用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于通量分析方法的河川型水库生态屏障区位设计
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Location design of ecological barriers for river-type reservoir based on flux analysis method
  • 作者:单楠 ; 张雯 ; 唐夫凯 ; 潘扬
  • 英文作者:SHAN Nan;ZHANG Wen;TANG Fu-kai;PAN Yang;Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences,Ministry of Environmental Protection;School of Earth Sciences and Engineering,Nanjing University;Department of Hydraulic Engineering,School of Civil Engineering,Tongji University;
  • 关键词:河川型水库 ; 生态屏障 ; 非点源污染 ; 通量分析 ; 区位设计
  • 英文关键词:river-type reservoir;;ecological barrier;;non-point source pollution;;flux analysis;;location design
  • 中文刊名:YYSB
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology
  • 机构:环境保护部南京环境科学研究所;南京大学地球科学与工程学院;同济大学土木工程学院水利工程系;
  • 出版日期:2018-12-12 16:41
  • 出版单位:应用生态学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.30
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目(41501570)资助~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:YYSB201902014
  • 页数:9
  • CN:02
  • ISSN:21-1253/Q
  • 分类号:107-115
摘要
区位选择是水生态屏障研究及建设过程中面临的重要科学问题.针对河川型水库入流方式多样、地形起伏大的特征,本研究从水生态屏障的非点源污染去除功能出发,提出一种基于通量分析的河川型水库生态屏障区位选择方法.以我国三峡库区为例,选择库区典型研究区运用该方法进行生态屏障区位研究.结果表明:按照三峡库区沿岸100 m宽度的设计方案,研究区内水生态屏障作用不能得到有效发挥,其中,最佳功能区仅占设计面积的11%,无效区占设计面积的10%,流域内79%的总氮与93%的总磷集中在占生态屏障区总面积21%的区域进入水库.根据污染物通量及流量通量过程,可提取出高污染通量汇流区域及高污染物浓度区,根据保护目标,分别对应开展以污染物总量削减及污染物浓度达标的生态工程措施.采用该方法可充分考虑地形对污染物质通量的影响,划分出水生态屏障的重点保护区域,能有效解决河川型水体的水生态屏障区位设计问题.
        Location selection is an important scientific issue in the research and construction of water ecological barrier. Considering the characteristics of river-type reservoir with various inflow modes and large topographic fluctuation,we presented a location selection method for ecological barrier of river type reservoir based on flux analysis with the removal function of non-point source pollution of water ecological barrier. Using this method,we examined the ecological barrier location in the Three Gorges Reservoir area of China. The results showed that the role of ecological barrier for water in the study area could not be brought into full play according to the design plan of 100 m width along the coast of the Three Gorges Reservoir area. The zone of optimal function accounted for11% of the design area,and ineffective zone accounted for 10% of the design area. 79% of the total nitrogen and 93% of the total phosphorus were concentrated in the area accounting for 21% of the total ecological barrier area and entered the reservoir. According to the flux of pollutants and their process of flow and flux,we extracted the confluence area of pollutants with high flux and area with high pollutant concentration. Based on the protection target,the ecological engineering measures to reduce the total pollutants and ensure the standard reaching of pollutant concentration were carried out respectively. This method,with full consideration of the influence of terrain on pollutant flux and classification of the key protected areas in water ecological barrier,could effectively solve the problem of location design of water ecological barrier in river-type water.
