用户名: 密码: 验证码:
济阳坳陷渤南洼陷古近系页岩油“甜点”地震预测及影响因素分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Seismic prediction of Paleogene shale oil “sweet spots” and its influencing factor analysis in the Bonan sub-sag,Jiyang depression
  • 作者:潘仁芳 ; 陈美玲 ; 张超谟 ; 潘进
  • 英文作者:PAN Renfang;CHEN Meiling;ZHANG Chaomo;PAN Jin;College of Earth Sciences,Yangtze University;College of Geophysics and Petroleum Resource,Yangtze University;
  • 关键词:济阳坳陷 ; 页岩油 ; 沙河街组 ; “甜点”地震预测 ; 影响因素
  • 英文关键词:Jiyang depression;;shale oil;;Shahejie Formation;;seismic prediction of "sweet spots";;influencing factors
  • 中文刊名:DXQY
  • 英文刊名:Earth Science Frontiers
  • 机构:长江大学地球科学学院;长江大学地球物理与石油资源学院;
  • 出版日期:2018-05-31 08:53
  • 出版单位:地学前缘
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.25;No.132
  • 基金:国家重点基础研究发展计划“973”项目(2014CB239104);; 国家自然科学基金项目(41472123)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:DXQY201804014
  • 页数:13
  • CN:04
  • ISSN:11-3370/P
  • 分类号:148-160
摘要
中国东部渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷古近系沙河街组发育一套富有机质页岩,页岩油"甜点"地震预测及影响因素分析将进一步推动有关济阳坳陷页岩油地震响应的研究。综合地震、钻井、测井、地球化学等资料,文章利用多属性线性回归方法研究了济阳坳陷渤南洼陷陆相页岩层系"甜点"地球物理响应特征并对其影响因素进行了分析。研究结果表明,渤南洼陷渤南洪城地震工区沙河街组沙三下亚段页岩油地质和工程"甜点"参数地震预测结果是有机质丰度TOC含量值为3%~6%,有机质成熟度Ro为0.81%~0.94%,页岩孔隙度为5.0%~12.5%,地层压力为33~58 MPa,压力系数为1.3~1.8,脆性指数为大于40%。沙河街组页岩油地质和工程"甜点"地球物理响应特征主要受岩石物理参数、叠后波阻抗反演地震体、自然伽马GR地震体和振幅等因素的影响,且这些因素在不同程度上影响该区"甜点"参数的预测结果。综合研究显示济阳坳陷渤南洼陷沙河街组主要发育"连续型甜点"的页岩油地震响应模式,叠后波阻抗反演地震体是影响沙河街组页岩油"甜点"地震预测最为重要的因素。
        Organic-rich terrestrial shales developed in the Paleogene Shahejie Formation in the Jiyang depression,Bohai Bay Basin,China.Seismic prediction of shale oil sweet spots and its influencing factor analysis shall promote studies on shale oil seismic response in the Jiyang depression.Based on seismic,drilling,logging and geochemistry data,we investigated the geophysical response characteristics of shale oil sweet spots using multi-attribute regression method,and performed the influencing factor analysis.The results revealed the parameters for shale oil geological and engineering sweet spots in the lower interval of the 3 rd Shahejie Formation in the BNHC seismic area,Bonan sub-sag,Jiyang depression.Organic richness and shale porosity were in the ranges of 3%-6% and 5.0%-12.5%,respectively,with Ro value between 0.81% and 0.94%.Furthermore,widespread overpressure developed in the Shahejie Formation shale reservoir with pressure coefficient between 1.3 and 1.8.And shale brittle index was more than 40%in the Shahejie Formation.Factors affecting geophysical response characteristics of shale oil geological and engineering sweet spots included rock physics parameters,poststack seismic P-impedance and S-impedance inversion data volumes,GR response volume,amplitude,etc.These factors affect the prediction of"sweet spots"to varying degrees.Our comprehensive study results suggest that a "continuous sweet spots"seismic response mode was developed in the Shahejie Formation,and poststack acoustic inversion volume is considered to be the most important factor affecting seismic prediction of shale oil sweet spots in the Shahejie Formation.
引文
[1]张林晔,李钜源,李政,等.北美页岩油气研究进展及对中国陆相页岩油气勘探的思考[J].地球科学进展,2014,29(6):700-711.
    [2]张林晔,李政,朱日房,等.济阳坳陷古近系存在页岩气资源的可能性[J].天然气工业,2008,28(12):26-29.
    [3]张善文,张林晔,李政,等.济阳坳陷古近系页岩油气形成条件[J].油气地质与采收率,2012,19(6):1-5.
    [4]王永诗,李政,巩建强,等.济阳坳陷页岩油气评价方法:以沾化凹陷罗家地区为例[J].石油学报,2013,34(1):83-91.
    [5]王永诗,王伟庆,郝运轻.济阳坳陷沾化凹陷罗家地区古近系沙河街组页岩储集特征分析[J].古地理学报,2013,15(5):657-662.
