用户名: 密码: 验证码:
林草植被驱动下的土壤导水能力变化研究
详细信息    查看官网全文
摘要
本文选择甘肃省泾川县官山林场为研究区域,以林场中退耕25年、15年和9年的林地、草地为样地,使用圆盘入渗仪野外测定结合土壤水分特征曲线法研究林草植被不同恢复年限下土壤导水能力差异及其影响因素,结果表明:林草地植被恢复年限越久,其根系形成的土壤大孔隙越发育、土壤导水能力越强;草地0-20cm层导水能力优于林地,在20cm以下林地逐渐优于草地,对于相同退耕年限,草地入渗速率>林地入渗速率,随着年限增加差异减小。林、草地土壤孔隙中的大孔隙对导水能力起到决定作用,其中>0.5mm的大孔隙对饱和入渗率的贡献率可达70.92~91.58%。表明植被恢复进程中土壤水分循环能力在增强,提升了植被涵养水源作用。
This study was set in Guan Shan Forest Farm in Jingchuan County Gansu Province,and were chosen the restoration forest lands and grasslands for 25 years,15 years and 9 years as sample plots.The discinfiltration instrument was used to study the differences of soil hydraulic conductivity under different restoration years and influencing factors.The results are shown as follows:The longer restoration years of forest lands and grassland is the better soil macropores formed by roots develop and the higher the soil hydraulic conductivity.The hydraulic conductivity of 0-20 cm layer,the grass is better than the forest,and below the 20 cm the forest is gradually better than grass.For the same year of restoration,the infiltration rate of grassland > the infiltration rate of woodland,the differences reduced with the year increased.Among the soil pores,the macropores have a decisive role in the soil hydraulic conductivity,and the contribution rate of the 0.5mm soil macropores to the saturated infiltration rate is 70.92~91.58%.It is indicated that the soil water cycling ability is enhanced in the process of vegetation restoration,meanwhile,the effect of vegetation conserving water is raised.
引文
[1]杨文治.黄土高原土壤水资源与植树造林[J].自然资源学报,2001,16(5):433-438.
    [2]程立平,刘文兆.黄土塬区几种典型土地利用类型的土壤水稳定同位索特征[J].应用生态学报,2012,23(003):651-658.
    [2]徐学选,张北赢,田均良.黄土丘陵区降水-土壤水-地下水转化实验研究[J].水科学进展,2010,21(1):16-22.
    [2]Allaire S E,Roulier,S,Cessna,A J.Quantifying preferential flow in soils:A review of different techniques[J].Journal of Hydrology,2009,378(1):179-204.
    [2]BodhinayakeW,Cheng Si,B.Near-saturated surface soil hydraulic properties under different land uses in the St Denis National Wildlife Area,Saskatchewan,Canada[J].Hydrological Processes,2004,18(15):2835-2850.
    [2]Holden J.Flow throughmacropores of different size classes in blanket peat[J].Journal of Hydrology,2009,364(3-4):342-348.
    [2]Carey S K,Quinton,WL,Goeller,N T.Field and laboratory estimates of pore size properties and hydraulic characteristics for subarctic organic soils[J].Hydrological Processes,2007,21(19):2560-2571.
    [2]高朝侠,徐学选等.2014.黄土塬区土地利用方式对土壤大孑L隙特征的影响[J].应用生态学报,56(2):1578-1584.
    [2]李文凤,张晓平,梁爱珍等.2008.不同耕作方式下黑土的渗透特性和优先流特征[J].应用生态学报,19(7):506-1510.
    [10]刘娜娜,赵世伟,王恒俊.2006.黄土丘陵区人工柠条林土壤水分物理性质变化研究[J].水土保持通报,26(3):15-17.
    [11]CSIRO 1988.DiscPermeameter-Instruction Manual[Z].Canberra.
    [12]高朝侠.2014.黄土区大孔隙流试验研究[D].中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心
    [13]Watson KW.Luxmoore RJ.Estimating macroporosity in a forest watershed by use of a tension infiltrometer[J].Soil Science Society of America Jurnal,1986,50:578-582.
    [14]Wilson GV,Luxmoore RJ.Infiltration macroporosity distribution on two watersheds[J].Soil Science Society of America Jurnal,1988,52:329-335.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700