基于设计结构矩阵的舰船设计流程多分辨率建模
|
摘要
针对因舰船设计系统规模庞大、设计任务间关系复杂,导致研制风险评估可信度较低的问题,本文提出一种符合系统流程分解细化、设计要素粒度提升的建模与评估方法。根据分辨率反映模型描述对象的精细程度,建立基于设计结构矩阵的多分辨率建模方法。并根据舰船方案设计的主要内容及其相互关系建立不同分辨率的设计结构矩阵,通过仿真对设计流程进度、费用进行评估,比较了不同分辨率模型的优缺点。在考虑建模工作量和难度的情况下,本文的结果为采用不同分辨率模型提供了模型之间差异量的近似估计方法。
Large-scale ship system design and the complex relationships among its design tasks carry low-confidence development risk assessments. In view of this,a modeling and assessment method is presented in accordance with system process breakdown and upgrade of design element granularity. By employing resolution to describe the level of modeling object details,multi-resolution modeling based on a design structure matrix( DSM) is presented. A DSM with differing resolutions was built according to ship design tasks and their involvement in warship scheme design. The schedule and cost of the design processes were evaluated by simulation; also,advantage and disadvantage of the different resolution models were compared. By comparing the difficulties and work of modeling with different resolutions,the difference between models with different resolutions was analyzed,and additionally an approximate method to estimate this difference between models was presented.
Large-scale ship system design and the complex relationships among its design tasks carry low-confidence development risk assessments. In view of this,a modeling and assessment method is presented in accordance with system process breakdown and upgrade of design element granularity. By employing resolution to describe the level of modeling object details,multi-resolution modeling based on a design structure matrix( DSM) is presented. A DSM with differing resolutions was built according to ship design tasks and their involvement in warship scheme design. The schedule and cost of the design processes were evaluated by simulation; also,advantage and disadvantage of the different resolution models were compared. By comparing the difficulties and work of modeling with different resolutions,the difference between models with different resolutions was analyzed,and additionally an approximate method to estimate this difference between models was presented.
引文
[1]HELGERSON D A,BILLINGSLEY D W,DOERRY N H.Initial DSM application to U.S. navy ship design[C]//Proceedings of the 11th International Design Structure Matrix Conference. Greenville,USA,2009:383-397.
[2]COOPER S,ALLEN G,SMITH R,et al. Ship design process modeling:capturing a highly complex process[C]//Proceedings of the 13th International Design Structure Matrix Conference. Massachusetts, USA, 2011:393-406.
[3]DOERRY N. Using the design structure matrix to plan complex design projects[C]//Proceedings of American Society of Naval Engineers(ASNE)Intelligent Ships Symposium.Philadelphia,PA,USA,2008:1-15.
[4]LI Weilin,MOON Y B. Modeling and managing engineering changes in a complex product development process[J]. The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology,2012,63(9/10/11/12):863-874.
[5]DENG Linyi,LIN Yan,JIN Chaoguang,et al. Optimization on design structure matrix method and its application for shipbuilding planning[C]//Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation. Dalian,China,2006:7395-7399.
[6]刘强,冯佰威,刘祖源.基于设计结构矩阵的船舶MDO建模[J].华南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(4):69-77.LIU Qiang,FENG Baiwei,LIU Zuyuan. MDO modeling of ships based on design structure matrix[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(natural science edition),2015,43(4):69-77.
[7]徐青.舰船总体设计流程分析[J].中国舰船研究,2012,7(5):1-7.XU Qing. Analysis of the overall warship design process[J]. Chinese journal of ship research,2012,7(5):1-7.
[8]WYNN D C,ECKERT C M. Perspectives on iteration in design and development[J]. Research in engineering design,2017,28(2):153-184.
[9]DAVIS P K,TOLK A. Observations on new developments in composability and multi-resolution modeling[C]//Proceedings of 2007 Winter Simulation Conference. Washington,DC,USA,2007:859-870.
[10]CARACCHI S,SRIRAM P K,SEMINI M,et al. Capability maturity model integrated for ship design and construction[C]//Proceedings of the IFIP WG 5. 7 International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems. Innovative and Knowledge-Based Production Management in A Global-Local World. Ajaccio, France,2014:296-303.
[11]BROWNING T R. Modeling and analyzing cost,schedule,and performance in complex system product development[D]. Massachusetts:Massachusetts Institute of Technology,1999.
[12]EPPINGER S D,BROWNING T R. Design structure matrix methods and applications[M]. Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press,2012.
[13]Sadegh Mirshekarian B. DSM EXCEL MACRO Version2. 1[EB/OL].[2017-07-11]. http://www. dsmweb. org/en/dsm-tools/research-tools/excel-macros-for-partitioning.html.
[2]COOPER S,ALLEN G,SMITH R,et al. Ship design process modeling:capturing a highly complex process[C]//Proceedings of the 13th International Design Structure Matrix Conference. Massachusetts, USA, 2011:393-406.
[3]DOERRY N. Using the design structure matrix to plan complex design projects[C]//Proceedings of American Society of Naval Engineers(ASNE)Intelligent Ships Symposium.Philadelphia,PA,USA,2008:1-15.
[4]LI Weilin,MOON Y B. Modeling and managing engineering changes in a complex product development process[J]. The international journal of advanced manufacturing technology,2012,63(9/10/11/12):863-874.
[5]DENG Linyi,LIN Yan,JIN Chaoguang,et al. Optimization on design structure matrix method and its application for shipbuilding planning[C]//Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation. Dalian,China,2006:7395-7399.
[6]刘强,冯佰威,刘祖源.基于设计结构矩阵的船舶MDO建模[J].华南理工大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(4):69-77.LIU Qiang,FENG Baiwei,LIU Zuyuan. MDO modeling of ships based on design structure matrix[J]. Journal of South China University of Technology(natural science edition),2015,43(4):69-77.
[7]徐青.舰船总体设计流程分析[J].中国舰船研究,2012,7(5):1-7.XU Qing. Analysis of the overall warship design process[J]. Chinese journal of ship research,2012,7(5):1-7.
[8]WYNN D C,ECKERT C M. Perspectives on iteration in design and development[J]. Research in engineering design,2017,28(2):153-184.
[9]DAVIS P K,TOLK A. Observations on new developments in composability and multi-resolution modeling[C]//Proceedings of 2007 Winter Simulation Conference. Washington,DC,USA,2007:859-870.
[10]CARACCHI S,SRIRAM P K,SEMINI M,et al. Capability maturity model integrated for ship design and construction[C]//Proceedings of the IFIP WG 5. 7 International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems. Innovative and Knowledge-Based Production Management in A Global-Local World. Ajaccio, France,2014:296-303.
[11]BROWNING T R. Modeling and analyzing cost,schedule,and performance in complex system product development[D]. Massachusetts:Massachusetts Institute of Technology,1999.
[12]EPPINGER S D,BROWNING T R. Design structure matrix methods and applications[M]. Cambridge, Mass:MIT Press,2012.
[13]Sadegh Mirshekarian B. DSM EXCEL MACRO Version2. 1[EB/OL].[2017-07-11]. http://www. dsmweb. org/en/dsm-tools/research-tools/excel-macros-for-partitioning.html.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |