渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷沾化凹陷L69井古近系沙三下亚段取心段页岩油勘探有利层段
|
摘要
为探讨渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷沾化凹陷L69井沙河街组三段下亚段(沙三下亚段)取心段页岩油勘探有利层段,对L69井沙三下亚段取心段典型岩相样品和获工业页岩油产量的XYS9井沙三下亚段取心段典型岩相样品,开展了常规热解和多温阶热释法分析,对比研究其含油性与不同赋存形式油含量特征,结合其他影响页岩油产量的因素综合评价页岩油勘探有利层段。结果表明:L69井埋深3 040. 35～3 072. 10 m富有机质纹层状泥质灰岩段,其游离油总量尤其是轻烃校正后游离油S1-1含量显著低于获工业页岩油产量的XYS9井沙三下亚段的含量,并且油饱和指数(OSI)均值仅为67 mg/g,不具有页岩油勘探潜力;埋深3 116. 90～3 126. 70 m含有机质纹层状泥质灰岩段,虽其油饱和指数(OSI)均在100 mg/g以上,平均达204 mg/g(样品数n=8),但游离油总量和轻烃校正后游离油S1-1含量显著低于获工业页岩油产量的XYS9井沙三下亚段的含量,页岩油勘探潜力较低;埋深2 994. 10～3 010. 90 m富有机质层状泥质灰岩、灰质泥岩段,其游离油总量尤其是轻烃校正后游离油S1-1含量和油饱和指数(OSI),与获工业页岩油产量的XYS9井沙三下亚段的含量基本相近或相等,并且该层段微裂缝发育、具异常压力、脆性矿物含量高和存在成熟运移油的贡献,为页岩油勘探的有利层段。
This paper aims to identify the favorable interval for shale oil prospecting in the cored interval of the lower section of the third member of the Shahejie Formation( Es3 L) from Well L69 in Zhanhua Sag,Jiyang Depression,Bohai Bay Basin. To study their oil content and occurrence,typical lithofacies samples from the cored intervals of Es3 Lin wells with commercial shale oil production,Well L69 and Well XYS9,were comparatively analyzed with routine Rock-Eval pyrolysis method and thermal desorption method,and the favorable interval for shale oil prospecting and factors affecting shale oil production were assessed. Results show that the total content of free oil,especially the content of free oil S1-1 after light hydrocarbon correction,for the organic-rich lamellar argillaceous limestones at a depth of 3 040. 35 m to 3 072. 10 m in Well L69,is obviously lower than that of cored interval with commercial shale oil production in Well XYS9,and the average Oil Saturation Index( OSI) is only 67 mg/g,both of which indicate no exploration potential for shale oil. The totalcontent of free oil,especially the content of free oil S1-1 after light hydrocarbon correction,for organic-rich lamellar argillaceous limestones at a depth of 3 116. 90 m to 3 126. 70 m in Well L69,is obviously lower than that of cored interval of the Es3( L)with commercial shale oil production from Well XYS9,though the OSIs are usually larger than 100 mg/g with an average of 204 mg/g,suggesting a lower shale oil exploration potential. The total content of free oil,especially the content of free oil S1-1 after light hydrocarbon correction,and the OSI of organic-rich laminar argillaceous limestones and calcareous mudstones at a depth of 2 994. 10 m to 3 010. 90 m in Well XYS9,are similar or almost equal to those of the cored interval of the Es3( L)with commercial shale oil production from Well XYS9; characterized by developed micro-fractures,abnormal pressure,high contents of brittle minerals and contribution of mature oil migration,the cored interval at the depth of 2 994. 10 m to 3 010. 90 m should be a favorable interval for shale oil exploration.
