执行转破产程序启动难的原因与对策
|
摘要
现阶段,大量的执行不能、"应破不破"的涉企业法人案件积压在执行阶段,给执行法院造成了极大的压力。解决这一问题的执行转破产程序基本处于启动难的空转状态。具体的原因表现在:当事人缺乏启动程序的内心动力;执行转破产程序法律规制不合理;当事人申请主义的法律效用低下。为解决启动难问题,建议构建当事人激励机制和扩大申请主体范围;优化法律规制和细化程序设置;优化执行转破产程序有限的职权主义启动模式。
At this stage,a large number of cases that cannot be executed and"should be unbreakable"are backlogged in the implementation stage,which has put tremendous pressure on the enforcement court. However,the execution of the bankruptcy process is basically in a state of idling that is difficult to start. The specific reasons are as follows: the parties lack the inner motivation to start the procedure; the legal regulation of the execution of the bankruptcy procedure is unreasonable; the legal effect of the party's applicationism is low. In order to solve this problem,it is recommended to construct the party incentive mechanism and expand the scope of the application subject; optimize the legal regulation and refine the procedure setting; implement the authority-based startup mode of the implementation of the bankruptcy procedure,so as to solve the difficult problem of the implementation of the bankruptcy procedure.
At this stage,a large number of cases that cannot be executed and"should be unbreakable"are backlogged in the implementation stage,which has put tremendous pressure on the enforcement court. However,the execution of the bankruptcy process is basically in a state of idling that is difficult to start. The specific reasons are as follows: the parties lack the inner motivation to start the procedure; the legal regulation of the execution of the bankruptcy procedure is unreasonable; the legal effect of the party's applicationism is low. In order to solve this problem,it is recommended to construct the party incentive mechanism and expand the scope of the application subject; optimize the legal regulation and refine the procedure setting; implement the authority-based startup mode of the implementation of the bankruptcy procedure,so as to solve the difficult problem of the implementation of the bankruptcy procedure.
引文
[1]王欣新.破产法论坛(第九辑)[M].北京:法律出版社,2015.
[2]齐明.破产法学:基本原理与立法规范[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2013.
[3]韩长印.破产程序的财产分配规则与价值规则增值规则——兼与个别执行制度的功能对比[J].法商研究,2003(3).
[4]徐阳光.执行与破产之功能分界与制度衔接[J].法律适用,2017(11).
[5]丁海湖.田飞.“执转破”操作模式及相关实务问题研究[J].法律适用,2017(11).
[6]曹守晔.杨悦.执行程序与破产程序的协调与衔接[J].人民司法,2015(21).
[7]江必新.标本兼治破解执行难逐步实现执行体系和执行能力现代化[J].人民司法,2016(10).
[8]刘黎明.浅议如何构建执行程序与破产程序衔接机制[J].中国法治,2017(2).
[9]刘旭东.陆晓燕.效益法则框架下“执转破”之功能透视及其制度建构[J].法律适用,2017(11).
[10]赵树文.王嘉伟.僵尸企业治理法治化保障研究——以破产法及其实施机制的完善为研究路径[J].河北法学,2017(2).
[2]齐明.破产法学:基本原理与立法规范[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2013.
[3]韩长印.破产程序的财产分配规则与价值规则增值规则——兼与个别执行制度的功能对比[J].法商研究,2003(3).
[4]徐阳光.执行与破产之功能分界与制度衔接[J].法律适用,2017(11).
[5]丁海湖.田飞.“执转破”操作模式及相关实务问题研究[J].法律适用,2017(11).
[6]曹守晔.杨悦.执行程序与破产程序的协调与衔接[J].人民司法,2015(21).
[7]江必新.标本兼治破解执行难逐步实现执行体系和执行能力现代化[J].人民司法,2016(10).
[8]刘黎明.浅议如何构建执行程序与破产程序衔接机制[J].中国法治,2017(2).
[9]刘旭东.陆晓燕.效益法则框架下“执转破”之功能透视及其制度建构[J].法律适用,2017(11).
[10]赵树文.王嘉伟.僵尸企业治理法治化保障研究——以破产法及其实施机制的完善为研究路径[J].河北法学,2017(2).