基于AHP法的大菊杂种F_1代新品种筛选
详细信息 查看官网全文
- 英文论文题名：AHP-Based Screening of Traditional Chrysanthemum Hybrid F_1 for New Variety
- 论文作者：高康 ; 宋雪彬 ; 戴思兰 ; 季玉山 ; 王朔
- 英文论文作者：GAO Kang ; SONG Xue-bin ; DAI Si-lan ; JI Yu-shan ; WANG Shuo ; Beijing Key Laboratory of Ornamental Plants Germplasm Innovation & Molecular Breeding ; National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture ; Beijing Laboratory of Urban and Rural Ecological Environment and College of Landscape Architecture ; Beijing Forestry University
- 年：2016
- 作者机构：花卉种质创新与分子育种北京市重点实验室国家花卉工程技术研究中心城乡生态环境北京实验室园林学院北京林业大学;
- 论文关键词：大菊 ; 层次分析法 ; 新品种
- 英文论文关键词：Traditional chrysanthemum cultivars ; Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) ; New variety
- 会议召开时间：2016-07-19
- 会议录名称：中国观赏园艺研究进展2016
- 语种：中文
- 分类号：S682.11
- 学会代码：EGYP
- 会议名称：2016年中国观赏园艺学术研讨会
- 会议地点：中国湖南长沙
- 主办单位：中国园艺学会观赏园艺专业委员会、国家花卉工程技术研究中心
- 学会名称：中国园艺学会
- 页数：7
- 文件大小：453k
- 原文格式：O
- 会议级别：全国
摘要
中国传统大菊是菊花品种中一类变异极为丰富且具有很高观赏价值的类群,其大多数品种来源于有性杂交。为了更好地从杂交后代中筛选出观赏价值高、品质优良的大菊新品种,建立菊花优良新品种综合评价体系尤为关键。本研究以大菊自然杂交F_1代180个单株为材料,通过层次分析法,从花部性状、整株性状和生态适应性3个方面出发,建立了大菊优良新品种综合评价体系的分层结构模型,并通过判断矩阵验证分层结构模型的合理性,确定各个评判指标权重,其中花色、瓣型、繁殖难易程度、重瓣性、花期、病虫害抗性、花径等7个指标的权重和达到了总权重的88.41%,所占比重较大。然后通过具体评价指标的评分标准,依据各因素权重计算出每个杂交后代的综合评价得分,将杂交后代划分为优良品种、较优品种、一般品种、较差品种4个等级,从中筛选出了6个综合性状优良的品种,具有花大色艳、花型奇特、株形优美、花期较早等优良特征。这一研究为大菊优良新品种的筛选提供了指导,也为中国传统大菊的进一步开发利用奠定了基础。
The group of Chinese traditional chrysanthemum cultivars is a class of varieties with rich variation and high ornamental valuein Chrysanthemum x morifolium Ramat In order to screen the new variety with good quality and high value from the hybrids oftraditional chrysanthemum cultivars,it is the key to establish comprehensive evaluation system of excellent new chrysanthemum varieties.In this study,180 large chrysanthemum natural hybrid F1 are the materials,and through the analytic hierarchy process,the study established the hierarchical structure model of comprehensive evaluation system in large chrysanthemum fromthe character of flower,whole plant properties and the ecological adaptability.The rationality of the hierarchical structure model are verified through the judgment matrix,and each evaluation index weight is determined.The color,disc type,degree of difficulty to breed,multi-disc,floweringtime,disease and insect resistance,flower diameter 7 indexes,whose weight is up to 88.41%of the total weight.And then through the concrete evaluation index scoring standard,and the factor weights to calculate the comprehensive evaluation score of each hybrids,they could be divided into good varieties of hybrids,better varieties,general varieties,poor grade varieties,6 varieties were screened,which have bright flower color,long diameter,strange and beautiful disctype,fine features,earlier flowering phases.The comprehensive evaluation system provides guidance for new variety,it alsolaid a foundation for the further development and utilization oftraditional chrysanthemum cultivars.
The group of Chinese traditional chrysanthemum cultivars is a class of varieties with rich variation and high ornamental valuein Chrysanthemum x morifolium Ramat In order to screen the new variety with good quality and high value from the hybrids oftraditional chrysanthemum cultivars,it is the key to establish comprehensive evaluation system of excellent new chrysanthemum varieties.In this study,180 large chrysanthemum natural hybrid F1 are the materials,and through the analytic hierarchy process,the study established the hierarchical structure model of comprehensive evaluation system in large chrysanthemum fromthe character of flower,whole plant properties and the ecological adaptability.The rationality of the hierarchical structure model are verified through the judgment matrix,and each evaluation index weight is determined.The color,disc type,degree of difficulty to breed,multi-disc,floweringtime,disease and insect resistance,flower diameter 7 indexes,whose weight is up to 88.41%of the total weight.And then through the concrete evaluation index scoring standard,and the factor weights to calculate the comprehensive evaluation score of each hybrids,they could be divided into good varieties of hybrids,better varieties,general varieties,poor grade varieties,6 varieties were screened,which have bright flower color,long diameter,strange and beautiful disctype,fine features,earlier flowering phases.The comprehensive evaluation system provides guidance for new variety,it alsolaid a foundation for the further development and utilization oftraditional chrysanthemum cultivars.
引文
1.雒新艳,宋雪彬,戴思兰.2016.中国传统大菊品种数量性状变异及其概率分级[J].北京林业大学报,38(1):101-111.
2.宋雪彬,黄河,张辕,等.2014.中日两国部分大菊品种的数量分类研究[C].中国观赏园艺研究进展2014:1-11.
3.张亚琼,张伟,戴思兰,等.2011.基于AHP的中国传统盆栽菊花产业化品种筛选[J].中国农业科学,44(21):4438-4446.
4.樊靖.2009.盆栽多头菊品种筛选及其反季节栽培中B9的应用研究[D].北京:北京林业大学硕士论文.
5.郭超.2009.独本菊反季节生产品种筛选及栽培技术研究[D].北京:北京林业大学硕士论文.
6.胡尚春.2009.案头菊品种筛选及栽培实验[D].北京:北京林业大学硕士论文.
7.徐雁飞.2008.菊花自交亲和特性与自交衰退现象初探[D].南京:南京农业大学硕士论文.
8.张亚琼,张伟,戴思兰.2011.层次分析法在野生花卉切花植物选择中的应用[J].湖南农业科学(7):107-110.
9.中华人民共和国农业部.2002.《中华人民共和国植物新品种特异性、一致性和稳定性的测试指南》(试行稿)菊花.
10.张亚琼,戴思兰.2011.中国传统菊花品种主要观赏性状稳定性的分析[C].中国观赏园艺研究进展2011.
11.陈俊愉,2001.中国花卉品种分类学[M].北京:中国林业出版社.
12.李鸿渐.1991.菊花的人工杂交育种[J].中国花卉盆景,(07):51.
13.Esra A,Yasemin CE.2004.Using analytic hierarchy process(AHP)toimprove human performance;An application of multiple criteria decision making problem[J].Journal of Manufacturing15:491-503.
14.Hsu YL,Lee CH,Kreng VB.2010.The application of Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy AHP in lubricant regenerative technology selection[J].Expert Systems with Applications37(1):419-425.
15.YuanC,WangW,LinY,ChenY.2012.A novel fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method for product configuration design integrated customer requirements[J].Advanced Science Letters6(1):774-778.
16.XuG,YangYP,LuSY,LiL,SongX.2011.Comprehensive evaluation of coal-fired power plants based on grey relational analysis and analytic hierarchy process[J].Energy Policy39(5):2343-2351.
17.张树林,戴思兰.2013.中国菊花全书[M].北京:中国林业出版社.
18.ZHANG Y,LUO X Y,ZHU J,et al.2014.A classification study for chrysanthemum(Chrysanthemum×grandiflorum Tzvelv)cultivars based on multivariate statistical analyses[J].Journal of Systematics and Evolution,52(5):612-628.
19.刘平,刘孟军,周俊义,等.2003.枣树数量性状的分布类型及其概率分级指标体系[J].林业科学,39(6):77-82.
20.刘孟军.1996.枣树数量性状的概率分级研究[J].园艺学报,23(2):105-109.
21.李娜娜,张德平,朱珺,等.2012.利用层次分析法初选单头切花菊杂种F,代优良单株的研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报,40(2):129-135.
22.孙明,李萍,张启翔.2011.基于层次分析法的地被菊品系综合评价研究[J].西北林学院学报,26(3):177-181.
23.杨彦伶,雷小华,李玲.2005.层次分析法在紫薇优良无性系选择的应用研究[J].西南农业大学学报:自然科学版,27(4),518-521.
24.钱虹妹,杨学军,余洪波.2006.利用AHP法综合评价中国百合野生种资源[J].江苏农业科学,(4):168-172.
25.陈和明,江南,朱根发.2009.层次分析法在大花蕙兰品种选择上的应用[J].亚热带植物科学,38(2):30-32.
26.王晓光,李金柱,邓先珍.2009.层次分析法在湖北省乌桕优树决选中的应用研究[J].华中农业大学学报,28(1):89-92.
27.陈仲芳,张霖,尚富德.2004.利用层次分析法综合评价湖北省部分桂花品种[J].园艺学报,31(6):825-828.
28.郭金玉,张忠彬,孙庆云.2008.层次分析法的研究与应用[J].中国安全科学学报,18(5):3003-3008.
2.宋雪彬,黄河,张辕,等.2014.中日两国部分大菊品种的数量分类研究[C].中国观赏园艺研究进展2014:1-11.
3.张亚琼,张伟,戴思兰,等.2011.基于AHP的中国传统盆栽菊花产业化品种筛选[J].中国农业科学,44(21):4438-4446.
4.樊靖.2009.盆栽多头菊品种筛选及其反季节栽培中B9的应用研究[D].北京:北京林业大学硕士论文.
5.郭超.2009.独本菊反季节生产品种筛选及栽培技术研究[D].北京:北京林业大学硕士论文.
6.胡尚春.2009.案头菊品种筛选及栽培实验[D].北京:北京林业大学硕士论文.
7.徐雁飞.2008.菊花自交亲和特性与自交衰退现象初探[D].南京:南京农业大学硕士论文.
8.张亚琼,张伟,戴思兰.2011.层次分析法在野生花卉切花植物选择中的应用[J].湖南农业科学(7):107-110.
9.中华人民共和国农业部.2002.《中华人民共和国植物新品种特异性、一致性和稳定性的测试指南》(试行稿)菊花.
10.张亚琼,戴思兰.2011.中国传统菊花品种主要观赏性状稳定性的分析[C].中国观赏园艺研究进展2011.
11.陈俊愉,2001.中国花卉品种分类学[M].北京:中国林业出版社.
12.李鸿渐.1991.菊花的人工杂交育种[J].中国花卉盆景,(07):51.
13.Esra A,Yasemin CE.2004.Using analytic hierarchy process(AHP)toimprove human performance;An application of multiple criteria decision making problem[J].Journal of Manufacturing15:491-503.
14.Hsu YL,Lee CH,Kreng VB.2010.The application of Fuzzy Delphi Method and Fuzzy AHP in lubricant regenerative technology selection[J].Expert Systems with Applications37(1):419-425.
15.YuanC,WangW,LinY,ChenY.2012.A novel fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method for product configuration design integrated customer requirements[J].Advanced Science Letters6(1):774-778.
16.XuG,YangYP,LuSY,LiL,SongX.2011.Comprehensive evaluation of coal-fired power plants based on grey relational analysis and analytic hierarchy process[J].Energy Policy39(5):2343-2351.
17.张树林,戴思兰.2013.中国菊花全书[M].北京:中国林业出版社.
18.ZHANG Y,LUO X Y,ZHU J,et al.2014.A classification study for chrysanthemum(Chrysanthemum×grandiflorum Tzvelv)cultivars based on multivariate statistical analyses[J].Journal of Systematics and Evolution,52(5):612-628.
19.刘平,刘孟军,周俊义,等.2003.枣树数量性状的分布类型及其概率分级指标体系[J].林业科学,39(6):77-82.
20.刘孟军.1996.枣树数量性状的概率分级研究[J].园艺学报,23(2):105-109.
21.李娜娜,张德平,朱珺,等.2012.利用层次分析法初选单头切花菊杂种F,代优良单株的研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报,40(2):129-135.
22.孙明,李萍,张启翔.2011.基于层次分析法的地被菊品系综合评价研究[J].西北林学院学报,26(3):177-181.
23.杨彦伶,雷小华,李玲.2005.层次分析法在紫薇优良无性系选择的应用研究[J].西南农业大学学报:自然科学版,27(4),518-521.
24.钱虹妹,杨学军,余洪波.2006.利用AHP法综合评价中国百合野生种资源[J].江苏农业科学,(4):168-172.
25.陈和明,江南,朱根发.2009.层次分析法在大花蕙兰品种选择上的应用[J].亚热带植物科学,38(2):30-32.
26.王晓光,李金柱,邓先珍.2009.层次分析法在湖北省乌桕优树决选中的应用研究[J].华中农业大学学报,28(1):89-92.
27.陈仲芳,张霖,尚富德.2004.利用层次分析法综合评价湖北省部分桂花品种[J].园艺学报,31(6):825-828.
28.郭金玉,张忠彬,孙庆云.2008.层次分析法的研究与应用[J].中国安全科学学报,18(5):3003-3008.