摘要
目的:通过体外实验比较3种冠修复材料及天然牙釉质的摩擦磨损性能,为临床上选择与天然牙磨耗性能相近的修复材料提供一定实验依据。方法:选取高度抛光的饰面瓷、爱尔创氧化锆、可切削复合树脂材料Lava Ultimate为实验组,对照组为天然牙釉质,以滑石瓷为对磨物,模拟口腔环境,在CFT-Ⅰ型材料表面性能综合测试仪上进行二体摩擦磨损实验,通过检测试样表面粗糙度、表面硬度、磨损量、磨斑形貌,研究天然牙釉质与不同材料之间的摩擦磨损性能。采用单因素方差分析方法进行统计学分析。结果:3种冠修复材料自身磨损量和对磨物磨损量与牙釉质组相比差异均有统计学意义(P <0.05),其中Lava Ultimate及对磨物与天然牙釉质及对磨物的磨损量最接近。结论:与饰面瓷对比,氧化锆具有更佳的耐磨性及更低的对磨物磨损;与天然牙釉质相比,Lava Ultimate具有更强的耐磨性及更低的对磨物磨损;与饰面瓷和氧化锆对比,Lava Ultimate的耐磨性能及对磨物磨损等方面与天然牙釉质更为接近。
Objective:By comparing with the friction and wear properties of three grown materials and tooth enamel in vitro experiment,to provide a certain experiment basis for choosing the repair materials with the wear resistance close to nature tooth in clinical. Methods:Choosing the veneering porcelain with highly polishing,aierchuang zirconia and machinable compound resin material Lava Ultimate as the experiment group,the tooth enamel was chosen for the control group. Taking the steatite ceramics as resist ware material,simulating the oral environment to do the friction and wear experiment of the two material on the CFT-Ⅰ type material surface properties general-purpose tester. By testing the inspection of surface roughness Ra,surface hardness,abrasion loss and rubbed surface to research the friction and wear properties between abrasion loss and different materials. The statistical analysis was conducted by the method of one-way analysis of variance. Results:Compared with the enamel group,the self-abrasion loss of the three materials and abrasion loss of the resist ware material have statistic difference(P < 0.05),in which the abrasion loss between Lava Ultimate and resist ware material closed to the abrasion loss between tooth enamel and resist ware material most. Conclusion:Compared with veneering porcelain,the zirconia had a better abrasive resistance and lower abrasion of resist ware material. Compared with tooth enamel,the Lava Ultimate had a better abrasive resistance and lower abrasion of resist ware material. Compared with the veneering porcelain and zirconia,Lava Ultimate closed to the tooth enamel more on the aspects of wear-resisting property and abrasion of resist wear material.
引文
[1]Heintze SD,Rousson V.Survival of zirconia-and metalsupported fixed dental prostheses:a systematic review[J].Int J Prosthodont,2010,23(6):493-502
[2]Pang Z,Chughtai A,Sailer I,et al.A fractographic study of clinically retrieved zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses[J].Dent Mater,2015,31(10):1198-1206
[3]Choi JW,Bae IH,Noh TH,et al.Wear of primary teeth caused by opposed all-ceramic or stainless steel crowns[J].J Adv Prosthodont,2016,8(1):43-52
[4]Dowson D.History of tribology[M].2nd.London:Professional Engineering Pub,1998:577
[5]皮昕.口腔解剖生理学[M].5版,北京:人民卫生出版社,2003:249
[6]Sato S,Hotta TH,Pedrazzi V.Removable occlusal overlay splint in the management of tooth wear:a clinical report[J].J Prosthet Dent,2000,83(4):392-395
[7]d’Incau E,Couture C,Maureille B.Human tooth wear in the past and the present:tribological mechanisms,scoring systems,dental and skeletal compensations[J].Arch Oral Biol,2012,57(3):214-229
[8]宋海燕,曾剑玉,司文捷.牙科氧化锆瓷摩擦磨损性能的研究[J].北京口腔医学,2014,22(3):137-140
[9]Sripetchdanond J,Leevailoj C.Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia,glass ceramic,and composite resin:an in vitro study[J].J Prosthet Dent,2014,112(5):1141-1150
[10]张曼曼,曾剑玉,李欣,等.可切削复合树脂材料磨损性能的研究[J].北京口腔医学,2016,24(5):250-253
[11]Arsecularatne JA,Hoffman M.On the wear mechanism of human dental enamel[J].J Mech Behav of Biomed Mater,2010,3(4):347-356
[12]陈曦,章非敏,胡建.两种不同厚度椅旁CAD/CAM全瓷材料断裂强度的实验研究[J].南京医科大学学报(自然科学版),2015,35(11):1632-1636
[13]Lee A,Swain M,He L,et al.Wear behavior of human enamel against lithium disilicate glass ceramic and type III gold[J].J Prosthet Dent.2014,112(6):1399-1405
[14]Zandparsa R,El HR,Hirayama H,et al.Effect of different dental ceramic systems on the wear of human enamel:an in vitro study[J].J Prosthet Dent,2016,115(2):230-237
[15]Min J,Zhang Q,Qiu X,et al.Investigation on the tribological behavior and wear mechanism of five difierent veneering porcelains[J].PLoS One,2015,10(9):e0137566
[16]Chong BJ,Thangavel AK,Rolton SB,et al.Clinical and laboratory surface finishing procedures for zirconia on opposing human enamel wear:A laboratory study[J].JMech Behav Biomed Mater,2015,50(1):93-103
[17]Amer R,KürklüD,Kateeb E,et al.Three-body wear potential of dental yttrium-stabilized zirconia ceramic after grinding,polishing,and glazing treatments[J].J Prosthet Dent,2014,112(5):1151-1155
[18]Mundhe K,Jain V,Pruthi G,et al.Clinical study to evaluate the wear of natural enamel antagonist to zirconia and metal ceramic crowns[J].J Prosthet Dent,2015,114(3):358-363
[19]Passos SP,Torrealba Y,Major P,et al.In vitro wear behavior of zirconia opposing enamel:a systematic review[J].J Prosthodont,2014,23(8):593-601
[20]Lawson NC,Janyavula S,Syklawer S,et al.Wear of enamel opposing zirconia and lithium disilicate after adjustment,polishing and glazing[J].J Dent,2014,42(12):1586-1591
[21]Park JH,Park S,Lee K,et al.Antagonist wear of three CAD/CAM anatomic contour zirconia ceramics[J].J Prosthet Dent,2014,111(1):20-29
[22]Wojda S,Szoka B,Sajewicz E.Tribological characteristics of enamel-dental material contacts investigated in vitro[J].Acta Bioeng Biomech,2015,17(1):21-29
[23]Luangruangrong P,Cook NB,Sabrah AH,et al.Influence of full-contour zirconia surface roughness on wear of glassceramics[J].J Prosthodont,2014,23(3):198-205
[24]Stober T,Bermejo JL,Schwindling FS,et al.Clinical assessment of enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns[J].J Oral Rehabil,2016,43(8):621-629