This paper aims to identify the favorable interval for shale oil prospecting in the cored interval of the lower section of the third member of the Shahejie Formation( Es3 L) from Well L69 in Zhanhua Sag,Jiyang Depression,Bohai Bay Basin. To study their oil content and occurrence,typical lithofacies samples from the cored intervals of Es3 Lin wells with commercial shale oil production,Well L69 and Well XYS9,were comparatively analyzed with routine Rock-Eval pyrolysis method and thermal desorption method,and the favorable interval for shale oil prospecting and factors affecting shale oil production were assessed. Results show that the total content of free oil,especially the content of free oil S1-1 after light hydrocarbon correction,for the organic-rich lamellar argillaceous limestones at a depth of 3 040. 35 m to 3 072. 10 m in Well L69,is obviously lower than that of cored interval with commercial shale oil production in Well XYS9,and the average Oil Saturation Index( OSI) is only 67 mg/g,both of which indicate no exploration potential for shale oil. The totalcontent of free oil,especially the content of free oil S1-1 after light hydrocarbon correction,for organic-rich lamellar argillaceous limestones at a depth of 3 116. 90 m to 3 126. 70 m in Well L69,is obviously lower than that of cored interval of the Es3( L)with commercial shale oil production from Well XYS9,though the OSIs are usually larger than 100 mg/g with an average of 204 mg/g,suggesting a lower shale oil exploration potential. The total content of free oil,especially the content of free oil S1-1 after light hydrocarbon correction,and the OSI of organic-rich laminar argillaceous limestones and calcareous mudstones at a depth of 2 994. 10 m to 3 010. 90 m in Well XYS9,are similar or almost equal to those of the cored interval of the Es3( L)with commercial shale oil production from Well XYS9; characterized by developed micro-fractures,abnormal pressure,high contents of brittle minerals and contribution of mature oil migration,the cored interval at the depth of 2 994. 10 m to 3 010. 90 m should be a favorable interval for shale oil exploration.
引文
[1]刘培,蒋有录,刘华,等.渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷断层活动与新近系油气成藏关系[J].天然气地球科学,2013,24(3):541-547.Liu Pei,Jiang Youlu,Liu Hua,et al.The relationship between faultactivity and hydrocarbon accumulation of Neogene in Zhanhua depression,Bohai Bay basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2013,24(3):541-547.
[2]王永诗,李政,巩建强,等.济阳坳陷页岩油气评价方法-以沾化凹陷罗家地区为例[J].石油学报,2013,34(1):83-91.Wang Yongshi,Li Zheng,Gong Jianqiang,et al.Discussion on an eva-luation method of shale oil and gas in Jiyang depression:A case study on Luojia area in Zhanhua sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(1):83-91.
[3]王鸿升,胡天跃.渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷页岩油形成影响因素分析[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(增刊1):141-149.Wang Hongsheng,Hu Tianyue.Analysis of influence factors of shale oil formation in Zhanhua depression of Bohai Bay basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(S1):141-149.
[4]王永诗,巩建强,房建军,等.渤南洼陷页岩油气富集高产条件及勘探方向[J].油气地质与采收率,2012,19(6):6-10.Wang Yongshi,Gong Jianqiang,Fang Jiangjun,et al.Enrichment condition analysis and exploration direction of shale oil-gas in Bonan subsag[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2012,19(6):6-10.
[5]刘惠民,张守鹏,王朴,等.沾化凹陷罗家地区沙三段下亚段页岩岩石学特征[J].油气地质与采收率,2012,19(6):11-15.Liu Huimin,Zhang Shoupeng,Wang Pu,et al.Lithologic characteristics of lower Es3 shale in Luojia area,Zhanhua sag[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2012,19(6):11-15.
[6]邓美寅,梁超.渤南洼陷沙三下亚段泥页岩储集空间研究:以罗69井为例[J].地学前缘,2012,19(1):173-181.Deng Meiyin,Liang Chao.Studies on reservoir space of mudstone and shale of the lower section of Es3 in Bonan subsag:An example from well Luo69[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2012,19(1):173-181.
