九寨沟地震前后次生地质灾害分布特征分析

详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |

英文篇名：ANALYSIS ON DISTRIBUTION CHARACTERISTICS OF SECONDARY GEO-HAZARDS BEFORE AND AFTER JIUZHAIGOU EARTHQUAKE 作者：刘果 ; 张友谊 ; 张珊珊 ; 叶小兵 ; 袁亚东 英文作者：LIU Guo;ZHANG You-yi;ZHANG Shan-shan;YE Xiao-bing;YUAN Ya-dong;Southwest University of Science and Technology,School of Civil Engineering and Architecture; 关键词：九寨沟地震 ; 地质灾害 ; 分布规律 ; 对比分析 英文关键词：Jiuzhaigou earthquake;;geological hazard;;distribution law;;comparative analysis 中文刊名：DZHB 英文刊名：Journal of Geological Hazards and Environment Preservation 机构：西南科技大学土木工程与建筑学院; 出版日期：2018-09-25 出版单位：地质灾害与环境保护 年：2018 期：v.29;No.116 语种：中文; 页：DZHB201803001 页数：4 CN：03 ISSN：51-1467/P 分类号：3-6

摘要

为研究九寨沟地震前后次生地质灾害分布特征,本文应用Arcgis软件平台,对研究区震前472处和震后新增272处地质灾害的分布特征进行统计分析,得出以下结论:(1)80.88%震后新增灾害点分布在距震中30km范围内,灾害点密度随震中距的增大而减小。67.28%新增灾害点分布在烈度Ⅷ度及以上区域,灾害点密度随地震烈度的降低而减小。(2)地震前后灾害点均集中分布在距河流300m范围内,各占总数的79.45%和81.25%,灾害点数量与密度均随着与河流距离的增加而显著降低。(3)地震前后在高程2 000～2 600m灾害点数量最多,高程2 600～3 200m次之。(4)地震前后分布在15°～45°坡度范围内灾害点数量分别占总数的82.2%和84.2%。(5)滑坡、崩塌等次生地质灾害为泥石流发育提供较好的物源条件,在未来3～5a雨季应切实做好泥石流防治工作。
        In order to study the distribution of secondary geo-hazards before and after jiuzhaigou earthquake,this paper statistically analyzed the distribution of 472 geo-hazards before the earthquake and the 272 new geo-hazards and main influencing factors at the study area by Arcgis.The results show that:1.80.88% of new geo-hazards distributed within 30 km from the epicenter,and the density decreased with the increase of epicentral distance.2.Pre-earthquake and post-earthquake new geo-hazards within a distance of less than 300 maway from river,accounting for 79.45% and 81.25% of the total number of disasters respectively.the number and the density decreased significantly with the distance from the river.3.New geo-hazards are mainly shallow landslide and collapses,and well developed in limestone,sandstone and quaternary soil.4.The most geo-hazards distributed in the elevation of 2 000～2 600 mup to 2 600～3 200 m.5.The number of pre-earthquake and added geo-hazards distributed in the slope of 15°～45° accounted for 82.2% and 84.2% of the total respectively.6.Secondary geo-hazards provide better source condition for the development of debris flow.In the next three to five years,the debris flow prevention and control should be effectively implemented during the rainy season.

引文

[1]李勇,邵崇建,李芃宇,等.九寨沟Ms 7.0级地震的左旋走滑作用与动力机制[J].成都理工大学学报(自然科学版),2017,44(6):641-648.
    [2]滕宏泉,谢婉丽,盖海龙,等.分形分维理论在地质灾害发育及空间分布规律中的应用——以长安区滑坡、崩塌地质灾害为例[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2016,27(1):44-50..
    [3]邓贵平.九寨沟世界自然遗产地旅游地学景观成因与保护研究[D].成都理工大学,2011.
    [4]张远明,杨伟,郝红兵,等.四川省南江县地质灾害分布、形成条件与防治[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2005,16(2):125-129.
    [5]姚巍,赵其华,李坛,等.四川省盐源县地质灾害分布特征与形成条件研究[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2008,19(1):48-51.
    [6]田述军,孔纪名,樊晓一,等.芦山地震灾区地震前后地质灾害发育规律与对比[J].山地学报,2014,32(1):111-116.
    [7]李秀珍,孔纪名,崔云,等.芦山地震诱发次生地质灾害的分布规律和类型、特征及演化趋势分析[J].工程地质学报,2014,22(2):272-279.
    [8]殷跃平,张永双,马寅生,等.青海玉树Ms7.1级地震地质灾害主要特征[J].工程地质学报,2010,18(3):289-296.
    [9]陆新征,顾栋炼,林旭川,等.2017.08.08四川九寨沟7.0级地震震中附近地面运动破坏力分析[J].工程建设标准化,2017,(8):68-73.
    [10]王佳运,张茂省,张成航,等.玉树7.1级地震地质灾害发展趋势分析[J].灾害学,2013,28(4):61-66.
    [11]崔鹏,陈晓清,柳素清,等.风景区泥石流防治特点与技术[J].地学前缘,2007,14(6):172-180.