用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于改进Shapley值的创意产业利益分配机制研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Research on Benefit Allocation Mechanism of Creative Industry Based on the Improvement of Shapley Value
  • 作者:时倩倩 ; 刘勇 ; 杜俊良
  • 英文作者:Shi Qianqian;Liu Yong;Du Jun-liang;School of Business, Jiangnan University;
  • 关键词:Shapley值 ; 利益分配 ; 创意产业联盟
  • 英文关键词:Shapley value;;benefit distribution;;creative industry alliance
  • 中文刊名:GYXN
  • 英文刊名:Research on the Generalized Virtual Economy
  • 机构:江南大学商学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-15
  • 出版单位:广义虚拟经济研究
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.10;No.37
  • 基金:广义虚拟经济专项资助项目[GX2015-1014(Y)]
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:GYXN201901015
  • 页数:6
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:11-5905/F
  • 分类号:93-98
摘要
针对创意产业成长期存在的"产业内部无序竞争严重、产业主体间利益协调困难"的问题,结合创意产业利益联盟的特点,构建了创意产业联盟利益分配的指标体系,考虑到利益分配同时受到多指标和多阶段的影响,采用专家打分确定影响创意产业利益分配的指标权重和时间权重,从而得到综合利益分配策略,修正了Shapley值法的利益分配方式,从而提出了基于改进的Shapley值法的创意产业联盟利益分配策略,并以案例验证了模型的有效性和合理性。
        Aiming at the problems that the creative industries have grown into long-term "difficult internal industry competition and difficulty in coordinating interests among industrial entities", and combining the characteristics of creative industry interest alliances, an index system of profit distribution for creative industry alliances has been constructed, taking into account that interest distribution is also affected with multi-indicators and multi-stage impacts, expert scoring is used to determine index weights and time weights that affect the distribution of interest in creative industries, so as to obtain a comprehensive benefit allocation strategy, and to revise the Shapley value distribution method of benefits, and thus to propose an improved Shapley value method. The strategy for the benefit allocation of the creative industry alliance and the validity and rationality of the model are verified by examples.
引文
[1]李纲.Shapley值在知识联盟利益分配中的应用[J].情报杂志,2010,29(2):115-117.
    [2]陈伟,张永超,马一博,等.基于AHP-GEM-Shapley值法的低碳技术创新联盟利益分配研究[J].运筹与管理,2012,21(4):220-226.
    [3]胡丽,张卫国,叶晓甦.基于SHAPELY修正的PPP项目利益分配模型研究[J].管理工程学报,2011,25(2):149-154.
    [4]卜心怡,赵灵丽.基于Shapley值的知识共享利益分配策略及改进[J].科技进步与对策,2009,26(3):119-121.
    [5]刁丽琳,朱桂龙,许治.基于多权重Shapley值的联盟利益分配机制[J].工业工程与管理,2011,16(4):79-84.
    [6]曾德明,张丹丹,张磊生.高技术产业技术创新战略联盟利益分配研究[J].经济与管理研究,2015(7):119-126.
    [7]李建玲,刘伊生,马欣.共性技术联盟的利益分配研究[J].中国科技论坛,2013,1(7):51-57.
    [8]杨哲.基于讨价还价理论的企业集团中的利益分配[J].管理工程学报,2015,29(4):140-144.
    [9]盖璐璐,施琴芬.基于数据包络分析博弈的团队知识共享利益分配研究[J].情报理论与实践,2012,35(5):64-68.
    [10]Solonandrasana B,Caccomo J L.Tourism Activities and Price Differences:Imperfect Information and Asymmetric Competition[C].Conference of the European Association for Research in Industrial Economics, August 30 To September 2,2001,Dublin,Ireland.2001.
    [11]Bastakis C,Buhalis D,Butler R.The perception of small and medium sized tourism accommodation providers on the impacts of the tour operators'power in the aastern mediterranean[J].Tourism Management,2004,(25):151-170.
    [12]Garcia D,Tugores M.Optimal choice of quality in hotel services.[J].Annals of Tourism Research,2006,33(2):456-469.
    [13]Wachsman Y.Strategic interactions among firms in tourist destinations.[J].Tourism Economics,2006,12(12):531-541.
    [14]Pintassilgo P,Silva J A.'Tragedy of the commons'in the tourism accommodation industry.[J].Tourism Economics,2007,13(2):209-224.
    [15]Candela G,Cellini R.Investment in tourism market:a dynamic model of differentiated oligopoly.[J]. Environmental&Resource Economics,2006,35(1):41-58.
    [16]胡争光,向荟.产业技术创新战略联盟利益分配方式选择研究[J].科技管理研究,2013,33(5):104-108.
    [17]马鑫.民族文化旅游资源的产权界定及利益分配问题研究[J].云南民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011(4):35-39.
    [18]李玉璧,周永梅.协同创新战略中的知识产权共享及利益分配问题研究[J].开发研究,2013(4):144-148.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700