用户名: 密码: 验证码:
纵向结构与企业创新激励
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文研究纵向结构与企业技术创新激励的关系,试图从全球价值链不同环节企业内在创新激励不同引致企业技术创新相对能力变化,来解释企业之间存在显著绩效差异原因和破解本土企业升级难题。
     在市场自由进入条件下,市场结构内生于领导企业的技术创新行为,全球价值链领导企业的过度研发投资使所在战略环节市场结构趋于高度集中(完全或寡头垄断结构)。如果领导企业能够很好的控制技术溢出,研发投资激励就会高于落后企业,其领导地位就能够持续维持甚至强化。只有当非对称知识溢出水平较高时,行业内技术落后企业的创新激励会超过领导者,才可能实现技术追赶。
     在市场自由进入情形,纵向关联行业的企业进入数量随着进入壁垒和市场规模的增加而减少,而且上、下游企业进入数量之间具有正向强化效应,导致纵向结构的演变。企业技术创新激励随着纵向关联行业企业数量增加(减少)而增加(减少)。
     领导企业还可以通过内生的一体化策略增加自身的研发投资激励,降低行业内竞争对手和纵向关联企业的创新激励,技术创新能力的差距将进一步扩大。
     通过对我国汽车产业企业技术创新的案例分析,初步验证了上述理论判断,并提出了提高企业自主创新能力实现企业升级的政策建议。
This dissertation focuses on the relationship between vertical structure and firm's innovation incentives. From the different innovation incentives and the changes of innovation ability within the firms from different segments of global value chain(GVC), We try to explain the significant difference business performance and solve local enterprises upgrade problems.
     Under free entry conditions, the market structure is endogenours with the leader's innovation behavior. The leader of GVC should invest more R & D to make the market structure of GVC strategic segments, tends to highly concentrated (full or oligopolistic structure). If the leader could control the rate of technology spillovers, leader would invest more R & D than the follwers'.The position of leadership would be maintained or even strengthened. Only when it exit higher levels of asymmetric knowledge spillovers, the follwers would be like to invest more R & D than the leader's, the gap of technology will be closed
     Under free entry conditions, the firm numubers of each GVC segments industry is incresed as entry barriers and market size are increased. The firms numuber between Upstream and downstream industry has positive effect, it leads to the evolution of GVC vertical structure. The increase (or deccrease)of firm number in vertical related industry woule incentive firms invest more (or lease) R & D
     GVC Leader firms can also increase their R & D investment incentives, and reducing competitors and vertical related firms'innovation incentives through endogenous integrated strategy.
     Through the case studies of China's automotive industry firms technological innovation, our theory sounds to be a good way to explain the firms innnovation behaviors. In the end, many policy recommendations be made to improve the innovation capability of local firms and the way to upgrade in GVC.
引文
[1]Acemoglu, Daron. Patterns of Skill Premia, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 70, No.2 (Apr.,2003), pp.199-230.
    [2]Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Griffith, R. and Zilibotti F. "Vertical Integration and Technology:Theory and Evidence," mimeo, MIT.2005.
    [3]Acemoglu, D. Innovation by Incumbents and Entrants, mimeo, M. I. T.2008
    [4]Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Griffith, R. Vertical integration and technology: theory and evidence, Journal of the European Economic Association,2010.
    [5]Aghion, P., Harris, C., Vickers, J. Competition and growth with step-by-step innovation:An example, European Economic Review,1997.
    [6]Aghion, P., Harris, C., Howitt, P. Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-by-Step Innovation, Review of Economic,2001.
    [7]Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R. and Griffith, R. Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship, Quarterly Journal of Economics,2005, v120(2, May), 701-728.
    [8]Aghion, P., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P. The effects of entry on incumbent innovation and productivity, The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol.91(1), pages 20-32.
    [9]Allain, M. L., Chambolle, C. and Rey, P. Vertical Integration, Innovation and Foreclosure,2010WP.
