用户名: 密码: 验证码:
农业结构转型对生态系统服务与人类福祉的影响——以西安都市圈两种农业类型为例
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Influence of agricultural structure transformation on ecosystem services and human well-being: Case study in Xi′an metropolitan area
  • 作者:任婷婷 ; 周忠学
  • 英文作者:REN Tingting;ZHOU Zhongxue;School of Geography and Tourism, Shaanxi Normal University;National Demonstration Center for Experimental Geography Education,Shaanxi Normal University;
  • 关键词:农业转型 ; 生态系统服务 ; 人类福祉 ; 西安都市圈 ; 相关分析
  • 英文关键词:agricultural transformation;;ecosystem services;;human well-being;;Xi′an metropolitan area;;correlation analysis
  • 中文刊名:STXB
  • 英文刊名:Acta Ecologica Sinica
  • 机构:陕西师范大学地理科学与旅游学院;陕西师范大学地理学国家级实验教学示范中心;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-10 09:10
  • 出版单位:生态学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.39
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金项目(41271550)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:STXB201907009
  • 页数:13
  • CN:07
  • ISSN:11-2031/Q
  • 分类号:91-103
摘要
研究城市化地区农业类型转变对农业生态系统服务与人类福祉的影响,对调控都市农业发展、维持农业生态系统服务以及提升农户福祉等具有重要意义。以西安都市圈两个农业类型转变的村庄为案例,通过入户调查对村域的生态系统服务价值及人类福祉进行测算,分析农业转型下生态系统服务与人类福祉的相互影响。结果表明:(1)农业结构转型过程中,以粮食耕种为主的马家村的生态系统服务价值由2000年141.88×10~4元减少至2017年117.58×10~4元(降幅为17.13%);而以蔬菜种植为主的火箭村生态系统服务价值由727.23×10~4元增长至1753.23×10~4元(增幅达141.08%),其变化主要源于农业劳动力、农户行为及农业类型的影响。(2)不同农业类型下人类福祉差异明显,以蔬菜种植为主的火箭村人类福祉比以粮食种植为主的马家村高出89%;表明由传统粮食种植转向现代都市农业可以提高人类福祉,在各福祉指标中农业纯收入对农户福祉影响最为显著。(3)不同农业类型下生态系统服务与人类福祉的相关程度不同,但都与农产品供给呈正相关,与农业纯收入呈负相关。以传统粮食种植为主的马家村村民对生态环境的关注度较低,而转向蔬菜种植的火箭村对水质等生态环境的关注度开始提高。生态系统服务价值和农户福祉的提升与农业类型显著相关,因此,可通过政府引导农户规划农业用地类型以优化景观格局,从而维持农业生态系统服务的可持续发展。
        Studying the influence of agricultural type transformation on agro-ecosystem services and human well-being in urbanizing area has great significance on controlling urban agriculture development, maintaining agro-ecosystem services, and improving the well-being of farmers.Taking two villages of Majia and Huojian on behalf of two agricultural transformation model in the Xi′an metropolitan area as an example, we have measured the value of human well-being and agro-ecosystem services by household surveys data, and further analyzed their interaction in different transformation models. From 2000 to 2017, ecosystem-services value of the grain-farming Majia village decreased from 141.88 × 10~4 yuan to 117.58 × 10~4 yuan(by 17.13% decrease), whilst the vegetable-planting Huojian village saw an increase from 727.23 × 10~4 yuan to 1753.23 × 10~4 yuan(by 141.08% increase). These changes primarily resulted from the alteration of agricultural labor number, farmer behavior and agricultural types. Additionally, we observed an obvious gap of human well-being value between two agricultural transformation models, that had 89% higher in Huojian village than that in Majia village. Specifically, agricultural pure income had significantly impact on change of the human well-being. Therefore, transformation from traditional grain planting to modern urban agriculture could improve human well-being. The degree of correlation between ecosystem services and human well-being differed among agricultural transformation models, but in these two models the human well-being values were positively related to the provisioning of agricultural products, and negatively related to agricultural net income. In Majia village, less attention was paid to the ecological environment, but Huojian village have begun to improve the awareness of the environment, such as water quality. Generally, the value of ecosystem services and farmer well-being are significantly correlated with agriculture types. Therefore, government policies can guide the design of agricultural types to optimize landscape patterns, allowing for the maintenance of sustainable development of agricultural ecosystem services.
引文
[1] 谢高地,肖玉.农田生态系统服务及其价值的研究进展.中国生态农业学报,2013,21(6):645- 651.
    [2] Wang B J,Tang H P,Xu Y.Integrating ecosystem services and human well-being into management practices:insights from a mountain-basin area,China.Ecosystem Services,2017,27:58- 69.