    [6]葛瑞全,刘铁龙.济阳坳陷古近系页岩气开发前景分析[J].录井工程,2013,24(4):11-14.
    [7]JARVIE D M,HILL R J,RUBLE T E,et al.Unconventional shale-gas systems:the Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment[J].American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin,2007,91(4):475-499.
    [8]JARVIE D M.Shale resource systems for oil and gas(Part2):shale-oil resource systems[J].American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir,2012,97:89-119.
    [9]JARVIE D M.Components and processes affecting producibility and commerciality of shale resource systems[J].Geologica Acta,2014,12(4):307-325.
    [10]贾承造,郑民,张永峰.中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J].石油勘探与开发,2012,39(2):129-136.
    [11]贾承造,邹才能,李建忠,等.中国致密油评价标准、主要类型、基本特征及资源前景[J].石油学报,2012,33(3):343-350.
    [12]邹才能,杨智,崔景伟,等.页岩油形成机制、地质特征及发展对策[J].石油勘探与开发,2013,40(1):14-26.
    [13]邹才能,杨智,张国生,等.常规-非常规油气“有序聚集”理论认识及实践意义[J].石油勘探与开发,2014,41(1):14-26.
    [14]邹才能,朱如凯,白斌,等.致密油与页岩油内涵“特征”潜力及挑战[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2015,34(1):3-17.
    [15]童晓光,郭建宇,王兆明.非常规油气地质理论与技术进展[J].地学前缘,2014,21(1):9-20.
    [16]康玉柱,周磊.中国非常规油气的战略思考[J].地学前缘,2016,23(2):1-7.
    [17]聂海宽,张培先,边瑞康,等.中国陆相页岩油富集特征[J].地学前缘,2016,23(2):55-62.
    [18]VERNIK L,NUR A.Ultrasonic velocity and anisotropy of source rocks[J].Geophysics,1992,57(5):727-735.
    [19]VERNIK L.Hydrocarbon-generation-inducedmicrocracking of source rocks[J].Geophysics,1994,59(4):555-563.
    [20]VERNIK L.Predicting lithology and transport properties from acoustic velocities based on petrophysical classification of siliciclastics[J].Geophysics,1994,59(3):420-427.
    [21]CARCIONE J M.A model for seismic velocity and attenuation in petroleum source rocks[J].Geophysics,2000,65(4):1080-1092.
    [22]CARCIONE J M.AVO effects of a hydrocarbon source-rock layer[J].Geophysics,2001,66(2):419-427.
    [23]刘振武,撒利明,杨晓,等.页岩气勘探开发对地球物理技术的需求[J].石油地球物理勘探,2011,46(5):810-818.
    [24]赵万金,李海亮,杨午阳.国内非常规油气地球物理勘探技术现状及进展[J].勘探技术,2012,36(4):36-40.
    [25]马中高,邓道静.岩石物理性质研究技术[J].勘探地球物理进展,2003,26(5/6):387-401.
    [26]张晋言,孙建孟.利用测井资料评价泥页岩油气“五性”指标[J].测井技术,2012,36(2):146-153.
    [27]张晋言.页岩油测井评价方法及其应用[J].地球物理学进展,2012,27(3):1154-1162.
    [28]CARCIONE J M,HELLE H B,PHAM N H,et al.Pore pressure estimation in reservoir rocks from seismic reflection data[J].Geophysics,2003,68(5):1569-1579.
    [29]DUTTA N C.Geopressure prediction using seismic data:current status and the road ahead[J].Geophysics,2002,67(6):2012-2041.
    [30]SAYERS C M,JOHNSON G M,DENYER G.Predrill pore-pressure prediction using seismic data[J].Geophysics,2002,67(4):1286-1292.
    [31]STOVAS A,LANDR M.Fluid-pressure discrimination inanisotropic reservoir rocks:a sensitivity study[J].Geophysics,2005,70(3):O1-O11.
    [32]陈美玲,潘仁芳,潘进.黄河口地区中深层超压成因机制及分布规律研究[J].石油天然气学报,2014,36(7):8-11.
    [33]林畅松,刘景彦,张英志,等.构造活动盆地的层序地层与构造地层分析:以中国中、新生代构造活动湖盆分析为例[J].地学前缘,2005,12(4):365-374.
    [34]潘桂棠,陆松年,肖庆辉,等.中国大地构造阶段划分及演化[J].地学前缘,2016,23(6):1-23.
    [35]宋国奇,徐兴友,李政,等.济阳坳陷古近系陆相页岩油产量的影响因素[J].石油与天然气地质,2015,36(3):463-471.
    [36]宁方兴.济阳坳陷页岩油富集主控因素[J].石油学报,2015,36(3):465-471.
    [37]侯贵廷,钱祥麟,宋新民.渤海湾盆地形成机制研究[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),1998,34(4):503-509.
