摘要
毛公铁矿采用大结构参数无底柱分段崩落法开采,生产过程中矿石贫损率较高,回收率低于50%。针对此问题,本文借助崩落体形态与放出体形态的匹配关系分析了崩矿步距对矿石回采指标的影响,并通过实验室物理模拟实验,研究了崩矿步距为一排炮孔和崩矿步距为两排炮孔条件下的纯矿石放出量、矿石回收率及混岩率等回采指标,得出崩矿步距为两排炮孔条件下的纯矿石放出量、矿石回收率及混岩率均好于崩矿步距为一排炮孔条件下的纯矿石放出量、矿石回收率及混岩率。本研究对于矿山实际生产有指导意义。
The non-pillar sublevel caving method with large structural parameters used in Mao Gong Iron Mine is of high rate of dilution and loss,and the ore recovery rate is less than 50%.Aiming at this problem,this paper analyzes the influence of the caving step on the mining index by means of the matching relationship between the shape of caved ore body and the drawn-out ore body,then through the physical simulation experiment in laboratory,the mining index such as the volume of pure ore drawing,ore recovery ratio and rock mixing ratio are studied under different caving step.The results show that the mining index under caving step of two row of blasthole is better than that under caving step of one row of blasthole.The research has guided significance for production of the mine.
引文
[1]余健,汪德文.高分段大间距无底柱分段崩落采矿新技术[J].金属矿山,2008(3):26-31.
[2]郭雷,熊靓辉.无底柱分段崩落法现状及发展趋势[J].中国矿山工程,2010,39(6):44-48.
[3]何荣兴,任凤玉,宋德林,等.大结构参数无底柱分段崩落法的发展及技术问题探讨[J].金属矿山,2015(6):1-5.
[4]张国建,翟会超.无底柱分段崩落法放出体、松动体、崩落体三者关系模型[J].中国矿业,2010,19(3):69-71.
[5]张国建,蔡美峰.崩落体形态及其影响研究[J].中国矿业,2003,12(12):38-42.
[6]李文增,任凤玉.弓长岭井下铁矿崩矿步距优化研究[J].中国矿业,2008,17(6):55-57.
[7]任凤玉,袁国强,陈晓云,等.弓长岭井下矿改进采场结构的研究[J].金属矿山,2006(9):86-87.
[8]范庆霞.梅山铁矿采场崩矿步距的探讨[J].金属矿山,2007(9):24-27.
[9]吴荣高,安龙,江学,等.梅山铁矿大结构参数下合理崩矿步距研究[J].金属矿山,2012(5):5-8,12.
[10]王云鹏,余健.无底柱分段崩落法崩矿步距的优化[J].中南大学学报:自然科学版,2014,45(2):603-608.
[11]李彬,许梦国,曹华斌,等.无底柱分段崩落法放矿步距优化数值模拟[J].矿业研究与开发,2012,32(2):5-7.
[12]安龙,徐帅,李元辉,等.基于多方法联合的崩落法崩矿步距优化[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2013,32(4):754-759.
[13]何荣兴,任凤玉,宋德林,等.无底柱分段崩落法崩矿步距优化方法及应用[J].矿业研究与开发,2015,35(8):1-4.
[14]王昌汉.放矿学[M].北京:冶金工业出版社,1982:129-145.