韩国奎章阁六臣注本《文选》的传本价值
|
摘要
奎章阁六臣注本《文选》的底本是现存唯一的最早合并李善注和五臣注的《文选》六臣注本,后世的"六家"、"六臣"注本都是这个文本的传承系统。作为六臣注祖本,它保留了原初注文合并的真实面貌,可以考察后世传本的变化及其编排删省的得失,体现合注互补的优势特点;其中的文字异同,可以校正后世传本的脱误错讹,拓展视野,探讨"秀州本"最初合并二家注时的编撰方法以及别本资料来源。当然奎章阁本《文选》也有不少失误,有的可能是"秀州本"编撰时造成的错误,也有的可能则是秀州本在朝鲜时代的传播刊刻中产生的问题。
The master copy of Wenxuanannotated by six scholars of Kyujanggak is the combination of LI Shan-zhu's annotated version and that of the five scholars,and thus is the existing earliest version annotated by six scholars.As the mother edition of six scholars' annotated version,it keeps the trace of combination of two versions,facilitating the survey on changing of later editions as well as gains and losses in their compiling,and reflecting the advantage of collective annotation.The differences in language help to correct mistakes of later versions,expand research vision,and explore the compiling method of Xiuzhou version when combining the two annotated versions and data source of other versions.Of course,there exist many errors in Wenxuanannotated by six scholars of Kyujanggak which may originates from the compiling of Xiuzhou version or from the dissemination of Xiuzhou version in Korean Era.
The master copy of Wenxuanannotated by six scholars of Kyujanggak is the combination of LI Shan-zhu's annotated version and that of the five scholars,and thus is the existing earliest version annotated by six scholars.As the mother edition of six scholars' annotated version,it keeps the trace of combination of two versions,facilitating the survey on changing of later editions as well as gains and losses in their compiling,and reflecting the advantage of collective annotation.The differences in language help to correct mistakes of later versions,expand research vision,and explore the compiling method of Xiuzhou version when combining the two annotated versions and data source of other versions.Of course,there exist many errors in Wenxuanannotated by six scholars of Kyujanggak which may originates from the compiling of Xiuzhou version or from the dissemination of Xiuzhou version in Korean Era.
引文
[1]傅刚.论韩国奎章阁本《文选》的文献价值[J].文献,2000,(3).
[2]郑玉顺.韩国奎章阁所藏《六臣注文选》本研究[D].南京:南京大学,1998.
[3]孔令刚.奎章阁本《文选》研究[D].郑州:河南大学,2013.
[4]奎章阁所藏六臣注本《文选》[M].首尔:多韵泉图书出版社,1996.
[5]房玄龄.晋书[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
[6]文选[M].北京:中华书局,1977.
[7]魏徵.隋书[M].北京:中华书局,1973.
[8]王先谦.后汉书集解[M].北京:中华书局,1984.
[9]文选五臣注[M].景印宋绍兴辛巳建阳陈八郎崇化书坊刊本.台北:国立中央图书馆,1981.
[10]日本足利学校藏《宋刊明州本六臣注〈文选〉》[M].北京:人民文学出版社,2008.
[11]六臣注文选[M].上海:上海书店,1989.
[12]阮元.十三经注疏[G].北京:中华书局,1980.
[13]扬雄.法言[G]//诸子集成(七).北京:中华书局,1954.
[14]六韬[G]//诸子集成:补编四.成都:四川人民出版社,1997.
(1)这并不等于说李善注中没有文章写作、体式风格的解说,也不等于说五臣注中全无文献典故的内容。
(2)参:曹道衡、沈玉成《陆机〈为顾彦先赠妇诗〉》,载《中古文学史料丛考》,中华书局2003年版,第129页。
[2]郑玉顺.韩国奎章阁所藏《六臣注文选》本研究[D].南京:南京大学,1998.
[3]孔令刚.奎章阁本《文选》研究[D].郑州:河南大学,2013.
[4]奎章阁所藏六臣注本《文选》[M].首尔:多韵泉图书出版社,1996.
[5]房玄龄.晋书[M].北京:中华书局,1974.
[6]文选[M].北京:中华书局,1977.
[7]魏徵.隋书[M].北京:中华书局,1973.
[8]王先谦.后汉书集解[M].北京:中华书局,1984.
[9]文选五臣注[M].景印宋绍兴辛巳建阳陈八郎崇化书坊刊本.台北:国立中央图书馆,1981.
[10]日本足利学校藏《宋刊明州本六臣注〈文选〉》[M].北京:人民文学出版社,2008.
[11]六臣注文选[M].上海:上海书店,1989.
[12]阮元.十三经注疏[G].北京:中华书局,1980.
[13]扬雄.法言[G]//诸子集成(七).北京:中华书局,1954.
[14]六韬[G]//诸子集成:补编四.成都:四川人民出版社,1997.
(1)这并不等于说李善注中没有文章写作、体式风格的解说,也不等于说五臣注中全无文献典故的内容。
(2)参:曹道衡、沈玉成《陆机〈为顾彦先赠妇诗〉》,载《中古文学史料丛考》,中华书局2003年版,第129页。
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |