能动司法语境下执行和解的路径探索
|
摘要
作为解决民事"执行难"的重要方式,执行和解被寄予了诸多理想价值。然而,执行和解的实践效果却远未实现立法者的期待。之所以出现这种困境,除执行和解协议天然地具有不确定风险性和被执行人诚信意识的缺失外,更为主要的原因是法院能动性发挥的不适当与不充分。将能动司法的理念引入执行和解具有现实的合理性与必要性。这就要求法院在执行和解中的能动作为既不能缺位也不能过线,如此执行和解才能真正发挥其应有的作用。
As an important way to solve the problem of civil "difficulty in execution", conciliation of execution has been placed in many ideal values. However, the implementation of the practical effect of reconciliation is far from achieving the expectations of legislators. In addition to the uncertainty risk and the lack of the good faith consciousness of the party, the main reason for this dilemma is the improper and insufficient exertion of the court's initiative. It is reasonable and necessary to introduce the concept of active justice into the implementation of conciliation. This requires the court in the implementation of reconciliation can not be absent and can not cross the line, so that the implementation of reconciliation can really play its due role.
As an important way to solve the problem of civil "difficulty in execution", conciliation of execution has been placed in many ideal values. However, the implementation of the practical effect of reconciliation is far from achieving the expectations of legislators. In addition to the uncertainty risk and the lack of the good faith consciousness of the party, the main reason for this dilemma is the improper and insufficient exertion of the court's initiative. It is reasonable and necessary to introduce the concept of active justice into the implementation of conciliation. This requires the court in the implementation of reconciliation can not be absent and can not cross the line, so that the implementation of reconciliation can really play its due role.
引文
[1]董皞主编.民事执行策略与方法[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2009.
[2]张卫平.执行和解制度的再认识[J].法学论坛,2016(4).
[3]王柏东,王赫.中国法语境下执行和解之建构[J].法律适用,2017(24).
[4]罗东川,丁广宇.我国能动司法的理论与实践评述[J].法律适用,2010(z1).
[5]江必新主编.民事执行重大疑难问题研究[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2010.
[6]徐小飞.执行和解中法院的职能和角色[J].法律适用,2012(10).
[7]陈伟君.无为而无不为:让执行和解的理想之花在实践中绽放——以规范法院的能动程度为视角[D].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2017.
[8]陈群峰,雷运龙.论民事执行和解司法审查的本质、功能与效力[J].法学家,2013(6).
[2]张卫平.执行和解制度的再认识[J].法学论坛,2016(4).
[3]王柏东,王赫.中国法语境下执行和解之建构[J].法律适用,2017(24).
[4]罗东川,丁广宇.我国能动司法的理论与实践评述[J].法律适用,2010(z1).
[5]江必新主编.民事执行重大疑难问题研究[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2010.
[6]徐小飞.执行和解中法院的职能和角色[J].法律适用,2012(10).
[7]陈伟君.无为而无不为:让执行和解的理想之花在实践中绽放——以规范法院的能动程度为视角[D].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2017.
[8]陈群峰,雷运龙.论民事执行和解司法审查的本质、功能与效力[J].法学家,2013(6).