云南植烟土壤肥力状况的组合评价法研究
|
摘要
【目的】为建立更加科学、综合的植烟土壤评价方法,【方法】以江苏中烟云南12个基地单元的土壤样本为研究对象,采用单一与组合评价模型对其肥力状况进行评价,并结合组合评价的事前事后检验,最终筛选出最优的组合评价方法。【结果】结果表明:(1)不同烟区土壤肥力状况指标的差异规律不同,尤其是隶属度法、主成分分析法以及灰色关联度法的评价结果规律各异;(2)组合前不同方法得分排序的标准差最大值为1.53,组合后排序的标准差最大值为1.4。3种方法组合后得分最高和最低的烟区均为烟区8和烟区12,较组合前更加一致;(3)7种评价方法的Spearman系数分别为平均值组合法(0.92)、Copeland组合法(0.91)、 Borda组合法(0.88)、模糊Borda法(0.86)、灰色关联度法(0.85)、隶属度函数法(0.77)、主成分分析法(0.68),组合后的评价结果普遍好于单一评价结果;(4)平均值组合法的tk值为7.42,评价结果表现最优。【结论】组合评价法集合单一评价得分排序结果,代表性、可靠性更高,适合于云南不同烟区植烟土壤肥力状况的综合评价。
To realize more scientific and comprehensive evaluation of the fertility status of tobacco growing soil, samples were collected as research objects from 12 base units of China Tobacco Jiangsu Industrial Co., Ltd. These soil samples were analyzed by single and combination evaluation models. Combined with pre-and post-test of combinatorial evaluation, the optimal combinatorial evaluation method was selected. Results showed that:(1) Soil fertility indices vary between different tobacco-growing areas, especially for results obtained by membership degree, principal component analysis and grey correlation degree method.(2) The maximum standard deviation of ranking result of different methods before combination was 1.53, and the value after combination was 1.4. The tobacco growing areas with the highest and lowest value were consistently area 8 and 12 after combination of 3 different methods.(3) The Spearman coefficients of 7 evaluation methods were: mean value combined method(0.92), Copeland combined method(0.91), Borda combined method(0.88),fuzzy Borda combined method(0.86), grey correlation method(0.85), fuzzy mathematics membership function model method(0.77),and principal component analysis method(0.68). The evaluation results of combination evaluation methods were generally better than the results of single ones.(4) The tk value of mean value combination method was 7.42, can be considered the optimal combination method.The combination evaluation methods integrated with score and ranking results of single evaluation method is more representative and reliable, which was suitable for comprehensive evaluation of fertility status of tobacco growing soil from different areas in Yunnan.
To realize more scientific and comprehensive evaluation of the fertility status of tobacco growing soil, samples were collected as research objects from 12 base units of China Tobacco Jiangsu Industrial Co., Ltd. These soil samples were analyzed by single and combination evaluation models. Combined with pre-and post-test of combinatorial evaluation, the optimal combinatorial evaluation method was selected. Results showed that:(1) Soil fertility indices vary between different tobacco-growing areas, especially for results obtained by membership degree, principal component analysis and grey correlation degree method.(2) The maximum standard deviation of ranking result of different methods before combination was 1.53, and the value after combination was 1.4. The tobacco growing areas with the highest and lowest value were consistently area 8 and 12 after combination of 3 different methods.(3) The Spearman coefficients of 7 evaluation methods were: mean value combined method(0.92), Copeland combined method(0.91), Borda combined method(0.88),fuzzy Borda combined method(0.86), grey correlation method(0.85), fuzzy mathematics membership function model method(0.77),and principal component analysis method(0.68). The evaluation results of combination evaluation methods were generally better than the results of single ones.(4) The tk value of mean value combination method was 7.42, can be considered the optimal combination method.The combination evaluation methods integrated with score and ranking results of single evaluation method is more representative and reliable, which was suitable for comprehensive evaluation of fertility status of tobacco growing soil from different areas in Yunnan.
