论文写作与评审管理平台Arpha Writing Tool功能剖析
|
摘要
【目的】系统介绍新型论文综合管理平台Arpha Writing Tool(AWT)的功能和特点,为我国科技期刊出版同行搭建论文管理系统提供借鉴。【方法】通过网站调研和模拟投稿的方法,全面了解AWT系统的流程和功能。【结果】AWT支持在线写作、在线同行评审、在线稿件编排加工和在线论文出版,在支持多样化的同行评议方式和数据论文写作方面具有独特的优势。【结论】建议我国科技期刊出版同行在建设或升级投审稿系统时考虑整合作者协同在线写作、丰富研究要素元数据描述、支持多样化同行评议以及在线出版等功能。
[Purposes] This paper aims to systematically introduce the functions and features of Arpha Writing Tool( AWT) which has collaborative authoring,reviewing,and publishing functions in one place,so as to provide a reference for Chinese peers in the field of scientific journal publishing to design or update the manuscript tracking systems. [Methods] Through the website research and simulation submission methods,this paper systematically reviewed the processes and functions of AWT. [Findings] AWT supports the writing,peer review,copyediting,and publishing of manuscripts,which are all online. It has unique advantages in supporting diversified manner of peer reviewand data paper writing. [Conclusions]It is suggested to integrate online collaborative writing,enrich metadata description for research elements,and support diversified peer reviewand online publishing,when constructing or upgrading manuscript tracking systems.
[Purposes] This paper aims to systematically introduce the functions and features of Arpha Writing Tool( AWT) which has collaborative authoring,reviewing,and publishing functions in one place,so as to provide a reference for Chinese peers in the field of scientific journal publishing to design or update the manuscript tracking systems. [Methods] Through the website research and simulation submission methods,this paper systematically reviewed the processes and functions of AWT. [Findings] AWT supports the writing,peer review,copyediting,and publishing of manuscripts,which are all online. It has unique advantages in supporting diversified manner of peer reviewand data paper writing. [Conclusions]It is suggested to integrate online collaborative writing,enrich metadata description for research elements,and support diversified peer reviewand online publishing,when constructing or upgrading manuscript tracking systems.
引文
[1]张欣欣,张纯洁,林汉枫,等.网络投稿与审稿系统Editorial Manager初探[J].中国科技期刊研究,2010,21(3):331-335.
[2]刘敏,王莉,董邦国.科技期刊在线审稿系统的发展趋势探索[J].大连民族学院学报,2011,13(1):64-67.
[3]姚戈,史冠中,王淑华.高校科技期刊国际审稿平台应用探析———以《地球科学》ScholarOne Manuscripts平台为例[J].科技与出版,2013(11):53-55.
[4]陈凌凤,贺萍. JIPB Bench> Press在线稿件处理系统的实践[J].中国科技期刊研究,2014,25(3):397-402.
[5]吕丹,俞红卫,朱建育.勤云稿件处理系统使用初期常见问题及对策[M]∥刘志强.学报编辑论丛.上海:上海大学出版社,2014:239-242.
[6]田欣,马瀚青,郑军卫,等.国内外5种主要网络同行评议系统平台对比研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2014,25(11):1363-1368.
[7]中国知网. Writeaid论文写作助手[EB/OL].[2019-03-27]. http:∥writeaid. cnki. net/.
[8]乐小虬,王子璇,张晓林,等. DPaper:一种面向语义出版的结构化论文写作工具设计与实现[J].现代图书情报技术,2016(11):76-81.
[9]看云[EB/OL].[2019-03-27]. https:∥www. kancloud.cn/kancloud/help.
[10] Arpha Writing Tool[EB/OL].[2018-12-01]. https:∥arpha. pensoft. net/.
[11] Smith V,Georgiev T,Stoev P,et al. Beyond dead trees:Integrating the scientific process in the Biodiversity Data Journal[J]. Biodiversity Data Journal,2013(1):e995.
[12] Catapano T. Tax Pub:An extension of the NLM/NCBI journal publishing DTD for taxonomic descriptions[C]. National Center for Biotechnology Information Journal Article Tag Suite Conference(JATS-Con)Proceedings,2010.
[13] Decoursey T. Perspective:The pros and cons of open peer review[J/OL]. Nature,2006. https:∥www. nature. com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04991. html.
[14] Sandewall E. A hybrid system of peerreview[J/OL]. Nature,2006. https:∥www. nature. com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04994. html.
[15] Nature Editorial Team. Peer review and fraud[J]. Nature,2006,444,971-972.
[16] Koop T. An open,two-stage peer-reviewjournal[J/OL].Nature,2006. https:∥www. nature. com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04988. html.
[17]汪挺,阮星星,陈小宇,等.开放审稿的必要性及可行性探讨[J].编辑学报,2014,26(1):19-22.
[18]马瀚青,周小玲,侯春梅,等.基于社交网络的同行评议新模式———基于Peerage of Science与Frontiers平台的案例研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(9):935-940.
[19]郑辛甜,张斯龙.学术期刊公开同行评议的发展现状及发展趋势[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(2):133-138.
[20]孟美任,张晓林.中国科技期刊引入开放同行评议机制的思考与建议[J].中国科技期刊研究,2019,30(2):149-155.
[21] Rosshellauer T. What is open peer review? A systematic review[J]. F1000Research,2017,6:588.
[22] Chavan V,Penev L. The data paper:A mechanism to incentivize data publishing in biodiversity science[J]. BMC Bioinformatics,2011,12(S15):S2.
[23] Penev L,Mietchen D,Chavan V,et al. Strategies and guidelines for scholarly publishing of biodiversity data[J]. Research Ideas and Outcomes,2017,3:e12431.
[24]中国科学技术学会主编.中国科技期刊发展蓝皮书(2018)[M].北京:科学出版社,2018.
(1)此图片版权归属Biodiversity Data Journal出版社,遵循CC-BY版权协议。相应的访问链接为https:∥www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/134442.php?from=351992。
[2]刘敏,王莉,董邦国.科技期刊在线审稿系统的发展趋势探索[J].大连民族学院学报,2011,13(1):64-67.
[3]姚戈,史冠中,王淑华.高校科技期刊国际审稿平台应用探析———以《地球科学》ScholarOne Manuscripts平台为例[J].科技与出版,2013(11):53-55.
[4]陈凌凤,贺萍. JIPB Bench> Press在线稿件处理系统的实践[J].中国科技期刊研究,2014,25(3):397-402.
[5]吕丹,俞红卫,朱建育.勤云稿件处理系统使用初期常见问题及对策[M]∥刘志强.学报编辑论丛.上海:上海大学出版社,2014:239-242.
[6]田欣,马瀚青,郑军卫,等.国内外5种主要网络同行评议系统平台对比研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2014,25(11):1363-1368.
[7]中国知网. Writeaid论文写作助手[EB/OL].[2019-03-27]. http:∥writeaid. cnki. net/.
[8]乐小虬,王子璇,张晓林,等. DPaper:一种面向语义出版的结构化论文写作工具设计与实现[J].现代图书情报技术,2016(11):76-81.
[9]看云[EB/OL].[2019-03-27]. https:∥www. kancloud.cn/kancloud/help.
[10] Arpha Writing Tool[EB/OL].[2018-12-01]. https:∥arpha. pensoft. net/.
[11] Smith V,Georgiev T,Stoev P,et al. Beyond dead trees:Integrating the scientific process in the Biodiversity Data Journal[J]. Biodiversity Data Journal,2013(1):e995.
[12] Catapano T. Tax Pub:An extension of the NLM/NCBI journal publishing DTD for taxonomic descriptions[C]. National Center for Biotechnology Information Journal Article Tag Suite Conference(JATS-Con)Proceedings,2010.
[13] Decoursey T. Perspective:The pros and cons of open peer review[J/OL]. Nature,2006. https:∥www. nature. com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04991. html.
[14] Sandewall E. A hybrid system of peerreview[J/OL]. Nature,2006. https:∥www. nature. com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04994. html.
[15] Nature Editorial Team. Peer review and fraud[J]. Nature,2006,444,971-972.
[16] Koop T. An open,two-stage peer-reviewjournal[J/OL].Nature,2006. https:∥www. nature. com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature04988. html.
[17]汪挺,阮星星,陈小宇,等.开放审稿的必要性及可行性探讨[J].编辑学报,2014,26(1):19-22.
[18]马瀚青,周小玲,侯春梅,等.基于社交网络的同行评议新模式———基于Peerage of Science与Frontiers平台的案例研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(9):935-940.
[19]郑辛甜,张斯龙.学术期刊公开同行评议的发展现状及发展趋势[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(2):133-138.
[20]孟美任,张晓林.中国科技期刊引入开放同行评议机制的思考与建议[J].中国科技期刊研究,2019,30(2):149-155.
[21] Rosshellauer T. What is open peer review? A systematic review[J]. F1000Research,2017,6:588.
[22] Chavan V,Penev L. The data paper:A mechanism to incentivize data publishing in biodiversity science[J]. BMC Bioinformatics,2011,12(S15):S2.
[23] Penev L,Mietchen D,Chavan V,et al. Strategies and guidelines for scholarly publishing of biodiversity data[J]. Research Ideas and Outcomes,2017,3:e12431.
[24]中国科学技术学会主编.中国科技期刊发展蓝皮书(2018)[M].北京:科学出版社,2018.
(1)此图片版权归属Biodiversity Data Journal出版社,遵循CC-BY版权协议。相应的访问链接为https:∥www.eurekalert.org/multimedia/pub/134442.php?from=351992。