[7]王永诗,王伟庆,郝运轻.济阳坳陷沾化凹陷罗家地区古近系沙河街组页岩储集特征分析[J].古地理学报,2013,15(5):657-662.Wang Yongshi,Wang Weiqing,Hao Yunqing.Shale reservoir characteristics analysis of the Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Luojia area of Zhanhua sag,Jiyang depression[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2013,15(5):657-662.
[8]李超,朱筱敏,朱世发,等.沾化凹陷罗家地区沙三下段泥页岩储层特征[J].沉积学报,2015,33(4):795-808.Li Chao,Zhu Xiaomin,Zhu Shifa,et al.Shale reservoir characteristics of the Lower 3th member of Shahejie Formation,Luojia area,Zhanhua Sag[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2015,33(4):795-808.
[9]张磊磊,陆正元,王军,等.渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙三下亚段页岩油层段微观孔隙结构[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(1):80-86.Zhang Leilei,Lu Zhengyuan,Wang Jun,et al.Microscopic pore structure of shale oil reservoirs in the Lower 3rdMember of Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Oil&Gas Geology,2016,37(1):80-86.
[10]彭丽,陆永潮,彭鹏,等.渤海湾盆地渤南洼陷沙三下亚段泥页岩非均质性特征及演化模式-以罗69井为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2017,38(2):219-229.Peng Li,Lu Yongchao,Peng Peng,et al.Heterogeneity and evolution model of the Lower Shahejie Member 3 mud-shale in the Bonan Subsag,Bohai Bay Basin:An example from Well Luo 69[J].Oil&Gas Geology,2017,38(2):219-229.
[11]李志明,钱门辉,黎茂稳,等.中-低成熟湖相富有机质泥页岩含油性及赋存形式-以渤海湾盆地渤南洼陷罗63井和义21井沙河街组一段为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2017,38(1):448-456.Li Zhiming,Qian Menhui,Li Maowen,et al.Oil content and occurrence in low-medium mature organic-rich lacustrine shales:A case from the 1stmember of the Eocene-Oligocene Shahejie Formation in Well Luo-63 and Yi-21,Bonan subsag,Bohai Bay basin[J].Oil&Gas Geology,2017,38(1):448-456.
[12]吴智平,李伟,郑德顺,等.沾化凹陷中、新生代断裂发育及其形成机制分析[J].高校地质学报,2004,10(1):405-417.Wu Zhiping,Li Wei,Zheng Deshun,et al.Analysis on features and origins of the Mesozoic and Cenozoic faults in Zhanhua sag[J].Geological Journal of China Universities,2004,10(1):405-417.
[13]杨超,陈清华.济阳坳陷构造演化及其构造层的划分[J].油气地质与采收率,2005,12(2):9-12,22.Yang Chao,Chen Qinghua.Tectonic evolution and tectono-stratigraphic classification of Jiyang depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2005,12(2):9-12,22.
[14]彭存仓.沾化凹陷断层活动性及其叠合特征[J].油气地质与采收率,2009,16(5):37-39,43.Peng Cuncang.Analysis of fault activity and structural type in Zhanhua depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2009,16(5):37-39,43.
[15]罗胜元,何生,金秋月,等.渤南洼陷超压系统划分及结构特征[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(1):37-51.Luo Shengyuan,He Sheng,Jin Qiuyue,et al.Overpressure system classification and structure characteristics in Bonan sag[J].Journal of Jinlin University:Earth Science Edition,2015,45(1):37-51.
[16]郭小波,黄志龙,陈旋,等.马郎凹陷芦草沟组页岩储层含油性特征与评价[J].沉积学报,2014,32(1):166-173.Guo Xiaobo,Huang Zhilong,Chen Xuan,et al.The oil-bearing property characteristics and evaluation of Lucaogou formation shale reservoirs in Malang sag[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2014,32(1):166-173.
