用户名: 密码: 验证码:
基于实物期权的企业战略投资决策模型及其应用研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
摘要:企业战略投资普遍具有时间跨度长、投资规模大、投资不可逆性的特点,企业战略投资过程充满了不确定性。传统的企业战略投资方法没有考虑企业战略投资所面临的各种不确定性因素,忽视了企业战略投资的期权价值。实物期权理论可以解决风险大、不确定性大的投资决策问题,而企业战略投资的最大特点恰恰就是风险大、不确定性大,本文借助于实物期权理论,运用定量分析技术对企业战略投资决策进行了系统的研究。企业战略投资传统的NPV方法没有考虑企业战略投资所面临的不确定性因素,运用NPV方法对企业战略投资决策时,要么投资、要么不投资,没有其他选择。企业战略投资ENPV方法只考虑企业战略投资中所面临的部分不确定性因素,不能做出完全有效的企业战略投资决策。基于实物期权的企业战略投资决策方法全面考虑了企业战略投资所面临的所有的不确定性因素的影响,能够确定企业战略投资中所具有的期权价值,从而更有效地进行企业战略投资决策。
     论文借助实物期权相关理论,对企业战略投资决策理论与方法进行了系统研究,构建了相应的模型,并运用MATLAB软件对模型进行数值分析,并对现实企业战略投资经济现象进行了解释。论文主要研究体现在以下几个方面:
     (1)建立了企业战略投资实物期权分析框架。将企业战略投资落实到具体的决策过程中来,在实物期权思想的指导下将博弈论、现金流折现法、情境分析、决策树分析、模拟分析、敏感性分析进行整合,提出了企业战略投资的实物期权分析框架。
     (2)构建了企业战略投资的定价模型。企业战略投资决策关键在于其期权价值的确定,企业战略投资期权价值的表现形式有连续型和离散两种,本文分别研究了这两种情形下战略投资期权定价模型。将企业战略投资的定价模型应用到企业的战略投资决策方面具有重要的应用价值。
     (3)构建了基于期权博弈的多因素企业战略投资决策模型。本文主要着眼于尽可能的接近企业战略投资所处的实际背景环境,将重点放在了产品市场需求和运营成本这两重不确定因素及其相关性,并为不对称双寡头企业的战略投资进行框架分析。首先,将运营成本和企业战略投资成本放在了一起进行研究,这两个成本实际上所服从的随机过程是一致的,所以可以运用合理的技术手段使二者有效的融合起来;其次,本文还放眼于企业的内生角色,重点研究了企业最优战略投资均衡策略规则。同时考虑了两重随机因素,并研究了混合均衡策略的存在性及其存在条件。
     (4)研究了战略投资决策模型重要的参数波动率。在企业的战略投资实物期权定价模型中,波动率是最难以取值但又是最重要的一个参数。金融期权是通过股票的历史价格计算得出股票历史收益率的标准差,在此基础上得出历史的波动率,不过对于战略投资实物期权来说,因为没有期权的市场价格,也没有历史价格,所以波动率的选取是在战略投资实物期权计算中的困难之处,本文研究了波动率的影响因素和计算方法。
Abstract:Corporate strategic investments generally need a long investment time span, a large investment scale and they are usually irreversible, and full of uncertainties. Traditional corporate strategy investment approaches do not take various uncertainties into considers, ignoring the option values of corporate strategic investment. Real options theory can help to solve risky and uncertainty investment decision problems, which precisely fits to the characteristics of corporate strategic investments. Therefore this paper uses the real options theory to study corporate strategic technology investment decisions systematically by means of quantitative analysis tools. Traditional NPV method on enterprise strategic investment decisions does not take the uncertainties into account, and assuming either invest or not to invest, there is no other choices, when the corporate is making strategic investment decisions. While ENPV only considers a part of uncertainties, and can not help the corporate to make decisions on corporate strategic investment fully effectively. However, real options approach do take all the uncertainties into account, and can assess the values of corporate strategic investment options, thus can help to make more effective corporate strategic investment decisions.
     The paper uses the real options theory to study systematically on corporate strategic investment decision theory and methods, constructs the corresponding model, and proposes some numerical analysis of the model using MATLAB software, and makes some explanations for enterprises strategic investment phenomenon in the real economy. Main innovations of the study in the paper are as following:
     (1) The analysis framework of corporate strategic investment based on real options is proposed, thus specific corporate strategy investment decision-makings are taken into the analysis process. Some theories and approaches are integrated into the proposed analysis framework of enterprises strategic investments including discounted cash flow method, scenario analysis, decision tree analysis, simulation analysis, sensitivity analysis, etc under the guide of real options.