    [38]侯贵廷,钱祥麟,蔡东升.渤海湾盆地中、新生代构造演化研究[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2001,37(6):845-851.
    [39]李三忠,索艳慧,戴黎明,等.渤海湾盆地形成与华北克拉通破坏[J].地学前缘,2010,17(4):64-89.
    [40]刘朝露,夏斌.济阳坳陷新生代构造演化特征与油气成藏组合模式[J].天然气地球科学,2007,18(2):210-214.
    [41]HAO F,ZHOU X H,ZHU Y M,et al.Mechanisms for oil depletion and enrichment on the Shijiutuo uplift,Bohai Bay Basin,China[J].American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin,2009,93(8):1015-1037.
    [42]SU J B,ZHU W B,WEI J,et al.Fault growth and linkage:implications for tectonosedimentary evolution in the Chezhen Basin of Bohai Bay,eastern China[J].American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin,2011,95(1):1-26.
    [43]林畅松,郑和荣,任建业,等.渤海湾盆地东营、沾化凹陷早第三纪同沉积断裂作用对沉积充填的控制[J].中国科学:D辑,2003,33(11):1025-1036.
    [44]苏宗富,邓宏文,陶宗普,等.济阳坳陷古近系区域层序地层格架地层特征对比[J].古地理学报,2006,8(1):89-102.
    [45]邓美寅,梁超.渤南洼陷沙三下亚段泥页岩储集空间研究:以罗69井为例[J].地学前缘,2012,19(1):173-181.
    [46]张善文,王永诗,张林晔,等.济阳坳陷渤南洼陷页岩油气形成条件研究[J].中国工程科学,2012,14(6):49-55.
    [47]PASSEY Q R,CREANEY S,KULLA J B,et al.A practical model for organic richness from porosity and resistivity logs[J].American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin,1990,74(12):1777-1794.
    [48]SINGH P,HUSAIN R,RABIE A,et al.Understanding geophysical responses for identification of sweet spot for Oxfordian shale oil/gas plays in Kuwait[C]∥Society of Exploration Geophysicists technical program expanded abstracts.Houston,Texas:Society of Exploration Geophysicists,2013:2269-2273.
    [49]MODICA,C L,LAPIERRE S G.Estimation of kerogen porosity in source rocks as a function of thermal transforma-tion:example from the Mowry shale in the Powder River Basin of Wyoming[J].American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin,2012,96(1):87-108.
    [50]潘仁芳,陈美玲,张超谟,等.济阳坳陷古近系沙河街组页岩有机质热演化特征[J].地学前缘,2016,23(4):277-283.
    [51]刘树根,马文辛,LUBA J,等.四川盆地东部地区下志留统龙马溪组页岩储层特征[J].岩石学报,2011,27(8):2239-2252.
    [52]SHARMA R K,CHOPRA S,VERNENGO L,et al.Reducing uncertainty in characterization of Vaca Muerta Formation shale with poststack seismic data[J].The Leading Edge,2015,34(12):1462-1467.
    [53]SCHMOKER J W.Empirical relation between carbonate porosity and thermal maturity:an approach to regional porosity prediction[J].American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin,1984,68(11):1697-1703.
    [54]SONDERGELD C H,NEWSHAM K E,COMISKY J T,et al.Petrophysical considerations in evaluating and producing shale gas resources[C]∥Society of Petroleum Engineers unconventional gas conference paper.Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania,USA:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2010:1-34.
    [55]YENUGU M,VERNIK L.Constraining seismic rock-property logs in organic shale reservoirs[J].The Leading Edge,2015,34(11):1326-1331.
    [56]TINGAY M R P,HILLIS R R,SWARBRICK R E,et al.Origin of overpressure and pore-pressure prediction in the Baram province,Brunei[J].American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin,2009,93(1):51-74.
    [57]GUO X W,HE S,LIU K Y,et al.Oil generation as the dominant overpressure mechanism in the Cenozoic Dongying depression,Bohai Bay Basin,China[J].American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin,2010,94(12):1859-1881.
    [58]WEBSTER M,CONNOR S O,PINDAR B,et al.Overpressures in the Taranaki Basin:Distribution,causes,and implications for exploration[J].American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin,2011,95(3):339-370.
    [59]EATON B A.Graphical method predicts geopressures worldwide[J].World Oil,1976,183(1):51-56.
    [60]SAYERS C M,FOSTER D,YENUGU M.Introduction to this special section:resource playsⅡ:geophysics[J].The Leading Edge,2015,34(12):1440-1441.
    [61]RICKMAN R,MULLEN M,PETRE E,et al.A practical use of shale petrophysics for stimulation design optimization:all shale plays are not clones of the Barnett shale[C]∥Society of Petroleum Engineers annual technical conference paper.Denver,Colorado,USA:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2008:1-11.
    [62]LI Z P,HUANG F Y,HE X W,et al.Shale-gas reservoirprediction study in Daanzhai,Eastern Sichuan Basin[J].The Leading Edge,2014,33(5):526-534.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700