中亚热带三种森林类型凋落物现存量及碳氮储量

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Litter Biomass and Its Carbon and Nitrogen Storage in Three Forests in Central Subtropical China 作者：黄茂根 英文作者：Huang Maogen;Luobuyan Provincial Nature Reserve; 关键词：武夷桦 ; 米槠 ; 马尾松 ; 凋落物现存量 ; 碳氮储量 英文关键词：Betula wuyiensis;;Castanopsis carlesii;;Pinus massoniana;;litter;;carbon and nitrogen storage 中文刊名：FJLT 英文刊名：Fujian Forestry 机构：三明市罗卜岩省级自然保护区管理站; 出版日期：2018-10-30 出版单位：福建林业 年：2018 期：No.198 基金：福建省林业科研项目(闽林科[2016]3号);; 福建省自然科学基金(2016J01116);; 省属公益类项目(2018R1011—7);; 三明市林业科研项目(明林计财(2017)49号);; 国家林业局南方山地用材林培育重点实验室、福建省森林培育与林产品加工利用重点实验室项目资助 语种：中文; 页：FJLT201805021 页数：4 CN：05 ISSN：35-1010/S 分类号：39-42

摘要

在福建三明市罗卜岩省级自然保护区,选择立地条件一致的武夷桦天然林、米槠天然林和马尾松天然林为研究对象,对其林下凋落物现存量及碳氮储量进行了研究。结果表明:三种森林类型总凋落物现存量平均值为马尾松天然林(15.90 t·hm~(-2))>武夷桦天然林(8.73 t·hm~(-2))>米槠天然林(4.91 t·hm~(-2)),除米槠林外,武夷桦天然林和马尾松天然林的凋落物未分解层现存量均表现为叶>枝>果;3种森林类型凋落物碳储量最大为马尾松天然林(7.28 t·hm~(-2)),其次为武夷桦天然林(3.70 t·hm~(-2)),米槠林最低(2.30 t·hm~(-2)),氮储量最大为马尾松天然林(156.60 kg·hm~(-2)),显著大于武夷桦天然林(59.60 kg·hm~(-2))和米槠林(46.90 kg·hm~(-2));3种森林凋落物的碳氮含量均呈极显著正相关(P<0.001)。
        The litter biomass and its carbon and nitrogen storage in three forests including Betula wuyiensis, Castanopsis carlesii and Pinus massoniana under the same site condition in Luobuyan Provincial Nature Reserve were investigated.The results showed that the range of total litter biomass in the three forest types was P. massoniana forest(15.9 t·hm~(-2))> B. wuyiensis forest(8.73 t·hm~(-2)) > C. carlesii forest(4.91 t·hm~(-2)). Except for C. carlesii forest, the existing litter component was leaf>branch>fruit in B. wuyiensis and P. massoniana forests. The highest litter carbon storage was in P.massoniana forest(7.28 t·hm~(-2)), followed by B. wuyiensis forest(3.70 t·hm~(-2)), and the lowest was in C. carlesii forest(2.30 t·hm~(-2)). The highest litter nitrogen storage was in P. massoniana forest(156.6 kg·hm~(-2)), which is significantly higher than that in B. wuyiensis forest(59.6 kg·hm~(-2)) and the C. carlesii forest(46.9 kg·hm~(-2)). The litter carbon and nitrogen contents of the three forests were all significantly positively correlated(P<0.001).

引文

[1]潘紫重,杨文化.不同林分类型凋落物的蓄水功能[J].东北林业大学学报,2002,30(5):19-21.
    [2]路翔,项文化,任辉,等.中亚热带四种森林凋落物及碳氮贮量比较[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(9):2234-2240.
    [3]Witkamp M.Microbial Populations of Leaf Litter in Relation to Environmental Conditions and Decomposition[J].Ecology,1963,44(2):370-377.
    [4]Raich J W,Schlesinger W H.The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate[J].Tellus Series B-chemical&Physical Meteorology,1992,44(2):81-99.
    [5]刘刚,朱剑云,叶永昌,等.东莞主要森林群落凋落物碳储量及其空间分布[J].山地学报,2010,28(1):69-75.
    [6]朱剑云,莫罗坚,叶永昌,等.东莞森林生态系统碳储量研究[J].林业与环境科学,2011,27(2):22-29.
    [7]态学杂志,2016,35(9):2271-2278.
    [8]常雅军,陈琦,曹靖,等.甘肃小陇山不同针叶林凋落物量、养分储量及持水特性[J].生态学报,2011,31(9):2392-2400.
    [9]吴兴盛.罗卜岩自然保护区武夷桦群落植物多样性研究[J].安徽农学通报,2016,22(15):30-32.
    [10]陈国龙.福建省三明市罗卜岩自然保护区种子植物区系初步研究[J].亚热带植物科学,1996,(1):38-42.
    [11]杨玉盛,林鹏,郭剑芬,等.格氏栲天然林与人工林凋落物数量、养分归还及凋落叶分解[J].生态学报,2003,23(7):1278-1289.
    [12]张家武,廖利平,李锦芳,等.马尾松火力楠混交林凋落物动态及其对土壤养分的影响[J].应用生态学报,1993,4(4):359-363.