川西坳陷南北向构造带上三叠统圈闭有效性评价研究
|
摘要
川西坳陷南北向构造带位于川西坳陷中段东部斜坡带上,研究区面积约1600km2,主体位于温江-中江油气勘查区块,其断褶构造带上共发育有知新场、石泉场、龙宝梁三个次一级正向构造。“八五”以来,西南油气分公司在石化总部支持下向该区投入了大量的勘探与研究经费,然而时至今日在该构造带尚未取得重大油气突破。究其原因主要是南北向构造带构造条件十分复杂,成藏地质条件认识尚不深入,圈闭有效性评价研究工作较为薄弱。众所周知,有效圈闭是油气成藏的关键问题,尤其是在断裂作用和破碎强烈地区,圈闭有效性研究就显得更为重要,然而迄今为止在该区尚未开展过这方面的专项研究,缺乏对该区油气成藏系统性和整体性评价。本论文通过现有地震资料的处理、解释技术,对圈闭进行识别和描述;利用现行圈闭评价技术,结合本区圈闭特点,建立南北向构造带上三叠统圈闭有效性评价技术标准;以天然气地质学、构造地质学和沉积学理论为基础,描述各目的层圈闭特征、分析构造演化史,以高分辨率层序地层学理论为指导对主要储层进行精细划分与等时对比,建立主要储层的沉积模式;运用层序地层学、现代地球物理技术和计算机技术等分别对储层沉积微相,裂缝分布、储层储集性等进行研究,综合地质认识对圈闭进行有效性综合评价,寻找最有利的勘探地区,为川西坳陷南北向构造带上三叠统能否实现油气勘探突破提供最重要的评价依据,为中石化西南油气分公司在南北向构造带上三叠统的油气勘探战略投资决策提供直接的服务,并为下一步勘探部署提供勘探目标。论文的主要研究内容和关键成果如下:
(1)南北向构造带形成于燕山期,在喜山期受到强烈改造;南北向构造带具有“早期南高北低、后期南低北高”的“跷跷板型”构造演化特征。
(2)研究区上三叠统烃源北部地区为Ⅱ类烃源岩,南部为Ⅲ类烃源岩。计算研究区区带上三叠统资源量为1605.35×108m3。
(3)系统编制了南北向构造带重点勘探层系上三叠统沉积相图,认为须家河组在工区内以三角洲前缘水下分流河道沉积为主,并首次确定了研究区东南方向为须家河组沉积时期的重要物源之一。
(4)研究区上三叠统须家河组储层总体以低孔低渗储层为主,孔隙空间以粒间及粒内溶孔为主,裂缝及微裂缝较发育,有效的改善了储层的储集性能。
(5)通过典型气藏解剖和已钻井分析,认为对南北向构造带发育的构造圈闭类型来说,圈闭的保存条件,尤其是控制圈闭范围和形态的主控断层的封堵性能对圈闭有效性特别重要。通过多种方法,对区内须家河组发育的多条主要断层进行了断层封堵性分析和评价。纵向上须二、须三、须五段断层侧向封堵性较好,须四段断层侧向封堵较差;平面上,研究区北部断层封堵性较南部要好。
(6)通过构造解释,结合综合研究成果,在南北向构造带上三叠统识别和落实3个构造圈闭,计算圈闭总资源量为792.16×108m3,其中T3x2占37.5%,说明研究区上三叠统资源主要分布T3x2地层中。其中,北部知新场构造和石泉场构造优于南部龙宝梁构造,且由北往南逐渐变差。根据构造圈闭的特点,建立了相应的地质评价模板,并优选出1个有利勘探目标,并提出2口钻井的井位部署建议。
North-south tectonic belt in western Sichuan depression located in the middle of the eastern slope of Western Sichuan Depression, having study area of about 1600km2, the principal in the Wen River-oil and gas exploration blocks in the river, its fault-fold structures are known to bring a new field of development, Shiquan field, Long Po Leung three times a positive structural. Since "Eighth Five-Year", under the Petrochemical headquarters support, Southwest Oil and Gas offices put a lot of exploration and research funding in the area, but now there is not significant breakthroughs in the oil and gas belt. The reason are that mainly north-south structural conditions are very complex and accumulation is not yet in-depth understanding of the geological conditions and evaluation of the effectiveness of the work trap is weak. The effective trap is the key of oil and gas accumulation. The effectiveness of traps becomes more important, especially in the faulting and crushing areas. But there is no special research in this area up to mow, the lack of hydrocarbon accumulation in the area of systemic and holistic assessment. The trap was identificated and descripted by the existing seismic data processing and interpretation techniques in this paper; using of the existing trap evaluation techniques, combined with the characteristics of this zone trap, the effective technology standards of north-south tectonic belt Triassic traps was established; on the basis of theory of natural gas geology, structural geology and sedimentology, I described the characteristics of the target zone trap and analyzed the history of tectonic evolution. On the theory of high-resolution sequence stratigraphy, a major reservoir was fine divided and contrasted by other. The reservoir microfacies, crack distribution, and the reservoir were studied using of sequence stratigraphy, modern geophysical techniques and computer technology. The closure was effectively evaluated to find the most favorable exploration areas on the basis of comprehensive geological knowledge, in order to provide the most important basis for Triassic oil and gas exploration breakthrough and provide direct services for strategic investment decision-making of Sinopec Southwest Oil and Gas Division, and to provide for further exploration of the deployment of exploration targets. The main research content and key results are as follows:
(1) North-south tectonic belt having "early high and low, low north to south late," the "seesaw-type" tectonic evolution feature was strongly modified in the Himalayan, which formed in Yanshan.
(2) The area of the Upper Triassic hydrocarbon source in the northern and southern region wereⅡ,Ⅲtype source rock, respectively. The volume of Triassic in Computing Resources District was 160.535 billion M3.
(3) system produced a focus on exploration north-south belt of Upper Triassic sedimentary strata phase diagram that Xujiahe delta front in the industrial area to the main underwater distributary channel deposits, and for the first time identified in the study area southeast direction was an important source of material, during the deposition of Xujiahe.
(4) The area of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe reservoir with low porosity and low permeability reservoirs, the pore space between grains and dissolution pores, many cracks and micro-cracks, effectively improved performance of reservoir.
(5) By a typical gas reservoir anatomy and drilling study, the effectiveness of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe traps were related to the main conserved conditions and the structural formation of traps, and the configuration of generation and expulsion of hydrocarbon.Through a variety of methods, many major faults of the the region Xujiahe were analyzed and evaluated. The lateral fault sealing of T3x2, T3x3 and T3x5 were better, but the lateral fault sealing of T3x4 were worse. In plane, the northern fault sealing were better than southern.
(6) through the structural interpretation, combined with comprehensive research, in the north-south tectonic belt Triassic to the identification and implementation of three structural trap, the total resource of trap was 79.216 billion cubic meters, of which T3x2 was 37.5%, indicating that Triassic mainly distributed in T3x2 strata. Among them, the structure of northern new field and Shiquan were better than the beam structure of southern Longbao, and from south to north gradually changed for the better. According to the characteristics of structural traps, the establishment of the corresponding template of geological evaluation, and then optimizes a favorable exploration target, and put forward proposals of well placement of two drilling well.
(1)南北向构造带形成于燕山期,在喜山期受到强烈改造;南北向构造带具有“早期南高北低、后期南低北高”的“跷跷板型”构造演化特征。
(2)研究区上三叠统烃源北部地区为Ⅱ类烃源岩,南部为Ⅲ类烃源岩。计算研究区区带上三叠统资源量为1605.35×108m3。
(3)系统编制了南北向构造带重点勘探层系上三叠统沉积相图,认为须家河组在工区内以三角洲前缘水下分流河道沉积为主,并首次确定了研究区东南方向为须家河组沉积时期的重要物源之一。
(4)研究区上三叠统须家河组储层总体以低孔低渗储层为主,孔隙空间以粒间及粒内溶孔为主,裂缝及微裂缝较发育,有效的改善了储层的储集性能。
(5)通过典型气藏解剖和已钻井分析,认为对南北向构造带发育的构造圈闭类型来说,圈闭的保存条件,尤其是控制圈闭范围和形态的主控断层的封堵性能对圈闭有效性特别重要。通过多种方法,对区内须家河组发育的多条主要断层进行了断层封堵性分析和评价。纵向上须二、须三、须五段断层侧向封堵性较好,须四段断层侧向封堵较差;平面上,研究区北部断层封堵性较南部要好。
(6)通过构造解释,结合综合研究成果,在南北向构造带上三叠统识别和落实3个构造圈闭,计算圈闭总资源量为792.16×108m3,其中T3x2占37.5%,说明研究区上三叠统资源主要分布T3x2地层中。其中,北部知新场构造和石泉场构造优于南部龙宝梁构造,且由北往南逐渐变差。根据构造圈闭的特点,建立了相应的地质评价模板,并优选出1个有利勘探目标,并提出2口钻井的井位部署建议。
North-south tectonic belt in western Sichuan depression located in the middle of the eastern slope of Western Sichuan Depression, having study area of about 1600km2, the principal in the Wen River-oil and gas exploration blocks in the river, its fault-fold structures are known to bring a new field of development, Shiquan field, Long Po Leung three times a positive structural. Since "Eighth Five-Year", under the Petrochemical headquarters support, Southwest Oil and Gas offices put a lot of exploration and research funding in the area, but now there is not significant breakthroughs in the oil and gas belt. The reason are that mainly north-south structural conditions are very complex and accumulation is not yet in-depth understanding of the geological conditions and evaluation of the effectiveness of the work trap is weak. The effective trap is the key of oil and gas accumulation. The effectiveness of traps becomes more important, especially in the faulting and crushing areas. But there is no special research in this area up to mow, the lack of hydrocarbon accumulation in the area of systemic and holistic assessment. The trap was identificated and descripted by the existing seismic data processing and interpretation techniques in this paper; using of the existing trap evaluation techniques, combined with the characteristics of this zone trap, the effective technology standards of north-south tectonic belt Triassic traps was established; on the basis of theory of natural gas geology, structural geology and sedimentology, I described the characteristics of the target zone trap and analyzed the history of tectonic evolution. On the theory of high-resolution sequence stratigraphy, a major reservoir was fine divided and contrasted by other. The reservoir microfacies, crack distribution, and the reservoir were studied using of sequence stratigraphy, modern geophysical techniques and computer technology. The closure was effectively evaluated to find the most favorable exploration areas on the basis of comprehensive geological knowledge, in order to provide the most important basis for Triassic oil and gas exploration breakthrough and provide direct services for strategic investment decision-making of Sinopec Southwest Oil and Gas Division, and to provide for further exploration of the deployment of exploration targets. The main research content and key results are as follows:
(1) North-south tectonic belt having "early high and low, low north to south late," the "seesaw-type" tectonic evolution feature was strongly modified in the Himalayan, which formed in Yanshan.
(2) The area of the Upper Triassic hydrocarbon source in the northern and southern region wereⅡ,Ⅲtype source rock, respectively. The volume of Triassic in Computing Resources District was 160.535 billion M3.
(3) system produced a focus on exploration north-south belt of Upper Triassic sedimentary strata phase diagram that Xujiahe delta front in the industrial area to the main underwater distributary channel deposits, and for the first time identified in the study area southeast direction was an important source of material, during the deposition of Xujiahe.
(4) The area of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe reservoir with low porosity and low permeability reservoirs, the pore space between grains and dissolution pores, many cracks and micro-cracks, effectively improved performance of reservoir.
(5) By a typical gas reservoir anatomy and drilling study, the effectiveness of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe traps were related to the main conserved conditions and the structural formation of traps, and the configuration of generation and expulsion of hydrocarbon.Through a variety of methods, many major faults of the the region Xujiahe were analyzed and evaluated. The lateral fault sealing of T3x2, T3x3 and T3x5 were better, but the lateral fault sealing of T3x4 were worse. In plane, the northern fault sealing were better than southern.
(6) through the structural interpretation, combined with comprehensive research, in the north-south tectonic belt Triassic to the identification and implementation of three structural trap, the total resource of trap was 79.216 billion cubic meters, of which T3x2 was 37.5%, indicating that Triassic mainly distributed in T3x2 strata. Among them, the structure of northern new field and Shiquan were better than the beam structure of southern Longbao, and from south to north gradually changed for the better. According to the characteristics of structural traps, the establishment of the corresponding template of geological evaluation, and then optimizes a favorable exploration target, and put forward proposals of well placement of two drilling well.
引文
[1] Allen P A,Homewood P,1986.Foreland Basin.Oxford:Blackwell scientific publication.
[2]肖芳淳,张效羽,张鹏.模糊分析设计在石油工业中的应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993.206-207.
[3]齐景顺,张吉光,杨明杰等,灰色关联分析法在油气勘探早期构造圈闭评价中的应用[J].国土资源科技管理,2003,(5):1-4.
[4]蔡庆龙.油气勘探风险评价方法与评价模型[J].石油化工技术经济,2003,19(6):58-62.
[5]易德,郭萍等,灰色理论与方法[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1998.
[6]徐景祯、陈章明、刘晓冬等,圈闭地质综合评价的专家系统模型[J],石油学报,1997.
[7]王英,应用神经网络技术进行油气圈闭评价研究[J].新疆地质,2003,21(4):493-494.
[8]杨昌明,成金华,张锦高,等.油气勘查开发经营辅助决策系统的研究[R].武汉:中国地质大学,1997:2-4.
[9]鄢永玲、黎家盆、张虹.四川省德阳市合兴场-石泉场地区地震祥查成果报告[R].西南石油地质局第二物探大队.1993,12.
[10]鄢永玲、刘殊.四川省德阳市石泉场地区三维地震勘探成果报告[R].地质矿产部西南石油地质局第二物探大队.1996,12.
[11]谢雄光、胡佑华、曾晓.四川省成都市金堂县龙宝梁地区油气地震祥查成果报告[R].西南石油局第二物探大队.1999,12.
[12]谢雄光等.四川省德阳市石泉场地区老资料重处理及解释研究成果报告[R].西南石油局第二物探大队.2003.
[13]王信.川西坳县合兴场-石泉场构造带三叠系须家河组天然气形成条件及其分布预测研究[R].西南分公司油气勘探研究室.1995,12.
[14]罗啸泉、李宗文、刘纪常.合兴场-石泉场构造形变带侏罗系油气勘探评价[R].西南石油地质局地质综合研究大队.1996,12.
[15]蒋晓红、张国东、宋永华.川西、川北地区老井挖潜评井选层研究[R].西南石油局油气测试中心.2001,12.
[16]许国明.孔德秋.刘诗容等.川西合兴场-石泉场反冲构造带天然气富集规律研究[R].2004.
[17]罗志立,童崇光.板块构造与中国油气盆地[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1989:1-28.
[18]王金琪.安县构造运动[J].石油天然气地质,1990,11(3):223-234.
[19]刘树根、罗志立、戴苏兰等,龙门山冲断带的隆升和川西前陆盆地的沉降[J].地质学报,1995,69(3):205-213.
[20]曾华盛等.川西坳陷二叠系-上三叠统油气资源量计算[R].中国石油化工股份有限公司石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所.2007.
[21]李书兵、张虹、张志勇.合兴场、东泰气田蓬莱镇组-须家河组二段气藏描述成果报告[R].西南石油局地质综合研究院、西南石油局第二物探大队、西南石油局测井站、西南石油局油气测试中心.2001,5.
[22] DewneyM W Evaluating seals for hydrocarbon accumulations [J],AAPG Bulletin, 1984,68:1752-1763.
[23]张吉、张烈辉、杨辉廷.断层封闭机理及其封闭性识别方法[J].河南石油,2003,17(3):7-9.
[24]付广、陈章明、吕延防等.断层封闭性综合评价方法探讨及其应用[J].河南石油,1996,10(2):7-12.
[25]吕延防.付广.高大岭油气藏封盖研究[M] .北京:石油工业出版社,1996.
[26] Allan U S. Model for hydrocarbon migtation and entrapment with in faulted stuctures[J].AAPG Bulletin,1989,73:803-811.
[27]刘泽容,信荃麟,邓俊国,等M断块群油气藏形成机制和构造模式[M],北京:石油工业出版社.
[28]曲德斌,胡素云,秦俭,宋国春.圈闭描述评价原理及TrapDES1.0使用指南[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1998.36-38.
[29]吕延防、付广等.断层封闭性研究[M].北京,石油工业出版社,2002.7.
[30]冯建辉、吕延仓、谭试典.中国石油构造样式[M].北京,石油工业出版社,2000.6.
[31]单文琅、宋鸿林等.构造变形分析的理论、方法和实践[M].武汉,中国地质大学出版社,1991.1
[32]王斌、周江羽等.塔里木盆地雅一轮地区断层封堵性研究[J].石油实验地质,2006,28(5).
[33]孙家振、李兰斌等.地震地质综合解释[M].武汉,中国地质大学出版社,2002.1.
[34]王燮培、费琪等.石油勘探构造分析[M].武汉,中国地质大学出版社,1990.5.
[35]姜在兴等.沉积学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2008.
[36]赵重远、陈荷立等.石油地质学[M].北京:地质出版社,1979.
[37]王允诚等.油气储层评价[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999.
[38]孙永传、李蕙生编.碎屑岩沉积相和沉积环境[M].北京:地质出版社,1986.
[39]王良忱、张金亮编.沉积环境和沉积相[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.
[40]王允诚等.裂缝性致密油气储集层[M].北京:地质出版社,1992.
[41]王来斌、徐怀民.断层封闭性的研究进展[J].新疆石油学院学报,2003,15(1):11-15
[42]赵密福.断层封闭性研究状态[J].新疆石油地质,2004,25(3):333-336.
[43]陈永峤、周新桂、于兴河.断层封闭性要素与封闭效应[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(6):38-40.
[44]吕延防、马福建.断层封闭性影响因素及类型划分[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2003,33(2):163-166.
[45] G.Yielding等著、李琳、冯敬摘译.断层封堵性的定量预测[J].石油物探译丛,1998,3:78-92.
[46]曹代勇、吴李泉、占文峰等.断层应力封闭性的FLAC模拟研究[J].煤田地质与勘探,2005,33(1):1-3.
[47]贾庆军.杨俊.张立新等.合兴场、东泰、罗江地区构造精细描述[R].中石化西南油气分公司勘探开发研究院.2008.9.
[48]刘刚.灰色聚类分析在圈闭评价中的应用[J].天然气地球化学,2001,12(6):18-22
[49]刘伯土、朱允辉、高晓歌.圈闭定量评价——三因素综合排队法[J].石油与天然气地质,2000,21(4):366-369.
[50]龚达波、杨鹏举、樊玉敏等.四川省成都市龙宝梁构造川宝622井完井地质报告[R].西南石油局录井公司.2001,7.
[51]唐海军、万丽萍、李延洪.四川省德阳市中江县黄家湾断档构造川江186井地质报告[R].西南石油局第八普查勘探大队.1997,12.
[52]李伟、张德山.四川省金堂县石泉场构造川泉128井完井地质报告[R].西南石油局第十一普查勘探大队.1993,12.
[53]邓少云、黎华继、黄燕.四川省金堂县石泉场构造川泉171井完井地质报告[R].西南石油局第十一普查勘探大队.1994,3.
[54]朱春晓.四川盆地龙门山台缘断褶带邛西构造邛西一井完井地质总结报告[R].中国石油天然气总公司四川石油管理局川西北矿区.1993,3.
[55]朱春晓.四川盆地龙门山台缘断褶带邛西构造邛西二井完井地质总结报告[R].中国石油天然气总公司四川石油管理局川西北矿区.1996,1.
[56]熊驰原.四川盆地邛西构造邛西4经录井完井报告[R].中国石油天然气股份有限公司西南油气田分公司川西北气矿.2003,6.
[57]李书兵.川西坳陷碎屑岩远源气藏圈闭的有效性[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2001,21(3):65-70.
[58]安凤山、岳东明、唐立章等.川西致密碎屑岩圈闭有效性分析[J].四川石油普查,75-83.
[59]邱芳强.地震振幅技术在桑东地区三叠系圈闭评价中的应用[J].新疆地质,2004,22(2):224-225.
[60]温祥泉、丛金山.构造圈闭有效性的数学判别[J].海相油气地质,1997,2(3):40-44.
[61]刘文碧、周文、李德发.川西坳陷上三叠统断层封闭性研究[J].西南石油学院学报,1996,18(3):10-16.
[62]宋明春、付广、郭忠文等.断层垂向封闭性研究及应用实例[J].中国石油勘探,2003,8(6):55-59.
[63]付广、吕延防、祝彦贺.断层垂向封油气性综合定量评价方法探讨及应用[J].地质科学,2005,40(4):476-485.
[64]付广、孟庆芬.断层封闭性影响因素的理论分析[J].天然气地球科学,2002,13(3-4):40-44.
[65]黎家盆.川西坳陷中段须家河组圈闭评价及井位论证研究成果报告[R].中国石化股份公司西南分公司物探研究院.2003,12.
[66]徐宏节、虞显和、曹波.川西坳陷中段地应力与中深层致密储层裂缝及天然气富集关系研究[R].中国石化新星公司勘探研究院、中国石化新星公司西南石油局研究院.2000,12.
[67]韦正金.川西坳陷东坡非常规圈闭天然气藏地震勘探方法应用研究[R].西南石油局第二物探大队.1990,2.
[68]吴承业、饶克敏、罗啸泉.川西坳陷构造圈闭分类评价及裂缝发育规律[R].西南石油地质局地质综合研究大队.1994,12.
[69]许国明、孔德秋、刘诗荣等.川西合兴场-石泉场反冲构造带天然气富集规律研究[R].中国石油化工股份有限公司西南分公司.2004,11.
[70]李书兵、叶军、吕正祥等.川西坳陷致密碎屑岩天然气成藏主控因素及大中型气田勘探新目标研究[R].中石化新星石油公司西南石油局地质综合研究院.2000,11.
[71]杨克明、叶军、刘正中等.川西上三叠统气田勘探开发关键技术研究[R].中国石油化工股份有限公司西南分公司.2005,12.
[72]张健、沈浩、马建勇.四川盆地中西部不同类型背斜圈闭裂缝分布研究[R].四川石油管理局地质勘探开发研究院.1994,6.
[73]杨克明、谢用良、段文燊.川西坳陷须家河组圈闭评价与深层天然气有力勘探目标优选[R].中国石化股份公司西南分公司.2003,12.
[74]王达远、黎家盆、谢雄光.2003年地震资料目标处理及解释项目成果报告[R].中国石化股份公司西南分公司.2003,12.
[75]汤良杰、金文正、吕志洲.龙门山冲断带构造特征和保存条件研究[R].中国石油的萨穴(北京)盆地与有藏研究中心、中国石化股份公司西南油气分公司勘探开发研究院.2007,9.
[76]郑荣才、李瑞、甘其刚.孝泉-新场-丰谷地区须家河组高分辨率层序地层与砂体分布研究[R].成都理工大学沉积地质研究院、成都理工大学信息工程学院中石化西南分公司物探研究院.2005,11.
[77]王明江、谯述蓉、陈韬.四川省绵阳市永兴-方水场地区油气地震普祥查成果报告[R].西南石油局第二物探大队.1999,12.
[78]时志强、何志国、李云等.龙门山推覆构造带中段中、上三叠统油气聚集与保存条件研究[R].中国石油化工股份有限公司西南分公司.2006,12.
[2]肖芳淳,张效羽,张鹏.模糊分析设计在石油工业中的应用[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1993.206-207.
[3]齐景顺,张吉光,杨明杰等,灰色关联分析法在油气勘探早期构造圈闭评价中的应用[J].国土资源科技管理,2003,(5):1-4.
[4]蔡庆龙.油气勘探风险评价方法与评价模型[J].石油化工技术经济,2003,19(6):58-62.
[5]易德,郭萍等,灰色理论与方法[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1998.
[6]徐景祯、陈章明、刘晓冬等,圈闭地质综合评价的专家系统模型[J],石油学报,1997.
[7]王英,应用神经网络技术进行油气圈闭评价研究[J].新疆地质,2003,21(4):493-494.
[8]杨昌明,成金华,张锦高,等.油气勘查开发经营辅助决策系统的研究[R].武汉:中国地质大学,1997:2-4.
[9]鄢永玲、黎家盆、张虹.四川省德阳市合兴场-石泉场地区地震祥查成果报告[R].西南石油地质局第二物探大队.1993,12.
[10]鄢永玲、刘殊.四川省德阳市石泉场地区三维地震勘探成果报告[R].地质矿产部西南石油地质局第二物探大队.1996,12.
[11]谢雄光、胡佑华、曾晓.四川省成都市金堂县龙宝梁地区油气地震祥查成果报告[R].西南石油局第二物探大队.1999,12.
[12]谢雄光等.四川省德阳市石泉场地区老资料重处理及解释研究成果报告[R].西南石油局第二物探大队.2003.
[13]王信.川西坳县合兴场-石泉场构造带三叠系须家河组天然气形成条件及其分布预测研究[R].西南分公司油气勘探研究室.1995,12.
[14]罗啸泉、李宗文、刘纪常.合兴场-石泉场构造形变带侏罗系油气勘探评价[R].西南石油地质局地质综合研究大队.1996,12.
[15]蒋晓红、张国东、宋永华.川西、川北地区老井挖潜评井选层研究[R].西南石油局油气测试中心.2001,12.
[16]许国明.孔德秋.刘诗容等.川西合兴场-石泉场反冲构造带天然气富集规律研究[R].2004.
[17]罗志立,童崇光.板块构造与中国油气盆地[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1989:1-28.
[18]王金琪.安县构造运动[J].石油天然气地质,1990,11(3):223-234.
[19]刘树根、罗志立、戴苏兰等,龙门山冲断带的隆升和川西前陆盆地的沉降[J].地质学报,1995,69(3):205-213.
[20]曾华盛等.川西坳陷二叠系-上三叠统油气资源量计算[R].中国石油化工股份有限公司石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所.2007.
[21]李书兵、张虹、张志勇.合兴场、东泰气田蓬莱镇组-须家河组二段气藏描述成果报告[R].西南石油局地质综合研究院、西南石油局第二物探大队、西南石油局测井站、西南石油局油气测试中心.2001,5.
[22] DewneyM W Evaluating seals for hydrocarbon accumulations [J],AAPG Bulletin, 1984,68:1752-1763.
[23]张吉、张烈辉、杨辉廷.断层封闭机理及其封闭性识别方法[J].河南石油,2003,17(3):7-9.
[24]付广、陈章明、吕延防等.断层封闭性综合评价方法探讨及其应用[J].河南石油,1996,10(2):7-12.
[25]吕延防.付广.高大岭油气藏封盖研究[M] .北京:石油工业出版社,1996.
[26] Allan U S. Model for hydrocarbon migtation and entrapment with in faulted stuctures[J].AAPG Bulletin,1989,73:803-811.
[27]刘泽容,信荃麟,邓俊国,等M断块群油气藏形成机制和构造模式[M],北京:石油工业出版社.
[28]曲德斌,胡素云,秦俭,宋国春.圈闭描述评价原理及TrapDES1.0使用指南[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1998.36-38.
[29]吕延防、付广等.断层封闭性研究[M].北京,石油工业出版社,2002.7.
[30]冯建辉、吕延仓、谭试典.中国石油构造样式[M].北京,石油工业出版社,2000.6.
[31]单文琅、宋鸿林等.构造变形分析的理论、方法和实践[M].武汉,中国地质大学出版社,1991.1
[32]王斌、周江羽等.塔里木盆地雅一轮地区断层封堵性研究[J].石油实验地质,2006,28(5).
[33]孙家振、李兰斌等.地震地质综合解释[M].武汉,中国地质大学出版社,2002.1.
[34]王燮培、费琪等.石油勘探构造分析[M].武汉,中国地质大学出版社,1990.5.
[35]姜在兴等.沉积学[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2008.
[36]赵重远、陈荷立等.石油地质学[M].北京:地质出版社,1979.
[37]王允诚等.油气储层评价[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999.
[38]孙永传、李蕙生编.碎屑岩沉积相和沉积环境[M].北京:地质出版社,1986.
[39]王良忱、张金亮编.沉积环境和沉积相[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1996.
[40]王允诚等.裂缝性致密油气储集层[M].北京:地质出版社,1992.
[41]王来斌、徐怀民.断层封闭性的研究进展[J].新疆石油学院学报,2003,15(1):11-15
[42]赵密福.断层封闭性研究状态[J].新疆石油地质,2004,25(3):333-336.
[43]陈永峤、周新桂、于兴河.断层封闭性要素与封闭效应[J].石油勘探与开发,2003,30(6):38-40.
[44]吕延防、马福建.断层封闭性影响因素及类型划分[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2003,33(2):163-166.
[45] G.Yielding等著、李琳、冯敬摘译.断层封堵性的定量预测[J].石油物探译丛,1998,3:78-92.
[46]曹代勇、吴李泉、占文峰等.断层应力封闭性的FLAC模拟研究[J].煤田地质与勘探,2005,33(1):1-3.
[47]贾庆军.杨俊.张立新等.合兴场、东泰、罗江地区构造精细描述[R].中石化西南油气分公司勘探开发研究院.2008.9.
[48]刘刚.灰色聚类分析在圈闭评价中的应用[J].天然气地球化学,2001,12(6):18-22
[49]刘伯土、朱允辉、高晓歌.圈闭定量评价——三因素综合排队法[J].石油与天然气地质,2000,21(4):366-369.
[50]龚达波、杨鹏举、樊玉敏等.四川省成都市龙宝梁构造川宝622井完井地质报告[R].西南石油局录井公司.2001,7.
[51]唐海军、万丽萍、李延洪.四川省德阳市中江县黄家湾断档构造川江186井地质报告[R].西南石油局第八普查勘探大队.1997,12.
[52]李伟、张德山.四川省金堂县石泉场构造川泉128井完井地质报告[R].西南石油局第十一普查勘探大队.1993,12.
[53]邓少云、黎华继、黄燕.四川省金堂县石泉场构造川泉171井完井地质报告[R].西南石油局第十一普查勘探大队.1994,3.
[54]朱春晓.四川盆地龙门山台缘断褶带邛西构造邛西一井完井地质总结报告[R].中国石油天然气总公司四川石油管理局川西北矿区.1993,3.
[55]朱春晓.四川盆地龙门山台缘断褶带邛西构造邛西二井完井地质总结报告[R].中国石油天然气总公司四川石油管理局川西北矿区.1996,1.
[56]熊驰原.四川盆地邛西构造邛西4经录井完井报告[R].中国石油天然气股份有限公司西南油气田分公司川西北气矿.2003,6.
[57]李书兵.川西坳陷碎屑岩远源气藏圈闭的有效性[J].沉积与特提斯地质,2001,21(3):65-70.
[58]安凤山、岳东明、唐立章等.川西致密碎屑岩圈闭有效性分析[J].四川石油普查,75-83.
[59]邱芳强.地震振幅技术在桑东地区三叠系圈闭评价中的应用[J].新疆地质,2004,22(2):224-225.
[60]温祥泉、丛金山.构造圈闭有效性的数学判别[J].海相油气地质,1997,2(3):40-44.
[61]刘文碧、周文、李德发.川西坳陷上三叠统断层封闭性研究[J].西南石油学院学报,1996,18(3):10-16.
[62]宋明春、付广、郭忠文等.断层垂向封闭性研究及应用实例[J].中国石油勘探,2003,8(6):55-59.
[63]付广、吕延防、祝彦贺.断层垂向封油气性综合定量评价方法探讨及应用[J].地质科学,2005,40(4):476-485.
[64]付广、孟庆芬.断层封闭性影响因素的理论分析[J].天然气地球科学,2002,13(3-4):40-44.
[65]黎家盆.川西坳陷中段须家河组圈闭评价及井位论证研究成果报告[R].中国石化股份公司西南分公司物探研究院.2003,12.
[66]徐宏节、虞显和、曹波.川西坳陷中段地应力与中深层致密储层裂缝及天然气富集关系研究[R].中国石化新星公司勘探研究院、中国石化新星公司西南石油局研究院.2000,12.
[67]韦正金.川西坳陷东坡非常规圈闭天然气藏地震勘探方法应用研究[R].西南石油局第二物探大队.1990,2.
[68]吴承业、饶克敏、罗啸泉.川西坳陷构造圈闭分类评价及裂缝发育规律[R].西南石油地质局地质综合研究大队.1994,12.
[69]许国明、孔德秋、刘诗荣等.川西合兴场-石泉场反冲构造带天然气富集规律研究[R].中国石油化工股份有限公司西南分公司.2004,11.
[70]李书兵、叶军、吕正祥等.川西坳陷致密碎屑岩天然气成藏主控因素及大中型气田勘探新目标研究[R].中石化新星石油公司西南石油局地质综合研究院.2000,11.
[71]杨克明、叶军、刘正中等.川西上三叠统气田勘探开发关键技术研究[R].中国石油化工股份有限公司西南分公司.2005,12.
[72]张健、沈浩、马建勇.四川盆地中西部不同类型背斜圈闭裂缝分布研究[R].四川石油管理局地质勘探开发研究院.1994,6.
[73]杨克明、谢用良、段文燊.川西坳陷须家河组圈闭评价与深层天然气有力勘探目标优选[R].中国石化股份公司西南分公司.2003,12.
[74]王达远、黎家盆、谢雄光.2003年地震资料目标处理及解释项目成果报告[R].中国石化股份公司西南分公司.2003,12.
[75]汤良杰、金文正、吕志洲.龙门山冲断带构造特征和保存条件研究[R].中国石油的萨穴(北京)盆地与有藏研究中心、中国石化股份公司西南油气分公司勘探开发研究院.2007,9.
[76]郑荣才、李瑞、甘其刚.孝泉-新场-丰谷地区须家河组高分辨率层序地层与砂体分布研究[R].成都理工大学沉积地质研究院、成都理工大学信息工程学院中石化西南分公司物探研究院.2005,11.
[77]王明江、谯述蓉、陈韬.四川省绵阳市永兴-方水场地区油气地震普祥查成果报告[R].西南石油局第二物探大队.1999,12.
[78]时志强、何志国、李云等.龙门山推覆构造带中段中、上三叠统油气聚集与保存条件研究[R].中国石油化工股份有限公司西南分公司.2006,12.
© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号 地址：北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编：100083 电话：办公室：(+86 10)66554848；文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新：66554700 |