引文
[1]贺升华,任炜.烤烟气象[M].昆明:云南科技出版社,2001:172-184.HESH,REN W.Meteorologyofflue-curedtobacco[M].Kumming:Yunnan Scientific Publishing Press, 2001:172-184.
[2]中国农业科学院烟草研究所.中国烟草栽培学[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2005:43-44.TOBACCO RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF AGRICULTURALSCIENCES, Tobaccocultivationin China[M]. Shanghai:Shanghai Science and Technology Press,2005:43-44.
[3]王树会,邵岩,邓云龙,等.云南植烟土壤主要养分特征及在生产上的对策[J].云南农业大学学报,2005(20):690-694.WANG Shuhui, SHAO Yan, DENG Yunlong, et al. Analysis on the soil nutrition and the strategy on the planting in Yunnan province[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University, 2005, 20:690-694.
[4]王树会,邵岩,李天福,等.云南12地州植烟土壤养分状况与施肥对策[J].土壤通报,2006(37):684-687.WANG Shuhui, SHAO Yan, LI Tianfu, et al. Analysis on soil nutrition and fertilizer strategy in 12 regions of Yunnan Province[J].Chinses Journal of Soil Science, 2006, 37:684-687.
[5]黄俊杰,李世琛,杨德海,等.大理红塔植烟基地土壤肥力综合评价[J].云南农业大学学报,2017(1):125-133.HUANG Junjie, LI Shichen, YANG Dehai, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of Soil Fertility in Hongta Tobacco Planting Base in Dali[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University, 2017(1):125-133.
[6]何元胜,杨美仙,亚平,等.临沧烟区土壤肥力综合评价[J].中国烟草科学,2014(3):23-26.HE Yuansheng, YANG Meixian, YA Ping, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on soil fertility in Lincang tobacco-growing areas[J].Chinese Tobacco Science, 2014(3):23-26.
[7]宋苏苏,黄林,陈勇.基于粗糙集的土壤肥力组合评价研究[J].农机化研究,2011(12):10-13.SONG Susu, HUANG Lin, CHEN Yong. Study on soil fetility combinationevaluationbasedonroughset[J].Journalof Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2011(12):10-13.
[8]郑立臣,宇万太,马强,等.农田土壤肥力综合评价研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2004(5):156-161.ZHENG Lichen, YU Wantai, Ma Qiang, et al. Advance in the integrated evaluation of farmland fertility[J]. Chinses Journal of Ecology, 2004(5):156-161.
[9]骆东奇,白洁,谢德体.论土壤肥力评价指标和方法[J].土壤与环境,2002(2):202-205.LUO Dongqi, BAI Jie, XIE Deti. Research on evaluation norm and method of soil fertility[J]. Soil and Environmental Sciences, 2002(2):202-205.
[10]颜雄,张杨珠,刘晶.土壤肥力质量评价的研究进展[J].湖南农业科学,2008(5):82-85.YAN Xiong, ZHANG Yangzhu, LIU Jing. Advance in quality evaluation of soil fertility[J]. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2008(5):82-85.
[11]胡钟胜,周兴华,招启柏,等.典型烤烟产区气候指标的组合评价法[J].烟草科技,2013(6):82-85.HU Zhongsheng, ZHOU Xinghua, ZHAO Qibai, et al. Combined evaluation methods for climatic indexes at typical flue-cured tobacco growing Areas[J]. Tobacco Science&Technology, 2013(6):82-85.
[12]郭显光.一种新的综合评价方法——组合评价法[J].统计研究,1995(5):56-59.GUO Xianguang. A new comprehensive evaluation method—combinatorial evaluation method[J]. Statistical Research, 1995, 5:56-59.
[13]曾宪报.关于组合评价法的事前事后检验[J].统计研究,1997(6):56-58.ZENG Xianbao. Test before and after the combinatorial evaluation method[J]. Statistical Research, 1997, 6:56-58.