引文
[1] Wang Y-K(王玉宽),Sun X-F(孙雪峰),Deng Y-L(邓玉林). A discussion on concept definition and academic value of ecological defence. Journal of Mountain Science(山地学报),2005,23(4):431-436(in Chinese)
    [2] Zhang Y-F(张祎帆),Zhao Q-H(赵清贺),Ding S-Y(丁圣彦),et al. Effects of slope gradient and vegetation coverage on hydrodynamic characteristics of overland flow on silty riparian slope. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology(应用生态学报),2017,28(8):2488-2498(in Chinese)
    [3] Xia J-H(夏继红),Yan Z-M(严忠民),Jiang C-F(蒋传丰). Comprehensive assessment index system of ecosystem riparian zone. Advances in Water Science(水科学进展),2005,16(3):345-348(in Chinese)
    [4] Hultine KR,Bush SE. Ecohydrological consequences of non-native riparian vegetation in the southwestern United States:A review from an ecophysiological perspective.Water Resources Research,2011,47:218-223
    [5] Vidon PG. Not all riparian zones are wetlands:Understanding the limitation of the “wetland bias”problem.Hydrological Processes,2017,31:2125-2127
    [6] Feld CK,Fernandes MRP,Ferreira MT. Evaluating riparian solutions to multiple stressor problems in river ecosystems:A conceptual study. Water Research,2018,139:381-394
    [7] Deng H-B(邓红兵),Wang Q-C(王青春),Wang QL(王庆礼),et al. On riparian forest buffers and riparian management. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology(应用生态学报),2001,12(6):951-954(in Chinese)
    [8] Rhodes TK,Aguilar FX,Jose S. Factors influencing the adoption of riparian forest buffers in the Tuttle Creek Reservoir watershed of Kansas, USA. Agroforestry Systems,2018,92:739-757
    [9] Dosskey MG. Setting priorities for research on pollution reduction functions of agricultural buffers. Environmental Management. 2002,30:641-650
    [10] Dosskey MG,Helmers MJ,Eisenhauer DE. A design aid for determining width of filter strips. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2008,63:232-241
    [11] Naiman RJ,Decamps H,Pollock M. The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity. Ecological Applications. 1993,3:209-212
    [12] Weller DE,Baker ME,Jordan TE. Effects of riparian buffers on nitrate concentrations in watershed discharges:New models and management implications. Ecological Applications,2011,21:1679-1695
    [13] Tomer MD,Dosskey MG,Burkart MR. Methods to prioritize placement of riparian buffers for improved water quality. Agroforestry Systems,2009,75:17-25
    [14] Bren LJ. The geometry of a constant buffer-loading design method for humid watersheds. Forest Ecology and Management,1998,110:113-125
    [15] Sahu M,Gu RR. Modeling the effects of riparian buffer zone and contour strips on stream water quality. Ecological Engineering,2009,35:1167-1177
    [16] Qiu ZY. A VSA-based strategy for placing conservation buffers in agricultural watersheds. Environmental Management,2003,32:299-311
    [17] Qiu ZY. Assessing critical source areas in watersheds for conservation buffer planning and riparian restoration.Environmental Management,2009,44:968-980.
    [18] Cao Z-H(曹梓豪),Zhao Q-H(赵清贺),Zuo X-Y(左宪禹),et al. Optimizing vegetation pattern for the riparian buffer zone along the lower Yellow River based on slope hydrological connectivity. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology(应用生态学报),2018,29(3):739-747(in Chinese)
    [19] Jenson SK,Domingue JO. Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information system analysis, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing,1988,54:1593-1600
    [20] Merz R,Bloschl G. Regionalisation of catchment model parameters. Journal of Hydrology. 2004,287:95-123
    [21] Oudin LK,Andreassian V,Perrin C. Are seemingly physically similar catchments truly hydrologically similar? Water Resources Research,2010,46:53-64
    [22] Mander,Tournebize J,Tonderski K. Planning and establishment principles for constructed wetlands and riparian buffer zones in agricultural catchments. Ecological Engineering,2017,103:296-300
    [23] Alberts JM,Beaulieu JJ,Buffam I. Watershed land use and seasonal variation constrain the influence of riparian canopy cover on stream ecosystem metabolism. Ecosystems,2017,20:553-567
    [24] de Sosa LL,Glanville HC,Marshall MR. Delineating and mapping riparian areas for ecosystem service assessment. Ecohydrology,2018,11(8):e1928
    [25] Schilling KE,Jacobson PJ,Wolter CF. Using riparian zone scaling to optimize buffer placement and effectiveness. Landscape Ecology,2018,33:141-156

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700