     (2) A options pricing model of corporate strategy investment is proposed.The key of corporate strategic investment decisions is to determine the value of strategic options.There are two kinds of expressions of option value in corporate strategy investments, which are continuous and discrete options pricing models separately. And this paper studies pricing models of strategic investment options from the above forms. It is of great application value to apply the option pricing model in corporate strategic investment decisions
     (3) A multi-factor model for corporate strategy investment decisions based on option game theory is proposed.The paper mainly focuses on simulating the actual context of corporate strategy investment decisions as closely as possible. And the paper also focuses on analyzing two important uncertainties of the market demand and operating costs and their relevance.Then a strategic investment framework for asymmetric duopoly enterprises is analyzed. Firstly, this paper studies the operating costs and investment costs of the corporate strategy together, because these two kinds of cost actually obey the same stochastic processes, thus an reasonable technical can be used to make them effectively integrating. Secondly, the paper also analyzes the roles of endogenous factors in enterprise, and induces the optimal strategic investment policy rules. At last, taking the double random factors into account, the paper also studies the existence and its conditions of mixed strategy equilibriums.
     (4) Volatility, an important parameters in the company's strategic investments based on real options pricing model, is studies, which is one of the most difficult but the most important parameters of the model. The volatility of financial options is calculated by the standard deviation of stock yields based on the historical stock prices.But for strategic investment options, it is difficult to calculate and to select the volatility, because there is no current and historical market prices of strategy options.Thus this paper studies the impact of factors and calculation methods of the parameter of volatility.
引文
[1]Giusepe Colangelo. Vertical vs Horizontal Integration:Pre-emptive Merging[J]. The Journal of Industry Economics,1995,9(3):323-337.
    [2]Mark L. The Synergy Trap:How Companies Lose The Acquisition Game[M], Trademarks of Simon &Schuster Inc.,1997,12-15.
    [3]Morellec and Zhdanov.Financing and takeovers[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 2008,87:556-581.
    [4]Beggs A W. Mergers and malls[J]. Journal of Industrial Economics,1994,42:419-428.
    [5]Meeks,G Disappointing Marriage:A Study of the Gains from Merger.Cambridge University Press,1977.
    [6]Weston,J.F., Chung,K.S.and K.S.Siu.Takeovers,Restructuring and Corporate Governance.Prentice Hall Inc.2008.
    [7]Jensen,M.C.and W.Meckling.Theory of the Firm:Managerial Behavior,Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.Journal of Financial Economics,1976,3(5):305-360.
    [8]Fama,E.F.Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm.Journal of Political Economy, 1980,88(2):288-307.
    [9]Fama,E.F.and Jensen,M.C.Separation of Ownership and Control.Journal of Law and Economics,1983,26(1):301-325.
    [10]Manne,H.G Mergers and the Market for Corporate Control.Journal of Political Economy, 1965,73(2):110-120.
    [11]Mueller,D.C.A Theory of Conglomerate Mergers.Quarterly Journal of Economics,1969, 83(1):643-659.
    [12]Firth,Michael.Takeovers,Shareholder Returns,and the Theory of the Firm.Quarterly Journal of Economics,2007,94(3):235-60.
    [13]Conyon,M.and P.Gregg.Pay at the Top:A Study of the Sensitivity of top Director
    [14]Remuneration to Company Specific Shocks.National Institute Economic Review,1994, 3:83-92.
    [15]Jensen,M.C.Agency Cost of Free Cash Flow,Corporate Finance and Takeovers.American Economic Review,2008,76(3):323-329.
    [16]Roll,Richard.The Hubris Hypothesis of Corporate Takeovers.Journal of Business,1986, 59(2):74-91.
    [17]Coase,R.The Nature of the Firm.Economica N.S.,1937,4:386-405.
    [18]Williamson,Oliver E.Transaction-Cost Economics:The Governance of Contractual Relations.Journal of Law and Economics,2009,22:23-261.
    [19]K.D.Brouthers,P.van Hastenburg,J.van den Ven.If Most Mergers Fail,Why Are They so Popular.Long Range Planning,1998,31(3):347-353.
