用户名: 密码: 验证码:
多突发事件耦合的城市交通应急等级评价
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着城市化和机动化进程的加快,城市多突发事件耦合发生越来越频繁,给本身就已经不堪重负的城市交通系统带来很大的威胁。多突发事件下的交通应急处置,成为城市和交通研究的热点和难点。为了在多突发事件耦合发生后,能快速、有效的处置事件,减少损失,就需要交通部门能迅速、正确的评估交通应急等级,从而采取相应的交通应急预案。目前,专门针对交通应急响应级别的研究很少,并且也只是定性的描述,缺少定量模型。论文以国家软科学研究计划项目“面向多突发事件耦合的城市交通应急决策支持体系研究”为背景,开展多突发事件耦合的城市交通应急等级评价研究,主要研究成果如下:
     (1)以火灾、爆炸、危险品泄漏和交通事故等涉及交通系统的事故灾难为研究对象,详细分析了各种事故本身特性及其交通特性;对多突发事件耦合进行了分析和归类,并对事件的耦合特性及多突发事件耦合和交通系统的相互关系进行了分析。
     (2)在特性分析的基础上,提炼出了影响交通应急等级评价的因素,借助层次分析法的思想,从交通响应的紧急程度和交通救援的难易程度两方面,初步拟定了多因素、多层次的评价指标体系,利用专家经验法和模糊优先排序法对初拟的评价指标体系进行了优化,提出了多突发事件耦合的交通应急等级评价指标体系,并明确给出了各指标的定义。
     (3)通过参考国家相关规范、突发事件分级标准、应急交通疏散标准以及相关文献资料,初步建立了各评价指标的阈值标准。
     (4)考虑传统的层次分析法确定权重的局限性,引入基于三角模糊数的模糊层次分析法计算了各指标的权重,借助模糊综合评判法构建了交通应急等级判定模型;并利用MATLAB软件设计开发了多突发事件耦合的交通应急等级评价系统。
     本论文的研究成果可以为交通管理部门在处置多突发事件耦合时提供一定的决策指导,从而能快速、有效地实施交通应急预案,最大程度的减少社会损失。
With the rapid development of urbanization and motorization, coupling of multipleemergencies occurred frequently, which has threatened the hard-pressed urban trafficsystem. Traffic emergency disposal of coupling of multiple accidents has become one ofthe hotspots and difficulties of the urban and traffic research. In order to deal with accidentquickly and effectively after coupling of accident and reduce loss, traffic department mustevaluate grade of traffic emergency correctly and rapidly as to take corresponding trafficemergency plan. Currently, there are few researches on classification of traffic emergencyresponse. In addition, the previous researches are qualitative, lacking of quantitative model.Taking the National soft science research program-urban traffic emergency decisionsupport system of coupling of multiple emergencies for background, this paper discussedthe grade of traffic emergency of coupling of multiple accidents. The researches of thispaper are as follows:
     (1) Taking such disaster accidents involved in traffic system as fire, explosion,leakage of dangerous goods and traffic accident as study objects, the characteristics ofaccidents and their traffic characteristics were analyzed in detail. Coupling of multipleaccidents were analyzed and classified, and the characteristics of coupling of accident andrelationship between accident and traffic system were analyzed.
     (2) Based on the analysis of characteristics, the influence factors of grade of trafficemergency were extracted. With the thought of analytic hierarchy process, the initialevaluation index system was established from two aspects, such as urgent degree of trafficresponse and difficult degree of traffic rescue. The expert experience and fuzzyprioritization method were used to optimize the initial index system and a comprehensiveevaluation index system of traffic response grading was proposed. Each index wasdefined.
     (3) The threshold criteria of each index were established through analyzing relevantnational standard, classifications criteria of accident, classifications standard of emergencyevacuation and relavant references.
     (4) Considering the limitation of traditional analytic hierarchy process, the fuzzyanalytic hierarchy process based on triangular fuzzy number was introduced to calculate weight of each index. Grading model of traffic emergency was established by fuzzycomprehensive evaluation. The traffic emergency grade evaluation software system wasdeveloped using MATLAB software.
