城镇化进程中青年群体的双向族群认同——以浙江温岭为例

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：On the Bi-ethnic Identity of the Youth in the Urbanization Process:Taking Wenling in Zhejiang as an Example 作者：蔡晨 英文作者：CAI Chen;Basic Course School of Zhejiang Shuren University; 关键词：城镇化 ; 青年群体 ; 教育背景 ; 母语能力 ; 双向族群认同 英文关键词：urbanization;;youth group;;educational background;;native language proficiency;;bi-ethnic identity 中文刊名：ZJSR 英文刊名：Journal of Zhejiang Shuren University(Humanities and Social Sciences) 机构：浙江树人大学基础学院; 出版日期：2019-01-22 出版单位：浙江树人大学学报(人文社会科学) 年：2019 期：v.19;No.164 基金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(2017YJC740003);; 浙江省社会科学界联合会研究课题(2019B47);; 浙江省教育厅一般科研项目(Y201840298) 语种：中文; 页：ZJSR201901014 页数：6 CN：01 ISSN：33-1261/Z 分类号：82-87

摘要

青年群体在城镇化过程中经历着社会认同和文化认同的改变。通过调查浙江温岭地区当地青年群体的双向族群认同情况,结果呈现混合、动态和异质的图像,但总体以整合型认同为主。具有研究生和本科学历的青年群体,更容易产生隔离的认同取向;母语能力好的青年群体更容易产生整合、隔离的认同取向;母语能力和教育背景在隔离认同上存在交互作用。最后,从语言规划、社区文化建设和大众传媒教育等方面提出建议。
        Youth groups experience changes in social identity and cultural identity in the process of urbanization. This paper explores the bi-ethnic identity of the youth groups at Wenling city,Zhejiang province,and founds that their bi-ethnic identity presents a dynamic,mixed and heterogeneous image,but the overall identity is mainly based on integrated identity. Those youth groups with graduate and undergraduate degrees are more likely to have separation identity. Youths who have good language proficiency are more likely to have integration and separation identities whereas the interaction of native language proficiency and educational background has a main effect on the separation identity. Lastly,some suggestions are proposed from the perspectives of language policy,cultural community construction and mass media education.

引文

(1)张先亮:《从新型城镇化角度看市民语言能力》,《中国社会科学》2015年第3期,第119-126页。
    (2)周大鸣:《论族群与族群关系》,《广西民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》2001年第2期,第13-25页。
    (1)王锋:《论语言在族群认同中的地位和表现形式》,《云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2010年第4期,第72-78页。
    (2)Kondo-Brown K,Heritage Language Development:Focus on East Asian Immigrant,John Benjamins Publishing Company,2006,p.46.
    (3)Montrul S,Perpinan S,Assessing Differences and Similarities between Instructed Heritage Language Learners and L2 Learners in Their Knowledge of Spanish Tense-aspect and Mood Morphology,Heritage Language Journal,2011,No.1,pp.90-133.
    (4)Wong K F,Xiao Y,Diversity and Difference:Identity Issues of Chinese Heritage Language Learners from Dialect Backgrounds,Heritage Language Journal,2010,No.7,pp.153-187.
    (5)陈小燕:《贺州不同族群成员语言掌握情况的计量研究---贺州多族群语言与族群认同关系研究之一》,《百色学院学报》2010年第2期,第30-38页。
    (6)刘琪:《族群认同的消弭与建构---对迪庆藏族自治州两个村落的比较研究》,《文化纵横》2016年第3期,第147-156页。
    (7)Berry J W,Acculturation:Living Successfully in Two Cultures,International Journal of Intercultural Relations,2005,No.6,pp.697-712.
    (1)Peyton J K,Ranard D A,Mcginnis S E,Heritage Languages in America:Preserving a National Resource,Delta Systems Company Inc,1990,p.147.
    (1)Shin F,Krashen S,Do People Appreciate Benefits of Advanced First Language Development,In Heritage Language Development,Language Education Associates,1998,p.84.
    (2)Cornell S E,Hartmann D,Ethnicity and Race:Making Identities in a Changing World,Sage,2007,p.56.
    (1)蔡晨:《城镇化进程中青年语言选择的社会心理机制》,《当代青年研究》2016年第1期,第71-77页。