    [10]Antonelli, C. The evolution of the industrial organisation of the production of knowledge - Cambridge Journal of Economics,1999
    [11]Atallah, G. Vertical R&D Spillovers, Cooperation, Market Structure, and Innovation,2000.
    [12]Baker, G. P. and Hubbard, T. N. "Contractibility and Asset Ownership:On-Board Computers and Governance in U.S. Trucking, " Quarterly Journal of Economics,2004, pp:1443-1479.
    [13]Banerjee, S. and Lin, P. Downstream R&D, raising rivals'costs, and input price contracts, International Journal of Industrial Organization,2003, pp79-96
    [14]Barney, J. B. Firms resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,1991, pp:99-120.
    [15]Barte, A. Outsourcing and Technological Change, nber. org,2005
    [16]Baum, Joel A. C. and Ingram, P. Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry,1898-1990, Management Science (MSc),1998, pp:996-1016.
    [17]Bolton, P. Incomplete contracts, vertical integration, and supply assurance, The Review of Economic Studies,1993.
    [18]Bolton, P. and Dewatripont, M. Introduction to Contract Theory, book manuscript.1998.
    [19]Brandenburger, A. and Stuart Jr., H. W. Biform games. Management Science,2007, pp.537-549.
    [20]Brocas, I. Vertical Integration and Incentives to Innovate, International Journal of Industrial Organization,2003(21), pp.457-488.
    [21]Buehler, S. and Schmutzler, A. Asymmetric Vertical Integration, Advances in theoretical Economics,2005.
    [22]BuehleR, S. The promise and pitfalls of restructuring network industries, German Economic Review,2005.
    [23]Buehler, S. and Schmutzler, A. Intimidating Competitors - Endogenous Vertical Integration and Downstream Investment in Successive Oligopoly, International Journal of Industrial,2008.
    [24]Cabral, L. M. B., Riordan, M. H. "The Learning Curve, Market Dominance, and Predatory Pricing", Econometrica,1994, pp.1115-1140.
    [25]Cabrera-Suarez, K. and De Saa-Perez, P. The succession process from a resource and knowledge based view of the family firm, Family business review,2001, pp.37-P47.
    [26]Cassiman, B. R&D cooperation and spillovers:some empirical evidence from Belgium, American Economic Review,2002.
    [27]Cassiman, B. and Veugelers, R. R&D Cooperation and Spillovers:Some Empirical Evidence from Belgium, The American Economic Review,2002,pp1169-1184.
    [28]Chen, Y. Vertical disintegration, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 2005 - Wiley Online Library.
    [29]Chen, Y. Product innovation incentives:Monopoly vs. competition,2009Working Papers,-stripe. colorado. edu.
    [30]Chen, Yongmin and Sappington, D. E. M. Innovation in Vertically Related Markets, The Journal of Industrial organization,2010.
    [31]Choi, J. P., Lee, G. and Stefanadis, C.,'The Effects of Integration on R&D Incentives in Systems Markets,'Netnomics,2003, pp.21-32.
    [32]Ciarli, T. Technological change and the vertical organisation of industries, Schumpeterian Perspectives on Innovation, Competition and Growth,2009.
    [33]Coase, Ronald, "The Nature of the Firm:Origin, Meaning and Influence" Journal of Law, Economics and Organization,1988.
    [34]Colangelo, G. Vertical vs. horizontal integration:pre-emptive merging, The Journal of Industrial Economics,1995.
    [35]Czarnitzki, D. andKraft, K. An empirical test of the asymmetric models on innovative activity:who invests more into R&D, the incumbent or the challenger?, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,2004.
    [35]Czarnitzki, D., Etro, F. and Kraf, K. Endogenous Market Structures and Innovation by Leaders:an Empirical Test,2010.
    [36]Czarnitzki, D., Etro, F. and Kraf, K. The Effect of Entry on R&D Investment of Leaders:Theory and Empirical Evidence,2010, Working paper.
