基于恢复能力与影响周期的围海养殖工程生态损害特征及补偿标准——以象山县水湖涂名优水产养殖区为例
|
摘要
以宁波市象山县水湖涂名优水产围海养殖工程为研究对象,通过构建生态服务价值损害评估指标体系,分析了围海养殖区的生态损害特征,并基于海域自我恢复能力,研究了围海养殖工程的生态补偿标准和资源恢复周期。结果显示:(1)名优水产围海养殖工程造成的生态损害总价值为318.90万元/a,单位面积损害价值为3.20万元/hm2·a。生态损害主要以生态服务型为主,占总量比例为53.54%。(2)生物资源型损害类别中,潮间带生物损害价值最大,为59.71万元,其次为紫菜养殖和鱼卵、仔鱼,二者损害价值量相当,占总量比例均为13.55%,底栖生物和游泳生物价值损失则均较小。(3)生态服务型损害类别中,一级类别主要以调节服务价值为主,占总量比例为32.56%。二级损害类别中,废弃物处理损害价值最大,为71.77万元,休闲娱乐损害价值也较大,占总量比例为12.80%,其他类型则价值损失较小。(4)名优水产围海养殖工程基于海域自我恢复能力的生态补偿标准为280.90万元/a,单位面积补偿价值为2.82万元/hm2·a,对比生态损害价值确定的补偿标准,总量减少11.92%。项目施工结束后,近岸滩涂恢复速度为4.6320hm2/a,约13年后新围大堤附近滩涂将恢复到围海前的基线水平。
Scientific and reasonable marine eco-compensation standard has great significance in optimizing the allocation of marine resources and maintaining the sustainable development of the marine economy. Taking the famous aquaculture reclamation project of Shuhutu in Xiangshan county of Ningbo city as the research object, the paper constructed an index system of ecological services value damage assessment, and methods for assessing the recovery capacity of sea areas and the impact cycle of resources. The damage value and characteristics of various ecological services caused by the aquaculture project were calculated and analyzed. The eco-compensation standard and the recovery cycle of the aquaculture project based on the marine self recovery capability were determined, and the differences in the compensation standards determined directly from the ecological damage value and based on the recovery capacity were compared and analyzed. The results showed that:(1) The total value of the ecological damage caused by the famous aquaculture reclamation project is 3.189 million yuan/a, and the damage value per unit area is 32000 yuan/hm2·a. Ecological damage is mainly based on ecological services,accounting for 53.54% of the total.(2) In the category of biological resource damage, the primary category is dominated by the value of resource damage, which accounts for 32.92% of the total. In the second category, the biological damage value of intertidal biological is the highest,at 597100 yuan, followed by the damage value of seaweed farming, fish eggs and larvae, both of which have the same damage value accounting for 13.55% of the total. The value loss of benthos and swimming organisms is smaller.(3) In the category of ecological service damage, the primary category is mainly adjustment service value, accounting for 32.56% of the total. In the secondary damage category, the damage value of waste disposal is the highest, reaching717700 yuan, while the value of recreation and entertainment is also large, accounting for12.80% of the total damage. The other types have less value loss.(4) The eco-compensation standard of the famous aquaculture reclamation project based on the sea self-reclamation capacity is 2.809 million yuan/a, and the compensation value per unit area is 28200 yuan/hm2·a.The average compensation value to be paid in installments is 1.8068 million yuan/a and the compensation amount per unit area is 18100 yuan/hm2·a.(5) Compared with the compensation standard determined by the value of ecological damage, the total amount of eco-compensation standard based on the recovery capacity of sea areas is reduced by 11.92%, and the unit area is reduced by 11.88%. After the completion of the project, the recovery speed of nearshore intertidal zone will be 4.632 hm2/a. After a total of 12.97 years, the tidal flat near the new embankment will be restored to the baseline level which existenced before the reclamation starting.