[17]柳波,郭小波,黄志龙,等.页岩油资源潜力预测方法探讨:以三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷芦草沟组页岩油为例[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(4):1472-1478.Liu Bo,Guo Xiaobo,Huang Zhilong,et al.Discussion on prediction method for hydrocarbon resource potential of shale oil:Taking Lucaogou Formation shale oil of Malang sag as case[J].Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2013,44(4):1472-1478.
[18]姜福杰,庞雄奇,姜振学,等.烃源岩滞留油气作用及其对泥页岩含油气率的影响[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(6):2439-2448.Jiang Fujie,Pang Xiongqi,Jiang Zhenxue,et al.Residual oil and gas in source rocks and its influence on oil and gas rate in shale[J].Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2013,44(6):2439-2448.
[19]薛海涛,田善思,王伟明,等.页岩油资源评价关键参数-含油率的校正[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(1):15-22.Xue Haitao,Tian Shansi,Wang Weiming,et al.Correction of oil content-one key parameter in shale oil resource assessment[J].Oil&Gas Geology,2016,37(1):15-22.
[20]薛海涛,田善思,卢双舫,等.页岩油资源定量评价中关键参数的选取与校正-以松辽盆地北部青山口组为例[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2015,34(1):70-78.Xue Haitao,Tian Shansi,Lu Shuangfang,et al.Selection and verification of key parameters in the quantitative evaluation of shale oil:a case study at the Qingshankou Formation,Northern Songliao Basin[J].Bulletin of Mineralogy,Petrology and Geochemistry,2015,34(1):70-78.
[21]朱日房,张林晔,李钜源,等.页岩滞留液态烃的定量评价[J].石油学报,2015,36(1):13-18.Zhu Rifang,Zhang Linye,Li Juyuan,et al.Quantitative evaluation of residual liquid hydrocarbons in shale[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(1):13-18.
[22]柳波,何佳,吕延防,等.页岩油资源评价指标与方法-以松辽盆地北部青山口组页岩油为例[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2014,45(11):3847-3852.Liu Bo,He Jia,Lv Yanfang,et al.Parameters and method for shale oil assessment:Taking Qinshankou Formation shale oil of Northern Songliao Basin[J].Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2014,45(11):3847-3852.
[23]蒋启贵,黎茂稳,钱门辉,等.不同赋存状态页岩油定量表征技术与应用研究[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(6):842-849.Jiang Qigui,Li Maowen,Qian Menhui,et al.Quantitative characterization of shale oil in different occurrence states and its application[J].Petroleum Geology&Experiment,2016,38(6):842-849.
[24]Jarvie D M.Components and processes affecting producibility and commerciality of shale resource system[C]//Li M W.Abstract of international symposium on shale oil technologies.Sinopec Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Mechanisms,Wuxi:2012,8-9.
[25]张林晔.陆相盆地页岩油勘探开发关键地质问题研究-以东营凹陷为例[C]//Li M W.页岩油资源与勘探开发技术国际研讨会摘要.中国石化油气成藏重点实验室,无锡:2012,14-15.Zhang Linye.The study of the key geologic factors in shale oil exploration and development in continental basin-take Dongying depression as an example[C]//Li M W.Abstract of International symposium on shale oil technologies.Sinopec Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Mechanisms,Wuxi:2012,14-15.
[26]宋国奇,张林晔,卢双舫,等.页岩油资源评价技术方法及其应用[J].地学前缘,2013,20(4):221-228.Song Guoqi,Zhang Linye,Lu Shuangfang,et al.Resource evaluation method for shale oil and its application[J].Earth Science Front,2013,20(4):221-228.
[27]张林晔,包友书,李钜源,等.湖相页岩中矿物和干酪根留油能力实验研究[J].石油实验地质,2015,37(6):776-780.Zhang Linye,Bao Youshu,Li Juyuan,et al.Hydrocarbon and crude oil adsorption abilities of minerals and kerogens in lacustrine shales[J].Petroleum Geology&Experiment,2015,37(6):776-780.
[28]李志明,芮晓庆,黎茂稳,等.北美典型混合页岩油系统特征及其启示[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(4):1060-1072.Li Zhiming,Rui Xiaoqing,Li Maowen,et al.Characteristics of typical hybrid shale oil system in north America and its implications[J].Journal of Jinlin University(Earth Science Edition),2015,45(4):1060-1072.
[29]刘魁元,孙喜新,李琦,等.沾化凹陷泥质岩储层中裂缝类型及其成因研究[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),2004,28(4):12-15.Liu Kuiyuan,Sun Xixin,Li Qi,et al.Fracture pattern and genesis of mudstone reservoir in Zhanhua depression[J].Journal of China University Petroleum,2004,28(4):12-15.
[30]宋梅远,张善文,王永诗,等.沾化凹陷沙三段下亚段泥岩裂缝储层岩性分类及测井识别[J].油气地质与采收率,2011,18(6):18-22.Song Meiyuan,Zhang Shanwen,Wang Yongshi,et al.Lithology classification and prediction of favorable area of ShaⅢmudstone-fractured reservoir in Zhanhua depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2011,18(6):18-22.
[31]刘华,蒋有录,谷国翠,等.沾化凹陷渤南洼陷古近系压力特征及成因机制[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2013,37(4):46-51.Liu Hua,Jiang Youlu,Gu Guocui,et al.Pressure characteristics and formation mechanisms of Paleogene in Bonan sag,Zhanhua depression[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum,2013,37(4):46-51.
[32]崔健健.沾化凹陷古近系温压场与油气分布关系研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学,2011,1-60.Cui Jianjian.Investigation on the relationship between Paleogene temperature-pressure field and hydrocarbon distribution in Zhanhua[D].Qingdao:China University of Petroleum,2011,1-60.
[33]姜在兴,张文昭,梁超,等.页岩油储层基本特征及评价要素[J].石油学报,2014,35(1):184-196.Jiang Zaixing,Zhang Wenzhao,Liang Chao,et al.Characteristics and evaluation elements of shale oil reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(1):184-196.
[34]王学军,宁方兴,郝雪峰,等.古近系页岩油赋存特征-以济阳坳陷为例[J].科学技术与工程,2017,17(29):39-48.Wang Xuejun,Ning Fangxing,Hao Xuefeng,et al.Paleogene shale oil occurrence features:a case of Jiyang depression[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2017,17(29):39-48.
(1)Larter S,Huang H,Bennett B. What don’t we know about self sourced oil reservoirs:challenges and potential solution[R]. Calgary:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2012.
(1)黎茂稳,李志明,蒋启贵,等.东部断陷盆地烃源层可动油定量评价方法[R].北京:中国石化石油勘探开发研究院:2014,1-93.
[2]王永诗,李政,巩建强,等.济阳坳陷页岩油气评价方法-以沾化凹陷罗家地区为例[J].石油学报,2013,34(1):83-91.Wang Yongshi,Li Zheng,Gong Jianqiang,et al.Discussion on an eva-luation method of shale oil and gas in Jiyang depression:A case study on Luojia area in Zhanhua sag[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2013,34(1):83-91.
[3]王鸿升,胡天跃.渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷页岩油形成影响因素分析[J].天然气地球科学,2014,25(增刊1):141-149.Wang Hongsheng,Hu Tianyue.Analysis of influence factors of shale oil formation in Zhanhua depression of Bohai Bay basin[J].Natural Gas Geoscience,2014,25(S1):141-149.
[4]王永诗,巩建强,房建军,等.渤南洼陷页岩油气富集高产条件及勘探方向[J].油气地质与采收率,2012,19(6):6-10.Wang Yongshi,Gong Jianqiang,Fang Jiangjun,et al.Enrichment condition analysis and exploration direction of shale oil-gas in Bonan subsag[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2012,19(6):6-10.
