图博档馆藏实体多模交互式呈现的可用性评估
|
摘要
对多模交互系统进行可用性评估,体现其相对于传统交互方式的比较优势,为交互界面的设计与优化提供建议,更好地满足图博档机构用户需求。在虚拟呈现任务情境下,通过实验研究方法获取任务过程中的主客观数据,在量化的指标体系下对两种交互系统进行可用性评估及对比。多模交互在呈现效果与用户满意度上明显优于传统交互方式,而在任务执行效率及易学习性上不及后者。结果表明,互动型任务将显著提升多模交互的可用性,未来对多模交互的研究应关注沉浸等更高维度指标,以贴近用户的真实体验。
The study evaluates the usability of the multimodal interactive system, reflects its comparative advantages relative to the traditional interactive methods,provides suggestions for the design and optimization of the interactive interface,and meets the user's needs. In the context of virtual presentation,the subjective and objective data are obtained through experiments,by which the quantitative usability evaluation and comparison of the two interactive systems are carried out. While evaluating the presentation effect and user satisfaction, the multimodal interaction was significantly superior to the traditional interaction,but less than the latter on the task execution efficiency and ease of learning. The results show that interactive task will significantly improve the usability of multimodal interaction. Future research on multimodal interaction should focus on higher-dimensional indicators such as immersion so as to be close to the user's real experience.
The study evaluates the usability of the multimodal interactive system, reflects its comparative advantages relative to the traditional interactive methods,provides suggestions for the design and optimization of the interactive interface,and meets the user's needs. In the context of virtual presentation,the subjective and objective data are obtained through experiments,by which the quantitative usability evaluation and comparison of the two interactive systems are carried out. While evaluating the presentation effect and user satisfaction, the multimodal interaction was significantly superior to the traditional interaction,but less than the latter on the task execution efficiency and ease of learning. The results show that interactive task will significantly improve the usability of multimodal interaction. Future research on multimodal interaction should focus on higher-dimensional indicators such as immersion so as to be close to the user's real experience.
引文
[1]曾蕾,王晓光,范炜.图档博领域的智慧数据及其在数字人文研究中的角色[J].中国图书馆学报,2018(1):17-34.
[2]夏立新,白阳,张心怡.融合与重构:智慧图书馆发展新形态[J].中国图书馆学报,2018(1):35-49.
[3]赵沁平.虚拟现实中的10个科学技术问题[J].中国科学:信息科学,2017(6):800-803.
[4][19]JEONG W,GLUCK M.Multimodal geographic information systems:Adding haptic and auditory display[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science&Technology,2003,54(3):229-242.
[5]VI C T,ABLAR T D,GATTI E,et al.Not just seeing,but also feeling art:Mid-air haptic experiences integrated in a multisensory art exhibition[J].International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,2017,108(12):1-14.
[6]HAMAM A,SADDIK A E,ALJAAM J M,et al.Aquality of experience model for haptic virtual environments[J].ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing,Communications,and Applications,2014,10(3):28.
[7]林绮屏.图书馆与博物馆数字资源开放式交互展示的融合研究[J].现代情报,2014(10):70-73.
[8]吴志强,祝忠明,刘巍,等.机构知识库三维模型检索与展示技术研究与实践[J].数据分析与知识发现,2017(1):73-80.
[9]MCLAUGHLIN M L,SUKHATME G,SHAHABIC,et al.The haptic museum[C]//Proceedings of the EVA 2000.Florence:Conference on Electronic Imaging and the Visual Arts,2000.
[10]BER GAMASCO M,FR ISOLI A,BAR BAGLI F.Haptics technologies and cultural heritage applications[C]//Computer Animation.IEEE Computer Society,2002:25.
[11]王建冬.国外可用性研究进展述评[J].现代图书情报技术,2009(9):7-16.
[12]Wikipedia.Usability[EB/OL].[2018-01-24].https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usability.
[13]STEPHANN M,ANN B,L.C A.Using information behaviors to evaluate the functionality and usability of electronic resources:From Ellis's model to evaluation[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2008,59(14):2244-2267.
[14]JENG J.What is usability in the context of the digital library and how can it be measured?[J].Information Technology and Libraries,2005,24(2):47-56.
[15]DIAH N M,ISMAIL M,AHMAD S,et al.Usability testing for educational computer game using observation method[C]//International Conference on Information R etrieval&Knowledge Management.IEEE,2010:157-161.
[16]HEGAR TYR,WUSTEMAN J.Evaluating EBSCOhost mobile[J].Library Hi Tech,2011,29(2):320-333.
[17]HASHIM A S,WAN F W A,AHMAD R.Usability study of mobile learning course content application as a revision tool[M].Berlin Heidelberg:Springer,2011.