Scientific and reasonable marine eco-compensation standard has great significance in optimizing the allocation of marine resources and maintaining the sustainable development of the marine economy. Taking the famous aquaculture reclamation project of Shuhutu in Xiangshan county of Ningbo city as the research object, the paper constructed an index system of ecological services value damage assessment, and methods for assessing the recovery capacity of sea areas and the impact cycle of resources. The damage value and characteristics of various ecological services caused by the aquaculture project were calculated and analyzed. The eco-compensation standard and the recovery cycle of the aquaculture project based on the marine self recovery capability were determined, and the differences in the compensation standards determined directly from the ecological damage value and based on the recovery capacity were compared and analyzed. The results showed that:(1) The total value of the ecological damage caused by the famous aquaculture reclamation project is 3.189 million yuan/a, and the damage value per unit area is 32000 yuan/hm2·a. Ecological damage is mainly based on ecological services,accounting for 53.54% of the total.(2) In the category of biological resource damage, the primary category is dominated by the value of resource damage, which accounts for 32.92% of the total. In the second category, the biological damage value of intertidal biological is the highest,at 597100 yuan, followed by the damage value of seaweed farming, fish eggs and larvae, both of which have the same damage value accounting for 13.55% of the total. The value loss of benthos and swimming organisms is smaller.(3) In the category of ecological service damage, the primary category is mainly adjustment service value, accounting for 32.56% of the total. In the secondary damage category, the damage value of waste disposal is the highest, reaching717700 yuan, while the value of recreation and entertainment is also large, accounting for12.80% of the total damage. The other types have less value loss.(4) The eco-compensation standard of the famous aquaculture reclamation project based on the sea self-reclamation capacity is 2.809 million yuan/a, and the compensation value per unit area is 28200 yuan/hm2·a.The average compensation value to be paid in installments is 1.8068 million yuan/a and the compensation amount per unit area is 18100 yuan/hm2·a.(5) Compared with the compensation standard determined by the value of ecological damage, the total amount of eco-compensation standard based on the recovery capacity of sea areas is reduced by 11.92%, and the unit area is reduced by 11.88%. After the completion of the project, the recovery speed of nearshore intertidal zone will be 4.632 hm2/a. After a total of 12.97 years, the tidal flat near the new embankment will be restored to the baseline level which existenced before the reclamation starting.
引文
[1]余建斌.海洋经济成为我国经济新的增长点.人民日报,2007-04-10(001).[YU J B.Marine economy has become a new economic growth point in China.People's Daily,2007-04-10(001).]
[2]隋吉学.海洋工程生态补偿探究.北京:海洋出版社,2016.[SUI J X.Research on Ecological Eompensation of Marine Engineering.Beijing:China Ocean Press,2016.]
[3]吴姗姗,刘容子,齐连明,等.渤海海域生态系统服务功能价值评估.中国人口·资源与环境,2008,102(2):65-69.[WU S S,LIU R Z,QI L M,et al.Value assessment of marine ecosystem service in Bohai sea.China Polulation,Resources and Environment,2008,102(2):65-69.]
[4]崔保山,谢湉,王青,等.大规模围填海对滨海湿地的影响与对策.中国科学院院刊,2017,32(4):418-425.[CUI B S,XIE T,WANG Q,et al.Impact of large-scale reclamation on coastal wetlands and implications for ecological restoration,compensation,and sustainable exploitation framework.Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2017,32(4):418-425.]
[5]张慧,孙英兰.青岛前湾填海造地海洋生态系统服务功能价值损失的估算.海洋湖沼通报,2009,31(3):34-38.[ZHANG H,SUN Y L.Loss appraisal on the value of marine ecosystem services of sea reclamation for Qianwan.Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology,2009,31(3):34-38.]
[6]王衍,孙士超.海南洋浦围填海造地的海洋生态系统服务功能价值损失评估.海洋开发与管理,2015,32(7):74-80.[WANG Y,SUN S C.Evaluation of loss of value of marine ecosystem services in reclaimed land in Yangpu,Hainan province.Ocean Development and Management,2015,32(7):74-80.]
[7]郭臣.胶州湾围填海造陆生态补偿机制研究.青岛:中国海洋大学,2012.[GUO C.Study on ecological compensation mechanism of Jiaozhou bay sea reclamation project.Qingdao:Ocean University of China,2012.]
[8]顾奕.围填海区海洋生态补偿标准研究.南京:东南大学,2015.[GU Y.Study on marine ecological compensation standard in reclamation.Nanjing:Southeast University,2015.]
[9]于淑玲,崔保山,闫家国,等.围填海区受损滨海湿地生态补偿机制与模式.湿地科学,2015,13(6):675-681.[YU SL,CUI B S,YAN J G,et al.Ecological compensation mechanisms and models of damaged coastal wetlands in reclamation areas.Wetland Science,2015,13(6):675-681.]
[10]于任翔.日照海州湾围填海工程对水动力及冲淤环境的影响研究.青岛:中国海洋大学,2013.[YU R X.Study of the effect of the reclamation works on marine hydrodynamics and environment erosion and deposion in the Haizhou Bay of Rizhao city.Qingdao:Ocean University of China,2013.]
[11]索安宁,张明慧,于永海,等.曹妃甸围填海工程的环境影响回顾性评价.中国环境监测,2012,28(2):105-111.[SUOA N,ZHANG M H,YU Y H,et al.Post project environmental retrospective evaluation of reclamation in Caofeidian.Environmental Monitoring in China,2012,28(2):105-111.]
[12]隋玉正,李淑娟,张绪良,等.围填海造陆引起的海岛周围海域海洋生态系统服务价值损失:以浙江省洞头县为例.海洋科学,2013,37(9):90-96.[SUI Y Z,LI S J,ZHANG X L,et al.Appraisal on the value loss of marine ecosystem services about island reclamation:A case study of Dongtou.Marine Sciences,2013,37(9):90-96.]
[13]姜忆湄,李加林,龚虹波,等.围填海影响下海岸带生态服务价值损益评估:以宁波杭州湾新区为例.经济地理,2017,37(11):181-190.[JIANG Y M,LI J L,GONG H B,et al.Ecosystem service value assessment of coastal zone caused by reclamation:A case study of Ningbo Hangzhou bay new zone.Economic Geography,2017,37(11):181-190.]
[14]许志华,李京梅,杨雪.基于生境等价分析法的罗源湾填海生态损害评估.海洋环境科学,2016,35(1):13-19.[XU ZH,LI J M,YANG X.Ecological damage assessment of Luoyuan bay reclamation based on habitat equivalency analysis.Marine Environmental Science,2016,35(1):13-19.]
[15]苗丽娟,于永海,关春江,等.机会成本法在海洋生态补偿标准确定中的应用:以庄河青堆子湾海域为例.海洋开发与管理,2014,31(5):21-26.[MIAO L J,YU Y H,GUAN C J,et al.Application of opportunity cost method in determination of marine ecological compensation rates:A case study of Qingduizi Bay of Zhuanghe river.Ocean Development and Management,2014,31(5):21-26.]
[16]王显金,钟昌标.沿海滩涂围垦生态补偿标准构建:基于能值拓展模型衡量的生态外溢价值.自然资源学报,2017,32(5):742-754.[WANG X J,ZHONG C B.Construction of ecological compensation standard for tidal flat reclamation:Based on the spillover ecological value measured by expansion emergy synthesis model.Journal of Natural Resources,2017,32(5):742-754.]
[17]肖建红,王敏,刘娟,等.基于生态标签制度的海洋生态产品生态补偿标准区域差异化研究.自然资源学报,2016,31(3):402-412.[XIAO J H,WANG M,LIU J,et al.Study on the regional difference of eco-compensation standards for the marine ecological products based on marine fisheries'eco-label schemes.Journal of Natural Resources,2016,31(3):402-412.]
[18]李京梅,王颖梅.围填海造地生态补偿指标体系的建立与应用.生态经济,2016,32(6):183-188.[LI J M,WANG YM.The establishment and application of eco-compensation index system for land reclamation.Ecological Economy,2016,32(6):183-188.]
[19]李洋,黄鹄,佟智成.钦州保税港区围填海工程生态损失及其补偿价值研究.钦州学院学报,2016,31(1):17-21.[LIY,HUANG H,TONG Z C.Study on ecological loss and compensation value of enclave reclamation project in Qinzhou Free Trade Port Area.Journal of Qinzhou University,2016,31(1):17-21.]
[20]刘敏,侯立军,许世远,等.长江河口潮滩表层沉积物对磷酸盐的吸附特征.地理学报,2002,57(4):397-406.[LIUM,HOU L J,XU S Y,et al.Carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes as tracers to source organic matter in the Yangtze Estuary.Acta Geographica Sinica,2002,57(4):397-406.]