[5]刘惠民,张守鹏,王朴,等.沾化凹陷罗家地区沙三段下亚段页岩岩石学特征[J].油气地质与采收率,2012,19(6):11-15.Liu Huimin,Zhang Shoupeng,Wang Pu,et al.Lithologic characteristics of lower Es3 shale in Luojia area,Zhanhua sag[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2012,19(6):11-15.
[6]邓美寅,梁超.渤南洼陷沙三下亚段泥页岩储集空间研究:以罗69井为例[J].地学前缘,2012,19(1):173-181.Deng Meiyin,Liang Chao.Studies on reservoir space of mudstone and shale of the lower section of Es3 in Bonan subsag:An example from well Luo69[J].Earth Science Frontiers,2012,19(1):173-181.
[7]王永诗,王伟庆,郝运轻.济阳坳陷沾化凹陷罗家地区古近系沙河街组页岩储集特征分析[J].古地理学报,2013,15(5):657-662.Wang Yongshi,Wang Weiqing,Hao Yunqing.Shale reservoir characteristics analysis of the Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Luojia area of Zhanhua sag,Jiyang depression[J].Journal of Palaeogeography,2013,15(5):657-662.
[8]李超,朱筱敏,朱世发,等.沾化凹陷罗家地区沙三下段泥页岩储层特征[J].沉积学报,2015,33(4):795-808.Li Chao,Zhu Xiaomin,Zhu Shifa,et al.Shale reservoir characteristics of the Lower 3th member of Shahejie Formation,Luojia area,Zhanhua Sag[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2015,33(4):795-808.
[9]张磊磊,陆正元,王军,等.渤海湾盆地沾化凹陷沙三下亚段页岩油层段微观孔隙结构[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(1):80-86.Zhang Leilei,Lu Zhengyuan,Wang Jun,et al.Microscopic pore structure of shale oil reservoirs in the Lower 3rdMember of Shahejie Formation in Zhanhua Sag,Bohai Bay Basin[J].Oil&Gas Geology,2016,37(1):80-86.
[10]彭丽,陆永潮,彭鹏,等.渤海湾盆地渤南洼陷沙三下亚段泥页岩非均质性特征及演化模式-以罗69井为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2017,38(2):219-229.Peng Li,Lu Yongchao,Peng Peng,et al.Heterogeneity and evolution model of the Lower Shahejie Member 3 mud-shale in the Bonan Subsag,Bohai Bay Basin:An example from Well Luo 69[J].Oil&Gas Geology,2017,38(2):219-229.
[11]李志明,钱门辉,黎茂稳,等.中-低成熟湖相富有机质泥页岩含油性及赋存形式-以渤海湾盆地渤南洼陷罗63井和义21井沙河街组一段为例[J].石油与天然气地质,2017,38(1):448-456.Li Zhiming,Qian Menhui,Li Maowen,et al.Oil content and occurrence in low-medium mature organic-rich lacustrine shales:A case from the 1stmember of the Eocene-Oligocene Shahejie Formation in Well Luo-63 and Yi-21,Bonan subsag,Bohai Bay basin[J].Oil&Gas Geology,2017,38(1):448-456.
[12]吴智平,李伟,郑德顺,等.沾化凹陷中、新生代断裂发育及其形成机制分析[J].高校地质学报,2004,10(1):405-417.Wu Zhiping,Li Wei,Zheng Deshun,et al.Analysis on features and origins of the Mesozoic and Cenozoic faults in Zhanhua sag[J].Geological Journal of China Universities,2004,10(1):405-417.
[13]杨超,陈清华.济阳坳陷构造演化及其构造层的划分[J].油气地质与采收率,2005,12(2):9-12,22.Yang Chao,Chen Qinghua.Tectonic evolution and tectono-stratigraphic classification of Jiyang depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2005,12(2):9-12,22.
[14]彭存仓.沾化凹陷断层活动性及其叠合特征[J].油气地质与采收率,2009,16(5):37-39,43.Peng Cuncang.Analysis of fault activity and structural type in Zhanhua depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2009,16(5):37-39,43.