    [20]Von Neumann J., and Morgensten O.The GameTheory and Eeonomic Behavior[M].Princeton University Press,1944:5-7.
    [21]Grenadier,S.R.Option Exercise Games:An Application to the Equlilibrium Investment Strategied of Firms[J]. Review of Financial Studies,2002,15:691-721.
    [22]Joaquin D.C. and K.C.Buttler.Competitive Investment Decisions:A Synthesis in Brennan and Trigeorgis,Eds.,Project Flexibility Agency,and Competition-New Developments in the Theory and Applications of Real Options. Working Paper,Oxford University,2007:324-339.
    [23]Lambrecht B,Perraudin W.Real options and preemption under incomplete information[J] Journal of Economic DynamicsJuly 10-12,2003:41-53P.
    [24]Grenadier,Steven R.An Equilibrium Analysis of Real Estate[J].NBER Working Paper January 2003:78-81.
    [25]Bernardo,A-E-,and B.Chowdhry.Resources,Real Options and Corporate Strategy[J].Journal of Financial Economics,2002,63:211-234.
    [26]Schwarts E.S.,and M.Moon. Evaluating Research and Development Investments in Project Flexbility,Agency and Competition[M].Oxford University Press,New York,USA.2008: 85-106.
    [27]Dias,M.A.G. and J.P.Teixeira.Continuous-Time Option Games:Review of Modes and Extensions.Partl:Duopoly under uncertainty[J].7th Annual international Real Options conference,Washington D.C.July,10-12,2003:21-43P.
    [28]Shleifer and Vishny'large Sharehold and Corporate Contral" Journal of Political Economy 94 Juny 1986p461-488
    [29]Hirshleifer "Facilitation of Competing Bids and the price of a Takeover Target"Review of Financial Studie1989
    [30]Baron"Tender Offers and Management Resistence"Journal or Finance,2007 pp 331-343
    [31]Giammarion and Heinker"A model of Dynamic Takeover Behavior"journal of finance June 1986 pp465-480
    [32]Black F'The Dividend Puzzle"Journal of Portolio Management 2 1976 P5--8
    [33]Bhattacharyao S"Imperfact information Divident Policy and the bird in the Hand Fallacy"Bell Journal ofEconomic 10 PP259-270
    [34]Kumar"Shareholder manager Conflict and the Information contract of dividends"Review of financial studies1pp111-136
    [35]Ross"The Ditermination of Financial Structure:The incentive Signalling Approach"Beii Journal of Economica18 pp 187-221
    [36]Jesen and W.meckling"Theory of the Firm Managerial Agency Costs san Capital Structure"Journal of Financial Economics 3P305-360
    [37]Bachelier L.Theorie de la speculation[A].Coonter P H.Annales de I'ecole Normale Superieure.English Translation in the Rndom Character of Stock Market Prices[D]. Cambridge:MIT Press,1964.17-78.
    [38]Sprenkle C M.Warrant prices as indicators of expectations and Preferences[J].Yale Economic Essays,1961,1(2):178-231.
    [39]Kassouf S T.An econometric model for option price with implications for investors expectations and audacity[J].Econometrica,1969,37(4):685-694.
    [40]Boness A.J.Elements of a theory of stock option value[J] Journal of Political Economy, 1964,72(2):163-175.
    [41]Samuelson P A.Rational theory of warrant pricing[J].Industrial Management Review,1965,6(2):13-32.
    [42]Musiela M,Kutkowski M.Martingale methods in financial methods in financial modeling theory and application[M].Beling Heidelberg,New York:Springer-Verlay,1997,126-180.