[18]黄晓斌,付跃安.基于用户体验的移动阅读终端可用性评价[J].图书馆论坛,2011(4):6-9.
[20]BATEMAN A,ZHAO O K,BAJCSY A V,et al.Auser-centered design and analysisof an electrostatic haptic touchscreen system for students with visual impairments[J].International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,2018,109(1):102-111.
[21]LEWIS J R,SAUR O J.The factor structure of the system usability scale[C]//Human Centered Design,First International Conference.DBLP,2009:94-103.
[22]林绮屏.机构博物类资源数字化服务系统的设计与实现[J].现代情报,2015(12):55-59.
[23]Wikipedia.User interface[EB/OL].[2017-11-01].https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_interface.
[24]李月琳,梁娜,齐雪.从交互维度到交互功能:构建数字图书馆交互评估理论模型[J].中国图书馆学报,2016(1):66-82.
[25]CSIKSZENTMIHALYI M.Flow:the psychology of optimal experience[M].New York:Harper&R ow,1990:303.
[26]赵生辉,朱学芳.数字人文仓储的构建与实现[J].情报资料工作,2015(4):42-47.
[2]夏立新,白阳,张心怡.融合与重构:智慧图书馆发展新形态[J].中国图书馆学报,2018(1):35-49.
[3]赵沁平.虚拟现实中的10个科学技术问题[J].中国科学:信息科学,2017(6):800-803.
[4][19]JEONG W,GLUCK M.Multimodal geographic information systems:Adding haptic and auditory display[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science&Technology,2003,54(3):229-242.
[5]VI C T,ABLAR T D,GATTI E,et al.Not just seeing,but also feeling art:Mid-air haptic experiences integrated in a multisensory art exhibition[J].International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,2017,108(12):1-14.
[6]HAMAM A,SADDIK A E,ALJAAM J M,et al.Aquality of experience model for haptic virtual environments[J].ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing,Communications,and Applications,2014,10(3):28.
[7]林绮屏.图书馆与博物馆数字资源开放式交互展示的融合研究[J].现代情报,2014(10):70-73.
[8]吴志强,祝忠明,刘巍,等.机构知识库三维模型检索与展示技术研究与实践[J].数据分析与知识发现,2017(1):73-80.
[9]MCLAUGHLIN M L,SUKHATME G,SHAHABIC,et al.The haptic museum[C]//Proceedings of the EVA 2000.Florence:Conference on Electronic Imaging and the Visual Arts,2000.
[10]BER GAMASCO M,FR ISOLI A,BAR BAGLI F.Haptics technologies and cultural heritage applications[C]//Computer Animation.IEEE Computer Society,2002:25.
[11]王建冬.国外可用性研究进展述评[J].现代图书情报技术,2009(9):7-16.
[12]Wikipedia.Usability[EB/OL].[2018-01-24].https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usability.
[13]STEPHANN M,ANN B,L.C A.Using information behaviors to evaluate the functionality and usability of electronic resources:From Ellis's model to evaluation[J].Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,2008,59(14):2244-2267.
[14]JENG J.What is usability in the context of the digital library and how can it be measured?[J].Information Technology and Libraries,2005,24(2):47-56.
[15]DIAH N M,ISMAIL M,AHMAD S,et al.Usability testing for educational computer game using observation method[C]//International Conference on Information R etrieval&Knowledge Management.IEEE,2010:157-161.
[16]HEGAR TYR,WUSTEMAN J.Evaluating EBSCOhost mobile[J].Library Hi Tech,2011,29(2):320-333.
[17]HASHIM A S,WAN F W A,AHMAD R.Usability study of mobile learning course content application as a revision tool[M].Berlin Heidelberg:Springer,2011.
[18]黄晓斌,付跃安.基于用户体验的移动阅读终端可用性评价[J].图书馆论坛,2011(4):6-9.
[20]BATEMAN A,ZHAO O K,BAJCSY A V,et al.Auser-centered design and analysisof an electrostatic haptic touchscreen system for students with visual impairments[J].International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,2018,109(1):102-111.
[21]LEWIS J R,SAUR O J.The factor structure of the system usability scale[C]//Human Centered Design,First International Conference.DBLP,2009:94-103.
[22]林绮屏.机构博物类资源数字化服务系统的设计与实现[J].现代情报,2015(12):55-59.
[23]Wikipedia.User interface[EB/OL].[2017-11-01].https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_interface.
[24]李月琳,梁娜,齐雪.从交互维度到交互功能:构建数字图书馆交互评估理论模型[J].中国图书馆学报,2016(1):66-82.
[25]CSIKSZENTMIHALYI M.Flow:the psychology of optimal experience[M].New York:Harper&R ow,1990:303.
[26]赵生辉,朱学芳.数字人文仓储的构建与实现[J].情报资料工作,2015(4):42-47.