动物实验系统评价/Meta分析检索方法的介绍
|
摘要
目的介绍动物实验系统评价/Meta分析检索策略的制定方法和实施步骤,为国内相关研究人员提供参考依据,促进国内高质量动物实验系统评价/Meta分析的开展和实施。方法计算机检索Pub Med、EMbase和CNKI数据库,搜集与动物实验系统评价/Meta分析检索策略、流程、方法制定和报告等相关的文献,检索时限均从建库至2017年10月。对纳入研究进行描述性分析。结果最终纳入5个研究。动物实验系统评价/Meta分析检索方法的实施过程可归纳为5个步骤:(1)确定/凝练研究问题;(2)选择恰当数据库和其他检索资源;(3)将研究问题转化为检索策略;(4)综合检索结果,去除重复引文;(5)筛选可能符合要求的研究。此外,需要注意从检索方法和检索结果两个方面充分报告其检索策略。结论动物实验系统评价/Meta分析检索方法实施过程分为5个步骤,提供了较为清晰的检索思路,能够帮助动物实验系统评价/Meta分析的研究人员设计、制定、实施较为广泛和全面的检索策略。
Objectives To introduce the formulating methods and implementing steps of search strategy of systematic reviews(SRs)/meta-analysis(MAs) of animal experiments, so as to provide a reference for domestic related researchers, and promote the development and implementation of high quality SRs/MAs of animal experiments in China. Methods Pub Med, EMbase and CNKI databases were searched online to retrieve studies on the search strategy of SRs/MAs of animal experiments from inception to October 2017. A descriptive analysis was then conducted using the evidence-based medicine theory and method. Results A total of 5 studies were included. The 5 basic steps on how to design and carry out comprehensive search strategies to identify potentially relevant animal experiments on a specific research question were as follow: 1) Formulate research question; 2) Identify appropriate databases and sources of studies;3) Transform research question into search strategy; 4) Collect search results and remove duplicates; 5) Identify potentially relevant papers. The report of search strategy needs to state its search method and search results clearly.Conclusion These 5 steps can provide an effective method, which will assist researchers in performing a comprehensive literature search.
Objectives To introduce the formulating methods and implementing steps of search strategy of systematic reviews(SRs)/meta-analysis(MAs) of animal experiments, so as to provide a reference for domestic related researchers, and promote the development and implementation of high quality SRs/MAs of animal experiments in China. Methods Pub Med, EMbase and CNKI databases were searched online to retrieve studies on the search strategy of SRs/MAs of animal experiments from inception to October 2017. A descriptive analysis was then conducted using the evidence-based medicine theory and method. Results A total of 5 studies were included. The 5 basic steps on how to design and carry out comprehensive search strategies to identify potentially relevant animal experiments on a specific research question were as follow: 1) Formulate research question; 2) Identify appropriate databases and sources of studies;3) Transform research question into search strategy; 4) Collect search results and remove duplicates; 5) Identify potentially relevant papers. The report of search strategy needs to state its search method and search results clearly.Conclusion These 5 steps can provide an effective method, which will assist researchers in performing a comprehensive literature search.
引文
1陈匡阳,王亚楠,赵雅琴,等.国内动物实验系统评价/Meta分析研究的现状分析.中国循证医学杂志,2015,15(4):414-418.
2 Hooijmans CR,Tillema A,Leenaars M,et al.Enhancing search efficiency by means of a search filter for finding all studies on animal experimentation in Pub Med.Lab Anim,2010,44(3):170-175.
3Hooijmans CR,Int Hout J,Ritskes-Hoitinga M,et al.Meta-analyses of animal studies:an introduction of a valuable instrument to further improve healthcare.ILAR J,2014,55(3):418-426.
4 陈匡阳,屈丽娜,胡芳,等.动物实验系统评价/Meta分析检索策略报告情况调查.中国循证医学杂志,2016,16(3):348-353.
5Leenaars M,Hooijmans CR,van Veggel N,et al.A step-by-step guide to systematically identify all relevant animal studies.Lab Anim,2012,46(1):24-31.
6 de Vries RB,Hooijmans CR,Tillema A,et al.A search filter for increasing the retrieval of animal studies in Embase.Lab Anim,2011,45(4):268-270.
7Peters JL,Sutton AJ,Jones DR,et al.A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of animal experiments with guidelines for reporting.J Environ Sci Health B,2006,41(7):1245-1258.
8 de Vries RB,Hooijmans CR,Tillema A,et al.Updated version of the Embase search filter for animal studies.Lab Anim,2014,48(1):88.
9Higgins JPT,Green S.Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.2.Available at:www.cochranehandbook.org.
10 Greenhalgh T,Peacock R.Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence:audit of primary sources.BMJ,2005,331(7524):1064-1065.
11刘莉,沈秀丽,刘云,等.BIOSIS Previews网络数据库检索系统的检索方法及应用.吉林大学学报(医学版),2004,30(1):155-156.
12Ramos-Remus C,Suarez-Almazor M,Dorgan M,et al.Performance of online biomedical databases in rheumatology.J Rheumatol,1994,21(10):1912-1921.
13 Suarez-Almazor ME,Belseck E,Homik J,et al.Identifying clinical trials in the medical literature with electronic databases:MEDLINE alone is not enough.Control Clin Trials,2000,21(5):476-487.
2 Hooijmans CR,Tillema A,Leenaars M,et al.Enhancing search efficiency by means of a search filter for finding all studies on animal experimentation in Pub Med.Lab Anim,2010,44(3):170-175.
3Hooijmans CR,Int Hout J,Ritskes-Hoitinga M,et al.Meta-analyses of animal studies:an introduction of a valuable instrument to further improve healthcare.ILAR J,2014,55(3):418-426.
4 陈匡阳,屈丽娜,胡芳,等.动物实验系统评价/Meta分析检索策略报告情况调查.中国循证医学杂志,2016,16(3):348-353.
5Leenaars M,Hooijmans CR,van Veggel N,et al.A step-by-step guide to systematically identify all relevant animal studies.Lab Anim,2012,46(1):24-31.
6 de Vries RB,Hooijmans CR,Tillema A,et al.A search filter for increasing the retrieval of animal studies in Embase.Lab Anim,2011,45(4):268-270.
7Peters JL,Sutton AJ,Jones DR,et al.A systematic review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of animal experiments with guidelines for reporting.J Environ Sci Health B,2006,41(7):1245-1258.
8 de Vries RB,Hooijmans CR,Tillema A,et al.Updated version of the Embase search filter for animal studies.Lab Anim,2014,48(1):88.
9Higgins JPT,Green S.Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.2.Available at:www.cochranehandbook.org.
10 Greenhalgh T,Peacock R.Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence:audit of primary sources.BMJ,2005,331(7524):1064-1065.
11刘莉,沈秀丽,刘云,等.BIOSIS Previews网络数据库检索系统的检索方法及应用.吉林大学学报(医学版),2004,30(1):155-156.
12Ramos-Remus C,Suarez-Almazor M,Dorgan M,et al.Performance of online biomedical databases in rheumatology.J Rheumatol,1994,21(10):1912-1921.
13 Suarez-Almazor ME,Belseck E,Homik J,et al.Identifying clinical trials in the medical literature with electronic databases:MEDLINE alone is not enough.Control Clin Trials,2000,21(5):476-487.