    [37]Dasgupta and Joseph Stiglitz, Uncertainty, industrial structure, and the speed of R&D, The Bell Journal of Economics,1980.
    [38]Dasgupta and Joseph Stiglitz, Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity,1980.
    [39]DeBondt, R. A note on innovation by leaders,2007.
    [40]De Fontenay, C. C. Can vertical integration by a monopsonist harm consumer welfare?, International Journal of Industrial,2004.
    [41]De Fontenay, C. C. and Gans, J. S. Vertical integration in the Presence of Upstream Competitive, RAND Journal of Economics,2005.
    [42]De Man, A. P. Collaboration and innovation:a review of the effects of mergers, acquisitions and alliances on innovation, Technovation,2005.
    [43]Dube, J. P. and Hitsch, G. J. Do switching costs make markets less competitive?, Journal of Marketing Research,2009, pp.435-445.
    [44]Elberfeld, W. Market size and vertical integration:Stigler's hypothesis reconsidered, The Journal of Industrial Economics,2002.
    [45]Erin, A. and Schmittlein, D. C. Integration of the Sales Force:An Empirical Examination, Rand Journal of Economics,1984, pp.385-395.
    [46]Ernst, D. Innovation offshoring:Asia's emerging role in global innovation networks,2006, scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu.
    [47]Etro, F. Innovation by leaders, The Economic Journal,2004.
    [48]Etro, F. Aggressive leaders, The RAND Journal of Economics,2006.
    [49]Etro, F. Market Leaders and Industrial Policy and the software market, Journal of Industrial Economics,2008, Market Leaders and Industrial Policy,2006wp.
    [50]Etro, F. Competition, innovation, and antitrust:a theory of market leaders and its policy implications, books. google. com,2007.
    [51]Etro, F. Endogenous Market Structures and Contract Theory, Working Papers, 2010.
    [52]Farrell, J. Integration and independent innovation on a network, American Economic Review,2003.
    [53]Farrell, J. Modularity, vertical integration, and open access policies: Towards a convergence of antitrust and regulation in the Internet age, Harvard Journal of Law and Technology,2003.
    [54]Fauli-Oller, R. and Sandonis Diez, J. Downstream mergers and upstream investment,2007 Working papers-dialnet.unirioja.es.
    [55]Feenstra, R. C. Integration of trade and disintegration of production in the global economy, The Journal of Economic Perspectives,1998.
    [56]Flaherty, T.M. "Industry Structure and Cost-Reducing Investment' Econometrica,1980, pp.1187-1209.
    [57]Gilbert, Richard J, and David M G Newbery. Preemptive Patenting and the Persistence of Monopoly Power, American Economic Review,1982, pp.514-526.
    [58]Gilson, R. J. and Sabel, C. F. Contracting for innovation:vertical disintegration and interfirm collaboration, Columbia Law Review,2009.
    [59]Goh, Ai-Ting. Knowledge Diffusion, Supplier's Technological Effort and Technology Transfer via Vertical Relationships [J]. Journal of International Economics, 2005, pp.527-540.
    [60]Gorg, H. and Hanley, A. Productivity effects of international outsourcing: evidence from plant-level data-Canadian Journal of Economics,2008, Wiley Online Library.
    [61]Grant, R. M. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review,1991, pp.114-135. [62] Grant, R. M. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal,1996, pp.109-122.
    [63]Greenstein, S. Innovation and the Evolution of Market Structure for Internet access in the United States, The Commercialization of the Internet and Its Impact,2007.
    [64]Grossman, Sanford J and Hart, Oliver D, The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration[J], Journal of Political,1986, pp.691-719.
    [65]Grossman, G. M. Integration Versus Outsourcing in Industry Equilibrium, Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press,2002.
    [66]Gulati, R. Network location and learning:The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation, Strategic management journal,1999.
    [67]Hamel, G. Competition for Competence and Inter-Partner Learning Within International Strategic alliances, Strategic Management Journal,1991, pp.83-103.
    [68]Handler, W. C. (1989). Managing the family firm succession process:The next-generation family member's experience. Michigan:UMI Dissertation Services.
    [69]Harhoff, D. Strategic Spillover Production, Vertical Organization and Incentives for Research and Development, unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1991.
    [70]Hart,O. and Holmstrom, B. The Theory of Contracts. In Advances in Economic Theory, Fifth World Congress, ed. by Truman Bewley[M]. Cambridge University Press, 1987.
    [71]Hart,O. "Incomplete Contracts" in J. Eatwell, P. Newman and M. Milgate, eds[M], The New Palgrave, Macmillan Press, London,1987.
    [72]Hart, Oliver, Incomplete Contracts and the Theory of the Firm[J], Journal of Law, Economics and Organization,1988.
    [73]Hart,O. and Moore, J. Property rights and the nature of the firm, The Journal of Political Economy,1990.
    [74]Hart,O. and Tirole, J. Vertical Integration and Market Foreclosure. Brookings Papers in Economic Activity:Microeconomics,1990, pp205-276.
    [75]Hart,O. and J. Moore, Foundations of Incomplete Contracts[J], Review of Economic Studies,1999.
    [76]Hart,O. and Moore, J. Contracts as Reference Points [J], The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, vol.123(1),2008.
    [77]Hay, D. A., Morris, D. J. Industrial Economics and Organization. New York:Oxford University Press,2001.
    [78]Hummels, D. and Ishii, J. The nature and growth of vertical specialization in world trade Journal of International economics,2001.
    [79]Humphrey, J. and Schmitz, H. Developing Country Firms in the World Economy: Governance and Upgrading in Global Value Chains,2002-inef. uni-due. de.
    [80]Humphrey, J, How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters?, Regional studies,2002.
    [81]Humphrey, J, Opportunities for SMEs in developing countries to upgrade in a global economy,2003- inti.gov. ar.
    [82]Inderst, R. and C. Wey (2003), "Bargaining, Mergers, and Technology Choice in Bilaterally Oligopolistic Industries, " Rand Journal of Economics,34,1-19.
    [83]Inkmann, Joachim. Horizontal and Vertical R&D Cooperation,1999.
    [84]Ishii, A. Cooperative R&D between Vertically Related Firms with Spillovers, International Journal of Industrial Organization,2004.
    [85]Jacobides, M. G. Benefiting from innovation:Value creation, value appropriation and the Role of industry architectures, Research Policy,2006.
    [86]Jaffe, Adam B. Real Effects of Academic Research, The American Economic Review, 1989, pp.957-970.
    [87]Kami en, M. and Schwartz, N. Market structure and innovative activity:A survey, Journal of Economic Literature,1975.
    [88]Kato, M. The persistence of market leadership:evidence from Japan, Industrial and Corporate Change,2009.
    [89]Keane, Jdie.A 'new' approach to global value chain analysis,2008 Working Paper.
    [90]Kim, Linsu. Imitation to innovation:The dynamics of Korea's technological learning [M]. Boston:Harvard Business School Press,1997:pp.101-130.
    [91]Klepper, S. Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle, The American Economic Review, Vol.86, No.3. (Jun.,1996), pp.562-583.
    [92]Kline, S. J. An overview of innovation, The positive sum strategy:Harnessing, 1986.
    [93]Kovdc, E. and Vinogradov, V. Technological leadership and persistence of monopoly under endogenous entry:Static versus dynamic analysis, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,2010.
    [94]Lafontaine, F. Vertical integration and firm boundaries:the evidence, Journal of Economic Literature,2007-ingentaconnect.com.
    [95]Lambertini, L. and Rossin, G. Vertical Integration and Differentiation in an Oligopoly with Process Innovating R&D,2004.
    [96]Lee, Keun, Lim, C. S. Technological regime,catching-up and leapfrogging: findings from the Korean industries [J]. Research Policy,2001, pp.459-483.
