用户名: 密码: 验证码:
SH灰土和糯米浆灰土材料物理力学性质对比
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comparison between the physical and mechanical properties of SH and sticky rice lime-soil materials
  • 作者:谌文武 ; 张起勇 ; 张帅 ; 崔凯 ; 杨朋朋 ; 张克文
  • 英文作者:Chen Wen-wu;Zhang Qi-yong;Zhang Shuai;Cui Kai;Yang Peng-peng;Zhang Ke-wen;Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Disasters and Environment in Western China with the Ministry of Education, School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Lanzhou University;Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation in Civil Engineering of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University of Technology;
  • 关键词:SH灰土 ; 糯米浆灰土 ; 物理性质 ; 力学性质
  • 英文关键词:SH lime-soil;;sticky rice lime-soil;;physical property;;mechanical property
  • 中文刊名:LDZK
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Lanzhou University(Natural Sciences)
  • 机构:兰州大学土木工程与力学学院西部灾害与环境力学教育部重点实验室;兰州理工大学甘肃省土木工程防灾减灾重点实验室;
  • 出版日期:2017-12-15
  • 出版单位:兰州大学学报(自然科学版)
  • 年:2017
  • 期:v.53;No.234
  • 基金:国家科技支撑计划项目(2014BAK16B02)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:LDZK201706008
  • 页数:6
  • CN:06
  • ISSN:62-1075/N
  • 分类号:58-63
摘要
通过研究SH灰土和糯米浆灰土两种加固材料保护土遗址.通过对比分析灰土保水性、吸水性和收缩性对灰土物理性质,无侧限抗压强度、纵波波速、青砖-灰土黏结强度和抗剪强度对灰土力学性质,研究干湿冻融循环对灰土物理力学性质的影响,针对拜寺口塔林62座塔基修复选择最适灰土.
        Two reinforcement materials, SH mortar and sticky-rice mortar, were studied to protect earthen ruins. The physical properties of lime-soils including water-retaining property,absorbency and contractility were analyzed and compared. Compared were the mechanical properties of lime-soils such as unconfined compressive strength, longitudinal wave velocity, boning strength of blue-brick and lime-soils and shear strength. Dry-wet and freezing-thawing cycle has an impact on the physical and mechanical properties of the lime-soils. The best mortar was chosen for repairing 62 column bases in Baisikou pagoda forest.
引文
[1]孙满利,王旭东,李最雄.西北地区土遗址病害[J].兰州大学学报:自然科学版,2010,47(6):41-45.
    [2]谌文武,吕海敏,崔凯,等.氯盐和硫酸盐对遗址土体颗粒级配和界限含水率影响的对比[J].兰州大学学报:自然科学版,2015,51(3):334-338.
    [3]冉津江,季明霞,黄建平,等.中国北方干旱区和半干旱区近60年气候变化特征及成因分析[J].兰州大学学报:自然科学版,2014,50(1):46-53.
    [4]杨富巍,张秉坚,潘昌初,等.以糯米灰浆为代表的传统灰浆:中国古代的重大发明之一[J].中国科学E辑:技术科学,2009,39(1):1-7.
    [5]杨富巍,张秉坚,曾余瑶,等.传统糯米灰浆科学原理及其现代应用的探索性研究[J].故宫博物院院刊,2008(5):105-114.
    [6]Yang Fu-wei,Zhang Bing-jian,Ma Qing-lin.Study of sticky rice-lime mortar technology for the restoration of historical masonry construction[J].Accounts of Chemical Research,2010,43(6):936-944.
    [7]Zeng Yu-yao.A case study and mechanism investigation of typical mortars used on ancient architecture in China[J].Thermochimica Acta,2008,473:1-6.
    [8]彭红涛,张琪,李乃胜,等.糯米浆对土遗址修复用三合土性能的影响[J].建筑材料学报,2011,14(5):718-722.
    [9]纪晓佳,宋茂强,庞苗.糯米浆三合土的物理力学性能试验研究[J].建筑技术,2013,44(6):540-543.
    [10]魏国锋,张秉坚,方世强.添加剂对传统糯米灰浆性能的影响及其机理[J].土木建筑与环境工程,2011,33(5):143-149.
    [11]王银梅,韩文峰,湛文武,等.新型高分子固化材料耐老化性能的试验研究[J].工程地质学报,2004,12(3):318-322.
    [12]王银梅,湛文武.新型化学固沙材料性能的试验研究[J].水土保持通报,2007,27(1):108-111,116.
    [13]王银梅,湛文武,韩文峰.SH固沙机理的微观探讨[J].岩土力学,2005,26(4):650-654.
    [14]王银梅,韩文峰,谌文武.新型高分子材料固沙抗冻性能试验研究[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2006,17(4):145-148.
    [15]王银梅,孙冠平,谌文武,等.SH固沙剂固化沙体的强度特征[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(增2):2883-2887.
    [16]李敏,柴寿喜,杜红普,等.SH抑尘剂固化建设场地类型土的抗风蚀性能[J].水土保持通报,2016,36(2):185-190.
    [17]李敏,柴寿喜,杜红普,等.SH抑尘剂固化建设场地类型土的抗雨蚀性能[J].环境工程学报,2016,10(6):3105-3110.
    [18]Li Min,Chai Shou-xi,Du Hong-pu,et al.Feasibility of reinforced saline soil with treated wheat straw and lime[J].Soil and Foundaitons,2012,52(2):231-241.
    [19]谌文武,郭志谦,徐彦荣,等.基于SH加固材料的土遗址夯土试样室内滴渗试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2015,37(8):1517-1523.
    [20]邵东桥.香妃墓琉璃砖破坏机理及防治方法研究[D].兰州:长州大学土木工程与力学学院,2013:57-66.
    [21]刘强,刘勋,裴重华,等.糯米浆对仿生碳酸钙形貌的影响[J].人工晶体学报,2014,43(2):443-449.
    [22]叶玮,Yabuki S,Kanayama S.中国西风区黄土常量元素地球化学行为与古环境[J].干旱区地理,2003,26(1):23-29.
    [23]汪兰,程薇,乔宇,等.冻融循环处理对淀粉凝胶结构和性质的影响[J].食品科技,2010,35(2):177-182.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700