广西旅游生态环境承载力时空分异研究
|
摘要
旅游生态环境承载力表示在一定时期内旅游地所能承受的旅游活动强度。通过压力系统、现状承载系统和发展支撑系统,构建广西旅游承载力评价指标体系。利用熵值法确定指标权重,并结合模糊综合评价模型对广西旅游承载力进行评价。结果表明:(1)广西旅游生态环境承载力整体水平在不断提高,但总体上还处于较低承载水平上。(2)根据多重分析和多重比较在空间分析上可分为五个等级:桂林和南宁为第一等级;柳州为第二等级;北海、防城港、河池和崇左为第三等级;钦州、玉林、贺州和来宾为第四等级;梧州和百色介于第四和第五等级之间,与两等级无显著性差异;贵港为第五等级。通过动态监测不同地市旅游承载力变化,对今后旅游经济阶段性发展和后续跟踪研究,提供借鉴性监测和探索,将更有针对性和实践指导意义。
Tourism eco-environmental carrying capacity represents the intensity of tourism activities in a certain period of time. The evaluation index system of tourism carrying capacity in Guangxi is constructed based on the pressure system,the current carrying capacity and the development supporting system. The index weight is determined by entropy method,and the carrying capacity of tourism in Guangxi is evaluated in combination with the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model. The results show that the overall level of the tourism environmental carrying capacity in Guangxi is improved increasingly but still at a lower level. According to the multiple analysis and multiple comparison,the spatial analysis can be divided into five grades. Guilin and Nanning are of the first grade; Liuzhou is of the second grade; Fangchenggang,Hechi,Beihai and Chongzuo are of the third grade; Yulin,Qinzhou,Hezhou and Laibin are of the fourth grade; Wuzhou and Baise are of the level between the fourth grade and the fifth grade with no significant difference; and Guigang is of the fifth grade. By dynamic monitoring of the changes of tourism carrying capacity in different cities,the study results will provide reference for monitoring and exploration of the stage development of tourism economy and follow-up researches which will be of more targeted and practical guiding significance.
Tourism eco-environmental carrying capacity represents the intensity of tourism activities in a certain period of time. The evaluation index system of tourism carrying capacity in Guangxi is constructed based on the pressure system,the current carrying capacity and the development supporting system. The index weight is determined by entropy method,and the carrying capacity of tourism in Guangxi is evaluated in combination with the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model. The results show that the overall level of the tourism environmental carrying capacity in Guangxi is improved increasingly but still at a lower level. According to the multiple analysis and multiple comparison,the spatial analysis can be divided into five grades. Guilin and Nanning are of the first grade; Liuzhou is of the second grade; Fangchenggang,Hechi,Beihai and Chongzuo are of the third grade; Yulin,Qinzhou,Hezhou and Laibin are of the fourth grade; Wuzhou and Baise are of the level between the fourth grade and the fifth grade with no significant difference; and Guigang is of the fifth grade. By dynamic monitoring of the changes of tourism carrying capacity in different cities,the study results will provide reference for monitoring and exploration of the stage development of tourism economy and follow-up researches which will be of more targeted and practical guiding significance.
引文
[1]崔凤军,刘家明.旅游生态环境承载力理论及其实践意义[J].地理科学进展,1998,17(1):86-90.
[2]王潞,李树峰.旅游伦理、旅游环境保护与旅游可持续发展关系探讨[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009,23(2):62-65.
[3]明庆忠,李宏,徐天任.生态旅游环境问题类型及保育对策[J].经济地理,2000,20(4):114-117.
[4]蒋洪强,徐玖平.旅游生态环境成本计量模型及实例分析[J].经济体制改革,2002,20(1):99-102.
[5]王艳,张建新,章锦河.三峡库区旅游生态环境问题及可持续旅游对策[J].重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版),2010,27(6):27-32.
[6]吴志才,彭华.旅游生态环境容量的经济学探讨[J].云南地理环境研究,2003,15(1):69-74.
[7]阳国亮,陈文捷,潘小玲.基于循环经济理论的旅游可持续发展研究—以广西北部湾滨海城市为例[J].广西社会科学,2011(5):20-24.
