用户名: 密码: 验证码:
自动痔疮套扎术治疗轻中度痔疮分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Analysis of treatment of mild to moderate hemorrhoids with automatic hemorrhoids ligation(RPH)
  • 作者:万月明 ; 陈应驹 ; 李小艳 ; 磨鹏诗 ; 梁永辉
  • 英文作者:WAN Yueming;CHEN Yingju;LI Xiaoyan;MO Pengshi;LIANG Yonghui;General Surgery, Lecong Hospital of Shunde District, Shunde Hospital Affiliated to Guangzhou Medical University;
  • 关键词:自动痔疮套扎术 ; 轻中度 ; 痔疮 ; 传统手术 ; 复发
  • 英文关键词:Automatic hemorrhoids ligation(RPH);;Mild to moderate;;Hemorrhoids;;Traditional operation;;Recurrence
  • 中文刊名:GYKX
  • 英文刊名:China Medicine and Pharmacy
  • 机构:广州医科大学附属顺德医院广东省佛山市顺德区乐从医院普外科;
  • 出版日期:2018-06-25
  • 出版单位:中国医药科学
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.8;No.180
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:GYKX201812067
  • 页数:4
  • CN:12
  • ISSN:11-6006/R
  • 分类号:225-228
摘要
目的探究自动痔疮套扎术(RPH)治疗轻中度痔疮的效果,为临床提供指导。方法以2015年4月~2017年4月我院270例轻中度痔疮患者作为观察对象,随机将270例患者分为RPH组(135例,应用自动痔疮套扎术治疗)、传统组(135例,应用传统手术治疗)。均随访半年,研究对比RPH组和传统组患者的临床疗效、手术时间、创面愈合时间、并发症发生率及复发率。结果 RPH组患者总有效率(93.33%)略高于传统组,但组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);RPH组患者手术时间[(10.79±2.25)min]、创面愈合时间[(7.24±2.10)d]相比传统组[(20.24±2.35)min、(15.36±3.45)d]明显更短,P<0.05;RPH组患者并发症发生率(2.22%)、复发率(4.44%)相比传统组(17.78%、20.00%)明显更低,P<0.05。结论对轻中度痔疮患者采取自动痔疮套扎术治疗效果明显,且并发症少。
        Objective To explore the effect of treatment of mild to moderate hemorrhoids with automatic hemorrhoids ligation(RPH) and provide guidance for clinical treatment. Methods From April 2015 to April 2017, 270 patients with mild to moderate hemorrhoids in our hospital were selected as research object, all patients were randomly divided into the RPH group(135 cases, application of automatic hemorrhoids ligation) and the traditional group(135 cases, application of traditional surgery). All patients were followed up for half a year. The clinical efficacy, surgical time, wound healing time, complication rate and recurrence rate were compared between RPH group and traditional group. Results The total effective rate(93.33%) in RPH group was slightly higher than that in the traditional group, but there was no significant difference between two groups, P > 0.05. In the RPH group, the operation time [(10.79±2.25) min] and wound healing time [(7.24±2.10) d] was significantly shorter than those of the traditional group [(20.24±2.35) min,(15.36±3.45)d], and P < 0.05. The incidence of complications(2.22%) and recurrence rate(4.44%) in RPH group were significantly lower than those in the traditional group(17.78%, 20.00%), and P < 0.05. Conclusion For patients with mild to moderate hemorrhoids, automatic hemorrhoids ligation is effective and less complication.
引文
[1]张锡滔,何剑平,刘天来,等.七叶皂苷钠穴位注射联合自动痔疮套扎术对老年痔疮术后康复进程及肛门疼痛的影响[J].广东医学,2017,38(7):1106-1109.
    [2]唐茂山.自动痔疮套扎术与外剥内扎术治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ期混合痔的对照研究[J].中华全科医学,2016,14(3):397-398,467.
    [3]Wang Q,Du J,Cai C,et al.Severe intra-abdominal bleeding leading to hemorrhagic shock,rectal perforation,and bilateral hydrothorax after stapling procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids(PPH):is the transanal drainage feasible in this situation?:report of a case and a successful experience[J].Int J Colorectal Dis,2014,29(4):541-542.
    [4]袁和学,曾宪东,殷志韬,等.超声多普勒引导下痔动脉结扎联合自动痔疮套扎术治疗痔病[J].中国现代医学杂志,2015,25(28):102-105.
    [5]Lim SS,Yu CW,Aw LD.Comparing topical hydrocortisone cream with Hai's Perianal Support in managing symptomatic hemorrhoids in pregnancy:a preliminary trial[J].J Obstet Gynaecol Res,2015,41(2):238-247.
    [6]胡响当,李帅军,罗敏,等.自动痔疮套扎术(RPH)结合剪口结扎术治疗混合痔的临床研究[J].中国中医急症,2016,25(3):403-404,432.
    [7]杜仲光.自动痔疮套扎术与外痔切除手术联合治疗Ⅱ~Ⅳ期混合痔的围术期指标观察[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2016,37(6):780-781.
    [8]张贤.自动痔疮套扎术加外痔切除联合中药内服外洗治疗混合痔32例[J].内蒙古中医药,2014,33(16):80-81.
    [9]陈初航,邱海敏,朱达康,等.自动痔疮套扎术治疗痔疮出血患者的临床效果分析[J].中国当代医药,2017,24(19):21-23.
    [10]宾东华,翦闽涛,严建,等.自动痔疮套扎术在痔合并肛瘘治疗中的应用[J].中国医药导报,2016,13(31):69-72.
    [11]余勇.微创自动痔疮套扎术联合硬化剂注射术治疗重度痔疮的临床疗效分析[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(25):4767-4768.
    [12]麦昌文.自动痔疮套扎术联合外痔切除术治疗混合痔的临床观察[J].右江民族医学院学报,2014,36(3):388-389.
    [13]丁艺超.七叶皂苷钠穴位注射联合自动痔疮套扎术对老年痔疮术后肛门疼痛和并发症的影响[J].现代诊断与治疗,2017,28(4):591-593,597.
    [14]周启昌,叶辉,龚治林,等.自动痔疮套扎术联合消痔灵注射液治疗II~IV度内痔的临床观察[J].国际中医中药杂志,2014,36(4):352-353.
    [15]肖燕松.自动痔疮套扎术(RPH)治疗轻中度痔疮的临床疗效分析[J].临床医药文献电子杂志,2017,4(20):3806-3807.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700