第28～31届奥运会中、美、俄、英竞技特征比较研究
|
摘要
采用对应分析等方法,对第28～31届奥运会中、美、俄、英竞技特征进行比较研究。结果表明:美国在速度性和同场对抗性、英国在耐力性项群上实力雄厚,中、俄在技能主导类项群上优势明显且竞争较为激烈;美、英优势项群竞技实力呈上升趋势,中、俄则呈下降趋势;美、俄呈"阴盛阳衰"特征,英国则相反;我国在体能主导性和同场对抗性项群上劣势明显,且美、英对我国优势项群形成新的威胁;我国奥运危机重重,并据此提出相应建议。
Using correspondence analysis method,this essay carries out comprehensive analysis on competitive feature of China,USA,Russia and Great Britain in 28 th-31 st Olympic Games. The result shows that the USA has solid strength on speed and antagonistic event-group,Great Britain shows solid strength on endurance event-group,while Russia and China are obviously dominant on skill event-group with fierce competition; The athletics strength of dominant event-group of USA and Great Britain is in rising trend,while China and Russia is in downtrend; The USA and Russia shows the feature"Women do better than Men",and Great Britain on contrary; China shows obvious disadvantage on physical dominant and antagonistic event-group. At present,the USA and Britain forms threaten to our dominant event-group; the crisis that our Olympic Games facing is intensified. Therefore,this assay proposes corresponding countermeasures based on analysis.
Using correspondence analysis method,this essay carries out comprehensive analysis on competitive feature of China,USA,Russia and Great Britain in 28 th-31 st Olympic Games. The result shows that the USA has solid strength on speed and antagonistic event-group,Great Britain shows solid strength on endurance event-group,while Russia and China are obviously dominant on skill event-group with fierce competition; The athletics strength of dominant event-group of USA and Great Britain is in rising trend,while China and Russia is in downtrend; The USA and Russia shows the feature"Women do better than Men",and Great Britain on contrary; China shows obvious disadvantage on physical dominant and antagonistic event-group. At present,the USA and Britain forms threaten to our dominant event-group; the crisis that our Olympic Games facing is intensified. Therefore,this assay proposes corresponding countermeasures based on analysis.
引文
[1]中国奥委会官方网站[EB/OL]. http://www. olympic. cn/olympic/
[2]雅典奥运会奖牌榜[EB/OL]. http://2004. sina. com. cn/medals/
[3]北京奥运会奖牌榜[EB/OL]. http://match. 2008. sina. com. cn/
[4]伦敦奥运会奖牌榜[EB/OL]. http://match. 2012. sina. com. cn/medals/
[5]里约奥运会奖牌榜[EB/OL]. http://stats. 2016. qq. com/medals/
[6]薛薇.统计分析方法与应用[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2013. 280-281
[7]田麦久.运动训练学[M].北京:人民体育出版社,2000. 35-36
[8]李秀红,郑辉,孙良勇.世界场地自行车奥运竞争格局及启示[J].体育文化导刊,2017(5):112-115
[9]彭国强,盛舒芳,经训成.回顾与思考:美国竞技体育成长因素及其特征[J].沈阳体育学院学报,2017,36(5):29-35
[10]金光珠.英国竞技体育投资与分配机制研究[J].南京体育学院学报(社会科学版),2017,31(1):70-74
[11]谢荣.英国竞技体育的崛起探源及其启示[J].南京体育学院学报(社会科学版),2017,31(1):76-84
[12]陈强.美国竞技体育持续走强的社会学分析[J].南京体育学院学报(社会科学版),2017,31(4):87-92
[13]叶煜,骆意.社会变革对俄罗斯竞技体操的影响及启示[J].南京体育学院学报(自然科学版),2017,16(3):79-83
[14]何俊.里约奥运会中国体操队失利分析及备战东京奥运会对策[J].体育科学:2017,36(4):87-91
[15]张雪芹,邓万金.俄罗斯竞技体育核心竞争力研究[J].广州体育学院学报,2015,35(2):57-61
[16]彭国强,盛舒芳.日俄体育战略嬗变的经验与启示[J].西安体育学院学报,2016,33(3):288-294
[17]李彦兴,靳强,李定忠,等.我国奥运项目优势等级的界定与分析[J].南京体育学院学报(自然科学版),2017,16(5):74-77
[2]雅典奥运会奖牌榜[EB/OL]. http://2004. sina. com. cn/medals/
[3]北京奥运会奖牌榜[EB/OL]. http://match. 2008. sina. com. cn/
[4]伦敦奥运会奖牌榜[EB/OL]. http://match. 2012. sina. com. cn/medals/
[5]里约奥运会奖牌榜[EB/OL]. http://stats. 2016. qq. com/medals/
[6]薛薇.统计分析方法与应用[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2013. 280-281
[7]田麦久.运动训练学[M].北京:人民体育出版社,2000. 35-36
[8]李秀红,郑辉,孙良勇.世界场地自行车奥运竞争格局及启示[J].体育文化导刊,2017(5):112-115
[9]彭国强,盛舒芳,经训成.回顾与思考:美国竞技体育成长因素及其特征[J].沈阳体育学院学报,2017,36(5):29-35
[10]金光珠.英国竞技体育投资与分配机制研究[J].南京体育学院学报(社会科学版),2017,31(1):70-74
[11]谢荣.英国竞技体育的崛起探源及其启示[J].南京体育学院学报(社会科学版),2017,31(1):76-84
[12]陈强.美国竞技体育持续走强的社会学分析[J].南京体育学院学报(社会科学版),2017,31(4):87-92
[13]叶煜,骆意.社会变革对俄罗斯竞技体操的影响及启示[J].南京体育学院学报(自然科学版),2017,16(3):79-83
[14]何俊.里约奥运会中国体操队失利分析及备战东京奥运会对策[J].体育科学:2017,36(4):87-91
[15]张雪芹,邓万金.俄罗斯竞技体育核心竞争力研究[J].广州体育学院学报,2015,35(2):57-61
[16]彭国强,盛舒芳.日俄体育战略嬗变的经验与启示[J].西安体育学院学报,2016,33(3):288-294
[17]李彦兴,靳强,李定忠,等.我国奥运项目优势等级的界定与分析[J].南京体育学院学报(自然科学版),2017,16(5):74-77