[14]黄成江,张晓海,李天福,等.植烟土壤理化性状的适宜性研究进展[J].中国农业科技导报,2007(1):42-46.HUANG Chengjiang, ZHANG Xiaohai, LI Tianfu, et al. Advance on adaptability of soil physical and chemical properties in tobacco[J]. Review of China Agricultural Science and Technology,2007, 1:42-46.
[15]李梅,张学雷.基于GIS的农田土壤肥力评价及其与土体构型的关系[J].应用生态学报,2011(1):129-136.LI Mei, ZHANG Xuelei. GIS-based evaluation of farmland soil fertility and its relationships with soil profile configuration pattern[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 1:129-136.
[16]鲍士旦.土壤农业化学分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:64.BAO S T. Chemical analysis of soil agriculture[M]. Beijing:China Agriculture Press, 2000:64.
[17]崔超岗,周冀衡,李强,等.陆良县植烟土壤类型与土壤肥力的灰色关联度分析[J].西南农业学报,2016(5):1172-1176.CUI Chaogang, ZHOU Jiheng, LI Qiang, et al. Grey relational analysis of soil fertility and tobacco planting soil types in Luliang county[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016,5:1172-1176.
[18]朱杰,赵会纳,郭燕,等.河南烟区植烟土壤养分状况综合评价[J].郑州轻工业学院学报,2009(1):22-26.ZHU Jie, ZHAO Huina, GUO Yan, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the status of soil fertility in tobacco growing areas of Henan province[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University of Light Industry,2009, 1:22-26.
[19]骆伯胜,钟继洪,陈俊坚.土壤肥力数值化综合评价研究[J].土壤,2004(1):104-106.LUO Bosheng, ZHONG Jihong, CHEN Junjian. Integrated digitization evaluation on soil fertility[J]. Soils, 2004, 1:104-106.
[20]黎妍妍,许自成,肖汉乾,等.湖南省主要植烟区土壤肥力状况综合评价[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2006(11):179-183.LI Yanyan, XU Zicheng, XIAO Hanqian, et al. The comprehensive evaluation of soil fertility status for tobacco growing areas in Hunan province[J]. Journal of Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry, 2006, 11:179-183.
[21]李丹丹,毕庆文,许自成,等.湖北宣恩烟区土壤养分状况综合评价[J].郑州轻工业学院学报,2007(5):33-36.LI Dandan, BI Qingwen, XU Zicheng, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the status of soil fertility in Xuanen tobacco growing areas of Hubei province[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, 2007, 5:33-36.
[22]李卫,周冀衡,张一扬,等.云南曲靖烟区土壤肥力状况综合评价[J].中国烟草学报,2010(2):61-65.LI Wei, ZHOU Jiheng, ZHANG Yiyang, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of tobacco soil fertility status in Yunnan′s Qunjing area[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2010, 2:61-65.
[23]王育军,周冀衡,孙书斌,等.云南省罗平县烟区土壤肥力适宜性评价及养分时空变异特征[J].土壤,2015(3):515-523.WANG Yujun, ZHOU Jiheng, SUI Shubin, et al. Evaluation of soil fertility suitability and spatial/temporal variability of nurtrient contents of tobacco-planting soils in Luoping county of Yunnan,China[J]. Soils, 2015, 3:515-523.
[24]邱学礼,高福宏,李忠环,等.昆明市植烟土壤肥力状况评价[J].中国土壤与肥料,2012(5):11-16.QIU Xueli, GAO Fuhong, LI Zhonghuan, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of soil fertility status for tobacco growing soils on Kunming[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2012, 5:11-16.
[25]胡雪琼,王树会,邓建华,等.云南省与津巴布韦烤烟种植气候相似性的精细分析[J].中国农业气象,2011(2):262-266.HU Xueqiong, WANG Shuhui, DENG Jianhua, et al. Fine analysis of climatic similarity for fire cured tobacco cropping between Yunnan and Zinbabwe[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology,2011, 2:262-266.
