冷储物流公司液氨泄漏事件环境损害评估研究
|
摘要
为探索液氨泄漏事故的环境损害评估方法,以重庆某冷储物流公司液氨泄漏事件为例,根据现有的环境损害鉴定评估相关规定,在采用伯努利方程计算其泄漏量的基础上,运用虚拟治理成本法对液氨泄漏的生态环境损害进行了量化。结果表明:本次事件造成的人身损害、财产损害、应急处置费用和生态环境损害费用共计215852. 4元,未对周边环境造成长期影响,无需开展中长期评估,事件定级为安全生产事故次生的一般(Ⅳ级)突发环境事件。
In recent years,liquid ammonia has been widely used as basic chemical raw materials and refrigerants,more and more environmental incidents occurred frequently caused by liquid ammonia leakage. Accurate and reasonable environmental damage assessment of event is particularly important for the classification and accountability of accident. In order to explore the evaluation methods of environmental damage accident of liquid ammonia,the ammonia leak incident of Cold Storage Company in Chongqing was taken as an example. According to the environmental damage assessment rules and regulations in operation,the amount of leakage was calculated on the basis of Bernoulli equation,the ecological environment damage was quantified using virtual disposal cost method. The results showed that the total cost of personal injury,property damage costs,emergency disposal costs and environmental damage costs was 215852. 4 RMB. This incident did not need to carry out medium and long-term assessment since its damage has not resulted in long-term impact on the surrounding environment. The incident classification was identified as grade IV unexpected environmental event.
In recent years,liquid ammonia has been widely used as basic chemical raw materials and refrigerants,more and more environmental incidents occurred frequently caused by liquid ammonia leakage. Accurate and reasonable environmental damage assessment of event is particularly important for the classification and accountability of accident. In order to explore the evaluation methods of environmental damage accident of liquid ammonia,the ammonia leak incident of Cold Storage Company in Chongqing was taken as an example. According to the environmental damage assessment rules and regulations in operation,the amount of leakage was calculated on the basis of Bernoulli equation,the ecological environment damage was quantified using virtual disposal cost method. The results showed that the total cost of personal injury,property damage costs,emergency disposal costs and environmental damage costs was 215852. 4 RMB. This incident did not need to carry out medium and long-term assessment since its damage has not resulted in long-term impact on the surrounding environment. The incident classification was identified as grade IV unexpected environmental event.
引文
[1]李竹霞,秦言杰,夏昕.液氨装卸站泄漏事故分析及后果模拟[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2008(5):118-120.
[2]孙晖,张树海,吴明亮.液氨泄露蒸气云爆炸的风险分析[J].安全与环境工程,2010,17(4):64-66.
[3]王俭,赵士波,李斗果,等.重庆市突发环境事件时空格局及影响研究[J].环境科学与管理,2017,42(1):108-113.
[4]商靠定.冷库液氨泄漏事故处置方法研究[J].武警学院学报,2015,31(10):24-28.
[5]郭斌.液氨泄漏的消防应急疏散分析及防控措施[J].石化技术,2016,23(5):15-16.
[6]杨静翎,凌敏. SLAB模型在某工厂液氨泄漏应急响应中的应用[J].环境工程技术学报,2017(1):102-106.
[7]徐鹏,方国强,饶国宁.液氨泄漏范围影响因素的研究[J].爆破器材,2017,46(2):21-25.
[8]夏登友,钱新明,黄金印,等.液氨泄漏扩散模拟及危害评估[J].中国安全科学学报,2014,24(3):22-27.
[9]张智超,刘辉,孙世梅.液氨储罐连续泄漏事故后果的影响因素分析[J].工业安全与环保,2017,43(3):38-42.
[10]彭林.液氨事故泄漏环境风险评价定量分析[J].环境科学与管理,2009,34(8):176-179.
[11]李占强.屠宰企业液氨泄漏的环境风险评价及风险管理措施研究[J].科技传播,2016,8(17):129-130
[12]赵丹,於方,王膑.环境损害评估中修复方案的费用效益分析[J].环境保护科学,2016,42(6):16-22.
[13]牛坤玉,於方,张天柱,等.矿区地表水环境损害评估研究及案例应用[J].环境保护,2016,44(24):62-68.
[14]赵丹,徐伟攀,朱文英,等.土壤地下水环境损害因果关系判定方法及应用[J].环境科学研究,2016,29(7):1059
[15]龚春明.环境污染损害评估方法初探—以某废油污染场地为例[J].环保科技,2014,20(5):26-28.
[16]李二平,李瑾,邱亚群,等.某废酸偷排污染事件的环境污染损害鉴定评估研究[J].环境科学与管理,2016(3):159-162
[17]王俭,赵士波,李新宇,等.突发性水污染事件中水资源损失评估方法应用与比较[J].环境科学与技术,2016,39(3):200-204.
[18]路忻,李祥华,张清敏.某电镀污泥倾倒事件环境损害鉴定评估研究[C]//2016中国环境科学学会学术年会. 2016.
[19]张红振,董璟琦,吴舜泽,等.铅污染损害评估研究[J].环境保护,2016,44(9):51-55.
[20]曹东,齐霁.环境损害鉴定评估的问题及破解路径[J].环境保护,2014,1(17):45-47.
[21]赵卉卉,张永波,王明旭.中国环境损害评估方法研究综述[J].环境科学与管理,2015,40(7):27-30.
[22]刘清华,彭志群,刘发安.小议含氨废气的吸收及其工艺比较[J].化学工程与装备,2011(7):204-206.
[23]张圣琼,赵翠薇.贵州省环境污染损失的经济核算[J].贵州科学,2012,30(6):92-96.
[24]於方.中国环境经济核算技术指南[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2009:44-49.
[2]孙晖,张树海,吴明亮.液氨泄露蒸气云爆炸的风险分析[J].安全与环境工程,2010,17(4):64-66.
[3]王俭,赵士波,李斗果,等.重庆市突发环境事件时空格局及影响研究[J].环境科学与管理,2017,42(1):108-113.
[4]商靠定.冷库液氨泄漏事故处置方法研究[J].武警学院学报,2015,31(10):24-28.
[5]郭斌.液氨泄漏的消防应急疏散分析及防控措施[J].石化技术,2016,23(5):15-16.
[6]杨静翎,凌敏. SLAB模型在某工厂液氨泄漏应急响应中的应用[J].环境工程技术学报,2017(1):102-106.
[7]徐鹏,方国强,饶国宁.液氨泄漏范围影响因素的研究[J].爆破器材,2017,46(2):21-25.
[8]夏登友,钱新明,黄金印,等.液氨泄漏扩散模拟及危害评估[J].中国安全科学学报,2014,24(3):22-27.
[9]张智超,刘辉,孙世梅.液氨储罐连续泄漏事故后果的影响因素分析[J].工业安全与环保,2017,43(3):38-42.
[10]彭林.液氨事故泄漏环境风险评价定量分析[J].环境科学与管理,2009,34(8):176-179.
[11]李占强.屠宰企业液氨泄漏的环境风险评价及风险管理措施研究[J].科技传播,2016,8(17):129-130
[12]赵丹,於方,王膑.环境损害评估中修复方案的费用效益分析[J].环境保护科学,2016,42(6):16-22.
[13]牛坤玉,於方,张天柱,等.矿区地表水环境损害评估研究及案例应用[J].环境保护,2016,44(24):62-68.
[14]赵丹,徐伟攀,朱文英,等.土壤地下水环境损害因果关系判定方法及应用[J].环境科学研究,2016,29(7):1059
[15]龚春明.环境污染损害评估方法初探—以某废油污染场地为例[J].环保科技,2014,20(5):26-28.
[16]李二平,李瑾,邱亚群,等.某废酸偷排污染事件的环境污染损害鉴定评估研究[J].环境科学与管理,2016(3):159-162
[17]王俭,赵士波,李新宇,等.突发性水污染事件中水资源损失评估方法应用与比较[J].环境科学与技术,2016,39(3):200-204.
[18]路忻,李祥华,张清敏.某电镀污泥倾倒事件环境损害鉴定评估研究[C]//2016中国环境科学学会学术年会. 2016.
[19]张红振,董璟琦,吴舜泽,等.铅污染损害评估研究[J].环境保护,2016,44(9):51-55.
[20]曹东,齐霁.环境损害鉴定评估的问题及破解路径[J].环境保护,2014,1(17):45-47.
[21]赵卉卉,张永波,王明旭.中国环境损害评估方法研究综述[J].环境科学与管理,2015,40(7):27-30.
[22]刘清华,彭志群,刘发安.小议含氨废气的吸收及其工艺比较[J].化学工程与装备,2011(7):204-206.
[23]张圣琼,赵翠薇.贵州省环境污染损失的经济核算[J].贵州科学,2012,30(6):92-96.
[24]於方.中国环境经济核算技术指南[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2009:44-49.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |