探讨临床护理路径对腹部创伤伴失血性休克患者抢救质量的影响。方法选取2016年1月—2018年2月经120急救中心送至徐州医科大学附属淮安医院急诊科就诊的腹部创伤伴失血性休克患者90例,其中2016年1月—2017年1月收治的45例患者作为对照组,2017年2月—2018年2月收治的45例患者作为研究组。对照组患者给予常规急救护理,研究组患者给予临床护理路径。比较两组患者入院至进手术室时间、手术时间、抢救成功率及患者满意度。结果研究组患者入院至进手术室时间、手术时间短于对照组,抢救成功率高于对照组(P<0.05)。研究组患者满意度高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论临床护理路径可有效缩短腹部创伤伴失血性休克患者入院至进手术室时间及手术时间,提高抢救质量和患者满意度。
Objective To investigate the impact of clinical nursing pathway on quality of rescue in abdominal injuries patients accompanied with hemorrhagic shock.Methods From January 2016 to February 2018,a total of 90 abdominal injuries patients accompanied with hemorrhagic shock that transferred by 120 Emergency Center were selected in the Department of Emergency,Huai'an Hospital Affiliated to Xuzhou Medical University,thereinto 45 cases admitted to this hospital from January 2016 to January 2017 were selected as control group,the other 45 cases admitted to this hospital from February 2017 to February 2018 were selected as study group.Patients in control group received routine emergency care,while patients in study group received clinical nursing pathway.Duration between admission and operating room,operation elapsed time,rescue success rate and patients' satisfaction were compared between the two groups.Results Duration between admission and operating room,and operation elapsed time in study group were statistically significantly shorter than those in control group,rescue success rate in study group was statistically significantly higher than that in control group(P<0.05).Patients' satisfaction in study group was statistically significantly higher than that in control group(P<0.05).Conclusion In abdominal injuries patients accompanied with hemorrhagic shock,clinical nursing pathway can effectively shorten duration between admission and operating room,and operation elapsed time,improve the quality of rescue and patients' satisfaction.
引文
[1]GRUEN R L,BROHI K,SCHREIBER M,et al.Haemorrhage control in severely injured patients[J].Lancet,2012,380(9847):1099-1108.DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61224-0.
[2]中国医师协会急诊分会,中国人民解放军急救医学专业委员会,中国人民解放军重症医学专业委员会,等.创伤失血性休克诊治中国急诊专家共识[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2017,26(12):1358-1365.DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2017.12.004.
[3]王瑞芳,李春玲,李敏,等.基于德尔菲法的胰体尾切除术围手术期临床护理路径表的构建[J].上海护理,2019,19(5):46-50.
[4]冼少眉,刘超群,陈佰棠,等.护理临床路径在批量颅脑损伤病人急救中的应用[J].护理研究,2016,30(24):3012-3014.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2016.24.020.
[5]黄娟娟,杨立倩,韦仁杰,等.快优临床护理路径在股骨骨折手术患者中的应用[J].广西医学,2017,39(9):1456-1458.DOI:10.11675/j.issn.0253-4304.2017.09.49.
[6]中国医师协会创伤外科医师分会,中华医学会创伤医学分会创伤急救与多发伤学组,刘良明,等.创伤失血性休克早期救治规范[J].创伤外科杂志,2017,19(12):881-883,891.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-4237.2017.12.001.
[7]苏靖,王丽.预见性护理干预对腹外伤合并休克病人急救的临床价值[J].护理研究,2016,30(4):475-477.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2016.04.030.
[8]WORMALD P J.The agger nasi cell:the key to understanding the anatomy of the frontal recess[J].Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,2003,129(5):497-507.DOI:10.1016/S0194-59980301581-X.
[9]晏慧琳,卢小楠.手术室护理路径在重型颅脑损伤患者中的应用效果[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2017,25(7):158-160.
[10]胡红花.临床护理路径在脑出血患者中的应用效果分析[J].实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2014,22(11):149-150.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-5971.2014.11.076.
[11]郭彩利,刘英乔,高泽宇,等.临床护理路径在失血性休克中的应用[J].河北医药,2016,38(15):2376-2378.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-7386.2016.15.041.
[12]杨艳霞.临床护理路径在失血性休克中的应用[J].全科护理,2017,15(2):194-197.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4748.2017.02.028.