[26]邓聚龙.灰色系统方法[M].武汉:华中理工大学出版社,1988:56-88.DENG J L. Grey system method[M]. Wuhan:Huazhong University of Technology Press, 1988:56-88.
[27]招启柏,陈晶波,魏建荣,等.组合评价法在烟叶化学质量综合评价中的应用研究[J].中国烟草学报,2013(19):1-6.ZHAO Qibai, CHEN Jingbo, WEI Jianrong, et al. Application of combinatorial evaluation method in comprehensive evaluation of leaf tobacco chemical quality[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2013, 19:1-6.
[28]胡国松,郑伟,王震东.烤烟营养原理[M].北京:科学出版社,2000:57-61.HU G S, ZHENG W, WANG Z D. Nutrition principle of flue-cured tobacco[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2000:57-61.
[29]窦逢科,张景略.烟草品质与土壤肥料[M].郑州:河南科学技术出版社,1992:60-98.DOU F K, ZHANG J L. Tobacco quality and soil fertilizer[M].Zhengzhou:Henan Science and Technology Press, 1992:60-98.
[30]曹志洪.优质烤烟生产的土壤与施肥[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1991:76-89.CAO H Z. Soil and fertilization for high quality flue-cured tobacco production[M]. Nanjing:Jiangsu Science and Technology Press,1991:76-89.
[31]李念胜,王树声.土壤pH值与烤烟质量[J].中国烟草科学,1986(2):12-14.LI Niansheng, WANG Shusheng. Soil pH value and flue-cured tobacco quality[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 1986, 2:12-14.
[32]宋承鉴,宋月家,周恩肖,等.广西植烟土壤特征分析[J].中国烟草科学,1994(2):5-9.SONG Chengjian, SONG Yuejia, ZHOU Enxiao, et al. Analysis of soil characters for tobacco in Guangxi[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science,1994, 2:5-9.
[2]中国农业科学院烟草研究所.中国烟草栽培学[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2005:43-44.TOBACCO RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF AGRICULTURALSCIENCES, Tobaccocultivationin China[M]. Shanghai:Shanghai Science and Technology Press,2005:43-44.
[3]王树会,邵岩,邓云龙,等.云南植烟土壤主要养分特征及在生产上的对策[J].云南农业大学学报,2005(20):690-694.WANG Shuhui, SHAO Yan, DENG Yunlong, et al. Analysis on the soil nutrition and the strategy on the planting in Yunnan province[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University, 2005, 20:690-694.
[4]王树会,邵岩,李天福,等.云南12地州植烟土壤养分状况与施肥对策[J].土壤通报,2006(37):684-687.WANG Shuhui, SHAO Yan, LI Tianfu, et al. Analysis on soil nutrition and fertilizer strategy in 12 regions of Yunnan Province[J].Chinses Journal of Soil Science, 2006, 37:684-687.
[5]黄俊杰,李世琛,杨德海,等.大理红塔植烟基地土壤肥力综合评价[J].云南农业大学学报,2017(1):125-133.HUANG Junjie, LI Shichen, YANG Dehai, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of Soil Fertility in Hongta Tobacco Planting Base in Dali[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University, 2017(1):125-133.
[6]何元胜,杨美仙,亚平,等.临沧烟区土壤肥力综合评价[J].中国烟草科学,2014(3):23-26.HE Yuansheng, YANG Meixian, YA Ping, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on soil fertility in Lincang tobacco-growing areas[J].Chinese Tobacco Science, 2014(3):23-26.
[7]宋苏苏,黄林,陈勇.基于粗糙集的土壤肥力组合评价研究[J].农机化研究,2011(12):10-13.SONG Susu, HUANG Lin, CHEN Yong. Study on soil fetility combinationevaluationbasedonroughset[J].Journalof Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2011(12):10-13.