     The results of this paper can provide certain guidance for traffic department whenthey deal with coupling of accident, which will contribute to implement traffic emergencyplan rapidly and effectively and reduce society loss to greatest extent.
引文
[1] Finlay P.J.&Fell R. The relationship between the probability of landslide occurrenceand rainfall. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,1997,4(6):811~824
    [2] Dahal R.K.&Hasegawa S. GIS-based weights-of-evidence modeling ofrainfall-induced landslides in small catchments for landslide susceptibility mapping.Environmental Geology,2008,54(2):311~324
    [3] Jeffrey D.&Colby garen A. Modeling flooding extent from Hurricane Floyd in thecoasml plains of North Carolina. Environmental Hazards,2000,2(4):157~168
    [4] K.F.Cheung, A.C.Phadke, Y.Wei etal. Modeling of storm-induced coastal floodingfor emergency management. Ocean Engineering,2003,30(1):1353~1386
    [5] Atefe Ramezankhani, Mostafa Najafiyazdi. A System Dynamics Approach onPost-Disaster Management: A Case Study of Bam Earthquake.22nd InternationalConference of the System Dynamics Society,2008,1111~1118
    [6] Lubos Buzna, Karsten Peters, Dirk Helbing. Modeling the dynamics of disasterspreading in networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,2006,363(11):132~140
    [7] Dirk Helbing, Christian Kfthnert. Assessing interaction networks with applications tocatastrophe dynamics and disaster management. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics andits Applications,2003,328(34):584~606
    [8] Batty, Michael, Jake De Syllas. The discrete dynamics of small-scale spatial events:agent-base models of mobility in carnivals and street parades. Working papers ofcentre for advanced spatial analysis,2002
    [9] Hongtae Kim, Jin-Hyoung Park, Dongkon Lee. Establishing the methodologies forhuman evacuation simulation in marine accidents. Computers&IndustrialEngineering,2004(46):725~740
    [10]Thiago Tinoco Pires. An approach for modeling human cognitive behavior inevacuation models. Fire Safety Journal,2005(40):177~189
    [11]Daniel Nilsson, Maria Johansson. Evacuation experiment in a road tunnel: A study ofhuman behaviour and technical installations. Fire Safety Journal,2009(44):458~468
    [12]T.J.Shields, K.E.Boyce, N.Mc.Connell. The behaviour and evacuation experiences ofWTC9/11evacuees with self-designated mobility impairments. Fire Safety Journal,2009(44):881~893
    [13]N.C.McConnell, K.E.Boyce, T.J.Shields etal. The UK9/11evacuation study: Analysisof survivors’recognition and response phase in WTC1. Fire Safety Journal,2010(45):21~34
    [14]Bao Lukun, Bao Jingjing. Human behavior process in train station fire emergencyevacuation. Proceedings of the8th International Conference of Chinese Logistics andTransportation Professionals-Logistics: The Emerging Frontiers of Transportationand Development in China,2008,3747~3752
    [15] Manley Matthew, Kim Yong Seog, Christensen Keith. Modeling emergencyevacuation of individuals with disabilities in a densely populated airport.Transportation Research Record,2011(22):32~38
    [16]Steven Deban. Innovative Traffic Management Following the1994NorthbridgeEarthquake. Prepared for organization of Chinese American.1995
    [17]Gordon E.&H.Richardson. The Business Interruption Effects of the NorthridgeEarthquake. Lusk Center Research Institute, Technical Report LCRI, University ofSouthern California, Los Angeles, CA, April.1995
    [18]Stephanie E. Chang. Transportation Performance, Disaster Vulnerability, and Long-Term Effects of Earthquakes. Proceedings of Second Euro Conference on GlobalChange and Catastrophe Risk Management, Laxenburg, Austria,2000
    [19]Chang S.E. Disasters and Transport Systems: Loss, Recovery, and Competition at thePort of Kobe after the1995Earthquake. Journal of Transport Geography,2000
    [20]Chang S.E.&N.Nojima. Measuring Post. Disaster Transportation SystemPerformance: The1995Kobe Earthquake in Comparative Perspective. TransportationResearch A,2000
    [21]Cho P.&Gordon H.W. Analyzing Transportation Network Reconstruction Strategies:A Full Cost Approach. The2000Western Regional Science Association Meetings,2000
