科学数据出版生态系统与质量控制体系构建
|
摘要
当前,业界对科学数据出版及其质量控制的研究渐趋丰富,但对诸如数据出版的模式与形态、质量控制的内容与方法等具体问题的讨论稍显分散,不利于研究者和实践者形成全局的视野、进行整体的把握。文章首先梳理了三种数据出版模式的出版流程、协同环节及质量可控环节,构建了融合三种出版模式的数据出版生态系统;然后将数据质量控制的内容与方法归纳为数据标准/规范、工具/平台、内容/形式三个维度;确定了数据质量控制要素,据此构建了面向流程的数据出版质量控制体系。
Researches on scientific data publishing and data quality control are becoming more and more abundant, but the discussion on specific issues such as data publishing models, contents and methods of data quality control are slightly dispersed, which are not conducive to form overviews for researchers and practitioners. The paper firstly figured three models of data publishing and their processes, identified their collaborative issues and quality controllable units, and then built the data publishing ecosystem that integrated three models. Moreover, the paper summarized data quality control into three dimensions: data standards and specifications, data tools and systems, and data contents and forms. Accordingly, determining data quality control elements, and then a process-oriented data publishing quality control system is constructed.
Researches on scientific data publishing and data quality control are becoming more and more abundant, but the discussion on specific issues such as data publishing models, contents and methods of data quality control are slightly dispersed, which are not conducive to form overviews for researchers and practitioners. The paper firstly figured three models of data publishing and their processes, identified their collaborative issues and quality controllable units, and then built the data publishing ecosystem that integrated three models. Moreover, the paper summarized data quality control into three dimensions: data standards and specifications, data tools and systems, and data contents and forms. Accordingly, determining data quality control elements, and then a process-oriented data publishing quality control system is constructed.
引文
[1]黄国彬,王舒,屈亚杰.科学数据出版模式比较研究[J].大学图书馆学报,2018,36(1):34-40,33.
[2]孔丽华.科学数据质量同行评议现状[R/OL].[2017-01-09].http://ir.las.ac.cn/handle/12502/7968.
[3]张静蓓,任树怀.科研数据出版模式、流程及引用策略研究[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(9):21-27.
[4]Lawrence B,Jones C,Matthews B,et al.Citation and Peer Review of Data:Moving Towards Formal Data Publication[J].International Journal of Digital Curation,2011,6(2):4-37.
[5]张丽丽,黎建辉.科研数据的开放:进展、模式与新探索[J].大数据,2016(6):25-33.
[6]张小强,李欣.数据出版理论与实践关键问题[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015(8):813-821.
[7]Pampel H,Pfeiffenberger H,Sch覿fer A,et al.Report on Peer Review of Research Data in Scholarly Communication[R/OL].[2017-10-05].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224922538_Report_on_Peer_Review_of_Research_Data_in_Scholarly_Communication.
[8]Austin C C,Bloom T,Dallmeier-Tiessen S,et al.Key components of data publishing:using current best practices to develop a reference model for data publishing[J].International Journal on Digital Libraries,2016:1-16.
[9]王丹丹.科学数据出版过程中的数据质量控制[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(23):124-129.
[10]屈宝强,王凯.数据出版视角下的科学数据同行评议[J].图书馆杂志,2017,36(10):71-77.
[11]张静蓓,任树怀.国外科研数据知识库数据质量控制研究[J].图书馆杂志,2016,35(11):38-44.
[12]涂志芳,刘兹恒.国外数据知识库模式的数据出版质量控制实践研究[J].图书馆建设,2018(3):5-13.
[13]Gordon K.Principles of Data Management[EB/OL].[2018-11-15].http://bcs.org/upload/pdf/data-management-chapter1.pdf.
[14]涂志芳.科学数据开放出版质量控制研究[D].北京:北京大学,2017.
[15]蔡迎春.分布式机构库的质量控制[J].图书情报工作,2008,52(7):44-47.
[16]赵华,王健.科学数据元数据功能与内容分析[J].科技管理研究,2015(17):232-235.
[17]Qin J,Ball A,Greenberg J.Functional and architectural requirements for metadata:supporting discovery and management of scientific data[C].Twelfth International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications.Malaysia:University of Bath,2012:62-71.
[18]ISO 15836:2009.Information and documentation-The Dublin Core metadata element set[EB/OL].[2017-04-09].https://www.iso.org/standard/52142.html.
[19]Federal Geographic Data Committee.National Geospatial Data Assets(NGDA)Metadata Guidelines[EB/OL].[2017-02-08].https://cms.geoplatform.gov/sites/default/files/document_library/NGDA_Metadata_Guidelines.pdf.
[20]ISO 19115-1:2014.Geographic information-Metadata[EB/OL].[2017-04-09].https://www.iso.org/standard/53798.html.
[21]DOI.The DOI system[EB/OL].[2017-02-07].http://www.doi.org/.
[22]Chandrakar R.Digital object identifier system:an overview[J].The Electronic Library,2006,24(4):445-452.
[23]ISO 26324:2012.Information and documentation-Digital object identifier system[EB/OL].[2017-02-10].https://www.iso.org/standard/43506.html.
[24]涂勇,彭洁.数字对象唯一标识在中国科学数据领域中的应用研究[J].数字图书馆论坛,2013(8):31-36.
[25]ISO/TR 17068:2012.Information and documentation-Trusted third party repository for digital records[EB/OL].[2017-02-06].https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:tr:17068:ed-1:v1:en.
[26]CCSDS[EB/OL].[2017-02-25].https://public.ccsds.org/default.aspx.
[27]ISO 16363:2012 Space data and information transfer systems-Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories[EB/OL].[2017-02-06].https://www.iso.org/standard/56510.html.
[28]Data Management General Guidance[EB/OL].[2017-02-12].https://dmptool.org/dm_guidance.
[29]沈彤,徐列东,付海军,等.数据管理计划的结构与内容[J].药学学报,2015(11):1388-1392.
[30]Library Publishing Coalition.Library Publishing Directory 2014-2018[EB/OL].[2018-11-21].https://librarypublishing.org/resources/.
[31]朱玲,聂华,崔海媛,等.北京大学开放研究数据平台建设:探索与实践[J].图书情报工作,2016(4):44-51.
[32]Dataverse.Best practices[EB/OL].[2017-02-18].http://dataverse.org/best-practices/data-management.
[33]DSpace[EB/OL].[2017-02-14].http://www.dspace.org/.
[34]吴振新.数字资源长期保存可信赖认证研究发展综述[J].中国图书馆学报,2015,41(3):114-126.
[35]Buddenbohm S,Cretin N,Dijk E,et al.State of the art report on open access publishing of research data in the humanities[R/OL].[2017-01-09].https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01357208/document.
[36]Peer L,Green A.Research Data Review is Gaining Ground[EB/OL].[2017-04-12].http://isps.yale.edu/news/blog/2015/03/research-data-review-is-gaining-ground.
[37]Callaghan S,Donegan S,Pepler S,et al.Making Data a First Class Scientific Output:Data Citation and Publication by NERC's Environmental Data Centres[J].International Journal of Digital Curation,2012,7(1):107-113.
[38]Economic and Social Research Council.Transparency of the peer review process[EB/OL].[2017-04-14].http://www.esrc.ac.uk/funding/guidance-for-peer-reviewers/transparency-of-the-peer-review-process/.
[2]孔丽华.科学数据质量同行评议现状[R/OL].[2017-01-09].http://ir.las.ac.cn/handle/12502/7968.
[3]张静蓓,任树怀.科研数据出版模式、流程及引用策略研究[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(9):21-27.
[4]Lawrence B,Jones C,Matthews B,et al.Citation and Peer Review of Data:Moving Towards Formal Data Publication[J].International Journal of Digital Curation,2011,6(2):4-37.
[5]张丽丽,黎建辉.科研数据的开放:进展、模式与新探索[J].大数据,2016(6):25-33.
[6]张小强,李欣.数据出版理论与实践关键问题[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015(8):813-821.
[7]Pampel H,Pfeiffenberger H,Sch覿fer A,et al.Report on Peer Review of Research Data in Scholarly Communication[R/OL].[2017-10-05].https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224922538_Report_on_Peer_Review_of_Research_Data_in_Scholarly_Communication.
[8]Austin C C,Bloom T,Dallmeier-Tiessen S,et al.Key components of data publishing:using current best practices to develop a reference model for data publishing[J].International Journal on Digital Libraries,2016:1-16.
[9]王丹丹.科学数据出版过程中的数据质量控制[J].图书情报工作,2015,59(23):124-129.
[10]屈宝强,王凯.数据出版视角下的科学数据同行评议[J].图书馆杂志,2017,36(10):71-77.
[11]张静蓓,任树怀.国外科研数据知识库数据质量控制研究[J].图书馆杂志,2016,35(11):38-44.
[12]涂志芳,刘兹恒.国外数据知识库模式的数据出版质量控制实践研究[J].图书馆建设,2018(3):5-13.
[13]Gordon K.Principles of Data Management[EB/OL].[2018-11-15].http://bcs.org/upload/pdf/data-management-chapter1.pdf.
[14]涂志芳.科学数据开放出版质量控制研究[D].北京:北京大学,2017.
[15]蔡迎春.分布式机构库的质量控制[J].图书情报工作,2008,52(7):44-47.
[16]赵华,王健.科学数据元数据功能与内容分析[J].科技管理研究,2015(17):232-235.
[17]Qin J,Ball A,Greenberg J.Functional and architectural requirements for metadata:supporting discovery and management of scientific data[C].Twelfth International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications.Malaysia:University of Bath,2012:62-71.
[18]ISO 15836:2009.Information and documentation-The Dublin Core metadata element set[EB/OL].[2017-04-09].https://www.iso.org/standard/52142.html.
[19]Federal Geographic Data Committee.National Geospatial Data Assets(NGDA)Metadata Guidelines[EB/OL].[2017-02-08].https://cms.geoplatform.gov/sites/default/files/document_library/NGDA_Metadata_Guidelines.pdf.
[20]ISO 19115-1:2014.Geographic information-Metadata[EB/OL].[2017-04-09].https://www.iso.org/standard/53798.html.
[21]DOI.The DOI system[EB/OL].[2017-02-07].http://www.doi.org/.
[22]Chandrakar R.Digital object identifier system:an overview[J].The Electronic Library,2006,24(4):445-452.
[23]ISO 26324:2012.Information and documentation-Digital object identifier system[EB/OL].[2017-02-10].https://www.iso.org/standard/43506.html.
[24]涂勇,彭洁.数字对象唯一标识在中国科学数据领域中的应用研究[J].数字图书馆论坛,2013(8):31-36.
[25]ISO/TR 17068:2012.Information and documentation-Trusted third party repository for digital records[EB/OL].[2017-02-06].https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:tr:17068:ed-1:v1:en.
[26]CCSDS[EB/OL].[2017-02-25].https://public.ccsds.org/default.aspx.
[27]ISO 16363:2012 Space data and information transfer systems-Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories[EB/OL].[2017-02-06].https://www.iso.org/standard/56510.html.
[28]Data Management General Guidance[EB/OL].[2017-02-12].https://dmptool.org/dm_guidance.
[29]沈彤,徐列东,付海军,等.数据管理计划的结构与内容[J].药学学报,2015(11):1388-1392.
[30]Library Publishing Coalition.Library Publishing Directory 2014-2018[EB/OL].[2018-11-21].https://librarypublishing.org/resources/.
[31]朱玲,聂华,崔海媛,等.北京大学开放研究数据平台建设:探索与实践[J].图书情报工作,2016(4):44-51.
[32]Dataverse.Best practices[EB/OL].[2017-02-18].http://dataverse.org/best-practices/data-management.
[33]DSpace[EB/OL].[2017-02-14].http://www.dspace.org/.
[34]吴振新.数字资源长期保存可信赖认证研究发展综述[J].中国图书馆学报,2015,41(3):114-126.
[35]Buddenbohm S,Cretin N,Dijk E,et al.State of the art report on open access publishing of research data in the humanities[R/OL].[2017-01-09].https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01357208/document.
[36]Peer L,Green A.Research Data Review is Gaining Ground[EB/OL].[2017-04-12].http://isps.yale.edu/news/blog/2015/03/research-data-review-is-gaining-ground.
[37]Callaghan S,Donegan S,Pepler S,et al.Making Data a First Class Scientific Output:Data Citation and Publication by NERC's Environmental Data Centres[J].International Journal of Digital Curation,2012,7(1):107-113.
[38]Economic and Social Research Council.Transparency of the peer review process[EB/OL].[2017-04-14].http://www.esrc.ac.uk/funding/guidance-for-peer-reviewers/transparency-of-the-peer-review-process/.