深度贫困地区土地利用变化及政策研究
|
摘要
深度贫困地区是脱贫攻坚的重点地区。本文以河北省10个深度贫困县为研究对象,利用数理统计方法,对这些深度贫困县2009～2017年土地利用变化情况进行分析。研究结果显示:①2009年以来10个深度贫困县耕地面积呈增加趋势,增加幅度以2014年为节点,2009～2013年绝对量呈增加趋势、增幅呈递减趋势,2013～2017年增幅呈平稳态势;②建设用地面积呈增加趋势,建设面积增加主要为城镇村用地和交通运输用地,2013年后建设用地变化相对平稳;③其他土地面积变化较大,主要以设施农用地、盐碱地、裸地为主,其中盐碱地减少趋势明显,设施农用地呈增加趋势,2014年前设施农用地增加较快,其他年份有所放缓;④土地扶贫政策主要涉及用地规划计划、增减挂钩政策、土地整治、流转、易地扶贫搬迁、土地复垦以及专项资金等政策。分析深度贫困地区土地利用变化及政策,可为深度贫困区早日脱贫和乡村振兴提供参考。
Deep poverty areas are the focus of poverty alleviation. Taking 10 deep poverty counties in Hebei Province as the research object, this paper analyzed the land use change of deep poverty counties from 2009 to 2017 by using mathematical statistics method. The results show that:(1) Since 2009, the arable land area of 10 deep poverty counties has shown an increasing trend, with the increase rate of 2014 as the node, and 2009-2013 as the node. The absolute amount shows an increasing trend, the increasing rate shows a decreasing trend, and the increasing rate shows a steady trend from 2013 to 2017;(2) the area of construction land shows an increasing trend, and the increase of construction area is mainly urban and rural land and transportation land, and the change of construction land is relatively stable after2013;(3) other land changes greatly, mainly agricultural land, saline-alkali land and bare land, and the decrease trend of saline-alkali land is obvious. Facility land tends to increase. Facility land increased rapidly before 2014, but slowed down in other years;(4) Land poverty alleviation policy mainly involves land use planning, increase-decrease linkage policy, land consolidation, circulation, land transfer, poverty alleviation and relocation, land reclamation and special funds. Through the analysis of land use change and policy in the deep poverty-stricken counties, it can provide reference for the early poverty alleviation and Rural Revitalization in the deep poverty-stricken counties.
Deep poverty areas are the focus of poverty alleviation. Taking 10 deep poverty counties in Hebei Province as the research object, this paper analyzed the land use change of deep poverty counties from 2009 to 2017 by using mathematical statistics method. The results show that:(1) Since 2009, the arable land area of 10 deep poverty counties has shown an increasing trend, with the increase rate of 2014 as the node, and 2009-2013 as the node. The absolute amount shows an increasing trend, the increasing rate shows a decreasing trend, and the increasing rate shows a steady trend from 2013 to 2017;(2) the area of construction land shows an increasing trend, and the increase of construction area is mainly urban and rural land and transportation land, and the change of construction land is relatively stable after2013;(3) other land changes greatly, mainly agricultural land, saline-alkali land and bare land, and the decrease trend of saline-alkali land is obvious. Facility land tends to increase. Facility land increased rapidly before 2014, but slowed down in other years;(4) Land poverty alleviation policy mainly involves land use planning, increase-decrease linkage policy, land consolidation, circulation, land transfer, poverty alleviation and relocation, land reclamation and special funds. Through the analysis of land use change and policy in the deep poverty-stricken counties, it can provide reference for the early poverty alleviation and Rural Revitalization in the deep poverty-stricken counties.
引文
[1]钱旭,杨玲.土地整治中的扶贫之路探析——以望谟县为例[J].现代农业科技,2017(3):288-290.
[2]袁梁,陈美球,刘洋洋.土地整治与扶贫开发[J].中国国土资源经济,2017,30(7):23-26.
[3]郑子敬.深度贫困地区增减挂钩节余指标跨省交易的路径研究[J].中国土地,2017,(12),34-37.
[4]韩冰,孟凡,邱倩.深化跨区域占补平衡进程助推精准扶贫——以四川省为例[J].资源与人居环境,2017,(07),8-9.
[5]韦鲜芳,韦燕飞,刘秋萍,童新华.广西左右江革命老区贫困县土地利用变化研究[J].农村经济与科技,2017,28(19):32-47.
[6]谢臻,张凤荣,高阳,张天柱,张佰林,周建.基于遥感和GIS的平原和山区贫困县农村耕地利用演变对比[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(15):255-263.
[7]李怡,刘正佳,李裕瑞.边境贫困县建设用地变化特征与驱动因素——以广西龙州为例[J].自然资源学报, 2018, 33(8):1291-1303.
[8]孙丕苓,许月卿,刘庆果,刘超,黄安.环京津贫困带土地利用多功能性的县域尺度时空分异及影响因素[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(15):283-292.
[9]赵丽,张蓬涛,周智.环首都贫困区土地利用变化对生态系统的影响及驱动因素分析——以河北涞水县为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2013,34(5):74-81.
[10]魏媛,吴长勇.喀斯特贫困山区土地利用碳排放效应及风险研究——以贵州省为例[J].生态经济,2018,34(3):31-36.
[11]郑子敬.扶贫开发进程中的土地政策[J].中国土地,2016,(11),27-28.
[12]余文波,蔡海生,张莹,吕博兰.农村土地精准扶贫/脱贫研究综述及展望[J].江西农业学报, 2017,29(4):117-122.
[13]郑娟尔,王世虎,袁国华.扶贫攻坚与土地政策创新——基于贵州省的调研与思考[J].中国国土资源经济,2014,27(06):27-30.
[14]阮松涛,吴克宁,郑子敬.中国土地扶贫的制度分析与政策探讨[J].国土资源科技管理,2013,10(5):115-121.
[15]向敬伟,李江风,曾杰.鄂西贫困县耕地利用转型空间分异及其影响因素[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(01):272-279.
[16]马蓓蓓,李海玲,魏也华,薛东前,江军.西安市贫困空间结构特征与发生机理[J].地理学报,2018,73(6):1018-1032.
[2]袁梁,陈美球,刘洋洋.土地整治与扶贫开发[J].中国国土资源经济,2017,30(7):23-26.
[3]郑子敬.深度贫困地区增减挂钩节余指标跨省交易的路径研究[J].中国土地,2017,(12),34-37.
[4]韩冰,孟凡,邱倩.深化跨区域占补平衡进程助推精准扶贫——以四川省为例[J].资源与人居环境,2017,(07),8-9.
[5]韦鲜芳,韦燕飞,刘秋萍,童新华.广西左右江革命老区贫困县土地利用变化研究[J].农村经济与科技,2017,28(19):32-47.
[6]谢臻,张凤荣,高阳,张天柱,张佰林,周建.基于遥感和GIS的平原和山区贫困县农村耕地利用演变对比[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(15):255-263.
[7]李怡,刘正佳,李裕瑞.边境贫困县建设用地变化特征与驱动因素——以广西龙州为例[J].自然资源学报, 2018, 33(8):1291-1303.
[8]孙丕苓,许月卿,刘庆果,刘超,黄安.环京津贫困带土地利用多功能性的县域尺度时空分异及影响因素[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(15):283-292.
[9]赵丽,张蓬涛,周智.环首都贫困区土地利用变化对生态系统的影响及驱动因素分析——以河北涞水县为例[J].中国农业资源与区划,2013,34(5):74-81.
[10]魏媛,吴长勇.喀斯特贫困山区土地利用碳排放效应及风险研究——以贵州省为例[J].生态经济,2018,34(3):31-36.
[11]郑子敬.扶贫开发进程中的土地政策[J].中国土地,2016,(11),27-28.
[12]余文波,蔡海生,张莹,吕博兰.农村土地精准扶贫/脱贫研究综述及展望[J].江西农业学报, 2017,29(4):117-122.
[13]郑娟尔,王世虎,袁国华.扶贫攻坚与土地政策创新——基于贵州省的调研与思考[J].中国国土资源经济,2014,27(06):27-30.
[14]阮松涛,吴克宁,郑子敬.中国土地扶贫的制度分析与政策探讨[J].国土资源科技管理,2013,10(5):115-121.
[15]向敬伟,李江风,曾杰.鄂西贫困县耕地利用转型空间分异及其影响因素[J].农业工程学报,2016,32(01):272-279.
[16]马蓓蓓,李海玲,魏也华,薛东前,江军.西安市贫困空间结构特征与发生机理[J].地理学报,2018,73(6):1018-1032.