    [97]Leiblein, M. J. And Reuer, J. J. Do make or buy decisions matter? The influence of organizational governance on technological performance, Strategic Management Journal,2002.
    [98]Lieberman, M. B. Determinants of vertical integration:an empirical test, The Journal of Industrial Economics,1991.
    [99]Lin, Ping and Saggi, Kamal. Product/process R&D and the nature of market competition, European Economic Review, Volume 46, Issue 1, January 2002, pp.201-211.
    [100]Linden, G. and Kraemer, K. L. Who captures value in a global innovation system? The case of Apple's ipod,2007 - escholarship. org.
    [101]Liu, Xiaohui and Buck, Trevor. Innovation performance and channels for international technology spillovers:Evidence from Chinese high-tech industries, Research Policy,2007, pp355-366.
    [102]Lommerud, K. E. and Straume,0. R. Downstream merger with upstream market power, European Economic Review,2005.
    [103]Long, N. V. Outsourcing and technology spillovers, International Review of Economics & Finance,2005.
    [104]Masaaki, Kotabe, etc, gaining from vertical partnerships knowledge transfer, relationship duration and supplier performance improvement in the U.S. and Japanese automative industries, Strategic Management Journal,2003, pp.293-316.
    [105]Masten, Scott E. The Organization of Production:Evidence from the Aerospace Industry, Journal of Law and Economics,1984, pp.403-417.
    [106]Masten, S. E., Meehan, J. W., and Snyder, Edward A. The Costs of Organization. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization,1991, pp.1-25.
    [107]McLaren, "Globalization" and Vertical Structure. American Economic Review, 2000, pp.1239-1254.
    [106]Miklos-Thal, Jeanine and Rey, Patrick. Vertical relations. International Journal of Industrial Organization,2010, pp.345-349.
    [107]Milliou, C. Vertical integration and R&D information flow:is there a need for [] firewalls'? - International Journal of Industrial Organization,2004.
    [108]Milliou, C. Upstream Horizontal Mergers and Efficiency Gains,-2009-ifo. de.
    [109]Monteverde, K. and Teece, D. J. Supplier Switching Costs and Vertical Integration in the Automobile Industry, Bell Journal of Economics,1982, pp 206-213.
    [110]Morrison, C. P. Global value chains and technological capabilities:A framework to study learning and innovation in developing countries, Oxford Development Studies,2008.
    [111]Mukherjee, A. and Zanchettin, P. Vertical integration and product innovation, 2007 Woring Paper.
    [112]Ordover, G. S. Equilibrium vertical foreclosure, The American Economic Review, 1990.
    [113]Pack, H. and Saggi, K. Vertical technology transfer via international outsourcing, Journal of Development Economics,2001, pp389-415.
    [114]Perry, M. K. Vertical integration:determinants and effects, Handbook of industrial organization,1989.
    [115]Pietrobelli, C. and Saliola, F. Power relationships along the value chain: multinational firms, global buyers, and local suppliers' performance, Cambridge Journal of Economics,2008 - dse. unibo. it.
    [116]Prendergast, C. The Tenuous Trade-0? Between Risk and Incentives. Journal of Political Economy,2002, pp.1071-1102.
    [117]Rey, P. and Tirole, J. "A primer on Foreclosure", Handbook of Industrial
    organization Ⅲ, edited by. Armstrong, M. and R. Porter,2007.
    [118]Richard, M. Vertical Integration vs Vertical Separation in an Imperfectly Competitive Industry, such as Electricity, with Retail, Wholesale and Forward M arkets, 2010 - iscr. co. nz.
    [119]Riordan, M. H. Anticompetitive vertical integration by a dominant firm, American Economic Review,1998.
    [120]Riordan, M. H. Competitive Effects of Vertical Integration, Handbook of Antitrust Economics,2008.
