植物样品中低水平铀同位素分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Determination of Low Level Uranium Isotopes in Vegetation Samples
  • 作者:鲁彤 ; 侯小琳 ; 张路远 ; 陈宁 ; 张伟超 ; 王妍芸
  • 英文作者:LU Tong;HOU Xiao-Lin;ZHANG Lu-Yuan;CHEN Ning;ZHANG Wei-Chao;WANG Yan-Yun;State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology,Institute of Earth Environment,Chinese Academy of Sciences;Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Technology and Application,Xi'an Accelerator Mass Spectrometer Center;University of Chinese Academy of Sciences;
  • 关键词: ; 同位素比值 ; 植物样品 ; 固相萃取 ; 电感耦合等离子体串联质谱
  • 英文关键词:Uranium;;Isotope ratio;;Vegetation samples;;Solid phase extraction;;Inductively coupled plasma tandem mass spectrometry
  • 中文刊名:FXHX
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry
  • 机构:中国科学院地球环境研究所黄土与第四纪地质国家重点实验室;陕西省加速器质谱技术及应用重点实验室西安加速器质谱中心;中国科学院大学;
  • 出版日期:2018-07-12
  • 出版单位:分析化学
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.46
  • 基金:科技部基础性工作专项项目(No.2015FY110800);; 国家自然科学基金项目(No.11605207);; 黄土与第四纪国家重点实验室培育项目资助~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:FXHX201807025
  • 页数:8
  • CN:07
  • ISSN:22-1125/O6
  • 分类号:153-160
摘要
建立了一种植物样品中痕量铀同位素(~(238)U、~(235)U和~(234)U)的分析方法。通过高温灰化去除植物样品中有机质,采用混合酸消解样品灰分,应用UTEVA萃取色谱分离和纯化铀。化学分离过程中铀的回收率达94%,对Na、K、Ca等基体和干扰元素的去除率超过99%。用高灵敏度ICP-MS/MS同时测定了3种天然铀同位素含量,对~(238)U、~(235)U、~(234)U的检出限分别为3.05、0.34和0.04 pg/g,其中对~(238)U和~(235)U的检出限比文献报道值低1个数量级。对小麦粉标准参考物质中~(238)U的分析结果与参考值吻合,表明本分析方法可靠。将本方法应用于中国西安地区植物样品中铀同位素的分析,结果表明,该地区植物中铀含量和铀同位素比值处于天然水平,未发现人为铀污染。这是中国植物样品中3种天然铀同位素水平的首次调查。
        An analytical method was developed for determination of low-level uranium isotopes in vegetation samples. Dry ashing method was employed to decompose organic matters of vegetation. The sample ash was further digested using multiple acids. Uranium in the prepared sample solution was separated and purified by an extraction chromatography using UTEVA resin. The chemical recovery of uranium in the separation procedure was more than 94%,and more than 99% of Na,K,Ca and other matrix elements and interfering elements were removed. Three natural uranium isotopes were finally measured with high sensitivity ICP-MS/MS. The detection limits of the method for~(238)U,~(235)U,~(234)U were 3.05,0.34 and 0.04 pg/g,respectively. The detection limits for~(238)U and~(235)U were 10 times better than the reported values. Analysis result of U in GBW-10046 standard reference material was in good agreement with reference value,indicating that this method was reliable. The method was successfully applied to determination of uranium isotopes in the vegetation samples collected in Xi ' an region,and it was found that the uranium concentrations and isotopic ratios in these vegetation samples fall well into natural level,and there was no significant artificial uranium contamination.This was the first survey of the three natural uranium isotopes in vegetation samples in this region.
引文
1 Sakaguchi A,Kawai K,Steier P,Quinto F,Mino K,Tomita J,Hoshi M,Whitehead N,Yamamoto M.Sci.Total Environ.,2009,407(14):4238-4242
    2 Eigl R,Srncik M,Steier P,Wallner G.J.Environ.Radioact.,2013,116:54-58
    3 Pourcelot L,Masson O,Renaud P,Cagnat X,Boulet B,Cariou N,De Vismes-Ott A.J.Environ.Radioact.,2015,141:1-7
    4 Guirguis L A,Farag N M,Salim A K.Nucl.Instrum.Methods Phys.Res.A,2015,777:211-217
    5 Sahoo S K.Indian J.Phys.,2009,83(6):787-797
    6 Godoy M L D P,Juli2o L M Q C,Godoy J M.Radiat.Prot.Dosim.,2009,133(4):234-239
    7 Tsai T L,Lin C C,Chu T C.Appl.Radiat.Isot.,2008,66(8):1097-1103
    8 Haciyakupoglu S,Gencay S.J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem.,1999,241(3):611-616
    9 Dreyfus S,PéCheyran C,Magnier C,Prinzhofer A,Donard O.J.ASTM Int.,2017,2(2):797-809
    10 Casacuberta N,Lehritani M,Mantero J,MasquéP,Garcia-Orellana J,Garcia-Tenorio R.Appl.Radiat.Isot.,2012,70(4):568-573
    11 Masson P,Dalix T,Bussière S.Commun.Soil Sci.Plant Anal.,2010,41(3):231-243
    12 WANG Chen,ZHAO Yong-Gang,ZHANG Ji-Long,JIANG Xiao-Yan,CHANG Zhi-Yuan,ZHU Liu-Chao.Journal of Chinese Mass Spectrometry Society,2010,31(1):34-38王琛,赵永刚,张继龙,姜小燕,常志远,朱留超.质谱学报,2010,31(1):34-38
    13 SUN De-Zhong,AN Zi-Yi,XU Chun-Xue,WANG Su-Ming,WANG Ya-Ping.Rock and Mineral Analysis,2012,31(6):961-966孙德忠,安子怡,许春雪,王苏明,王亚平.岩矿测试,2012,31(6):961-966
    14 Okuda T,Kato J,Mori J,Tenmoku M,Suda Y,Tanaka S,He K,Ma Y,Yang F,Yu X.Sci.Total Environ.,2004,330(1-3):145-158
    15 Lloyd N,Parrish R,Horstwood M A,Chenery S N.J.Anal.Atom.Spectrom.,2009,24(6):752-758
    16 WANG Wei,LI Zhi-Ming,XU Jiang,ZHOU Guo-Qing,SHEN Xiao-Pan,Zhai Li-Hua.Chinese J.Anal.Chem.,2015,43(5):703-708汪伟,李志明,徐江,周国庆,沈小攀,翟利华.分析化学,2015,43(5):703-708
    17 Maxwell S L,Hutchison J B,Mcalister D R.J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem.,2015,305(2):1-11
    18 Nisa Q U,Ali A,Khan M H.J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem.,2013,295(3):2203-2214
    19 Croudace I,Warwick P,Taylor R,Dee S.Anal.Chim.Acta,1998,371(2-3):217-225
    20 Veyseh S,Niazi A.Talanta,2016,147:117-123
    21 Raileanu M E.Tensor New,2009,71(3):225-233
    22 Rileanu M,Cecal A.J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem.,2008,277(3):587-590
    23 CHENG Yu-Mei,SUN Xian-Ming,KANG Ye-Bin.Food Science,2005,26(2):165-169成玉梅,孙鲜明,康业斌.食品科学,2005,26(2):165-169
    24 Yoshida S,Muramatsu Y,Tagami K,Uchida S,Ban-Nai T,Yonehara H,Sahoo S.J.Environ.Radioact.,2000,50(1):161-172
    25 Casacuberta N,Lehritani M,Mantero J,MasquéP,Garcia-Orellana J,Garcia-Tenorio R.Appl.Radiat.Isot.,2012,70(4):568-573
    26 Horwitz E P,Dietz M L,Chiarizia R,Diamond H,Essling A M,Graczyk D.Anal.Chim.Acta,1992,266(1):25-37
    27 Ko Y G,Lim J M,Lee H,Chung K H,Kang M J.React.Funct.Polym.,2016,106:43-50
    28 Currie L A.Pure Appl.Chem.,1995,67(10):1699-1723
    29 Grinberg P,Willie S,Sturgeon R E.J.Anal.Atom.Spectrom.,2005,20(8):717-723
    30 WU Tao,KANG Hou-Jun,SHI Zheng-Kun.Phs.Test.Chem.Anal.,Part B,2013,(02):219-221吴涛,康厚军,石正坤.理化检验(化学分册),2013,(02):219-221
    31 Yoshida S,Muramatsu Y.Int.J.Environ.Anal.Chem.,1997,67(1-4):49-58

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700