[21]石洪华,郑伟,丁德文,等.典型海洋生态系统服务功能及价值评估:以桑沟湾为例.海洋环境科学,2008,27(2):3-6.[SHI H H,ZHENG W,DING D W,et al.Valuation of typical marine ecosytem services:A case study in Sanggou Bay.Marine Environmental Science,2008,27(2):3-6.]
[22]史定刚,关万春,艾为明,等.三门核电站周边海域叶绿素a及初级生产力时空分布.浙江农业学报,2014,26(5):1303-1308.[SHI D G,GUAN W C,AI W M,et al.Spatial-temporal distribution of chlorophyll-a and primary productivity in the surrounding areas of Sanmen bay nuclear power station.Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis,2014,26(5):1303-1308.]
[23]任杰,贺宝根.盐沼水-沉积物-植物界面泥沙输移过程研究进展概述.科技信息:科学教研,2007,(16):21,33.[REN J,HE B G.Summary of research progress on sediment transport process in salt marsh water-sediment-plant interface.Science&Technology Information:Science and Education,2007,(16):21,33.]
[24]王萱,陈伟琪,张珞平,等.同安湾围(填)海生态系统服务损害的货币化预测评估.生态学报,2010,30(21):5914-5924.[WANG X,CHEN W Q,ZHANG L P,et al.Predictive valuation of ecosystem services losses from sea reclamation planning projects in Tong'an Bay.Acta Ecologica Sinica,2010,30(21):5914-5924.]
[25]王静,徐敏,张益民,等.围填海的滨海湿地生态服务功能价值损失的评估:以海门市滨海新区围填海为例.南京师大学报:自然科学版,2009,32(4):134-138.[WANG J,XU M,ZHANG Y M,et al.Coastal wetland ecological service value loss appraisal of reclamation:Take the coastal wetland reclamation of Haimen for example.Journal of Nanjing Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2009,32(4):134-138.]
[26]欧维新,杨桂山,高建华.盐城潮滩湿地对N、P营养物质的截留效应研究.湿地科学,2006,4(3):179-186.[OU W X,YANG G S,GAO J H.Retention effect of wetland for Nitrogen and Phosphorus nutrients in the coastal zone of the Yancheng.Wetland Science,2006,4(3):179-186.]
[27]李纯厚,黄洪辉,林钦,等.海水对虾池塘养殖污染物环境负荷量的研究.农业环境科学学报,2004,23(3):545-550.[LI C H,HUANG H H,LIN Q,et al.Environmental carrying capacity of the pollutants from the prawn seawater culture ponds.Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2004,23(3):545-550.]
[28]COSTANZA R,DARGE R,DEGROOT R,et al.The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital.Nature,1997,387:253-260.
[29]陈仲新,张新时.中国生态系统效益的价值.科学通报,2000,45(1):17-22.[CHEN Z X,ZHANG X S.The value of ecosystem benefits in China.Chinese Science Bulletin,2000,45(1):17-22.]
[30]李新,周青松,俞存根,等.浙江三门湾春季鱼类种类组成及多样性研究.浙江海洋学院学报:自然科学版,2014,33(6):488-494.[LI X,ZHOU Q S,YU C G,et al.Species composition and diversity of fish in spring in Sanmen Bay.Journal of Zhejiang Ocean University:Natural Science,2014,33(6):488-494.]
[31]蔡萌.三门湾鱼类和蟹类数量变化和生态特征的研究.上海:上海海洋大学,2009.[CAI M.Investigation of density and ecological characteristics of fishes and crabs in the Sanmen Bay.Shanghai:Shanghai Ocean University,2009.]
[32]中国水利学会:2006年学术年会//谢亚力,伍冬领.三门湾滩涂围垦对海湾水动力及海床影响初步分析.北京:中国水利水电出版社,2006:146-151[Chinese Hydraulic Engineering Society:2006 Academic Annual Conference Papers//XIE Y L,TONG D L.Preliminary Analysis on The Impact of Sanmen Bay Reclamation on The Hydrodynamics and Seabed of The Gulf.Beijing:China Water Power Press,2006:146-151.]
