Three Types of Spatial Function Zoning in Key Ecological Function Areas Based on Ecological and Economic Coordinated Development: A Case Study of Tacheng Basin, China
|
摘要
Three types of spatial function zoning is an effective measure for regional environmental protection and orderly development.For ecological and economic coordinated development, spatial function zones should be divided scientifically to clear its direction of development and protection. Therefore, based on ecological constraints, a beneficial discussion would be about the key ecological function areas adopting the concept of ecological protection restriction and supporting socioeconomic development for spatial function zoning. In this paper, the researchers, taking Tacheng Basin, Xinjiang of China as an example, choose township as basic research unit and set up an evaluation index system from three aspects, namely, ecological protection suitability, agricultural production suitability, and urban development suitability, which are analyzed by using spatial analysis functions and exclusive matrix method. The results showed that: 1) This paper formed a set of multilevel evaluation index systems for three types of spatial function zoning of the key ecological function areas based on a novel perspective by scientifically dividing Tacheng Basin into ecological space, agricultural space, and urban space,which realized the integration and scientific orientation for spatial function at the township scale. 2) Under the guidance of three types of spatial pattern, the functional orientation and suggestions of development and protection was clearly defined for ecological protection zones,ecological economic zones, agricultural production zones, and urban development zones. 3) A new idea of space governance is provided to promote the coordinated and sustainable development between ecology and economy, which can break the traditional mode of thinking about regional economic development, and offers a scientific basis and reference for macro decision-making.
Three types of spatial function zoning is an effective measure for regional environmental protection and orderly development.For ecological and economic coordinated development, spatial function zones should be divided scientifically to clear its direction of development and protection. Therefore, based on ecological constraints, a beneficial discussion would be about the key ecological function areas adopting the concept of ecological protection restriction and supporting socioeconomic development for spatial function zoning. In this paper, the researchers, taking Tacheng Basin, Xinjiang of China as an example, choose township as basic research unit and set up an evaluation index system from three aspects, namely, ecological protection suitability, agricultural production suitability, and urban development suitability, which are analyzed by using spatial analysis functions and exclusive matrix method. The results showed that: 1) This paper formed a set of multilevel evaluation index systems for three types of spatial function zoning of the key ecological function areas based on a novel perspective by scientifically dividing Tacheng Basin into ecological space, agricultural space, and urban space,which realized the integration and scientific orientation for spatial function at the township scale. 2) Under the guidance of three types of spatial pattern, the functional orientation and suggestions of development and protection was clearly defined for ecological protection zones,ecological economic zones, agricultural production zones, and urban development zones. 3) A new idea of space governance is provided to promote the coordinated and sustainable development between ecology and economy, which can break the traditional mode of thinking about regional economic development, and offers a scientific basis and reference for macro decision-making.
Three types of spatial function zoning is an effective measure for regional environmental protection and orderly development.For ecological and economic coordinated development, spatial function zones should be divided scientifically to clear its direction of development and protection. Therefore, based on ecological constraints, a beneficial discussion would be about the key ecological function areas adopting the concept of ecological protection restriction and supporting socioeconomic development for spatial function zoning. In this paper, the researchers, taking Tacheng Basin, Xinjiang of China as an example, choose township as basic research unit and set up an evaluation index system from three aspects, namely, ecological protection suitability, agricultural production suitability, and urban development suitability, which are analyzed by using spatial analysis functions and exclusive matrix method. The results showed that: 1) This paper formed a set of multilevel evaluation index systems for three types of spatial function zoning of the key ecological function areas based on a novel perspective by scientifically dividing Tacheng Basin into ecological space, agricultural space, and urban space,which realized the integration and scientific orientation for spatial function at the township scale. 2) Under the guidance of three types of spatial pattern, the functional orientation and suggestions of development and protection was clearly defined for ecological protection zones,ecological economic zones, agricultural production zones, and urban development zones. 3) A new idea of space governance is provided to promote the coordinated and sustainable development between ecology and economy, which can break the traditional mode of thinking about regional economic development, and offers a scientific basis and reference for macro decision-making.
引文
Albrechts L,Healey P,Kunzmann K R,2003.Strategic spatial planning and regional governance in Europe.Journal of America Planning Association,69(2):113-129.doi:10.1080/01944-360308976301
Baral N,Dhungana A,2014.Diversifying finance mechanisms for protected areas capitalizing on untapped revenues.Forest Policy and Economics,41(3):60-67.doi:10.1016/j.forpol.20-14.01.002
Baur J W R,Tynon J F,Ries P et al.,2016.Public attitudes abouturban forest ecosystem services management:a case study in Oregon cities.Urban For Urban Greening,17:42-53.doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2016.03.012
Brian H R,Alan T M,2002.National and regional corporate spatial structure.The Annals of Regional Science,36(2):347-368.doi:10.1007/s001680200082
Carranza T,Manica A,Kapos V et al.,2014.Mismatches between conservation outcomes and management evaluation in protected areas:a case study in the Brazilian Cerrado.Biological Conservation,173(8):10-16.doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.0-3.004
Chen W,Duan X J,Chen J L et al.,2004.The methods of spatial development function regionalization.Acta Geographica Sinica,59(Z1),53-58.
Gualini E,2004.Regionalization as experimental regionalism:the rescaling of territorial policy-making in Germany.International Journal of Urban and Research,28(2):329-353.doi:10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00522.x
European Commission,2003.European Spatial Development Perspective.European Commission.
Fan Jie,Tao Anjun,Ren Qing,2010.On the historical background,scientific intentions,goal orientation,and policy framework of major function-oriented zone planning in China.Journal of Resources and Ecology,4:289-299.(in Chinese)
Fan J,2015.Draft of major function oriented zoning of China.Acta Geographica Sinica,70(2):186-201.
Fan Shuping,Cheng Jiumiao,Xiang Sike,2011.Major function oriented zoning in Wuhu urban area:an approach based on the model of Three-dimensional Rubik’s Cube.Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment,7(2):66-74.(in Chinese)
Farnworth E G H,Golley F B,1975.Fragile ecosystems:evaluation of research and applications in the Neotropics.Journal of Ecology,64(1):384-384.doi:10.2307/2258706
Friedmann J,1998.Urban and Regional Governance in the Asia Pacific.Vancouver:The University of British Columbia.
Greater L A,2011.The London Plan,Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London.London:Greater London Authority.
Gu Linsheng,2003.The characteristics and new trend of foreign land planning.The World Geography Research,12(1):60-70.(in Chinese)
Higgins A J,Hajkowicz S,2008.A model for landscape planning under complex spatial conditions.Environmental Modeling and Assessment,13(4):459-471.doi:10.1007/s10666-007-91-17-3
Hong W Y,Guo R Z,2017.Indicators for quantitative evaluation of the social services function of urban greenbelt systems:a case study of shenzhen,China.Ecological Indicators,75:259-267.doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.044
Liu X H,Liu L,Peng Y,2017.Ecological zoning for regional sustainable development using an integrated modeling approach in the Bohai Rim,China.Ecological Modeling,353(10):158-166.doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.09.027
Lu Dadao,Liu Yi,Fan Jie,1999.The regional policy effects and regional development states in China.Acta Geographica Sinica,54(6):496-508.(in Chinese)
Ma Suisui,Zhu Chuangeng,Qiu Fangdao,2010.Progress and prospect of study on major function regionalization of China.The World Geography Research,19(4):91-97.(in Chinese)
Mamat K,Du P J,Ding J L,2017.Ecological function regionalization of cultural heritage sites in Turpan,China,based on GIS.Arabian Journal of Geosciences,10(4):1-12.doi:10.1007/s1-2517-017-2892-5
Mi N,Yang M L,Fan X G et al.,2016.Theory and application of the main functional subdivision of limited development ecological zones.Acta Ecologica Sinica,36(16):5058-5066.doi:10.5846/stxb201501290239
Petrosillo I,Zurlini G,Grato E et al.,2006.Indicating fragility of socio-ecological tourism-based systems.Ecological Indicators,6(1):104-113.doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.008
Roberts B H,Murray A T,2002.National and regional corporate spatial structure.The Annals of Regional Science,36(2):347-368.doi:10.1007/s001680200082
Shaw D,Sykes O,2005.Addressing connectivity in spatial planning:the case of the English regions.Planning Theory and Practice,6(1):11-33.doi:10.1080/1464935042000334949
Stephen,2013.Health workforce planning and innovations in service delivery.Brain Research,348(1):201-203.
Tang Changchun,2011.Construction of method and index system of MFOZ in a river basin:a case study of Yangtze River Basin.Geographical Research,30(12):2173-2185.(in Chinese)
Tian Lingling,2014.The Research of Major Function Oriented Zone Planning in Important Eco-function County.Wuhan:Central China Normal University.(in Chinese)
Tonts M,Martinus K,Plummer P,2013.Regional development,redistribution and the extraction of mineral resources:the Western Australinan Goldfields as a resource bank.Applied Geography,45(5):365-374.doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.03.004
Wang Li,Zhang Zhuo,Wang Dan et al.,2012.Research on division of the major function oriented zoning of Liaoning Province.Areal Research and Development,29(6):8-11.(in Chinese)
Wang Tianfu,2015.The‘Ecological’Landscape Construction of Eco-Village.Tianjin:Tianjin University.(in Chinese)
Yang Qinye,Wu Shaohong,Zheng Du,2002.A retrospect and prospect of researches on regional physiogeographical system(RPGS).Geographical Research.21(4):407-417.(in Chinese)
Yang Meiling,2014.Research on the Main Functional Subdivision of Limited Development Ecological Zones and Regional Development Mode.Xian:Northwest University.(in Chinese)
Zhang Li,2009.Research on the County Land Use Planning Based on the‘Anti-planning’Theory:A Case Study of Biyang County,Henan Province.Beijing:China University of Geosciences.(in Chinese)
Zhang Lihua,Zou Bo,Huang Baorong,2012.New perspective of comprehensive evaluation research on urban green space Ecosystem.China Population Resource and Environment,22(4):67-71.(in Chinese)
Zhao Yongjiang,Dong Jianguo,Zhang Li,2007.Researches of index system for planning the main functional regions:a case study of Henan Province.Geographical Research and Development,26(6):39-42.(in Chinese)
Zhu Lijuan,2016.County Functional Division in the Important Eco-function Areas:A Case Study in Guangze,Fujian Province.Fuzhou:Fujian Normal University.(in Chinese)
Baral N,Dhungana A,2014.Diversifying finance mechanisms for protected areas capitalizing on untapped revenues.Forest Policy and Economics,41(3):60-67.doi:10.1016/j.forpol.20-14.01.002
Baur J W R,Tynon J F,Ries P et al.,2016.Public attitudes abouturban forest ecosystem services management:a case study in Oregon cities.Urban For Urban Greening,17:42-53.doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2016.03.012
Brian H R,Alan T M,2002.National and regional corporate spatial structure.The Annals of Regional Science,36(2):347-368.doi:10.1007/s001680200082
Carranza T,Manica A,Kapos V et al.,2014.Mismatches between conservation outcomes and management evaluation in protected areas:a case study in the Brazilian Cerrado.Biological Conservation,173(8):10-16.doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.0-3.004
Chen W,Duan X J,Chen J L et al.,2004.The methods of spatial development function regionalization.Acta Geographica Sinica,59(Z1),53-58.
Gualini E,2004.Regionalization as experimental regionalism:the rescaling of territorial policy-making in Germany.International Journal of Urban and Research,28(2):329-353.doi:10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00522.x
European Commission,2003.European Spatial Development Perspective.European Commission.
Fan Jie,Tao Anjun,Ren Qing,2010.On the historical background,scientific intentions,goal orientation,and policy framework of major function-oriented zone planning in China.Journal of Resources and Ecology,4:289-299.(in Chinese)
Fan J,2015.Draft of major function oriented zoning of China.Acta Geographica Sinica,70(2):186-201.
Fan Shuping,Cheng Jiumiao,Xiang Sike,2011.Major function oriented zoning in Wuhu urban area:an approach based on the model of Three-dimensional Rubik’s Cube.Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment,7(2):66-74.(in Chinese)
Farnworth E G H,Golley F B,1975.Fragile ecosystems:evaluation of research and applications in the Neotropics.Journal of Ecology,64(1):384-384.doi:10.2307/2258706
Friedmann J,1998.Urban and Regional Governance in the Asia Pacific.Vancouver:The University of British Columbia.
Greater L A,2011.The London Plan,Spatial Development Strategy for Greater London.London:Greater London Authority.
Gu Linsheng,2003.The characteristics and new trend of foreign land planning.The World Geography Research,12(1):60-70.(in Chinese)
Higgins A J,Hajkowicz S,2008.A model for landscape planning under complex spatial conditions.Environmental Modeling and Assessment,13(4):459-471.doi:10.1007/s10666-007-91-17-3
Hong W Y,Guo R Z,2017.Indicators for quantitative evaluation of the social services function of urban greenbelt systems:a case study of shenzhen,China.Ecological Indicators,75:259-267.doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.044
Liu X H,Liu L,Peng Y,2017.Ecological zoning for regional sustainable development using an integrated modeling approach in the Bohai Rim,China.Ecological Modeling,353(10):158-166.doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.09.027
Lu Dadao,Liu Yi,Fan Jie,1999.The regional policy effects and regional development states in China.Acta Geographica Sinica,54(6):496-508.(in Chinese)
Ma Suisui,Zhu Chuangeng,Qiu Fangdao,2010.Progress and prospect of study on major function regionalization of China.The World Geography Research,19(4):91-97.(in Chinese)
Mamat K,Du P J,Ding J L,2017.Ecological function regionalization of cultural heritage sites in Turpan,China,based on GIS.Arabian Journal of Geosciences,10(4):1-12.doi:10.1007/s1-2517-017-2892-5
Mi N,Yang M L,Fan X G et al.,2016.Theory and application of the main functional subdivision of limited development ecological zones.Acta Ecologica Sinica,36(16):5058-5066.doi:10.5846/stxb201501290239
Petrosillo I,Zurlini G,Grato E et al.,2006.Indicating fragility of socio-ecological tourism-based systems.Ecological Indicators,6(1):104-113.doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.008
Roberts B H,Murray A T,2002.National and regional corporate spatial structure.The Annals of Regional Science,36(2):347-368.doi:10.1007/s001680200082
Shaw D,Sykes O,2005.Addressing connectivity in spatial planning:the case of the English regions.Planning Theory and Practice,6(1):11-33.doi:10.1080/1464935042000334949
Stephen,2013.Health workforce planning and innovations in service delivery.Brain Research,348(1):201-203.
Tang Changchun,2011.Construction of method and index system of MFOZ in a river basin:a case study of Yangtze River Basin.Geographical Research,30(12):2173-2185.(in Chinese)
Tian Lingling,2014.The Research of Major Function Oriented Zone Planning in Important Eco-function County.Wuhan:Central China Normal University.(in Chinese)
Tonts M,Martinus K,Plummer P,2013.Regional development,redistribution and the extraction of mineral resources:the Western Australinan Goldfields as a resource bank.Applied Geography,45(5):365-374.doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.03.004
Wang Li,Zhang Zhuo,Wang Dan et al.,2012.Research on division of the major function oriented zoning of Liaoning Province.Areal Research and Development,29(6):8-11.(in Chinese)
Wang Tianfu,2015.The‘Ecological’Landscape Construction of Eco-Village.Tianjin:Tianjin University.(in Chinese)
Yang Qinye,Wu Shaohong,Zheng Du,2002.A retrospect and prospect of researches on regional physiogeographical system(RPGS).Geographical Research.21(4):407-417.(in Chinese)
Yang Meiling,2014.Research on the Main Functional Subdivision of Limited Development Ecological Zones and Regional Development Mode.Xian:Northwest University.(in Chinese)
Zhang Li,2009.Research on the County Land Use Planning Based on the‘Anti-planning’Theory:A Case Study of Biyang County,Henan Province.Beijing:China University of Geosciences.(in Chinese)
Zhang Lihua,Zou Bo,Huang Baorong,2012.New perspective of comprehensive evaluation research on urban green space Ecosystem.China Population Resource and Environment,22(4):67-71.(in Chinese)
Zhao Yongjiang,Dong Jianguo,Zhang Li,2007.Researches of index system for planning the main functional regions:a case study of Henan Province.Geographical Research and Development,26(6):39-42.(in Chinese)
Zhu Lijuan,2016.County Functional Division in the Important Eco-function Areas:A Case Study in Guangze,Fujian Province.Fuzhou:Fujian Normal University.(in Chinese)