    [22]Berdica K. Analyzing Vulnerability in the Road Transportation System. Departmentof Infrastructure and Planning, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden,2000
    [23]Erica Dalziell, Alan Nicholson. Risk and Impact of Natural Hazards on Road Network.Journal of Transportation,2001,127(2):159~166
    [24]Yafengyin, Hitoshi Ieda. Optimal Improvement Scheme for Network Reliability.Transportation Research Record,1783,2002
    [25]M.Baykal-Gürsoy, W.Xiao, K.Ozbay. Modeling traffic flow interrupted by incidents.European Journal of Operational Research,2009(195):127~138
    [26]http://www.yingji.org/
    [27]Thomas, Richard Dean, Lu Po-Yung. The development of emergency response values.1st Joint Emergency Preparedness and Response/Robotic and Remote SystemsTopical Meeting, American Nuclear Society,2006:424~430
    [28]Brown David, Dunn William. Application of a quantitative risk assessment method toemergency response planning. Computers and Operations Research,2007,34(5):1243~1265
    [29]Shang Hongyan, Wang Xuping, Liu Xiaodong. Application of fuzzy assessmentmethod to emergency response capability in hazardous materials transportation.Second International Conference on Innovative Computing, Information and Control,ICICIC2007:2008~2009
    [30]Jiuh-Biing Sheu. Dynamic relief-demand management for emergency logisticsoperations under large-scale disasters. Transportation Research Part E,2010,46:1~17
    [31]Jiuh-Biing Sheu. An emergency logistics distribution approach for quick response tourgent relief demand in disasters. Transportation Research Part E,2007,43:687~709
    [32]Marna Hoard, JackHomer b, William Manleya, etal. James Helmkampc. Systemsmodeling in support of evidence-based disaster planning for rural areas.Environ.-Health,2005,208:117~125
    [33]Mei-Shiang Chang, Ya-Ling Tseng, Jing-Wen Chen. A scenario planning approachfor the flood emergency logistics preparation problem under uncertainty.Transportation Research Part E,2007,43:737~754
    [34]Bhaduri B., Liu C., Franzese O. A PC-based computer tool for emergency evacuationplanning. Symposium on GIS for Transportation,2006
    [35]Corbin J. strategies to improve Management of Travel for All Planned Special Eventsin a Region. The82thTransportation Research Board Annual Meeting. Washington DC,2003,12~16
    [36]Matthew G.K., Konstantinos Kepaptsoglou, Anthony Stathopoulos. ParatransitService Optimization for Special Events. TRB Annual Meeting CD-ROM,2005
    [37]Ferguson E. Transportation demand management plannin development andimplementation. Journal of the American Planning Association,1990
    [38]Federal Highway Administration. U.S. Department of Transportation Evaluation ofTravel Demand Management (TDM) Measures to Relieve Congestion.1990
    [39]Michael D., Meyer. Traffic demand management as an element of transportationpolicy: using carrots and sticks to influence travel behavior, Transportation ResearchA,1999.
    [40]H. M. Zhang, W. W. Recker. On optimal freeway ramp control policies forcongested traffic corridors. Transportation Research,1999:417~431
    [41]Michael J., Cassidy, Robert L. Some traffic features at freeway bottlenecks.Transportation Research,1999,33:25~42
    [42]J.L. Bowman, M.E. Ben-Akiva. Activity-based disaggregate travel demand modelsystem with activity schedules. Transportation Research Part A,2000
    [43]Chotikapanich D, Griffiiths W.E. Estimating Lorenz curves using a Dirichletdistribution. Business and Economic Statistics,2002(20):290~295
    [44]Christos Goumopoulos, Efthymios Housos. Efficient trip generation with a rulemodeling system for crew scheduling problems. The Journal of Systems and Software,2004
    [45]S.W.Yoon, J.D. Velasquez, B.K. Partridge. Transportation security decision supportsystem for emergency response: A training prototype. Decision Support Systems,2008,46:139~148
    [46]Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng, Hsin-Jung Cheng, Tsung Dow Huang. Multi-objective optimalplanning for designing relief delivery systems. Transportation Research Part E,2007,43:673~686
    [47]Chen Rui, Rao, H. Raghav, Upadhyaya, Shambhu J. Coordination in emergencyresponse management. Communications of theACM,2008,51(5):66~73.