[33]宁波市第五届学术大会论文集//施慧雄.宁波市滩涂资源及其动态变化.杭州:浙江大学出版社,2008:143-149[Ningbo fifth academic conference proceedings//SHI H X.Tidal Flat Resources and Its Dynamic Changes in Ningbo.Hangzhou:Zhejiang University Press,2008:143-149.]
[34]郑伟,徐元,石洪华,等.海洋生态补偿理论及技术体系初步构建.海洋环境科学,2011,30(6):877-880.[ZHENG W,XU Y,SHI H H,et al.Establishment of theory and technical system for marine ecological compensation.Marine Environment Science,2011,30(6):877-880.]
[35]饶欢欢,彭本荣,刘岩,等.海洋工程生态损害评估与补偿:以厦门杏林跨海大桥为例.生态学报,2015,35(16):5467-5476.[RAO H H,PENG B R,LIU Y,et al.Ecological damage assessment and compensation of marine engineering:A case study of Xinglin sea-crossing bridge,Xiamen.Acta Ecologica Sinica,2015,35(16):5467-5476.]
[2]隋吉学.海洋工程生态补偿探究.北京:海洋出版社,2016.[SUI J X.Research on Ecological Eompensation of Marine Engineering.Beijing:China Ocean Press,2016.]
[3]吴姗姗,刘容子,齐连明,等.渤海海域生态系统服务功能价值评估.中国人口·资源与环境,2008,102(2):65-69.[WU S S,LIU R Z,QI L M,et al.Value assessment of marine ecosystem service in Bohai sea.China Polulation,Resources and Environment,2008,102(2):65-69.]
[4]崔保山,谢湉,王青,等.大规模围填海对滨海湿地的影响与对策.中国科学院院刊,2017,32(4):418-425.[CUI B S,XIE T,WANG Q,et al.Impact of large-scale reclamation on coastal wetlands and implications for ecological restoration,compensation,and sustainable exploitation framework.Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences,2017,32(4):418-425.]
[5]张慧,孙英兰.青岛前湾填海造地海洋生态系统服务功能价值损失的估算.海洋湖沼通报,2009,31(3):34-38.[ZHANG H,SUN Y L.Loss appraisal on the value of marine ecosystem services of sea reclamation for Qianwan.Transactions of Oceanology and Limnology,2009,31(3):34-38.]
[6]王衍,孙士超.海南洋浦围填海造地的海洋生态系统服务功能价值损失评估.海洋开发与管理,2015,32(7):74-80.[WANG Y,SUN S C.Evaluation of loss of value of marine ecosystem services in reclaimed land in Yangpu,Hainan province.Ocean Development and Management,2015,32(7):74-80.]
[7]郭臣.胶州湾围填海造陆生态补偿机制研究.青岛:中国海洋大学,2012.[GUO C.Study on ecological compensation mechanism of Jiaozhou bay sea reclamation project.Qingdao:Ocean University of China,2012.]
[8]顾奕.围填海区海洋生态补偿标准研究.南京:东南大学,2015.[GU Y.Study on marine ecological compensation standard in reclamation.Nanjing:Southeast University,2015.]
[9]于淑玲,崔保山,闫家国,等.围填海区受损滨海湿地生态补偿机制与模式.湿地科学,2015,13(6):675-681.[YU SL,CUI B S,YAN J G,et al.Ecological compensation mechanisms and models of damaged coastal wetlands in reclamation areas.Wetland Science,2015,13(6):675-681.]
[10]于任翔.日照海州湾围填海工程对水动力及冲淤环境的影响研究.青岛:中国海洋大学,2013.[YU R X.Study of the effect of the reclamation works on marine hydrodynamics and environment erosion and deposion in the Haizhou Bay of Rizhao city.Qingdao:Ocean University of China,2013.]
[11]索安宁,张明慧,于永海,等.曹妃甸围填海工程的环境影响回顾性评价.中国环境监测,2012,28(2):105-111.[SUOA N,ZHANG M H,YU Y H,et al.Post project environmental retrospective evaluation of reclamation in Caofeidian.Environmental Monitoring in China,2012,28(2):105-111.]