[8]祁新华,陈烈,程煜.区域旅游可持续发展的生态学透视[J].地理与地理信息科学,2005,21(1):74-78.
[9]刘敏,刘春风,胡中州.旅游生态补偿:内涵探讨与科学问题[J].旅游学刊,2013,28(2):52-59.
[10]翁钢民,赵黎明,杨秀平.旅游景区环境承载力预警系统研究[J].中国地质大学学报,2005,5(4):54-58.
[11]王剑,熊康宁,殷红梅,等.旅游生态环境承载力在待开发景区规划中的应用初探—以贵州东风湖为例[J].中国岩溶,2002,21(4):303-308.
[12]孙道玮,俞穆清,陈田,等.生态旅游生态环境承载力研究—以净月潭国家森林公园为例[J].东北师大学报(自然科学版),2002,34(1):61-71.
[13]刘佳,于水仙,王佳.滨海旅游生态环境承载力评价与量化测度研究—以山东半岛蓝色经济区为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(9):166-170.
[14]裴玮.基于面板数据的西南地区旅游生态环境承载力评价[J].云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,45(3):31-36.
[15]邱菀华.管理决策与应用熵学[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2002:41-43.
[16]杨倩,蒙吉军,王晓东.基于多维状态空间法的漓江上游生态旅游承载力空间评价及提升策略[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2015,51(1):131-140.
[17]王奎峰,李娜.基于P-S-R概念模型的生态环境承载力评价指标体系研究—以山东半岛为例[J].环境科学学报,2014,34(8):2133-2139.
[18]谭映宇,张平,刘容子.渤海内主要海湾资源和生态环境承载力比较研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(12):7-12.
[2]王潞,李树峰.旅游伦理、旅游环境保护与旅游可持续发展关系探讨[J].河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009,23(2):62-65.
[3]明庆忠,李宏,徐天任.生态旅游环境问题类型及保育对策[J].经济地理,2000,20(4):114-117.
[4]蒋洪强,徐玖平.旅游生态环境成本计量模型及实例分析[J].经济体制改革,2002,20(1):99-102.
[5]王艳,张建新,章锦河.三峡库区旅游生态环境问题及可持续旅游对策[J].重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版),2010,27(6):27-32.
[6]吴志才,彭华.旅游生态环境容量的经济学探讨[J].云南地理环境研究,2003,15(1):69-74.
[7]阳国亮,陈文捷,潘小玲.基于循环经济理论的旅游可持续发展研究—以广西北部湾滨海城市为例[J].广西社会科学,2011(5):20-24.
[8]祁新华,陈烈,程煜.区域旅游可持续发展的生态学透视[J].地理与地理信息科学,2005,21(1):74-78.
[9]刘敏,刘春风,胡中州.旅游生态补偿:内涵探讨与科学问题[J].旅游学刊,2013,28(2):52-59.
[10]翁钢民,赵黎明,杨秀平.旅游景区环境承载力预警系统研究[J].中国地质大学学报,2005,5(4):54-58.
[11]王剑,熊康宁,殷红梅,等.旅游生态环境承载力在待开发景区规划中的应用初探—以贵州东风湖为例[J].中国岩溶,2002,21(4):303-308.
[12]孙道玮,俞穆清,陈田,等.生态旅游生态环境承载力研究—以净月潭国家森林公园为例[J].东北师大学报(自然科学版),2002,34(1):61-71.
[13]刘佳,于水仙,王佳.滨海旅游生态环境承载力评价与量化测度研究—以山东半岛蓝色经济区为例[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(9):166-170.
[14]裴玮.基于面板数据的西南地区旅游生态环境承载力评价[J].云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,45(3):31-36.
[15]邱菀华.管理决策与应用熵学[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2002:41-43.
[16]杨倩,蒙吉军,王晓东.基于多维状态空间法的漓江上游生态旅游承载力空间评价及提升策略[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2015,51(1):131-140.
[17]王奎峰,李娜.基于P-S-R概念模型的生态环境承载力评价指标体系研究—以山东半岛为例[J].环境科学学报,2014,34(8):2133-2139.
[18]谭映宇,张平,刘容子.渤海内主要海湾资源和生态环境承载力比较研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2012,22(12):7-12.