[15]罗胜元,何生,金秋月,等.渤南洼陷超压系统划分及结构特征[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(1):37-51.Luo Shengyuan,He Sheng,Jin Qiuyue,et al.Overpressure system classification and structure characteristics in Bonan sag[J].Journal of Jinlin University:Earth Science Edition,2015,45(1):37-51.
[16]郭小波,黄志龙,陈旋,等.马郎凹陷芦草沟组页岩储层含油性特征与评价[J].沉积学报,2014,32(1):166-173.Guo Xiaobo,Huang Zhilong,Chen Xuan,et al.The oil-bearing property characteristics and evaluation of Lucaogou formation shale reservoirs in Malang sag[J].Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2014,32(1):166-173.
[17]柳波,郭小波,黄志龙,等.页岩油资源潜力预测方法探讨:以三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷芦草沟组页岩油为例[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(4):1472-1478.Liu Bo,Guo Xiaobo,Huang Zhilong,et al.Discussion on prediction method for hydrocarbon resource potential of shale oil:Taking Lucaogou Formation shale oil of Malang sag as case[J].Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2013,44(4):1472-1478.
[18]姜福杰,庞雄奇,姜振学,等.烃源岩滞留油气作用及其对泥页岩含油气率的影响[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2013,44(6):2439-2448.Jiang Fujie,Pang Xiongqi,Jiang Zhenxue,et al.Residual oil and gas in source rocks and its influence on oil and gas rate in shale[J].Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2013,44(6):2439-2448.
[19]薛海涛,田善思,王伟明,等.页岩油资源评价关键参数-含油率的校正[J].石油与天然气地质,2016,37(1):15-22.Xue Haitao,Tian Shansi,Wang Weiming,et al.Correction of oil content-one key parameter in shale oil resource assessment[J].Oil&Gas Geology,2016,37(1):15-22.
[20]薛海涛,田善思,卢双舫,等.页岩油资源定量评价中关键参数的选取与校正-以松辽盆地北部青山口组为例[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2015,34(1):70-78.Xue Haitao,Tian Shansi,Lu Shuangfang,et al.Selection and verification of key parameters in the quantitative evaluation of shale oil:a case study at the Qingshankou Formation,Northern Songliao Basin[J].Bulletin of Mineralogy,Petrology and Geochemistry,2015,34(1):70-78.
[21]朱日房,张林晔,李钜源,等.页岩滞留液态烃的定量评价[J].石油学报,2015,36(1):13-18.Zhu Rifang,Zhang Linye,Li Juyuan,et al.Quantitative evaluation of residual liquid hydrocarbons in shale[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2015,36(1):13-18.
[22]柳波,何佳,吕延防,等.页岩油资源评价指标与方法-以松辽盆地北部青山口组页岩油为例[J].中南大学学报(自然科学版),2014,45(11):3847-3852.Liu Bo,He Jia,Lv Yanfang,et al.Parameters and method for shale oil assessment:Taking Qinshankou Formation shale oil of Northern Songliao Basin[J].Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2014,45(11):3847-3852.
[23]蒋启贵,黎茂稳,钱门辉,等.不同赋存状态页岩油定量表征技术与应用研究[J].石油实验地质,2016,38(6):842-849.Jiang Qigui,Li Maowen,Qian Menhui,et al.Quantitative characterization of shale oil in different occurrence states and its application[J].Petroleum Geology&Experiment,2016,38(6):842-849.
[24]Jarvie D M.Components and processes affecting producibility and commerciality of shale resource system[C]//Li M W.Abstract of international symposium on shale oil technologies.Sinopec Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Mechanisms,Wuxi:2012,8-9.
[25]张林晔.陆相盆地页岩油勘探开发关键地质问题研究-以东营凹陷为例[C]//Li M W.页岩油资源与勘探开发技术国际研讨会摘要.中国石化油气成藏重点实验室,无锡:2012,14-15.Zhang Linye.The study of the key geologic factors in shale oil exploration and development in continental basin-take Dongying depression as an example[C]//Li M W.Abstract of International symposium on shale oil technologies.Sinopec Key Laboratory of Petroleum Accumulation Mechanisms,Wuxi:2012,14-15.
