用户名: 密码: 验证码:
两种检查体位在胸部增强CT扫描中的对比研究
详细信息    查看官网全文
摘要
目的:对比头先进仰卧位、足先进仰卧位两种体位在胸部增强中的应用安全、便捷情况,确定一种较佳的胸部增强CT扫描体位。方法:对拟行胸部增强CT患者120人,随机分成两组,分别采用头先进仰卧位、足先进仰卧位进行增强多期扫描。对比两组间扫描前准备时间、扫描时间、患者配合程度(舒适度分级)、扫描中观察方便程度,紧急状况处理快捷程度、图像质量等指标。结果:足先进仰卧位进行胸部增强CT扫描所需扫描前准备时间短、患者配合程度高、扫描观察方便、紧急状况处理快捷、图像质量高。结论:足先进仰卧位进行胸部增强CT扫描相对于头先进仰卧位具有安全、快捷、患者接受程度较高、便于检查者观察及处理紧急情况、所获图像质量高的优点,值得临床广泛应用。
Objective: Compared the head-first supine position and the foot-first advanced position in the thoracal contrast enhanced CT scann about the safety and convenience, to determine abetter thoracal enhanced CT scan position. Methods: 120 people who were prepared to undergo thorax contrast enhanced CT scan were divided into two groups at random, and administrated the headfirst supine position or the feet-first supine position to enhanced scan respe ctively. The parameters of the two groups were compared, such as, p reparation time before scan, scanning time, the degree ofpatient comfort, the convenience of the observing and handling emergency processing, image quality, and so on. Results: It has many advantages that using the feet-first supine examination positionto thorax contrast enhanced CT scanning relative to the head-first supine scanning position, such as, security, short preparation time, easy acceptation to patients, easy observing patient and handlingemergency treatment for examiner, and high image quality. Conclusion: It is worth wide application in the clinical practice using the feet-first supine examination position to contrast enhanced thoraxCT scanning.
引文
[1]Araki T,Sholl LM,Gerbaudo VH,et al.Intrathymic cyst:clinical and radiological features in surgically resected cases[J].Clin Radiol,2014,69(7):732-738.
    [2]Meng X,Wang R.Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor occurs in the mediastinum[J].J Cancer Res Ther,2013,9(4):721-723.
    [3]Ma y MS,Eller A,Stahl C,et al.Dose reduction in computed tomography of the chest:image quality of iterative reconstructions at a 50%radiation dose compared to filtered back projection at a 100%radiation dose[J].Rofo,2014,186(6):576-584.
    [4]Tang S,Shao H,Yang Z,et al.[Contrast-enhanced MSCT features and predominant anatomic distribution of mediastinal tuberculous lymphadenitis][J].Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi,2013,30(2):283-286.
    [5]Gorkem SB,Coskun A,Yikilmaz A,et al.Evaluation of pediatric thoracic disorders:comparison of unenhanced fast-imaging-sequence 1.5-T MRI and contrast-enhanced MDCT[J].AJR Am J Roentgenol,2013,200(6):1352-1357.
    [6]G.Knobloch,G.Jost,A.Huppertz,等.对此双能量CT与动态增强CT及传统的单能量增强CT对瑞格非尼(Regorafenib)在临床前期肿瘤模型早期疗效的评估[J].国际医学放射学杂志,2014,(05).
    [7]施珏倩,于红,范丽,等.CTA对慢性阻塞性肺疾病支气管动脉形态学变化的研究[J].实用放射学杂志,2015,(1).
    [8]赵青兰,程文华,孙莉.超声引导下经肘上留置中心静脉导管的效果观察[J].解放军医药杂志,2013,25(9).
    [9]Baumueller S,Alkadhi H,Stolzmann P,et al.Computed tomography of the lung in the high-pitch mode:is breath holding still required?[J].Invest Radiol,2011,46(4):240-245.
    [10]Yamada S,Ueguchi T,Ogata T,et al.[Perceptual image dissimilarity--a novel metric for objective assessment of image quality in computed tomography with iterative reconstruction][J].Igaku Butsuri,2014,34(2):35-46.
    [11]Sun K,Li K,Han R,et al.Evaluation of high-pitch dual-source CT angiography for evaluation of coronary and carotid-cerebrovascular arteries[J].Eur J Radiol,2015,84(3):398-406.
    [12]Heyer CM,Thuring J,Lemburg SP,et al.Anxiety of patients undergoing CT imaging-an underestimated problem?[J].Acad Radiol,2015,22(1):105-112.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700