用户名: 密码: 验证码:
业绩排名对开放式基金经理投资行为影响的研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
基金经理是基金运作的核心人物,在很大程度上决定基金的业绩。对基金经理而言,业绩排名是重要的隐性激励方式,影响其职业前景。为了提升业绩排名,基金经理最直接、最有效的办法就是改变投资组合。本文在梳理、分析业绩排名、基金经理职业前景、经理人个性特征及其投资行为之间关系的基础上进行实证研究。通过基金经理年龄、学历、性别、从业经历与其职业前景之间关系的分析,探讨业绩排名与经理人职业前景、业绩排名与投资行为、经理人个性特征对业绩排名的敏感度差异,深入研究基金经理投资行为的差异性。
     本文的实证研究分两步进行。第一步:通过对业绩排名与职业前景、经理人个性特征的实证分析,实证结果证实了本文的构想,即业绩排名与职业前景正相关,并且不同个性特征的基金经理对业绩排名的敏感度是不一致的,从而造成投资行为的差异性。第二步:在第一步实证的基础上,实证研究受业绩排名影响,不同个性特征的基金经理会采取相应的投资策略。根据这一思路提出了在业绩排名压力下基金经理投资行为与个性特征间的假设,得出的结论与理论分析结果基本吻合。
     文章最后总结了研究结论,提出了对基金业绩评价体系、基金投资者、基金管理公司的启示,并指出进一步研究的方向。
Fund manager is the key person in the operation of an investment fund, who has a great impact on fund performance. To fund manager, the performance ranking is the most important implicit incentive method, affects its career foreground. In order to promote the performance ranking, the most direct and effective means for the fund manager is to change investment portfolio. Empirical study has been made in this paper on the aspects of analyzing the performance ranking, a fund manager’s career foreground and the relationship between his individuality and investment behavior. Through analyzing the relationships of a fund manager’s age, education, gender, the experience and his career foreground, and discussing the performance ranking, the manager career foreground, the performance ranking and the investment behavior, the manager individuality difference in the performance ranking sensitivity, this article made an intensive study on the diversities of the fund managers’investment behavior.
     The research has been divided into two steps. The first step improves the conception of this paper that there’s positive correlation between performance ranking and career foreground, and different individuality caused different sensitivity about ranking, which leads to the difference of investment behavior by the empirical study of career foreground and individuality. The second step: on the basis of the first step, the empirical study the performance ranking influence, different individuality fund manager will adopt the corresponding investment strategy. Then, this paper brought the assumption of the relationships between the individuality and investment behavior under the performance ranking pressure according to this clue, and the result is basically matched with theoretical analysis.
     Finally, this article sums up the research conclusion, and bring forward an inspiration on fund performance evaluation system, fund investors and fund companies, and therefore pointed out the direction of further research.
引文
[1] http://www.p5w.net/fund/index.htm
    [2]廖仁英.我国开放式基金业绩评价体系的完善思考.商场现代化,2005(3):149
    [3]王珩.短命的基金经理.管理人,2005(12):68-69
    [4] Khorana, A. Top Management Turnover. An Empircal Investjgation of Mutual Fund Managers. Journal of Financial Economics, 1996(40):403-427
    [5] www.2rich.net/2rich-news/content Html/20070613/200706131145321370.htm
    [6]李荣昌.近三成投资者青睐基金投资.证券时报,2005-02-21
    [7] Ang.Chen and Wayne Y. Lin. Mutual Fund Performance: Does Fund Size Matter?. Financial Analysis Journal. Vol.55. No.3.1999
    [8] Jurgen Eichberger, Simon Gant, Stephen King.On relative performance contracts and fund manager`s incentives [J]. European Economic Review, 1999,43(1):135-161
    [9]龚红.证券投资基金经理激励问题研究:[博士学位论文].湖南:湖南大学,2005.23-24
    [10] Brown,K.,W.Harlow and L.Starks.Of Tournaments and Temptations: An Analysis of Mangerial Incentives in the Mutual Fund Industry.Journal of Finance.1996(51):85-110
    [11] Goriaev, A., F., Palomino and A., Part. Mutual Fund Tournament: risk taking Incentives induced by ranking objectives. Working paper, New Economic School, Moscow. 2003
    [12]王立新.投资基金制度研究.北京:中国社会科学院研究生院,2000.78-87
    [13] Israelsen. Risk-Adjusted Performance of Mutual Funds. New England Economic Review. 1998(9):33-48
    [14]李豫湘,程剑,彭聪.基金经理个人特性对基金业绩影响的研究.价值工程,2006(12):151-155
    [15] Gibbons, R. K. J. Murphy. Optimal incentive contracts in the presence of career concerns: theory and evidence[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1992(100):468-505
    [16] Hu F A, R Hall, Harvey C R. Promtion or Demotion? An Empirical Investigation of the Determinants of Top Mutual Manager Change[Z]. Working paper. Duke University, 2000
    [17] Scharfstein D S, Stein J C. Herd Behavior and Investment. American Economic Review, 1990(80):465-479
    [18] Anchor Lin.et al.The Behavior and Performance of Foreign Investors in Emerging Equity Markets:Evidence from Taiwan [J].International Review of Finance,2003(March-April):189-210
    [19] Lakonishok, J., A. Shleifer, R. Thaler and R. Vishny. Window Dressing by pesnsion Fund Managers. American Ecinomic Review, 1991(81):227-232
    [20] Chevalier, Judith and Glenn Ellison. Risk taking by mutual funds as a response to incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 1997(105):1167-1200
    [21] Capon, N., G.Fitzsimons and R.Prince. An Individual Level Analysis of the Mutual Fund Investment Decision. Journal of Financial Services Research, 1996(10):59-82
    [22] Jason Zweig. Watch out for the Year-End Fund Flimflam[J]. Momey Magazine. November, 1997
    [23] Mark M.Carhart, Ron Kaniel, David K.Musto, Adam V.Reed. Leaning for the Tape: Evidence of Gaming Behavior in Equity Mutual Funds[J]. Journal of Finance, 2002(57)
    [24] Hsiu-lang Chen, and George G.Pennacchi. Does prior performance affect a mutual fund`s choice of risk? Working paper. 2001
    [25] Busse, J.Another Look at Mutual Fund Tournaments. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 2001(36):53-73
    [26] Avery, Christopher N, Judith A Chevalier.Herding over the career[J]. Economics Letters. 1999(53):327-333
    [27] Harrison Hong, Jeffrey D.Kubik, Amit Solomon. Security analysis’career concerns and herding of earnings forecasts[J]. Journal of Economics, 2000,31(1):121-144
    [28]徐婧婧.明星基金经理离职背后.上海证券报,2009-07-13
    [29]施东晖.证券投资基金的交易行为及其市场影响[J].世界经济,2001(10):26-31
    [30]吴福龙,曾勇,唐小我.中国证券投资基金羊群行为的进一步研究.中国管理科学,2004(4):7-12
    [31]张庆华.基于行为金融学的证券投资行为研究:[硕士学位论文].青岛:中国海洋大学,2003.16-17
    [32]宋德舜,宋逢明.国有控股、经营者变更和公司绩效[J].南开管理评论,2005,8(1):10-15
    [33]张美霞.基金业绩、基金经理更换与投资者财富效应——项基于我国资本市场的实证研究.山西财经大学学报,2007,29(9):98-105
    [34]张贡生.中国开放式证券投资基金短期行为分析.吉林工商学院学报,2008,24(3):50-53
    [35]张昕.中国亏损上市公司第四季度盈余管理的实证研究.会计研究,2008(4):25-32
    [36]欧阳凌,欧阳令南,周红霞.基于职业生涯的企业家投资行为博弈研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2005,37(1):141-144
    [37]史晨昱,刘霞.从竞争观点探讨基金经理人的风险调整行为[M].证券市场导报,2005(2):28-32
    [38]熊胜君,杨朝军.中国证券投资基金投资风格变化原因分析[J].哈尔滨商业大学学报(自然科学版),2005(6):129-133
    [39]王茂斌,毕秋侠.业绩排名、投资者选择和投资基金行为.证券市场导报,2006(4):52-55
    [40]丁振华.基金过去的业绩会影响未来的风险选择吗.证券市场导报,2006(4):39-45
    [41]李凌波,吴启芳,汪寿阳.周内效应和月度效应:中国证券投资基基金市场的实证研究[J].管理学报,2004(1):49-54
    [42]赵秀娟,吴启芳,汪寿阳.开放式基金净值增长率被拉升了吗?——中国证券市场日历效应检验[J].中国管理科学,2006(4):15-20
    [43]伏爱国.基金行为与基金业绩的日历效应.经济理论与经济管理,2008(5):39-45
    [44] http://news.stockstar.com/info/darticle.aspx?id=ss20080121,30074213
    [45] Jensen, M. and W. Meckling. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 1976(3):305-360
    [46]蒋峰.中国投资基金效率研究.厦门:厦门大学.金融学,2005-05
    [47]蔡庆丰.代理投资、道德风险和市场效率:[博士学位论文].厦门:厦门大学,2006.13-14
    [48] Susan I Cohen, Laura T Stacks. Estimation Risk and Incentive Contracts far Portfolio Managers. Management Science, 1988,34(9): 1067-1079
    [49] Menkhoff Lukas. Institutional investors: the external costs of a successful innovation. Jouranl of Economic Issues, 2002,36(4):907-933
    [50]冷雪霜.证券投资基金的委托—代理关系研究[J].价值工程,2005(6):113-115
    [51]孙静,邱菀华.基金竞争对基金经理交易行为影响的实证研究.北京航天航空大学学报(社会科学版),2005,18(2):5-9
    [52]潘天群.理性的失落与追寻:评西方科学哲学中理性主义与非理性主义之争.武汉:武汉大学西方哲专业,1992.07
    [53]樊刚.经济理性与货币调控有效性研究.武汉:中南财金政法大学政治经济学专业,2003-04-28
    [54] Lazear P, S Rosen. Rank-order tournaments as optimal labor contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 1981,89(4):841-864
    [55] Baker, George P. The use of performance measures in incentive contracting. A.M.R papers,2000
    [56] Kreps D, Wilson R. Reputation and imperfect information. Journal of Economic Theory, 1982,27(1):253-279
    [57]肖条军,盛昭瀚.两阶段基于信号博弈的声誉模型.管理科学学报,2003,6(1):27-31
    [58] Diewert W E. Exact and Superlative Index Numbers[J]. Econometrics, 1976(4):115-145
    [59] Geoffrey C Kiel, Gavin J Nicholson. Board composition and corporate Performance: how the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of Corporate governance[J]. Corporate governance: an international review, 2003,11(3):189-205
    [60] H Demsetz. The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law & Economics, l983,26(3): 375-390
    [61]张美霞.证券投资基金经理变更的实证研究—来自中国资本市场的经验证据.财经研究,2007,33(12):77-89
    [62]曾康林.解读行为金融学.经济学动态,2003,34(6):59-61
    [63] Clayton P Alderfer. Existence, Relatedness and Growth. New York: Free Press, 1972.73-80
    [64]李成全.声誉重于业绩.企业文明,2005(5):16-19
    [65] Morck R, Shleifer A, Vishny R. Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1989(20):293-315
    [66]罗真,张宗成.职业忧虑影响基金经理投资行为的经验分析[J].世界经济,2004(4):63-71
    [67] Holmstron B. Managerial incentive problems: A dynamice perspective[J]. Review of Economic Studies, 1999(66):169-182
    [68] Chevalier Judith,Ellision Glenn.Gareer concerns of mutual fund managers[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1999,105(6):1167-1200
    [69]董入芳,王志宏.证券投资基金羊群行为的成因及监控分析.辽宁工程技术大学学报(社会科学版),2008,10(5):258-260
    [70]吴玉桐,梁静国.羊群行为与有限理性.学术交流,2008,173(8):116-118
    [71]彭星辉,江晓红.上海股民的投资行为与个性特征研究.心理科学,1995(02):94-98
    [72]于欣.投资风格存在性别差异—女性基金经理更稳健.新财富,2007(03):90-93
    [73]余为政,叶敏蕾.基金经理更换公告的市场与披露内容的监控[D].上海财经大学2003管理会计国际研讨会,2003:292-302
    [74] Heinkel, R and N. M. Stoughton. The dynamics of portfolio management contracts [J]. Review of Financial Studies, 1999,7(2):351-387
    [75]曾德明,刘颖等.管理费激励与基金绩效:对中国基金的实证研究[J].湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2005,19(2):35-38
    [76]关培兰.中外女企业家发展问题研究[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2003.
    [77] Richard T Bliss and Mark E Potter. Risk-Adjusted Performance of Mutual Fund. New England Economic Review. 2001(9):33-48

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700