[26]宋国奇,张林晔,卢双舫,等.页岩油资源评价技术方法及其应用[J].地学前缘,2013,20(4):221-228.Song Guoqi,Zhang Linye,Lu Shuangfang,et al.Resource evaluation method for shale oil and its application[J].Earth Science Front,2013,20(4):221-228.
[27]张林晔,包友书,李钜源,等.湖相页岩中矿物和干酪根留油能力实验研究[J].石油实验地质,2015,37(6):776-780.Zhang Linye,Bao Youshu,Li Juyuan,et al.Hydrocarbon and crude oil adsorption abilities of minerals and kerogens in lacustrine shales[J].Petroleum Geology&Experiment,2015,37(6):776-780.
[28]李志明,芮晓庆,黎茂稳,等.北美典型混合页岩油系统特征及其启示[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2015,45(4):1060-1072.Li Zhiming,Rui Xiaoqing,Li Maowen,et al.Characteristics of typical hybrid shale oil system in north America and its implications[J].Journal of Jinlin University(Earth Science Edition),2015,45(4):1060-1072.
[29]刘魁元,孙喜新,李琦,等.沾化凹陷泥质岩储层中裂缝类型及其成因研究[J].石油大学学报(自然科学版),2004,28(4):12-15.Liu Kuiyuan,Sun Xixin,Li Qi,et al.Fracture pattern and genesis of mudstone reservoir in Zhanhua depression[J].Journal of China University Petroleum,2004,28(4):12-15.
[30]宋梅远,张善文,王永诗,等.沾化凹陷沙三段下亚段泥岩裂缝储层岩性分类及测井识别[J].油气地质与采收率,2011,18(6):18-22.Song Meiyuan,Zhang Shanwen,Wang Yongshi,et al.Lithology classification and prediction of favorable area of ShaⅢmudstone-fractured reservoir in Zhanhua depression[J].Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency,2011,18(6):18-22.
[31]刘华,蒋有录,谷国翠,等.沾化凹陷渤南洼陷古近系压力特征及成因机制[J].中国石油大学学报(自然科学版),2013,37(4):46-51.Liu Hua,Jiang Youlu,Gu Guocui,et al.Pressure characteristics and formation mechanisms of Paleogene in Bonan sag,Zhanhua depression[J].Journal of China University of Petroleum,2013,37(4):46-51.
[32]崔健健.沾化凹陷古近系温压场与油气分布关系研究[D].青岛:中国石油大学,2011,1-60.Cui Jianjian.Investigation on the relationship between Paleogene temperature-pressure field and hydrocarbon distribution in Zhanhua[D].Qingdao:China University of Petroleum,2011,1-60.
[33]姜在兴,张文昭,梁超,等.页岩油储层基本特征及评价要素[J].石油学报,2014,35(1):184-196.Jiang Zaixing,Zhang Wenzhao,Liang Chao,et al.Characteristics and evaluation elements of shale oil reservoir[J].Acta Petrolei Sinica,2014,35(1):184-196.
[34]王学军,宁方兴,郝雪峰,等.古近系页岩油赋存特征-以济阳坳陷为例[J].科学技术与工程,2017,17(29):39-48.Wang Xuejun,Ning Fangxing,Hao Xuefeng,et al.Paleogene shale oil occurrence features:a case of Jiyang depression[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2017,17(29):39-48.
(1)Larter S,Huang H,Bennett B. What don’t we know about self sourced oil reservoirs:challenges and potential solution[R]. Calgary:Society of Petroleum Engineers,2012.
(1)黎茂稳,李志明,蒋启贵,等.东部断陷盆地烃源层可动油定量评价方法[R].北京:中国石化石油勘探开发研究院:2014,1-93.