摘要
为掌握‘红羽1号’和‘红羽2号’油茶新品种繁育的相关技术参数,本研究以普通油茶作砧木,‘红羽1号’和‘红羽2号’油茶新品种作接穗进行大树换冠,开展嫁接成活率及接穗新梢生长量的对比试验研究。结果表明:‘红羽1号’和‘红羽2号’油茶新品种与普通油茶嫁接亲和力强,嫁接成活率分别为93.75%、94.74%,芽成活率分别为88.33%、88.89%。利用‘红羽1号’作接穗其接穗的生长及抽梢情况单株间差异极显著(P <0.01),但利用‘红羽2号’作接穗只是接穗的生长单株间差异显著(P <0.05);‘红羽1号’和‘红羽2号’新品种间的嫁接生长情况差异不显著。
In order to find out the relevant technical parameters of the breeding of two new Camellia semiserrata varieties‘Hongyu 1'and‘Hongyu 2',we used Camellia oleifera as root-stock and‘Hongyu 1'and‘Hongyu 2'as scions to develop comparative study on grafting survival rate and shoot growth of scion. Resultsshowed that‘Hongyu 1'and‘Hongyu 2'had strong affinity with C. oleifera,which grafting survival rateswere 93.75% and 94.74% and survival rates of buds were 88.33% and 88.89%,respectively. The growth ofscion and condition of tassel of individual plant using‘Hongyu 1'as scion were extremely significant(P <0.01),while that was significant(P <0.05) using‘Hongyu 1'as scion. There was no significant differencein graft growth between‘Hongyu 1'and ‘Hongyu 2'(P > 0.05).
引文
[1]陈国臣,张乃燕,王东雪,等.油茶新品种‘红羽1号’[J].广西林业科学,2016,45(2):232.
[2]陈国臣,张乃燕,王东雪,等.油茶新品种‘红羽2号’[J].广西林业科学,2016,45(2):233-234.
[3]谭新建,钟秋平,李建安,等.油茶大树插皮枝接接口处理试验[J].经济林研究,2017,35(1):73-79.
[4]彭佳龙,郑永祥,史小华.油茶高接换冠嫁接成活率影响试验[J].浙江林业科技,2012,32(2):57-59.
[5]段伟华.油茶高接换冠技术研究[D].长沙:中南林业科技大学,2012.
[6]奚如春,陈真权,邓小梅,等.油茶大树嫁接关键技术的优化[J].经济林研究,2011,29(4):105-110.
[7]田大清,张正学,刘凡值,等.油茶高接换种嫁接成活率试验[J].南方农业学报,2012,43(7):947-950.
[8]冯金玲.油茶芽苗砧嫁接体愈合机理研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2011.
[9]李明,姜世玲,王幼群.基因转录后沉默信号可以在拟南芥嫁接体内快速双向传递[J].科学通报,2006,51(2):142-147.