[8]郑立臣,宇万太,马强,等.农田土壤肥力综合评价研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2004(5):156-161.ZHENG Lichen, YU Wantai, Ma Qiang, et al. Advance in the integrated evaluation of farmland fertility[J]. Chinses Journal of Ecology, 2004(5):156-161.
[9]骆东奇,白洁,谢德体.论土壤肥力评价指标和方法[J].土壤与环境,2002(2):202-205.LUO Dongqi, BAI Jie, XIE Deti. Research on evaluation norm and method of soil fertility[J]. Soil and Environmental Sciences, 2002(2):202-205.
[10]颜雄,张杨珠,刘晶.土壤肥力质量评价的研究进展[J].湖南农业科学,2008(5):82-85.YAN Xiong, ZHANG Yangzhu, LIU Jing. Advance in quality evaluation of soil fertility[J]. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2008(5):82-85.
[11]胡钟胜,周兴华,招启柏,等.典型烤烟产区气候指标的组合评价法[J].烟草科技,2013(6):82-85.HU Zhongsheng, ZHOU Xinghua, ZHAO Qibai, et al. Combined evaluation methods for climatic indexes at typical flue-cured tobacco growing Areas[J]. Tobacco Science&Technology, 2013(6):82-85.
[12]郭显光.一种新的综合评价方法——组合评价法[J].统计研究,1995(5):56-59.GUO Xianguang. A new comprehensive evaluation method—combinatorial evaluation method[J]. Statistical Research, 1995, 5:56-59.
[13]曾宪报.关于组合评价法的事前事后检验[J].统计研究,1997(6):56-58.ZENG Xianbao. Test before and after the combinatorial evaluation method[J]. Statistical Research, 1997, 6:56-58.
[14]黄成江,张晓海,李天福,等.植烟土壤理化性状的适宜性研究进展[J].中国农业科技导报,2007(1):42-46.HUANG Chengjiang, ZHANG Xiaohai, LI Tianfu, et al. Advance on adaptability of soil physical and chemical properties in tobacco[J]. Review of China Agricultural Science and Technology,2007, 1:42-46.
[15]李梅,张学雷.基于GIS的农田土壤肥力评价及其与土体构型的关系[J].应用生态学报,2011(1):129-136.LI Mei, ZHANG Xuelei. GIS-based evaluation of farmland soil fertility and its relationships with soil profile configuration pattern[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 1:129-136.
[16]鲍士旦.土壤农业化学分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:64.BAO S T. Chemical analysis of soil agriculture[M]. Beijing:China Agriculture Press, 2000:64.
[17]崔超岗,周冀衡,李强,等.陆良县植烟土壤类型与土壤肥力的灰色关联度分析[J].西南农业学报,2016(5):1172-1176.CUI Chaogang, ZHOU Jiheng, LI Qiang, et al. Grey relational analysis of soil fertility and tobacco planting soil types in Luliang county[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016,5:1172-1176.
[18]朱杰,赵会纳,郭燕,等.河南烟区植烟土壤养分状况综合评价[J].郑州轻工业学院学报,2009(1):22-26.ZHU Jie, ZHAO Huina, GUO Yan, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the status of soil fertility in tobacco growing areas of Henan province[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University of Light Industry,2009, 1:22-26.
[19]骆伯胜,钟继洪,陈俊坚.土壤肥力数值化综合评价研究[J].土壤,2004(1):104-106.LUO Bosheng, ZHONG Jihong, CHEN Junjian. Integrated digitization evaluation on soil fertility[J]. Soils, 2004, 1:104-106.
[20]黎妍妍,许自成,肖汉乾,等.湖南省主要植烟区土壤肥力状况综合评价[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2006(11):179-183.LI Yanyan, XU Zicheng, XIAO Hanqian, et al. The comprehensive evaluation of soil fertility status for tobacco growing areas in Hunan province[J]. Journal of Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry, 2006, 11:179-183.
[21]李丹丹,毕庆文,许自成,等.湖北宣恩烟区土壤养分状况综合评价[J].郑州轻工业学院学报,2007(5):33-36.LI Dandan, BI Qingwen, XU Zicheng, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the status of soil fertility in Xuanen tobacco growing areas of Hubei province[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, 2007, 5:33-36.
[22]李卫,周冀衡,张一扬,等.云南曲靖烟区土壤肥力状况综合评价[J].中国烟草学报,2010(2):61-65.LI Wei, ZHOU Jiheng, ZHANG Yiyang, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of tobacco soil fertility status in Yunnan′s Qunjing area[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2010, 2:61-65.
[23]王育军,周冀衡,孙书斌,等.云南省罗平县烟区土壤肥力适宜性评价及养分时空变异特征[J].土壤,2015(3):515-523.WANG Yujun, ZHOU Jiheng, SUI Shubin, et al. Evaluation of soil fertility suitability and spatial/temporal variability of nurtrient contents of tobacco-planting soils in Luoping county of Yunnan,China[J]. Soils, 2015, 3:515-523.
[24]邱学礼,高福宏,李忠环,等.昆明市植烟土壤肥力状况评价[J].中国土壤与肥料,2012(5):11-16.QIU Xueli, GAO Fuhong, LI Zhonghuan, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of soil fertility status for tobacco growing soils on Kunming[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2012, 5:11-16.
[25]胡雪琼,王树会,邓建华,等.云南省与津巴布韦烤烟种植气候相似性的精细分析[J].中国农业气象,2011(2):262-266.HU Xueqiong, WANG Shuhui, DENG Jianhua, et al. Fine analysis of climatic similarity for fire cured tobacco cropping between Yunnan and Zinbabwe[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology,2011, 2:262-266.
[26]邓聚龙.灰色系统方法[M].武汉:华中理工大学出版社,1988:56-88.DENG J L. Grey system method[M]. Wuhan:Huazhong University of Technology Press, 1988:56-88.
[27]招启柏,陈晶波,魏建荣,等.组合评价法在烟叶化学质量综合评价中的应用研究[J].中国烟草学报,2013(19):1-6.ZHAO Qibai, CHEN Jingbo, WEI Jianrong, et al. Application of combinatorial evaluation method in comprehensive evaluation of leaf tobacco chemical quality[J]. Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 2013, 19:1-6.
[28]胡国松,郑伟,王震东.烤烟营养原理[M].北京:科学出版社,2000:57-61.HU G S, ZHENG W, WANG Z D. Nutrition principle of flue-cured tobacco[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2000:57-61.
[29]窦逢科,张景略.烟草品质与土壤肥料[M].郑州:河南科学技术出版社,1992:60-98.DOU F K, ZHANG J L. Tobacco quality and soil fertilizer[M].Zhengzhou:Henan Science and Technology Press, 1992:60-98.
[30]曹志洪.优质烤烟生产的土壤与施肥[M].南京:江苏科学技术出版社,1991:76-89.CAO H Z. Soil and fertilization for high quality flue-cured tobacco production[M]. Nanjing:Jiangsu Science and Technology Press,1991:76-89.
[31]李念胜,王树声.土壤pH值与烤烟质量[J].中国烟草科学,1986(2):12-14.LI Niansheng, WANG Shusheng. Soil pH value and flue-cured tobacco quality[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science, 1986, 2:12-14.
[32]宋承鉴,宋月家,周恩肖,等.广西植烟土壤特征分析[J].中国烟草科学,1994(2):5-9.SONG Chengjian, SONG Yuejia, ZHOU Enxiao, et al. Analysis of soil characters for tobacco in Guangxi[J]. Chinese Tobacco Science,1994, 2:5-9.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |