用户名: 密码: 验证码:
俄罗斯百脉根种质材料营养价值综合评价
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comprehensive evaluation on nutritive value of Lotus corniculatus Introduced from Russia
  • 作者:吴芳 ; 师尚礼 ; 马翠敏 ; 常丹丹
  • 英文作者:Wu Fang;Shi Shang-li;Ma Cui-min;Chang Dan-dan;College of Pratacultural Science,Gansu Agricultural University,Key laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem,Ministry of Education,Sino-U.S.Centers for Grazingland Ecosystem Sustainability;
  • 关键词:百脉根 ; 粗蛋白 ; 酸性洗涤纤维 ; 粗脂肪 ; 中性洗涤纤维 ; 灰色关联度分析
  • 英文关键词:Lotus corniculatus;;crude protein;;acid detergent fiber;;ether extract;;neutral detergent fiber;;grey relational grade analysis
  • 中文刊名:CYKX
  • 英文刊名:Pratacultural Science
  • 机构:甘肃农业大学草业学院草业生态系统教育部重点实验室中-美草地畜牧业可持续发展研究中心;
  • 出版日期:2017-09-15
  • 出版单位:草业科学
  • 年:2017
  • 期:v.34;No.290
  • 基金:基金项目 农业部牧草种质资源保护(NB2130135)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:CYKX201709023
  • 页数:11
  • CN:09
  • ISSN:62-1069/S
  • 分类号:161-171
摘要
本研究以里奥(Lotus corniculatus cv.Leo)、迈瑞伯(Lotus corniculatus cv.Mirabal)、佐治亚(Lotus corniculatus cv.Georgia)作为对照,对从俄罗斯引进的61份百脉根种质材料在西北绿洲进行种植试验,依据营养指标变异分析和灰色关联度法进行营养指标分析和综合评价。结果表明,粗蛋白变异最明显,变异系数最大,为13.569%;磷含量、钙含量和相对饲喂价值的变异明显,变异系数较大,分别为13.187%、12.044%、11.537%;酸性洗涤纤维、粗脂肪和中性洗涤纤维的变异系数分别为9.763%、8.559%、8.533%,变异较明显;干物质的变异最不明显,仅为0.609%。根据灰色关联度加权分析,其中Zxy08p-4687(γi=0.748)、Zxy09p-5647(γi=0.733)、Zxy09p-6485(γi=0.713),综合营养价值高;营养价值较高的百脉根材料有10份(0.604≤γi≤0.682),分别为Zxy08p-5070、Zxy09p-5583、Zxy08p-4892、Zxy09p-5642、Zxy06p-1775、Zxy09p-5591、Zxy08p-4916、Zxy09p-5809、Zxy08p-4645、Zxy09p-5694;营养价值中等的材料有27份及对照材料佐治亚(0.505≤γi≤0.587),占44.262%,包含Zxy09p-5591、Zxy08p-4768、Zxy08p-4589、Zxy06p-2666、Zxy06p-2663等;营养价值较差的材料有21份及对照材料迈瑞伯、里奥(0.423≤γi≤0.499),占34.426%,比如Zxy06p-2376、Zxy09p-6358、Zxy08p-5393、Zxy08p-4528、Zxy09p-6300等。
        The nutritive value of 61lotus(Lotus corniculatus)germplasm material introduced from Russia were comprehensively evaluated in this study in the oasis in Northwest China based on the variability analysis and grey relational grade analysis.Leo(Lotus corniculatus CV.Leo),Mirabal(L.corniculatus cv.Mirabal)and Georgia(L.corniculatus cv.Georgia)were used as control materials.Our results revealed the following:Crude protein content varied significantly(13.569%),variation coefficients of phosphorus,calcium,and relative feed value were 13.187%,12.044%,and 11.537%,respectively.The coefficient of variation of acid detergent fiber,ether extract and neutral detergent fiber were 9.763%,8.559%,and 8.533%,respectively.Dry matter variation was small and insignificant(0.609%).According to the grey relational degree weighted analysis,the weighted grey correlative degree of Zxy08p-4687,Zxy09p-5647,Zxy09p-6485 was 0.748,0.733,0.713,respectively,which had the highest nutritive value.The higher nutritive value of germplasm materials(0.604≤γ≤0.682)included were Zxy08p-5070,Zxy09p-5583,Zxy08p-4892,Zxy09p-5642,Zxy06p-1775,Zxy09p-5591,Zxy08p-4916,Zxy09p-5809,Zxy08p-4645,and Zxy09p-5694.Georgia(0.505≤γi≤0.587),and 27 germplasm accessions had intermediate nutritive value,which indicated that of the total germplasm accessions only44.262%,including Zxy09p-5591,Zxy08p-4768,Zxy08p-4589,Zxy06p-2666,Zxy06p-2663.The low nutritive value group contained 21 germplasm accessions,Mirabal,and Leo(0.423≤γi≤0.499),which were about34.426% of the total,including,Zxy06p-2376,Zxy09p-6358,Zxy08p-5393,Zxy08p-4528,and Zxy09p-6300.
引文
[1]宋淑明,聂朝相.Mirabel(迈瑞伯)百脉根引种及生产性能的动态研究.草业科学,1995,12(3):66-69.Song S M,Nie C X.Dynamic study of the introducing and productive characteristics of Mirebal variety(Lotus cornculatus).Pratacultural Science,1995,12(3):66-69.(in Chinese)
    [2]刘法涛,杨志忠.里奥百脉根的优点与利用价值.中国草地,1998(6):31-35,43.Liu F T,Yang Z Z.The advantage and utilization evaluation of LotuscornculatusL.Leo.Grassland of China,1998(6):31-35,43.(in Chinese)
    [3]俞小秋,丁玉川,杜雷全,刘法涛.果牧优良草种百脉根生长特性与应用简结.山西果树,1998,74(4):28-29.
    [4]向金城,李德明,崔亚飞.百脉根不同成熟期的种用特性.草业科学,2012,29(2):45-48.Xiang J C,Li D M,Cui Y F.A study on seed characteristics of Lotus Japonicus at maturity stage.Pratacultural Science,2012,29(2):45-48.(in Chinese)
    [5]张本瑜,师尚礼.俄罗斯百脉根种质资源农艺性状鉴定与评价.草业科学,2016,33(9):1779-1787.Zhang B Y,Shi S L.Identification and evaluation on agronomic traits of Lotus corniculatus germplasm resources from Russia.Pratacultural Science,2016,33(9):1779-1787.(in Chinese)
    [6]朱博,师尚礼,倪磊,张丽娟,杨艳欣.12个紫花苜蓿材料速生性能综合评价.植物遗传资源学报,2014,15(2):436-440.Zhu B,Shi S L,Ni L,Zhang L J,Yang Y X.Comprehensive evaluation of the fast-growing characters of 12alfalfa varieties.Jour nal of Plant Genetic Resources,2014,15(2):436-440.(in Chinese)
    [7]郭霞,刘雪云,周志宇,梁坤伦,王瑞.应用灰色关联度分析法综合评价啃食强度对紫穗槐营养价值的影响.草业学报,2012,21(2):196-204.Guo X,Liu X Y,Zhou Z Y,Liang K L,Wang R.Applying grey correlative degree analysis to comprehensive evaluate the influence of different defoliation intensities on nutritional value of Amorpha fruticosa.Acta Pratacultural Sinica,2012,21(2):196-204.(in Chinese)
    [8]沈珍瑶,杨志峰.灰色关联分析方法用于指标体系的筛选.数学的实践与认识,2005(5):728-732.Shen Z Y,Yang Z F.Gray associate analysis method in screening of index system.Mathematics in Practice and Theory,2005(5):728-732.(in Chinese)
    [9]郑敏娜,李荫藩,梁秀芝,薛龙飞.晋北地区引种苜蓿品种的灰色关联度分析和综合评价.草地学报,2014,22(3):631-637.Zheng M N,Li Y F,Liang X Z,Xue L F.Relation grade analysis of grey theory and comprehensive evaluation of introduced alfalfa in the North of Shanxi Province.Acta Agrestia Sinica,2014,22(3):631-637.(in Chinese)
    [10]薛帅,秦烁,王继师,梁振兴,谢光辉.灰色系统理论在非粮柴油植物评价与筛选中的应用.中国农业大学学报,2012,17(6):225-230.Xue S,Qin S,Wang J S,Liang Z X,Xie G H.Application of grey system theory in evaluation and screening of no-food biodiesel plant resources.Journal of China Agricultural University,2012,17(6):225-230.(in Chinese)
    [11]李鸿雁,李志勇,李红,蔡丽艳,张静萍,邢建军.用灰色关联度法综合评价萹蓿豆生产性能.草业科学,2012,29(11):1737-1743.Li H Y,Li Z Y,Li H,Cai L Y,Zhang J P,Xing J J.Comprehensive evaluation of production performance of Medicago ruthenica by grey correlation method.Pratacultural Science,2012,29(11):1737-1743.(in Chinese)
    [12]杨曌,张新权,李向林,万里强.应用灰色关联度综合评价17个不同秋眠级苜蓿的生产性能.草业学报,2009,18(5):67-72.Yang Z,Zhang X Q,Li X L,Wan L Q.Applying grey correlative degree analysis to comprehensively evaluate growth performance 17types of alfalfa with different fall-dormancy grades.Acta Pratacultural Sinica,2009,18(5):67-72.(in Chinese)
    [13]崔亚飞.百脉根早熟品系特征特性的研究及再生体系建立.兰州:甘肃农业大学硕士学位论文,2009.Cui Y F.Studies on characteristic and the establishment of tissue culture regeneration system of an early strain of Lotus.Master Thesis.Lanzhou:Gansu Agricultural University,2009.(in Chinese)
    [14]朱进忠.草业科学实践教学指导.北京:中国农业出版社,2008:375-412.Zhu J Z.Guidance on Practice Teaching of Pratacultural Science.Beijing:China Agriculture Press,2008:375-412.(in Chinese)
    [15]张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术.北京:中国农业大学出版社,2003:45-79.Zhang L Y.Technique of Feed Analysis and Feed Quality Detection.Beijing:China Agricultural University Press,2003:45-79.(in Chinese)
    [16]陈谷,齐晓,邰建辉.美国商业应用中的牧草质量及质量标准.中国草学会饲料生产委员会第15次饲草生产学术研讨会.北京:中国草学会,2009:48-49.Chen G,Qi X,Tai J H.Forage quality and its quality standardization in the United States.Chinese Grassland Society of Feed Production Committee 15th Conference on Forage Production.Beijing:Chinese Grassland Society,2009:48-49.(in Chinese)
    [17]韩世洁,姬奇武,韩汝旦,董宽虎.山西不同居群白羊草营养价值灰色关联度分析.中国草地学报,2016,38(1):47-52.Han S J,Ji Q W,Han R D,Dong K H.Evaluation of the nutritive value of different Bothriochloa ischaemum populations in Shanxi by grey relational grade analysis.Chinese Journal of Grassland,2016,38(1):47-52.(in Chinese)
    [18]田兵,冉雪琴,薛红,谢健,陈彬,武玉祥,王嘉福,王啸.贵州42种野生牧草营养价值灰色关联度分析.草业学报,2014,23(1):92-103.Tian B,Ran X Q,Xue H,Xie J,Chen B,Wu Y X,Wang J F,Wang X.Evaluation of the nutritive value of 42kinds of forage in Guizhou Province by grey relational grade analysis.Acta Pratacultural Sinica,2014,23(1):92-103.(in Chinese)
    [19]曾洪光.牧草品质综合评定概述.四川畜牧兽医,2001,28(9):40.Zeng H G.Overview of general evaluation on forage grass quality.Sichuan Animal&Veterinary Sciences,2001,28(9):40.(in Chinese)
    [20]尹利,逯晓萍,傅晓峰,李美娜,郭建.高丹草杂交种灰色关联度分析与评判.中国草地学报,2006,28(3):21-25.Yin L,Lu X P,Fu X F,Li M N,Guo J.The grey relation analysis and evaluation of hybrid pacesetter.Chinese Journal of Grassland,2006,28(3):21-25.(in Chinese)
    [21]韩启秀.运用灰色关联度对山东小麦新品种(系)综合表现的评价.中国农学通报,2005,21(2):312-314.Han Q X.Applying the grey relational analysis method to the multi-factorial evaluation of new wheat varieties(Lines)in Shandong Province.Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2005,21(2):312-314.(in Chinese)
    [22]鲁雪林,王秀萍,张国新.旱稻抗旱性评价指标研究.中国农学通报,2006,22(1):124-126.Lu X L,Wang X P,Zhang G X.Study on drought resistance appraise index of upland rice.Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2006,22(1):124-126.(in Chinese)
    [23]宁布.论野生牧草的饲用评价.中国草地,1998(2):78-79.Ning B.The discussion on feeding value of wild forage.Grassland of China,1998(2):78-79.(in Chinese)
    [24]王德利,祝廷成.牧草价值综合评价的定量方法探讨.草业学报,1993,2(1):33-38.Wang D L,Zhu T C.Approach to quantitative multifactorial evaluation method of forage value.Acta Pratacultural Sinica,1993,2(1):33-38.(in Chinese)
    [25]姜慧敏,布仁图雅.豆科牧草与禾本科牧草的营养品质指标的比较研究.环境与发展,2014,26(8):65-72.Jiang H M,Burentuya.A comparative study on nutrion quality indicator legumeinous forage and gramineous forage.Environment and Development,2014,26(8):65-72.(in Chinese)
    [26]朱新强,师尚礼,张新颖.4份苜蓿材料在3个生态区的营养成分含量比较.草原与草坪,2011,31(4):5-9.Zhu X Q,Shi S L,Zhang X Y.Nutrient quality analysis of 4alfalfa materials grown in 3ecological areas.Grassland and Turf,2011,31(4):5-9.(in Chinese)
    [27]孙启忠,韩建国,桂荣,刘国荣.科尔沁沙地敖汉苜蓿地上生物量及营养物质积累.草地学报,2001,9(3):165-170.Sun Q Z,Han J G,Gui R,Liu G R.Accumulation of biomass and nutrient material of Aohan alfalfa in Kerqin sand.Acta Agrestia Sinica,2001,9(3):165-170.(in Chinese)
    [28]徐丽君,杨桂霞,陈宝瑞,辛晓平.不同苜蓿品种营养价值的比较.草业科学,2013,30(4):566-570.Xu L J,Yang G X,Chen B R,Xin X P.Comprehensive evaluation of nutritional values of different alfalfa species and varieties.Pratacultural Science,2013,30(4):566-570.(in Chinese)
    [29]侯敏.30个苜蓿材料生长特性与品质的比较及综合评价.呼和浩特:内蒙古大学硕士学位论文,2010.Hou M.Comparison and evaluation of growth characteristics and quality of 30alfalfa materials.Master Thesis.Hohhot:Inner Mongolia University,2010.(in Chinese)
    [30]魏双霞,师尚礼,康文娟,谭谌淼.抗寒紫花苜蓿品系的营养价值评价.草原与草坪,2016,36(3):54-59.Wei S X,Shi S L,Kang W J,Tan S M.Evaluation on nutritive value of cold-resistant strains of Medicago sativa.Grassland and Turf,2016,36(3):54-59.(in Chinese)
    [31]姚玉霞,李云.宁夏不同地区紫花苜蓿的营养成分分析.安徽农业科技,2011,36:22344-22345,22410.Yao Y X,Li Y.Analysis on nutrient constituent of alfalfa Medicago sativa L.from different areas of Ningxia.Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science,2011,36:22344-22345,22410.(in Chinese)
    [32]曹宏,章会玲,盖琼辉,陈红,赵满来.22个紫花苜蓿品种的引种试验和生产性能综合评价.草业学报,2011,20(6):219-229.Cao H,Zhang H L,Gai Q H,Chen H,Zhao M L.Test and comprehensive assessment on the performance of 22alfalfa varieties.Acta Pratacultural Sinica,2011,20(6):219-229.(in Chinese)
    [33]温方.紫花苜蓿不同品种生产性能及光合特性研究.北京:中国农业科学院硕士学位论文,2007.Wen F.Study on productivity and photosynthetic character of different alfalfa varieties.Master Thesis.Beijing:Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,2007.(in Chinese)

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700