    [3] Palmer M,Bernhardt E,Chornesky E,Collins S,Dobson A,Duke C,Gold B,Jacobson R,Kingsland S,Kranz R,Mappin M,Martinez M L,Micheli F,Morse J,Pace M,Pascual M,Palumbi S,Reichman O J,Reichman A,Townsend A,Turner M.Ecology for a crowded planet.Science,2004,304(5675):1251- 1252.
    [4] Le Maitre D C,Milton S J,Jarmain C,Colvin C A,Saayman I,Vlok J H J.Linking ecosystem services and water resources:landscape-scale hydrology of the little Karoo.Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,2007,5(5):261- 270.
    [5] Vitousek P M,Mooney H A,Lubchenco J,Melillo J M.Human domination of earth′s ecosystems.Science,1997,277(5325):494- 499.
    [6] 傅伯杰,周国逸,白永飞,宋长春,刘纪远,张惠远,吕一河,郑华,谢高地.中国主要陆地生态系统服务功能与生态安全.地球科学进展,2009,24(06):571- 576.
    [7] Wang X C,Dong X B,Liu H M,Wei H J,Fan W G,Lu N C,Xu Z H,Ren J H,Xing K X.Linking land use change,ecosystem services and human well-being:a case study of the Manas River Basin of Xinjiang,China.Ecosystem Services,2017,27:113- 123.
    [8] 张琨,吕一河,傅伯杰.黄土高原典型区植被恢复及其对生态系统服务的影响.生态与农村环境学报,2017,33(01):23- 31.
    [9] 李晓华,任志远,周自翔.区域景观格局变化特征及人类影响因素分析——以陕西关中平原地区为例.西北大学学报:自然科学版,2005,35(5):633- 636.
    [10] 黄甘霖,姜亚琼,刘志锋,聂梅,刘阳,李经纬,鲍宇阳,王玉海,邬建国.人类福祉研究进展——基于可持续科学视角.生态学报,2016,36(23):7519- 7527.
    [11] 丁屹红,姚顺波.退耕还林工程对农户福祉影响比较分析——基于6个省951户农户调查为例.干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(5):45- 50.
    [12] 唐琼,王文瑞,田璐,王伟伟.沙漠-绿洲过渡带农户福祉认知和综合评价——以沙坡头为例.干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(5):51- 56.
    [13] 王大尚,李屹峰,郑华,欧阳志云.密云水库上游流域生态系统服务功能空间特征及其与居民福祉的关系.生态学报,2014,34(1):70- 81.
    [14] 翁鸣.中国农业转型升级与现代农业发展——新常态下农业转型升级研讨会综述.中国农村经济,2017,(4):88- 95.
    [15] Vandercasteelen J,Tamru S,Minten B,Swinnen J.Cities and agricultural transformation in Africa:evidence from Ethiopia//AAAE Fifth International Conference.Addis Ababa,Ethiopia:AAAE,2016.
    [16] 孙新华.农业转型的动力机制研究及其拓展.华中农业大学学报:社会科学版,2017,(3):90- 97.
    [17] Song B J,Robinson G M,Zhou Z X.Agricultural transformation and ecosystem services:a case study from Shaanxi Province,China.Habitat International,2017,69:114- 125.
    [18] 马晓冬,孙晓欣.2000年以来江苏省农业转型发展的时空演变及问题区识别——基于全要素生产率的视角.经济地理,2016,36(7):132- 138.
    [19] 王大尚,郑华,欧阳志云.生态系统服务供给、消费与人类福祉的关系.应用生态学报,2013,24(06):1747- 1753.
    [20] Cruz-Garcia G S,Sachet E,Blundo-Canto G,Vanegas M,Quintero M.To what extent have the links between ecosystem services and human well-being been researched in Africa,Asia,and Latin America?Ecosystem Services,2017,25:201- 212.
    [21] Panno A,Carrus G,Lafortezza R,Mariani L,Sanesi G.Nature-based solutions to promote human resilience and wellbeing in cities during increasingly hot summers.Environmental Research,2017,159:249- 256.
    [22] Delgado L E,Marín V H.Well-being and the use of ecosystem services by rural households of the Río Cruces watershed,southern Chile.Ecosystem Services,2016,21:81- 91.
    [23] Powdthavee N,Burkhauser R V,De Neve J E.Top incomes and human well-being:evidence from the Gallup world poll.Journal of Economic Psychology,2017,62:246- 257.
    [24] Zhang D,Huang Q X,He C Y,Wu J G.Impacts of urban expansion on ecosystem services in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration,China:a scenario analysis based on the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways.Resources,Conservation and Recycling,2017,125:115- 130.
    [25] Fedele G,Locatelli B,Djoudi H.Mechanisms mediating the contribution of ecosystem services to human well-being and resilience.Ecosystem Services,2017,28:43- 54.
    [26] 杨莉,甄霖,李芬,魏云洁,姜鲁光,曹晓昌,龙鑫.黄土高原生态系统服务变化对人类福祉的影响初探.资源科学,2010,32(5):849- 855.
    [27] 刘桂林,张落成,张倩.长三角地区土地利用时空变化对生态系统服务价值的影响.生态学报,2014,34(12):3311- 3319.
    [28] 代光烁,余宝花,娜日苏,董孝斌.内蒙古草原生态系统服务与人类福祉研究初探.中国生态农业学报,2012,20(5):656- 662.
    [29] 乔旭宁,张婷,杨永菊,牛海鹏,杨德刚.渭干河流域生态系统服务的空间溢出及对居民福祉的影响.资源科学,2017,39(3):533- 544.
    [30] DeClerck F A J,Jones S K,Attwood S,Bossio D,Girvetz E,Chaplin-Kramer B,Enfors E,Fremier A K,Gordon L J,Kizito F,Noriega I L,Matthews N,McCartney M,Meacham M,Noble A,Quintero M,Remans R,Soppe R,Zhang W.Agricultural ecosystems and their services:the vanguard of sustainability?Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability,2016,23:92- 99.
    [31] Tscharntke T,Klein A M,Kruess A,Steffan-Dewenter I,Thies C.Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management.Ecology Letters,2010,8(8):857- 874.
    [32] Wood S A,Karp D S,DeClerck F,Kremen C,Naeem S,Palm C A.Functional traits in agriculture:agrobiodiversity and ecosystem services.Trends in Ecology & Evolution,2015,30(9):531- 539.
    [33] Zhou Z X,Li M T.Spatial-temporal change in urban agricultural land use efficiency from the perspective of agricultural multi-functionality:a case study of the Xi′an metropolitan zone.Journal of Geographical Sciences,2017,27(12):1499- 1520.
    [34] Wu Z L,Li B,Hou Y.Adaptive choice of livelihood patterns in rural households in a farm-pastoral zone:a case study in Jungar,Inner Mongolia.Land Use Policy,2017,62:361- 375.
    [35] 周忠学.城市化背景下农业景观变化对生态服务影响——以西安都市圈为例.干旱区地理,2015,38(5):1004- 1013.
    [36] 王云,周忠学.多功能性的都市农业用地效率评价——以西安市为例.经济地理,2014,34(7):129- 134.
    [37] 宋晓媚,周忠学,王明.城市化过程中都市农业景观变化及其生态安全评价——以西安市为例.冰川冻土,2015,37(3):835- 844.
    [38] 邹月,周忠学.西安市景观格局演变对生态系统服务价值的影响.应用生态学报,2017,28(8):2629- 2639.
    [39] 李梦桃,周忠学.西安市城市景观的正负生态系统服务测算及空间格局.地理学报,2016,71(7):1215- 1230.
    [40] 李琰,李双成,高阳,王羊.连接多层次人类福祉的生态系统服务分类框架.地理学报,2013,68(8):1038- 1047.
    [41] 王富喜,毛爱华,李赫龙,贾明璐.基于熵值法的山东省城镇化质量测度及空间差异分析.地理科学,2013,33(11):1323- 1329.
    [42] 张颖聪.四川省耕地生态服务价值时空变化研究[D].雅安:四川农业大学,2012.
    [43] 张国盛,Chan K Y,Li G D,Heenan D P.长期保护性耕种方式对农田表层土壤性质的影响.生态学报,2008,28(6):2722- 2728.
    [44] 黄高宝,郭清毅,张仁陟,逄蕾,Li G D,Chan K Y,于爱忠.保护性耕作条件下旱地农田麦-豆双序列轮作体系的水分动态及产量效应.生态学报,2006,26(4):1176- 1185.
    [45] 赵亚丽,薛志伟,郭海斌,穆心愿,李潮海.耕作方式与秸秆还田对冬小麦-夏玉米耗水特性和水分利用效率的影响.中国农业科学,2014,47(17):3359- 3371.
    [46] 高懋芳,邱建军,刘三超,刘宏斌,王立刚,逄焕成.基于文献计量的农业面源污染研究发展态势分析.中国农业科学,2014,47(6):1140- 1150.
    [47] 朱淀,张秀玲,牛亮云.蔬菜种植农户施用生物农药意愿研究.中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(4):64- 70.
    [48] 马健.城市化对都市农业生态系统功能的影响研究[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2013.
    [49] 王云.西安都市农业景观演变对生态系统服务的影响研究[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2015.
    [50] Bertram C,Rehdanz K.The role of urban green space for human well-being.Ecological Economics,2015,120:139- 152.
    [51] 刘家根,黄璐,严力蛟.生态系统服务对人类福祉的影响——以浙江省桐庐县为例.生态学报,2018,38(5):1687- 1697.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700