    [48]Kwan Mei-Po1, Ransberger Daniel M. LiDAR assisted emergency response:Detection of transport network obstructions caused by major disasters. Computers,Environment and Urban Systems,2010,34(3):179~188
    [49] Peraza, David. Strategies for damage assessments and emergency response. ForensicEngineering-Proceedings of the Fourth Forensic Engineering Congress,2007,217:59~66
    [50]Elba Urbina, Brian Wolshon. National review of hurricane evacuation plans andpolicies: a comparison and contrast of state practices. Transportation Research,2003,Part A.37:264~286
    [51]Thomas J. Cova, Justin P. Johnson. A network flow model for lane-based evacuationrouting. Transportation Research,2003, part A.37:579~604
    [52]Southworth F. Regional Evacuation Modeling: A State-of-the Art Review. Oak RidgeNational Laboratory,1991
    [53]Liu Y, Lai X, Chang G. A. Two-Level Integrated Optimization Model for Planning ofEmergency Evacuation: ACase Study of Ocean City under Hurricane Evacuation. The84thTransportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington D C,2005.
    [54]Xuwei Chen, F. Benjamin. Agent-based modeling and simulation of urban evacuationrelative effectiveness of simultaneous and evacuation strategies. Journal of theOperational Research Society,2008,(2):25~33
    [55]Virginia P. Sisiopiku. Application of Traffic Simulation Modeling for ImprovedEmergency Preparedness Planning. Journal of Urban Planning and Development,ASCE,2007:51~60
    [56]Virginia P, Steven L. J., Jr A. J., etal. Regional traffic simulation for emergencyPreparedness. Birmingham, Alabama: University Transportation Center for Alabama,2004
    [57]Shangyao Yan, Yu-LinShih. Optimal scheduling of emergency roadway repair andsubsequent relief distribution. Computers&Operations Research,2009,36:2049-2065
    [58]Sisiopiku, V.P., Sullivan, A.J., Foster, P.J. etal. Emergency response and trafficcongestion: The dispatcher's perspective WIT Transactions on the Built Environment,2011,119:125~135
    [59]Basoz Nesrin, Williams Meredith, Kiremidjian Anne. A GIS-Based EmergencyResponse System for Transportation Networks. Technical Council on LifelineEarthquake Engineering Monograph,2003(25):926~935
    [60]Berman Oded, Verter Vedat, Kara Bahar Y. Designing emergency response networksfor hazardous materials transportation. Computers and Operations Research,2007,34,(5):1374~1388.
    [61]Meyer, Travis S. Muething, Joseph Z.; Lima, Gustavo Amoras Souza; Torres, BrenoRaemy Rangel; Gomes, José Orlando; Lambert, James H. Decision support systeminterface design for radiological emergency response coordination in Brazil.2011IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium, SIEDS2011-Conference Proceedings,2011:146~151
    [62]Zografos Konstantinos G.&Androutsopoulos Konstantinos N. A decision supportsystem for integrated hazardous materials routing and emergency response decisions.Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies,2008,16(6):684~703.
