伤愈水治疗急性软组织损伤的临床疗效探讨

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：Clinical Effect of Wound Healing Water on Acute Soft Tissue Injury 作者：杨远林 ; 朱君军 ; 周荣斌 ; 廖军 ; 冯勇 英文作者：YANG Yuan-lin;ZHU Jun-jun;ZHOU Rong-bin;LIAO Jun;FENG Yong;Department of Orthopaedics, Fuling District Hospital of Chongqing; 关键词：伤愈水 ; 急性软组织损伤 ; 临床疗效 英文关键词：Wound healing water;;Acute soft tissue injury;;Clinical efficacy 中文刊名：HZZZ 英文刊名：China & Foreign Medical Treatment 机构：重庆市涪陵区中医院骨伤科; 出版日期：2019-01-11 出版单位：中外医疗 年：2019 期：v.38 基金：2014年重庆市卫生和计生委中医药科技项目:伤愈水治疗急性软组织损伤的临床疗效观察(ZY201402160) 语种：中文; 页：HZZZ201902028 页数：4 CN：02 ISSN：11-5625/R 分类号：88-91

摘要

目的观察伤愈水治疗急性软组织损伤的疗效。方法方便选取该院于2015年1月—2016年7月收治的急性软组织损伤患者180例,随机分为治疗组与对照组,治疗组行伤愈水外敷、对照组行云南白药酊外用,7 d为1个疗程,1个疗程开始、结束时记录患部疼痛、压痛、肿胀、瘀斑、肌肉僵硬、功能障碍评分。结果①治疗组对压痛单项症状疗效(临床痊愈41.11%、显效57.78%、有效1.11%)、对症组对压痛单项症状疗效(临床痊愈17.78%、显效81.11%、有效1.11%),两组比较差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.343、P=0.001<0.05),治疗组优于对照组。②治疗组对功能障碍单项症状疗效(临床痊愈76.67%、显效17.78%、有效5.56%)、对照组对功能障碍单项症状疗效(临床痊愈62.22%、显效24.44%、有效13.34%),两组比较差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.213、P=0.027<0.05),治疗组优于对照组。结论伤愈水治疗急性软组织损伤疗效确切。
        Objective To observe the therapeutic effect of wound healing water on acute soft tissue injury. Methods 180 patients with acute soft tissue injury admitted to our department from January 2015 to July 2016 were convenient randomly divided into treatment group and control group. The treatment group was treated with external application of wound water and the control group was treated with Yunnan Baiyao for 7 days for one course of treatment, the pain, tenderness, swelling,ecchymosis, muscle stiffness, and dysfunction scores of the affected part were recorded at the beginning and end of one course of treatment. Results 1.The treatment group had the effect of single symptom of tenderness(41.11% clinical cure,57.78% effective, 1.11% effective), and the symptomatic effect of symptomatic group on clinical symptoms of tenderness(general recovery 17.78%, marked effect 81.11%, effective 1.11%). The difference was statistically significant(Z=-3.343,P =0.001 <0.05), and the treatment group was superior to the control group. 2.The treatment group had a single symptom symptom of dysfunction(76.67% clinical recovery, 17.78% obvious effective, 5.56% effective), and the control group had single symptom symptoms(62.22% clinical cure, 24.44% obvious effective, 13.34% effective). The difference was statistically significant(Z=-2.213, P=0.027<0.05), and the treatment group was superior to the control group. Conclusion The treatment of acute soft tissue injury with wound healing water is effective.

引文

[1]程涛,黄家骏.中药内服治疗急性软组织损伤的研究进展[J].中医正骨,2017,29(1):39-41.
    [2]关钦强,杨爱勇,刘东海.舒筋活络祛痛膏治疗急性软组织损伤的临床疗效观察[J].内蒙古中医药,2017,36(17):76-77.
    [3]李颖.四黄散外敷治疗急性软组织损伤320例[J].内蒙古中医药,2017,36(1):58-59.
    [4]王和呜.中医骨伤科学[M].2版.北京:中国中医药出版社,2017:255.
    [5]杨利学,张文安,董建文,等.活血止痛软胶囊治疗急性软组织损伤临床研究[J].中国医药科学,2015,5(12):16-20.
    [6]刘国奋,吴俊哲,李大刚,等.双柏散配伍冰片外敷在急性软组织损伤患者中的应用价值[J].光明中医,2017,32(23):16-20.
    [7]蒋国鹏,谢兴文,顾玉彪,等.急性软组织损伤的中医治疗进展[J].中国中医急诊,2015,24(7):1209-1211.
    [8]杨春恒,刘德春,韩士鼎.伤痛膏外敷治疗急性软组织损伤疗效观察[J].中医药临床杂志,2017,29(2):270-272.
    [9]王哲新.中西医结合治疗急性软组织损伤临床观察[J].中国中医急症,2014,23(10):1930-1931.
    [10]王日生.活血化瘀中药药理作用探析[J].亚太传统医药,2014,10(4):74-75.
    [11]高冲,刘璐,胡爱菊,等.活血化瘀中药的药理作用研究进展[J].药物评价研究,2013,36(1):64-68.
    [12]张宝霞,张金生,杜梅梅,等.活血化瘀药调控干细胞旁分泌效应修复损伤脑组织作用机制的研究[J].中华中医药杂志,2015,30(1):288-290.
    [13]范慧慧,许二平.活血化瘀法调控骨髓间充质干细胞旁分泌促血管再生研究述评[J].中医学报,2013,28(177):258-260.
    [14]王颖,付立波.当归对炎症痛大鼠的痛觉调节作用[J].中国老年学杂志,2015,35(10):2623-2624.
    [15]李顺.四黄散外敷治疗急性软组织损伤320例[J].内蒙古中医药,2017,1(1):58-59.