    [121]Robertson, P. L., and Langlois, R. N. Innovation, networks, and vertical integration, Research Policy,1995, pp.543-562.
    [122]Romano, R. E. A Note on Market Structure and Innovation when Inventors can Enter. Journal of Industrial Economics,1987, pp.353-358.
    [123]Rossini, G. Endogeneous outsourcing and vertical integration with process R&D,- amsacta. cib. unibo. it,2003.
    [124]Salanie, B. The Economics of Contracts[M], Cambridge:MIT Press,1997.
    [125]Salinger, M. A. Vertical mergers and market foreclosure, The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1988.
    [126]Saliola, Federica and Zanfei, Antonello. "Multinational Firms, Global Value Chains and the Organization of Technology Transfer", working paper 2007.
    [127]Sastry, B. Market structure and incentives for innovation, Innovation and Competition Policy.,2007.
    [128]Schilling, M. A. Interfirm collaboration networks:The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science,2007.
    [129]Schmutzler, A. Investment and market dominance, RAND Journal of Economics, 2001.
    [130]Schmutzler, Armin. " Is Competition Good for Innovation? A Simple Approach to an Unresolved Question", Foundations and Trends in Microeconomics,2010 nowpublishers. com.
    [131]Segal, I. Complexity and Renegotiation:A Foundation for Incomplete Contracts[J], Review of Economic Studies,1999.
    [132]Shin, N., Kraemer, K. L. and Dedrick, J. R&D, value chain location and firm performance in the global electronics industry,-Industry & Innovation,2009.
    [133]Slade, Margaret E. Multitask Agency and Organizational Form:An Empirical Exploration, International Economic Review,1996, pp.465-486.
    [134]Spender, J.C. Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal,1996, pp.45-62.
    [135]Steurs, G.'Inter-Industry R&D Spillovers:What Difference Do they Make?', International Journal of Industrial Organization,1995, pp.249-276.
    [136]Sturgeon, T. J. How Do We Define Value Chains and Production Networks, IDS bulletin,2001.
    [137]Sutton, John. Market Share Dynamics and the 'Persistence of Leadership'Debate, The American Economic Review,2007.
    [138]Syrneonidis, G. Innovation, firm size and market structure:Schumpeterian hypotheses and some new themes,-OECD Economic Studies,1996-oecd. org.
    [139]Tavares, A. T. Sourcing patterns of foreign-owned multinational subsidiaries in Europe,-Regional Studies,2006 - Routledge.
    [140]Teece, D. J. Supplier switching costs and vertical integration in the automobile industry, The Bell Journal of Economics,1982.
    [141]Teece, D. J. Profiting from technological innovation:Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy, Research policy,1986.
    [142]Teece, D. J. Capturing value from knowledge assets:The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review,1998, pp.55-79.
    [143]Teece, D. J. Competition, cooperation, and innovation::Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,1992.
    [144]Teece, D. J. Firm organization, industrial structure, and technological innovation, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,1996.
    [145]Tirole, J., Incomplete Contracts:Where Do We Stand?[J], Econometrica,1999.
    [146]Tishler, A. R&D Wars and the Effects of Innovation on the Success and Survivability of Firms in Oligopoly Markets, International Journal of Industrial Organization,2009.
    [147]Tsai, Wenpin. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks:Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance, Academy of Management Journal,2001, pp 996-1004.
    [148]Uychara, C. H. U. S.-Japan Science and Technology Exchange-Patterns of independence [M], Westview Press Tnc., Colorado,1988, pp.223.
    [149]Van Cayseele, PJG. Market structure and innovation:A survey of the last twenty years, De Economist,1998.
    [150]Vandekerckhove, J., De Bondt R., Asymmetric Spillovers and Investment in Research and Development of Leaders and Followers. forthcoming in Economics of Innovationand New Technology,2007Working Paper.
    [151]Vives, X. Innovation and Competitive Pressure, Journal of Industrial Economics,2008, pp.419-469.