[12]隋玉正,李淑娟,张绪良,等.围填海造陆引起的海岛周围海域海洋生态系统服务价值损失:以浙江省洞头县为例.海洋科学,2013,37(9):90-96.[SUI Y Z,LI S J,ZHANG X L,et al.Appraisal on the value loss of marine ecosystem services about island reclamation:A case study of Dongtou.Marine Sciences,2013,37(9):90-96.]
[13]姜忆湄,李加林,龚虹波,等.围填海影响下海岸带生态服务价值损益评估:以宁波杭州湾新区为例.经济地理,2017,37(11):181-190.[JIANG Y M,LI J L,GONG H B,et al.Ecosystem service value assessment of coastal zone caused by reclamation:A case study of Ningbo Hangzhou bay new zone.Economic Geography,2017,37(11):181-190.]
[14]许志华,李京梅,杨雪.基于生境等价分析法的罗源湾填海生态损害评估.海洋环境科学,2016,35(1):13-19.[XU ZH,LI J M,YANG X.Ecological damage assessment of Luoyuan bay reclamation based on habitat equivalency analysis.Marine Environmental Science,2016,35(1):13-19.]
[15]苗丽娟,于永海,关春江,等.机会成本法在海洋生态补偿标准确定中的应用:以庄河青堆子湾海域为例.海洋开发与管理,2014,31(5):21-26.[MIAO L J,YU Y H,GUAN C J,et al.Application of opportunity cost method in determination of marine ecological compensation rates:A case study of Qingduizi Bay of Zhuanghe river.Ocean Development and Management,2014,31(5):21-26.]
[16]王显金,钟昌标.沿海滩涂围垦生态补偿标准构建:基于能值拓展模型衡量的生态外溢价值.自然资源学报,2017,32(5):742-754.[WANG X J,ZHONG C B.Construction of ecological compensation standard for tidal flat reclamation:Based on the spillover ecological value measured by expansion emergy synthesis model.Journal of Natural Resources,2017,32(5):742-754.]
[17]肖建红,王敏,刘娟,等.基于生态标签制度的海洋生态产品生态补偿标准区域差异化研究.自然资源学报,2016,31(3):402-412.[XIAO J H,WANG M,LIU J,et al.Study on the regional difference of eco-compensation standards for the marine ecological products based on marine fisheries'eco-label schemes.Journal of Natural Resources,2016,31(3):402-412.]
[18]李京梅,王颖梅.围填海造地生态补偿指标体系的建立与应用.生态经济,2016,32(6):183-188.[LI J M,WANG YM.The establishment and application of eco-compensation index system for land reclamation.Ecological Economy,2016,32(6):183-188.]
[19]李洋,黄鹄,佟智成.钦州保税港区围填海工程生态损失及其补偿价值研究.钦州学院学报,2016,31(1):17-21.[LIY,HUANG H,TONG Z C.Study on ecological loss and compensation value of enclave reclamation project in Qinzhou Free Trade Port Area.Journal of Qinzhou University,2016,31(1):17-21.]
[20]刘敏,侯立军,许世远,等.长江河口潮滩表层沉积物对磷酸盐的吸附特征.地理学报,2002,57(4):397-406.[LIUM,HOU L J,XU S Y,et al.Carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes as tracers to source organic matter in the Yangtze Estuary.Acta Geographica Sinica,2002,57(4):397-406.]
[21]石洪华,郑伟,丁德文,等.典型海洋生态系统服务功能及价值评估:以桑沟湾为例.海洋环境科学,2008,27(2):3-6.[SHI H H,ZHENG W,DING D W,et al.Valuation of typical marine ecosytem services:A case study in Sanggou Bay.Marine Environmental Science,2008,27(2):3-6.]
[22]史定刚,关万春,艾为明,等.三门核电站周边海域叶绿素a及初级生产力时空分布.浙江农业学报,2014,26(5):1303-1308.[SHI D G,GUAN W C,AI W M,et al.Spatial-temporal distribution of chlorophyll-a and primary productivity in the surrounding areas of Sanmen bay nuclear power station.Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis,2014,26(5):1303-1308.]
[23]任杰,贺宝根.盐沼水-沉积物-植物界面泥沙输移过程研究进展概述.科技信息:科学教研,2007,(16):21,33.[REN J,HE B G.Summary of research progress on sediment transport process in salt marsh water-sediment-plant interface.Science&Technology Information:Science and Education,2007,(16):21,33.]
