“嵌入性”视角下行业连接与企业竞争能力关系研究——基于“声望”和“权力”的中介效应
|
摘要
文章基于社会网络的"嵌入性"视角,界定了企业网络"声望"和"权力",构建了行业连接、网络位置与企业竞争能力之间关系的理论模型。以我国A股上市公司2008-2012年董事会的"全网络"数据进行实证检验,结果表明:同质性行业连接和异质性行业连接均对企业竞争力具有显著正效应;同质性行业连接正向影响企业网络"声望",异质性行业连接正向影响企业网络"权力";企业网络"声望"和"权力"均对企业竞争能力有显著正向影响,且后者作用更大;同质性行业连接和异质性行业连接作用机制不同,前者通过影响企业网络"声望"来影响竞争能力,后者通过影响企业网络"权力"来影响竞争能力;企业网络"声望"和"权力"在行业连接和企业竞争能力之间具有完全中介作用。
Based on the"embeddedness"perspective of social networks,this paper defines the"prestige"and"power"of cor-porate networks,and constructs the theoretical framework of the relationship between industry connection,network positionand competitiveness. Then the paper makes an empirical analysis by using the"whole boardroom network"data of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2008 to 2012. The results show that: Both homogeneous and heterogeneous industry connectionhave a significant positive influence on corporate competitiveness;The homogeneous industry connection has a positive influ-ence on the"prestige"of corporate networks,whereas the heterogeneous industry connection has a positive influence on the"power"of corporate networks. Both the"prestige"and"power"of corporate networks have a significant positive effect on thecompetitiveness,but the latter has a greater impact;The mechanism of homogeneous and heterogeneous industry connectionis different,the former affects the competitiveness through the"prestige"of corporate networks,whereas the latter affects thecompetitiveness through the"power"of corporate networks;The"prestige"and"power"of corporate networks play a full me-diating role in the relationship between industry connection and corporate competitiveness.
Based on the"embeddedness"perspective of social networks,this paper defines the"prestige"and"power"of cor-porate networks,and constructs the theoretical framework of the relationship between industry connection,network positionand competitiveness. Then the paper makes an empirical analysis by using the"whole boardroom network"data of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2008 to 2012. The results show that: Both homogeneous and heterogeneous industry connectionhave a significant positive influence on corporate competitiveness;The homogeneous industry connection has a positive influ-ence on the"prestige"of corporate networks,whereas the heterogeneous industry connection has a positive influence on the"power"of corporate networks. Both the"prestige"and"power"of corporate networks have a significant positive effect on thecompetitiveness,but the latter has a greater impact;The mechanism of homogeneous and heterogeneous industry connectionis different,the former affects the competitiveness through the"prestige"of corporate networks,whereas the latter affects thecompetitiveness through the"power"of corporate networks;The"prestige"and"power"of corporate networks play a full me-diating role in the relationship between industry connection and corporate competitiveness.
引文
[1]MIZRUCHI M S.What Do Interlocks Do?An Analysis,Critique,and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Di-rectorates[J].Annual Review of Sociology,1996,22(4):271-298.
[2]PENG M W.Institutional Transitions and Strategic Choices[J].Academy of Management Review,2003,28(2):275-296.
[3]SIMONI M,CAIAZZA R.Interlocking Directorates’Effectson Economic System’s Competitiveness[J].Business Strate-gy Series,2013,14(1):30-35.
[4]CAMPELLO M,GIAMBONA E,GRAHAM J R,et al.Li-quidity Management and Corporate Investment during a Fi-nancial Crisis[J].Review of Financial Studies,2011,24(6):1944-1979.
[5]GRANOVETTER M.Economic Action and Social Structure:The Problem of Embeddedness[J].American Journal of So-ciology,1985,91(3):481-510.
[6]POLANYI K.The Great Transformation:The Political andEconomic Origins of Our Time[M].Boston:Beacon Press,1944:10-16.
[7]郑方.治理与战略的双重嵌入性——基于连锁董事网络的研究[J].中国工业经济,2011(9):108-118
[8]朱丽,柳卸林,宋继文.网络反思下的管理学研究及前沿热点[J].管理世界,2016(10):184-185.
[9]尉建文,赵延东.权力还是声望?——社会资本测量的争论与验证[J].社会学研究,2011(3):64-83.
[10]FALATO A,KADYRZHANOVA D,LEL U.DistractedDirectors:Does Board Busyness Hurt Shareholder Value?[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2014,113(3):404-426.
[11]林南.社会资本——关于社会结构与行动的理论[M].张磊,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2005:83-86.
[12]BURT R.Structural Holes:The Social Structure of Compe-tition[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1992:92-165.
[13]DUNBAR R I M.Neocortex Size as a Constraint on GroupSize in Primates[J].Journal of Human Evolution,1992,22(6):469-493.
[14]金彧昉,张祥建,徐晋.连锁董事网络竞争场的微观结构与动态极化效应[J].经济管理,2016(12):62-73.
[15]HARGADON A,SUTTON R I.Technology Brokeringand Innovation in a Product Development Firm[J].Admin-istrative Science Quarterly,1997,42(2):716-749.
[16]朱丽,柳卸林,刘超,等.高管社会资本、企业网络位置和创新能力——“声望”和“权力”的中介[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(6):94-109.
[17]曾德明,邹思明,张运生.网络位置、技术多元化与企业在技术标准制定中的影响力研究[J].管理学报,2015,12(2):198-206.
[18]马连福,张琦,王丽丽.董事会网络位置与企业技术创新投入——基于技术密集型上市公司的研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37(4):126-136.
[19]KOKA B R,PRESCOTT J E.Designing Alliance Net-works:The Influence of Network Position,EnvironmentalChange,and Strategy on Firm Performance[J].StrategicManagement Journal,2008,29(6):639-661.
[20]DEUTSCH Y,KEIL T,LAAMANEN T.A Dual AgencyView of Board Compensation:The Joint Effects of OutsideDirector and CEO Stock Options on Firm Risk[J].Strate-gic Management Journal,2011,32(6):212-227.
[21]范群林,邵云飞,唐小我,等.结构嵌入性对集群企业创新绩效影响的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2010,28(12):1891-1900.
[22]任胜钢,彭宇柯,赵天宇.关系社会资本的交互效应对新创企业发展绩效影响的纵向案例研究[J].管理学报,2015,12(10):1429-1435.
[23]郭毅,朱熹.企业家的社会资本——对企业家研究的深化[J].外国经济与管理,2002(1):13-39.
[24]刘东.企业网络论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003:22-30.
[25]TSAI W,GHOSHAL S.Social Capital and Value Creation:the Role of Intrafirm Networks[J].Academy of Manage-ment Journal,1998,41(4):464-476.
[26]边燕杰,李煜.中国城市家庭的社会网络资本[J].清华社会学评论,2000(2):1-18.
[27]张祥建,郭岚.国外连锁董事网络研究述评与未来展望[J].外国经济与管理,2014,36(5):69-79.
[28]FREEMAN L C.Centrality in Social Networks ConceptualClarification[J].Social Network,1979,1(3):215-239.
[29]赵炎,郭霞婉.结构洞度对联盟网络中企业创新绩效的影响研究——基于中国家用视听设备制造业企业联盟网络[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(17):76-81.
[30]刘军.整体网分析——UCINET软件使用指南[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2016:243-247.
[31]张方华.网络嵌入影响企业创新绩效的概念模型与实证分析[J].中国工业经济,2010(4):110-119.
[2]PENG M W.Institutional Transitions and Strategic Choices[J].Academy of Management Review,2003,28(2):275-296.
[3]SIMONI M,CAIAZZA R.Interlocking Directorates’Effectson Economic System’s Competitiveness[J].Business Strate-gy Series,2013,14(1):30-35.
[4]CAMPELLO M,GIAMBONA E,GRAHAM J R,et al.Li-quidity Management and Corporate Investment during a Fi-nancial Crisis[J].Review of Financial Studies,2011,24(6):1944-1979.
[5]GRANOVETTER M.Economic Action and Social Structure:The Problem of Embeddedness[J].American Journal of So-ciology,1985,91(3):481-510.
[6]POLANYI K.The Great Transformation:The Political andEconomic Origins of Our Time[M].Boston:Beacon Press,1944:10-16.
[7]郑方.治理与战略的双重嵌入性——基于连锁董事网络的研究[J].中国工业经济,2011(9):108-118
[8]朱丽,柳卸林,宋继文.网络反思下的管理学研究及前沿热点[J].管理世界,2016(10):184-185.
[9]尉建文,赵延东.权力还是声望?——社会资本测量的争论与验证[J].社会学研究,2011(3):64-83.
[10]FALATO A,KADYRZHANOVA D,LEL U.DistractedDirectors:Does Board Busyness Hurt Shareholder Value?[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2014,113(3):404-426.
[11]林南.社会资本——关于社会结构与行动的理论[M].张磊,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2005:83-86.
[12]BURT R.Structural Holes:The Social Structure of Compe-tition[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1992:92-165.
[13]DUNBAR R I M.Neocortex Size as a Constraint on GroupSize in Primates[J].Journal of Human Evolution,1992,22(6):469-493.
[14]金彧昉,张祥建,徐晋.连锁董事网络竞争场的微观结构与动态极化效应[J].经济管理,2016(12):62-73.
[15]HARGADON A,SUTTON R I.Technology Brokeringand Innovation in a Product Development Firm[J].Admin-istrative Science Quarterly,1997,42(2):716-749.
[16]朱丽,柳卸林,刘超,等.高管社会资本、企业网络位置和创新能力——“声望”和“权力”的中介[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2017,38(6):94-109.
[17]曾德明,邹思明,张运生.网络位置、技术多元化与企业在技术标准制定中的影响力研究[J].管理学报,2015,12(2):198-206.
[18]马连福,张琦,王丽丽.董事会网络位置与企业技术创新投入——基于技术密集型上市公司的研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37(4):126-136.
[19]KOKA B R,PRESCOTT J E.Designing Alliance Net-works:The Influence of Network Position,EnvironmentalChange,and Strategy on Firm Performance[J].StrategicManagement Journal,2008,29(6):639-661.
[20]DEUTSCH Y,KEIL T,LAAMANEN T.A Dual AgencyView of Board Compensation:The Joint Effects of OutsideDirector and CEO Stock Options on Firm Risk[J].Strate-gic Management Journal,2011,32(6):212-227.
[21]范群林,邵云飞,唐小我,等.结构嵌入性对集群企业创新绩效影响的实证研究[J].科学学研究,2010,28(12):1891-1900.
[22]任胜钢,彭宇柯,赵天宇.关系社会资本的交互效应对新创企业发展绩效影响的纵向案例研究[J].管理学报,2015,12(10):1429-1435.
[23]郭毅,朱熹.企业家的社会资本——对企业家研究的深化[J].外国经济与管理,2002(1):13-39.
[24]刘东.企业网络论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003:22-30.
[25]TSAI W,GHOSHAL S.Social Capital and Value Creation:the Role of Intrafirm Networks[J].Academy of Manage-ment Journal,1998,41(4):464-476.
[26]边燕杰,李煜.中国城市家庭的社会网络资本[J].清华社会学评论,2000(2):1-18.
[27]张祥建,郭岚.国外连锁董事网络研究述评与未来展望[J].外国经济与管理,2014,36(5):69-79.
[28]FREEMAN L C.Centrality in Social Networks ConceptualClarification[J].Social Network,1979,1(3):215-239.
[29]赵炎,郭霞婉.结构洞度对联盟网络中企业创新绩效的影响研究——基于中国家用视听设备制造业企业联盟网络[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29(17):76-81.
[30]刘军.整体网分析——UCINET软件使用指南[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2016:243-247.
[31]张方华.网络嵌入影响企业创新绩效的概念模型与实证分析[J].中国工业经济,2010(4):110-119.