    [43]Cox J, Ross S A, Rubinstein M. Option pricing:a simplified approach, Journal of Financial Economics,1979,9(7):229-263
    [44]Amram M, Kulatilaka N. Real Options:managing strategic investment in an uncertain world. Harvard Business School Press,1998
    [45]Copeland, T. and et al. Valuation:measuring and managing the value of companies. New York:Johnwiley and Sons,1990
    [46]Lenos Trigeorgis. The Nature of Option Interactions and the Valuation of Investment with Multiple Real Options. Journal of Finance and Quantitative. Analysis,1993,26:1-20
    [47]Paddock J, Siege1 D, Smith J, Options Valuation of Claims on Physical Assets:The case of offshore Petroleum lease, Quarterly Journal of Economics,1988,103 (3):479-508
    [48]Carr P. the Valuation of sequential exchange opportunities, Journal of Finance,1988,43 (5):1235-1256
    [49]Pindyck RS. Irreversible Investment, Capacity Choice, and the Value of the Firm, The American Economic Review,1988,78 (5):969-985
    [50]Brennan MJ, Scwartz ES. Evaluating Natural Resource Investment, Journal of Business, 1985,58 (2):135-157
    [51]Sharp, D.J., Uncovering the Hidden Value in High-Risk Investment, Sloan Management Review,1991, Summer:69-74
    [52]Bowman, E.H and Hurry, D, Strategy through the option Lens:An Integrated View of Resource Investments and the Incremental-Choice Process. Academy of Management Review,1993,18 (4):760-782
    [53]Kelly, S., A Binomial Lattice Approach for Valuing a Mining Property IPO, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Vol.5, sep 1998:693-709
    [54]Copeland, T and V.Antikarov, Real Options, Texere, New York,2001
    [55]Davis, G, Estimating Review of Economics and Volatility and Dividend Yield When Valuing Real Options to Invest or Abandon, The Quarterly Finance, Vol.38, 5pecial Issue,1998,:725-754
    [56]Smith, J., and R.Nau, Valuing Risky Projects:Option pricing Theory and Decision Analysis, Management Science, Vol.41, No5, May 1995:795-816
    [57]Trigeorgis L. Real options-managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation [M]. Cambridge. MA:MIT Press,1996,273-304
    [58]Carr P.the valuation of sequential exchange opportunities[J].Journal of Finance,1988, 43(5):65-66
    [59]Pindyck R S.Irreversible Investment,Capacity Choice,and the value of the Firm[J].The American Economics Review,1988,78(5):65-66
    [60]Myers SC.Determinants of corporate borrowing[J] Journal of Financial Economics,1977, 5(2):85-86
    [61]Myers S.C.Finance Theory of Financial StrategyfJ].Midland Corporate Finance Journal,1987,5(1):95-96
    [62]Myers S.C.Brealey R.A.Principles of Financial anagement[J].McGraw-Hill,1996:45-56
    [63]Cox J.C,Ross S.A,Rubinstein.Option Pricing:A simplified[M].Approach[J].Journal ofFinancial Economics,1979,7(3):35-36
    [64]Geske R.The Financial Economics Valuation of Compound Options[J] Journal of 1979,7(5): 35-36
    [65]Smit HTJ.Acquisition strategies as option games Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 2001,14(2):79-89.
    [66]Lambrecht B.The timing and terms of mergers under uncertainty:a real option approach.University of Cambridge working paper,2001.
    [67]Lambrecht B.The timing and terms of mergers motivated by economies of scale.Journal ofFinancial Economics,2004,72:41-62.
    [68]Hemantha S·B·Herath and John S·Jahera J r:Real options:valuing f lexibility in strategic mergers andacquisitions as an exchange ratio·Manageri al finance [J],2002; (28),12:44-621
    [69][116] Silvia Rossetto, Enrico Perotti, Mark Kranenburg:Equity carve-outs as acquisitions of strategic realoptions, Working paper,2002, University of Amsterdam.
    [70]Diwakar Gupta, Yigal Gerchak:Quantif ying operational synergies in a merger/ acquisition, Workingpaper,2001, University of Minnesota.
    [71]Manigart S., Wright M. Venture capitalists'appraisal of investment projects:an empirical European study [J]. Entrepreneurship Theory &practice.1997,21(4):9-28.
    [72]Lenos T. Real options and interactions with financial flexibility[J]. Financial Management. 1993,22(3):202-218.
    [73]Grenadier S R, Weiss A M. Investment in technological innovations:An option pricing approach[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1997,44(3):397-416.
    [74]Farzin Y H, Huisman KJ M, et al. Optimal timing of technology adoption[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,1998,22 (5):779-799.
    [75]Doraszelski U. The net present value method versus the option value of waiting:A note on Farzin, Huisman and Kort(1998) [J] Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2001,25(8):1109-1115.
    [76]Doraszelski U. Innovations, Improvements, and the Optimal Adoption of New Technologies[R]. Working Paper, Hoover Institution, Stanford University, http:PPpubweb. acns. nwu. eduP-udo390Ptechadop. pdf,2002.
    [77]Bessen J. Real Options and the Adoption of New Technologies[R]. Working Paper, MIT, http://www.researchoninnovation.org/realopt.pdf,1999.
    [78]Sarkar S. On the investment2uncertainty relationship in a real options model [J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,200024 (2):219 -225.
    [79]Alvarez L H R, Stenbacka R. Adoption of uncertain multistage technology projects:A real options approach[J]. Journal of Mathematical Economics,2001,35(1):71-97.
    [80]Kort P M. Optimal R&D investments of the firm[J]. OR-Spektrum,1998,20:155-164.
    [81]Merton R C. Application of option-pricing theory:twenty-five years later[J]. American Economic Revies, June 1998,323-349
    [82]Black F, Scholes M. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities[J]. Journal of Political Economy, May-June,1973, (81):637-659
    [83]Merton R C. On the pricing of contingent claims and the modigliani-miller theorem [J]. Journal of Finacial Economics,1977b,5(3):241-249
    [84]Lambrecht B, Peraudin W. Options game[R]. Working Paper, Cmbridge University, August 1994,25-28.
    [85]Amram M, Kulatilaka N. Real options:managing strategic investment in an uncertaion world[M]. Harvard Business School Press,1998
    [86]Smit H T J, Ankum L A. A real options and game-theoretic approach to corporate investment strategy under competition[J]. Financial Management, Autumn,2003, 241-250
    [87]Brealey R A, Myers S C. Principles of financial management[M]. Mc Graw-Hill,1996, 555-616
    [88]Brennan M, Schwartz E. Evaluating natural resource investment[J]. Journal of Business, 1985,58(2):135-157
    [89]Trigeorgis L. Real options in capital investments models, Strategies, and Applications [M]. (ed.)Westport:Conn. Praeger,2005,163-184
    [90]Dixit A, Pindyck R. Investment under uncertainty.princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press,2006,282-318
    [91]Merton R C. Continuous-Time Finance[M]. Cambridge, MA:Blackwell,1992
    [92]Quigg L. Empirical testing of real options-pricing models[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1993,48(2):621-640
    [93]Trigeorgis L. Antecipated competitive entry and early preemptive investment in deferrable projects[J]. Journal of Economics and Business, May 1991,43(2):143-156
    [94]Lambrecht B, Perraudin W. Real options and preemption[R]. Working Paper, Cambridge University,1996
    [95]Grenadier S R. The strategic exercise of options:development cascaeds and overbuilding in real estate market[J]. The Journal of Finance,1996,51(5):1653-1679
    [96]Moel A, Tufano P. When Are real options exercised? An Empirical Study of Mine Closings[R]. Working Paper, Harvard Business School
    [97]Siegel D, Smith J, Paddock J. Valuing offshore oil properties with option pricing models[J]. Midland Corporate Finance Journal,2006, Spring,22-30
    [98]Benaroch M, Kauffman R J. A case for using real options pricing analysis to evaluate information technology project investments[J]. Information Systems Research, March, 1999,10(1):70-86
    [99]Cox J C, Ross S A. The valuation of options for alternative stochastic processes[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1976,3(2):145-166
    [100]Kemna, Angelien G Z. Case studies on real options[J]. Financial Management, Autumn 1993,259-270
    [101]Smets F. Exporting versus FDI:The effect of uncertainty, irreversibilities and strategic interactions, working paper, Yale University,1991
    [102]Lambrecht B, Perraudin W. Options game. Working Paper, Cmbridge University,August 1994,40-45.
    [103]Williams JT. Equilibrium and options on real assets [J].The Review of Financial Studies, 1993,6(4):825-850
    [104]Han T, Smit J. Acquisition Strategies as Option Games[J]-Journal of Applied Corporate Finance,2001,14(2):79-89
    [105]Murto P, Keppo J.A Game Model of Irreversible Investment under
    [106]Uncertainty[J].International Game Theory Review,2002,4(2):127-140
    [107]Jose PD, Santiago F. Options Approach to Tender Offers and Acquisitions Processes, Working Paper,2003
    [108]Betton B, Moran P. A Dynamic Model of Corporate Acquisitions, Concordian University Working Paper,2003.
    [109]Morellec E, Zhdanov A.The dynamics of mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics,2005,77:647-672.
    [110]Smit HTJ, Vandenberg WA, Maeseneire W. Acquistions as Real Option Bidding Game.Tinbergen Institue Working paper, No.TI 2004-084/2,2004.
    [111]Mason R, Weeds H. The Timing of Acquisitions, University of Southampton Working paper,2005.
    [112]Lambrecht B, Myers SC. A Theory of Takeovers and Disinvestment. The Journal of Finance 2007,62(2):809-838.
    [113]夏晖,曾勇.不完全竞争环境下不对称企业技术创新战略投资[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(1):30-41.
    [114]张宏斌,韩伟,宁浪.基于实物期权理论的RFID技术投资评价方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2012,08:1719-1726.
    [115]尹海员.竞争条件下两阶段战略投资决策研究——基于实物期权博弈的分析[J].云南财经大学学报,2011,27(3):60-65.
    [116]张运生,曾德明,张利飞等.竞争条件下企业战略投资时机的实物期权分析[J].管理科学学报,2008,11(4):30-37.
    [117]马旭耀,秦现生,白宏伟等.实物期权在多阶段投资中的应用研究[J].中国制造业信息化,2012,41(5):54-57,63.
    [118]王小斌.期权的产生和发展[J]北京:财政金融,2011:50-78.
    [119]吴孝灵,周晶,洪巍.基于有效运营期的BOT项目特许权期决策模型[J].系统工程学报,2011,(3):373-378.
    [120]王东波,宋金波,戴大双,李挣.不确定收益下公路BOT项目特许期决策方法研究[J].预测,2010,(2):58-63.
    [121]陈珠明,杨华李.基于实物期权的企业兼并行为分析[J].中国管理科学,2009,17(1):29-35.
    [122]雷星辉,李来俊.竞争环境下基于期权博弈的R&D投资决策研究[J].管理科学.2004:285-289.
    [123]黄炎.负债企业控制权转移的时机和均衡价格[J].中国管理科学,2012,05:178-184.
    [124]刘相芳.基于博弈的实物期权定价方法研究[D].西安理工大学,2005.5:20-27.
    [125]刘海龙等.非完全市场期权定价的ε—套利方法,预测,2001,20(4):17-19
    [126]郑立辉,张近.确定性套利-非完备市场中期权定价的新概念[A].吴冲锋,黄培清.亚太金融研究,亚太金融学会第七届年会论文选[C].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2001.28-36.
    [127]Hull J C.期权、期货和衍生证券.张陶伟译.北京:华夏出版社,1997:205-252
    [128]宋逢明.期权定价理论和1997年度的诺贝尔经济学奖[J].管理科学学报,1998(2):6-10
    [129]邓光军.技术创新投资项目实物期权定价[D].北京:电子科技大学,2002:253-306
    [130]梁彤缨、黄建欢.期权思想与方法的应用探讨[J].中国软科学,2001,6
    [131]刘照德、周木生.现实期权在高科技企业风险投资中的应用[J].重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版),2002:30-32
    [132]李治,陈述.期权博弈理论在创业投资项目评价中的应用[J].财经科学,2012,11:57-65.
    [133]张子刚、卢丽娟.期权定价理论在风险投资决策中的应用[J].华中科技大学学报:自然科学版,2002,4
    [134]赵秀云、李敏强.风险项目投资决策与实物期权估价方法[J].系统工程学报,2000,9
    [135]谈毅、冯宗宪.高新技术产业风险投资的期权特征与经济评价[J].科研管理,1999,5
    [136]张宗成、戚道安,创业投资定价模型的推导[J].华中科技大学学报:自然科学版,2002,7
    [137]安实、向琳.基于实物期权的风险投资决策模型研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2002,6
    [138]陈劲、谢联恒等.现实期权方法及实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2001,7:46-49
    [139]高佳卿、刘胜军等.资本投资的期权理论与方法[J].经济理论与经济管理,1998,2:41-44
    [140]韩隽、郑德渊.融资结构对R&D项目期权价值的影响[J].预测,2001,4
    [141]吴漪,邱菀华,周鹏.模糊群决策环境下的实物期权模型[J].控制与决策,2012,12:.
    [142]薛明皋、龚朴.在折现率大于零的情况下,具有完成时间和残值不确定性的R&D项目的投资策略[J].经济理论与经济管理2005,1:112-119
    [143]殷宝健、胡适耕、胡飞.一类含经营成本的研发项目的不确定性投资[J].华中科技大学学报(自然科学版).2005,5:103-105
    [144]丹尼斯·卡尔顿和杰弗里·佩罗夫.现代产业组织[M].出版社:三联书店,1997,330404
    [145]王超主编.项目决策与管理[M].中国对外经济贸易出版社,1999,165-210
    [146]安瑛晖,张维.期权博弈理论的方法模型分析与发展[[J].管理科学学报,2001,4(1):38-44
    [147]陆克今,薛恒新.实物期权理论两个新应用领域——基于文献的研究性述评[J].经济学动态,2012,07:89-93.