    [63]Yoon S.W., Velasquez J.D., Partridge B.K. Transportation security decision supportsystem for emergency response: A training prototype. Decision Support Systems,2008,46(1):139~148
    [64]叶四桥,唐红梅,王昌贤等.滑坡灾害过程耦合机制与方法研究.岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(2):2707~2712
    [65]李明,唐红梅,叶四桥.典型地质灾害链式机理研究.灾害学,2008,23(1):1~5
    [66]李晓,李守定,陈剑等.地质灾害形成的内外动力耦合作用机制.岩石力学与工程学报,2008,27(9):35~38
    [67]郭安红,郭增建.从地气耦合观点讨论洪涝灾害.灾害学,2009,24(03):66~68
    [68]方应波,李长安,易文芳.江汉平原人类活动与洪涝灾害的耦合研究.人民长江,2009,40(07):38~40
    [69]张永双,石菊松,孙萍等.汶川地震内外动力耦合及灾害实例.地质力学学报,2009,15(2):131
    [70]王军,张旭.多向风流耦合作用对隧道火灾温度场的影响.铁道标准设计,2008,(51):23~26
    [71]徐琳,张旭,朱春.耦合风扰作用下火源热烟羽受限扩散规律实验研究.应用基础与工程科学学报,2010,18(04):589~598
    [72]姚斌,蔡昕,周煜琴.热-力耦合作用对建筑结构火灾安全的影响.火灾科学,2007,16(01):6~12
    [73]裘江南,董磊磊,叶鑫.突发事件耦合度模型研究.第四届国际应急管理论坛暨中国(双法)应急管理专业委员会第五届年会,2009,9~12
    [74]董磊磊.基于贝叶斯网络的突发事件链建模研究[硕士学位论文].大连:大连理工大学,2009
    [75]迟菲,陈安.突发事件耦合机理研究.应急管理汇,2011,6(2):5~16
    [76]张树平.建筑火灾中人的行为反应研究[博士学位论文].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2004
    [77]张树平,张耀泽,卢兆明.建筑火灾中人的行为反应的调查研究.消防科学与技术,2005,24(5):563~566
    [78]张树平,史行君,卢兆明.建筑火灾中人的行为研究综述.消防科学与技术,2005,24(2):178~181
    [79]何理,钟茂华,史聪灵等.地铁突发事件下乘客疏散行为调查研究.中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(1):53~58
    [80]石小法,王炜.交通事故对城市交通网络的影响研究.公路交通科技,2000,17(5):38~41
    [81]严新平.非常态下城市交通的解决方案研究.交通运输系统工程与信息,2008,8(6):78~84
    [82]郭晶,程金良,王俊骅等.基于仿真的高速公路紧急事件交通流特征研究.中国安全生产科学技术,2009,5(4):42~46
    [83]陈茜,王炜.大型活动中突发事件对交通流的时空影响.交通运输工程学报2009,9(3):81-85
    [84]陈燕.应对突发事件的城市交通应急管理研究[硕士学位论文].成都:西南交通大学,2009
    [85]吴燕华.突发事件应急交通疏散策略的研究[硕士学位论文].上海:同济大学,.2009
    [86]郭寒英.突发事件下出行者行为时间特征研究.西华大学学报(自然科学版),2010,29(2):119~121
    [87]中华人民共和国国务院.《国家突发公共事件总体应急预案》.2006-6-1
    [88]杨静,陈建明,赵红.应急管理中的突发事件分类分级研究.管理评论,2005,17(4):37~41
    [89]Ji Xuewei, Weng Wenguo, Ni Shunjiang. Warning classification model for publicemergencies. Qinghua Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Tsinghua University,2008,48(8):1252~1255
    [90]姜学鹏,徐志胜.公路隧道事故分级及其应急救援研究.灾害学,2008,23(4):91~95
    [91]宋莎莎,戴锋,卫保路.基于模糊层次分析法和聚类分析的突发事件分级研究.科学决策,2010,10:68~72
    [92]马兆有,王长君.基于风险危害评价的高速公路紧急事件分级.重庆大学学报(自然科学版),2010,29(5):776~780
    [93]王富,李杰,石永辉.城市突发公共事件交通响应级别及交通组织对策研究.交通企业管理,2009,24(9):3~4
    [94]吴兴春.突发事件下城市交通应急管理研究[硕士学位论文].成都:西南交通大学,2010
    [95]杨孝宽.突发事件应急交通规划方法与应用.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010
    [96]吴宗之,刘茂.重大事故应急预案分级、分类体系及其基本内容.中国安全科学学报,2003,13(1):15~18
    [97]中华人民共和国交通运输部.《公路交通突发公共事件应急预案》.交公路发[2009]226号
    [98]深圳市交通局.《深圳市交通局处置突发公共事件主体应急预案》.深交[2005]667号
    [99]北京市政府.《北京市雪天交通保障应急预案》.2010-12-08
    [100]哈尔滨市人民政府.《哈尔滨市道路旅客运输及城市公共交通安全事故应急预案》.2008-7-1
    [101]钱勇生,广晓平.地铁应急救援预案的研究.地下空间与工程学报,2006,2(2):288~292
    [102]张钰.城市交通紧急疏散管理方法及应用研究[硕士学位论文].武汉:武汉理工大学.2006
    [103]蒋光胜.大城市突发事件交通组织和疏散对策研究[硕士学位论文].北京:北京工业大学.2006
    [104]宫建.奥运应急交通疏散路径选择模型研究[硕士学位论文].北京:北京工业大学.2007
    [105]胡红,刘小明,魏恒等.奥运应急疏散路网规划系统方法.北京工业大学学报,2008,34(8):865~872
    [106]柴干,濮居一.万水省域高速公路交通应急救援联动机制探讨.中国安全科学学报,2008,18(5):68~74
    [107]周莎莎,柴干.紧急事件下高速公路交通管制对策初探.231~235.