[24]王萱,陈伟琪,张珞平,等.同安湾围(填)海生态系统服务损害的货币化预测评估.生态学报,2010,30(21):5914-5924.[WANG X,CHEN W Q,ZHANG L P,et al.Predictive valuation of ecosystem services losses from sea reclamation planning projects in Tong'an Bay.Acta Ecologica Sinica,2010,30(21):5914-5924.]
[25]王静,徐敏,张益民,等.围填海的滨海湿地生态服务功能价值损失的评估:以海门市滨海新区围填海为例.南京师大学报:自然科学版,2009,32(4):134-138.[WANG J,XU M,ZHANG Y M,et al.Coastal wetland ecological service value loss appraisal of reclamation:Take the coastal wetland reclamation of Haimen for example.Journal of Nanjing Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2009,32(4):134-138.]
[26]欧维新,杨桂山,高建华.盐城潮滩湿地对N、P营养物质的截留效应研究.湿地科学,2006,4(3):179-186.[OU W X,YANG G S,GAO J H.Retention effect of wetland for Nitrogen and Phosphorus nutrients in the coastal zone of the Yancheng.Wetland Science,2006,4(3):179-186.]
[27]李纯厚,黄洪辉,林钦,等.海水对虾池塘养殖污染物环境负荷量的研究.农业环境科学学报,2004,23(3):545-550.[LI C H,HUANG H H,LIN Q,et al.Environmental carrying capacity of the pollutants from the prawn seawater culture ponds.Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2004,23(3):545-550.]
[28]COSTANZA R,DARGE R,DEGROOT R,et al.The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital.Nature,1997,387:253-260.
[29]陈仲新,张新时.中国生态系统效益的价值.科学通报,2000,45(1):17-22.[CHEN Z X,ZHANG X S.The value of ecosystem benefits in China.Chinese Science Bulletin,2000,45(1):17-22.]
[30]李新,周青松,俞存根,等.浙江三门湾春季鱼类种类组成及多样性研究.浙江海洋学院学报:自然科学版,2014,33(6):488-494.[LI X,ZHOU Q S,YU C G,et al.Species composition and diversity of fish in spring in Sanmen Bay.Journal of Zhejiang Ocean University:Natural Science,2014,33(6):488-494.]
[31]蔡萌.三门湾鱼类和蟹类数量变化和生态特征的研究.上海:上海海洋大学,2009.[CAI M.Investigation of density and ecological characteristics of fishes and crabs in the Sanmen Bay.Shanghai:Shanghai Ocean University,2009.]
[32]中国水利学会:2006年学术年会//谢亚力,伍冬领.三门湾滩涂围垦对海湾水动力及海床影响初步分析.北京:中国水利水电出版社,2006:146-151[Chinese Hydraulic Engineering Society:2006 Academic Annual Conference Papers//XIE Y L,TONG D L.Preliminary Analysis on The Impact of Sanmen Bay Reclamation on The Hydrodynamics and Seabed of The Gulf.Beijing:China Water Power Press,2006:146-151.]
[33]宁波市第五届学术大会论文集//施慧雄.宁波市滩涂资源及其动态变化.杭州:浙江大学出版社,2008:143-149[Ningbo fifth academic conference proceedings//SHI H X.Tidal Flat Resources and Its Dynamic Changes in Ningbo.Hangzhou:Zhejiang University Press,2008:143-149.]
[34]郑伟,徐元,石洪华,等.海洋生态补偿理论及技术体系初步构建.海洋环境科学,2011,30(6):877-880.[ZHENG W,XU Y,SHI H H,et al.Establishment of theory and technical system for marine ecological compensation.Marine Environment Science,2011,30(6):877-880.]
[35]饶欢欢,彭本荣,刘岩,等.海洋工程生态损害评估与补偿:以厦门杏林跨海大桥为例.生态学报,2015,35(16):5467-5476.[RAO H H,PENG B R,LIU Y,et al.Ecological damage assessment and compensation of marine engineering:A case study of Xinglin sea-crossing bridge,Xiamen.Acta Ecologica Sinica,2015,35(16):5467-5476.]
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |