政策影响下企业开放与独占创新收益分配策略的演化博弈研究

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Evolutionary Game Analysis on Impacts of Government Policy on Open and Appropriability Innovation Income Distribution Strategy 作者：张墨 ; 陈恒 ; 贯君 ; 林超然 英文作者：ZHANG Mo;CHEN Heng;GUAN Jun;LIN Chao-ran;School of Economics and Management,Harbin Engineering University;School of Economics and Management,Northeast Agricultural University;School of Economics and Management,Northeast Forestry University; 关键词：开放式创新 ; 开放性 ; 独占性 ; 演化博弈 ; 演化稳定策略 英文关键词：open innovation;;openness;;appropriability;;evolutionary game;;evolutionary stable strategy 中文刊名：GZCB 英文刊名：Journal of Guizhou University of Finance and Economics 机构：哈尔滨工程大学经济管理学院;东北农业大学经济管理学院;东北林业大学经济管理学院; 出版日期：2019-05-15 出版单位：贵州财经大学学报 年：2019 期：No.200 基金：国家自然科学基金项目“基于农产品价值时空分异特征的冷链物流效用优化及协调策略研究”(71403047);; 黑龙江省哲学社会科学规划项目(18GLB022);; 黑龙江省科技攻关计划项目“科技创新商业化的影响因素、路径和政策研究”(GZ13D105);; 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资助基金“黑龙江省落叶松碳汇供给潜力与经营决策研究”(2572018BM07) 语种：中文; 页：GZCB201903008 页数：11 CN：03 ISSN：52-1156/F 分类号：68-78

摘要

针对我国创新鼓励政策和知识产权保护政策的执行,从演化博弈视角探讨企业创新中开放与独占创新策略与政府决策的演化过程。建立了创新鼓励与知识产权政策影响下的企业开放与独占创新策略的演化博弈模型。根据复制动态方程得到参与者的行为演化规律和行为演化稳定策略,分析了企业的开放与独占创新策略的影响因素。研究结果表明,系统中群体的开放评价系数、独占转化系数、开放补贴系数、知识产权补贴系数以及采纳开放与独占策略的初始比例,都会对企业开放与独占创新策略产生影响。
        Aiming at the implementation of China's innovation encouragement policy and intellectual property protection policy, this paper explores the evolution process of open and appropriability mixed innovation strategy and government decision-making in the process of enterprise innovation from the perspective of evolutionary game theory. An evolutionary game model of the government's open innovation incentive policy, intellectual property encouragement policy and the open and appropriability mixed innovation strategy of the enterprise were established. According to the replication dynamic equation, the participants' behavior evolution law and behavior evolution stability strategy were obtained, and the influencing factors of the enterprise's open and appropriability mixed innovation strategy were analyzed. The results show that the open evaluation coefficient, exclusive conversion coefficient, open subsidy coefficient, intellectual property subsidy coefficient and the initial proportion of adopting open and appropriability strategies in the system will have an impact on the open and exclusive mixed innovation strategy of enterprises.

引文

[1]H Chesbrough.Open Innovation:The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology[M].Harvard Business School Press,Boston,2003.
    [2]K Kyl?heiko,A Jantunen,K Puumalainen,S Saarenketo,A Tuppura.Innovation and Internationalization as Growth Strategies:The Role of Technological Capabilities and Appropriability[J].International Business Review,2011,20(5):508-520.
    [3]H Delerue,A Lejeune.Job Mobility Restriction Mechanisms and Appropriability in Organizations:The Mediating Role of Secrecy and Lead Time[J].Technovation,2010,30(5-6):359-366.
    [4]JH Lin,MY Wang.Complementary Assets,Appropriability,and Patent Commercialization:Market Sensing Capability as a Moderator[J].Asia Pacific Management Review,2015,20(3):141-147.
    [5]L Dahlander,DM Gann.How open is innovation[J].Research Policy,2010,39(6):699-709.
    [6]Teece D J.Profiting from Technological Innovation:Implications for Integration,Collaboration,Licensing and Public Policy[J].Research Policy,1986,15(6):285-305.
    [7]秦玮,徐飞.宋波研发联盟合作伙伴行为演化博弈分析——吸收能力的视角[J].工业工程与管理,2011(6):16-20.
    [8]商淑秀,张再生.虚拟企业知识共享演化博弈分析[J].中国软科学,2015(3):150-157.
    [9]刁丽琳.合作创新中知识窃取和保护的演化博弈研究[J].科学学研究,2012(5):721-728.
    [10]汪明月,肖灵机,万玲.基于演化博弈的战略性新兴产业技术异地协同共享激励机制研究[J].管理工程学报,2018,32(3):206-213.
    [11]张春辉,陈继祥.两种创新补贴对创新模式选择影响的比较分析[J],科研管理,2011,32(8):9-16.
    [12]汪勇杰,陈通,邓斌超.政府补贴机制下研发外包的演化博弈分析[J].管理工程学报,2017,31(2):137-142.
    [13]张振刚,陈志明,李云健.开放式创新、吸收能力与创新绩效关系研究[J].科研管理,2015,36(3):49-56.
    [14]开放式创新视角下企业知识吸收能力影响因素研究[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2011(5):71-82.
    [15]葛沪飞,仝允桓,高旭东.开放式创新下组织吸收能力概念拓展[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2010,31(2).