    [108]张董莉.重大毒气泄漏事故地区交通疏散研究[硕士学位论文].天津:南开大学.2008
    [109]彭公权.高速公路突发事件应急预案研究.决策与信息,2008,8:147~148
    [110]张钊,宴启鹏,刘澜.突发事件下应急交通疏散管理研究.铁道运输与经济,2009,31(5):85~89
    [111]王海峰,上官志洪.核电厂事故应急疏散研究.中国安全科学学报,2010,20(7):26~31
    [112]刘小明,张杰.突发事件下交通干预控制框架研究与设计.交通部公路科学研究院,98~105
    [113] Cheng Shaowu, Ye Xiaofei, An Shi. A framework of the traffic organizationsimulation system for freeway emergency response. Proceedings of the9thInternational Conference of Chinese Transportation Professionals, ICCTP2009:Critical Issues in Transportation System Planning, Development, and Management,2009:1479~1483
    [114] Du Xugang, Sun Qingfeng. Research on transportation route optimizationamong emergency evacuation. Proceedings2011International Conference onMechatronic Science, Electric Engineering and Computer, MEC.2011:2139~2142
    [115] Yang, Zhaosheng, Liu Chunrong. Urban traffic emergency management responseto abnormal incidents. Source: ICTIS2011: Multimodal Approach to SustainedTransportation System Development-Information, Technology, and Implementation-Proceedings of the1st Int. Conf. on Transportation Information and Safety.2011:823~829
    [116] Wu Zhengyan, Jiang Guiyan, Zhang Chunqin. Traffic organization method foremergency evacuation based on information centrality.Proceedings-2nd IEEEInternational Conference on Advanced Computer Control, ICACC.2010:92~96
    [117]陈安,陈宁.现代应急管理理论与方法.北京:科学出版社.2009
    [118] GB5907-86《消防基本术语》.国家标准局.1986,3
    [119]范维澄,孙金华,陆守香等.火灾风险评估方法学.北京:科学出版社.2004
    [120]事故应急处置措施(火灾、爆炸、泄露).http://bbs.anquan.com.cn/thread-106510-1-1.html,2008-5-17
    [121]爆炸事故的种类特征和事故类型.http://wenku.baidu.com/view/429318de6f1aff00bed51e83.html
    [122]安全科学网,爆炸的机理及其分类.http://www.safehoo.com/Engineer/Exam/Tech/201009/50441.shtml,2010-9-15
    [123]中华人民共和国国务院令第344号《危险化学品安全管理条例》.2002,3
    [124]高洋.浅谈危险化学品泄漏事故及其处置.http://www.safehoo.com/Tech/Chemical/201112/255838.shtml,2011-12-9
    [125] http://baike.baidu.com/view/156245.htm(EB/OL)
    [126]滕佳颖.点源事故耦合下城市交通预警评价及机制研究[硕士学位论文].武汉:华中科技大学.2012
    [127] http://www.safehoo.com/NewsSpecial/Fire
    [128] http://www.safehoo.com/NewsSpecial/Traffic
    [129] http://www.safehoo.com/NewsSpecial/Chemical/
    [130]杜栋,庞庆华.现代综合评价方法与案例精选.北京:清华大学出版社.2005.
    [131]徐志胜,吴振营,姜学鹏.瞬间泄漏危害区域预测方法的研究.消防科学与技术,2007,26(6):607~609
    [132]朱顺应,王炜,邓卫等.交通网络可靠度及其通路算法研究.中国公路学报,2000,13(1):91~94
    [133] Asakura Y. Reliability Measures of an Origin and Destination Pair in aDeteriorated Road Network with Variable Flows. Transportation Networks:RecentMethodologicalAdvances.Oxford: Pergamon Press,1996:273~288
    [134]张生瑞,马壮林.高速公路隧道交通环境评价指标体系.长安大学学报(自然科学版),2006,26(2):78~81.
    [135]谢季坚,刘承平.模糊数学方法及其应用(第三版).武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2005
    [136]杨林,王麟.公路景观评价指标体系建立方法的研究.森林工程,2008,24(1):80~83
    [137]北京市政府.《北京市突发事件总体应急预案》.2005-9-9
    [138]公安部.《火灾统计管理规定》.[1989]公发26号,1989-11-27
    [139]公消[2007]234号.《关于调整火灾等级标准的通知》.2007-6-1
    [140]北京市政府.《北京市火灾事故应急预案》.2008-8-27
    [141]劳安字[1991]23号.《关于印发〈企业职工伤亡事故报告和处理规定〉有关问题的解释的通知》.1991-7
    [142]国务院令第89号.《道路交通事故处理办法》.1991-9-22
    [143]邢志祥,常建国,蒋军成.池火灾最小安全距离的确定.消防技术与产品信息,2005,9:22~26
    [144] GB50156-2002《汽车加油加气站设计与施工规范》.2002-5-29
    [145] GB50016-2006《建筑设计防火规范》.2006-12-1
    [146]陆化普,王建伟.城市交通管理评价体系.北京:人民交通出版社.2003,6
    [147]王炜,徐吉谦,杨涛等.城市交通规划理论及其应用.南京:东南大学出版社.1998
    [148]主席令11届第47号.《中华人民共和国道路交通安全法》.全国人民代表大会常务委员会,2011-4-22
    [149]郭亚军.综合评价理论、方法及应用.北京:科学出版社.2007
    [150] Saaty T. L. The analytic hierarchy process. New York: McGraw-Hill.1980
    [151] Kahraman C., Cebeci U.,&Ulukan Z. Multi-criteria supplier selection usingfuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management,2003,16(6):382~394.
    [152] F.T.S.&Chan N. Kumar. Global supplier development considering risk factorsusing fuzzy extended AHP-based approach, Omega.2007,35:417~431.
    [153] Wang T.C.&Chen Y.H. Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations topartnership selection. Omega, the International Journal of Management Science,2007,35:384~388.
    [154] Deng H. Multicriteria analysis with fuzzy pair-wise comparison. InternationalJournal ofApproximate Reasoning,1999,21:215~231
    [155] Van Laarhoven&Pedrcyz W. A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. FuzzySets and Systems,1983,11:229~241
    [156] Buckley J.J. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1985,17:233~247
    [157] Chang D.Y. Extent Analysis and Synthetic Decision, Optimization Techniquesand Applications, World Scientific, Singapore,1992:352
    [158] Chang D. Y. Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. EuropeanJournal of Operational Research,1996,95:649~655
    [159] L. Mikhailov, P. Tsvetinov. Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytichierarchy process. Applied Soft Computing,2004,5:23~33
    [160]陈大宇,肖峻,王成山.基于模糊层次分析法的城市电网规划决策综合评判.电力系统自动化学报,2003,15(4):83~88
    [161]马小雨.基于AHP的煤炭科研项目评价系统的设计与实现[硕士学位论文].北京:北京邮电大学,2007
    [162]宋晓秋.模糊数学原理与方法(第二版).中国矿业大学出版社.2004
    [163]张国立,张辉,孔倩.模糊数学基础及其应用.北京:化学工业出版社.2011
    [164]胡永宏.综合评价方法.北京:科学出版社.2000
    [165] http://baike.baidu.com/view/10598.htm(EB/OL)
    [166]薛山. MATLAB基础教程.北京:清华大学出版社.2011
    [167]王建卫. MATLAB7.X程序设计.北京:中国水利水电出版社.2007

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700