    [148]齐安田,张维,吴中元.企业并购的期权特征分析与定价研究[[J].预测,2003,22(5):14-28
    [149]马建飞,韩仁德,扈文秀.不完全信息下不对称双头垄断期权的博弈模型[J].统计与决策,2009,(7):42-45.
    [150]鲍继业,张恒.博弈框架下巴黎期权性质的可转换债券定价[J].管理科学,2013,01:80-88.
    [151]张能福,蔡嗣经,刘朝马.矿业工程项目投资价值实物期权评价方法[J],中国矿业大学学报,2003,4
    [152]徐鹏彪.矿业权价格及投资矿业权的风险[J],中国煤炭,2010(12):20-22
    [153]朱芸.实物期权法在抢滩博弈投资行为中的适用性[J].财会通讯,2013,03:79-81.
    [154]沙·阿姆拉姆.实物期权[M].张维译.北京:机械工业出版社,2001
    [155]罗涛,樊纲治.不可逆投资、不对称企业和战略均衡[J].财经问题研究,2013,07:19-27.
    [156]张能福、刘朝马等.矿业工程项目投资价值和投资决策的期权方法[J],中国矿业,2003,7:13-15
    [157]朱磊、范英、魏一鸣.基于实物期理论的矿产资源最优投资策略模型[J],中国管理科学,2009,17(2):3641
    [158]党兴华,涂宴卿,何凌燕, 基于二项式期权定价模型的风险投资最优时机选择研究[J],科技进步与对策.2007,9
    [159]郭健,尹洁林,林则夫.期权视角下高速公路BOT项目风险分担策略研究[J].科技管理研究,2013,13:223-228.
    [160]张国兴,郭菊娥,赵强兵.基于跳跃-扩散过程的基础设施融资项目政府担保价值研究[J],预测,2009,1
    [161]何沐文,刘金兰,高奇特.不确定环境下自然资源开发项目投资评价模型[J].管理科学学报,2013,06:46-55.
    [162]杨海生、陈少凌.不确定条件下的投资:基于“跳’’过程的实物期权模型[J].系统工程理论与实践,2009,12
    [163]资料来源:Smit & Trigeorgis:《战略投资学一实物期权和博弈论》,高等教育出版社2006年版。
    [164]吴刚,李传昭,黄大荣.基于实物期权理论的公司并购决策模型[J].统计与决策(理论版),2007,(1):139-140.
    [165]张敏莉,李元辉.二叉树模型在项目投资决策中的应用[J].扬州大学学报(自然科学版),2010,(4):75-78.
    [166]兆文军,徐冬冬.基于复合实物期权的高科技企业价值评估方法[J].大连理工大学学报(社会科学版),2007,28(2):50-54.
    [167]郭勤,郭静,廖东升.基于实物期权的基础设施BOT项目投资研究[J].生产力研究,2013,08:98-100.
    [168]刘琪,周家娟.知识经济时代下人力资源价值评估[J].山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,01:52-58.
    [169]陈晓慧,谢扬,邓军涛.机电设备维修备件的柔性采购机制与柔性价值[J].系统工程理论与实践,2012,02:306-311.
    [170]韩嘉琪.投资决策风险把握及其计算方法研究[J].统计与决策,2012,03:91-94.
    [171]吕秀梅,赖绍永.产品差异下的策略投资[J].系统工程理论与实践,2012,07:1437-1445.
    [172]张新华,叶泽,李薇.价格与技术不确定条件下的发电商碳捕获投资模型及分析[J].管理工程学报,2012,03:109-113.
    [173]蒋丹璐,曹国华,顾湘.商业地产类绿色建筑投资时机研究[J].科技进步与对策,2012,18:147-150.
    [174]陈梅,王新冲.基于实物期权的中国乳业战略联盟契约控制[J].财经问题研究,2012,10:31-37.
    [175]王媛,贾生华.政府经营性土地储备供应决策——基于实物期权的理论模型[J].中国土地科学,2012,04:72-77.
    [176]隋鑫.企业人力资产风险的实物期权控制策略研究[J].经济问题,2012,10:68-71.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700