    [152]Weiss, P. Adoption of product and process innovations in differentiated markets:the impact of competition, Review of Industrial Organization,2003.
    [153]Whinston, Michael D. "On the Transaction Cost Determinants of Vertical In-tegration, " Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization,2003, pp.1-23.
    [154]Williamson, Oliver E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press,1985.
    [155]Young, Allan Richard. Vertical Structure and Nash Equilibrium:A Note[J]. Journal of Industrial Economics,1991, pp.717-722.
    [156]Zaheer, A. Benefiting from network position:firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance, Strategic management journal,2005.
    [157]艾青,纵向一体化与并购效应研究,武汉大学博士论文2005
    [158]陈宇科,孟卫东,竞争条件下纵向合作创新企业的联盟策略,系统工程理论与实践,2010.5
    [159]曹明福,全球价值链分工的利益分配,西北大学博士论文,2007
    [160]杜伟,企业技术创新激励制度论,四川大学博士论文,2002年3月
    [161]杜义飞,基于价值创造与分配的产业价值链研究,博士论文,电子科技大学
    [162]杜晓君,梅开,纵向结构专利联盟的创新激励作用分析,科研管理,2010.1.
    [163]丁勇,跨国公司对国际生产网络的控制及其对发展中国家的影响,南开大博士论文,2009
    [164]方刚,基于资源观的企业网络能力与创新绩效关系研究,浙江大学博士学位论文,2008
    [165]龚三乐,全球价值链内企业升级的动力对绩效的影响研究,暨南大学博士学位论文,2007.
    [166]关涛,跨国公司内部的知识转移与影响因素实证研究,复旦大学博士学位论文,2005
    [167]郭劲光,企业网络理论研究,东北财经大学博十学位论文,2004
    [168]关涛,跨国公司内部的知识转移与影响因素实证研究,复旦大学博士学位论文,2005
    [169]哈特,企业、合同、与财务结构[M]上海:上海人民出版社,2006
    [170]黄晶,产业内垂直分工研究-基于产业组织的视角和中国的实证,暨南大学博士学位论文,2008
    [171]何元贵,中国汽车企业规模经济实证研,暨南大学博士学位论文,2009
    [172]江小绢,中国吸引外资30年,经济与管理研究,2008
    [173]罗珉,王雌,组织间关系的拓展与演进:基于组织间知识互动的研究,中国工业经济,2008
    [174]罗珉,组织间关系理论最新研究视角探析,外国经济与管理,2007
    [175]陈柳长三角地区FDI技术外溢、本土创新能力与经济增长,世界经济研究,2007
    [176]李平,张庆昌,国际间技术溢出对我国自主创新动态效应分析,兼论人力资本消化吸收,世界经济,2008
    [177]李平等,中国自主创新中研发资本投入产出绩效分析—兼论人力资本和知识产权保护的影响,中国社会科学,2007。
    [178]赖明勇,周杨,高新技术产品出对中国经济增长的拉动效应及外溢分析,世界经济研究,2008
    [179]马可-斯达德勒,信息经济学引论:激励与合约[M],上海:上海财经大学出版社 2004
    [180]倪晓靓,跨国公司FDI技术转移及其影响因素研究,厦门大学博士论文,2009
    [181]彭新敏,企业网络对技术创新绩效的作用机制研究,浙江大学博士论文,2009
    [182]蒲明,嵌入性、组织学习与跨国公司子公司发展的关系研究,南开大学博士论文,2009
    [183]钱德勒主编,柳御林主译,大企业和国民财富,北京大学出版社,2004
    [184]钱锡红,徐万里,杨永福,企业网络位置、间接联系与创新绩效,中国工业经济,2010.2
    [185]沈坤荣,马昀,高新技术产业发展与经济增长—南京市高新技术产业发展研究,软科学研究,2002.5
    [186]史自力,美、口、欧、中汽车产业技术创新比较研究,吉林大学博士学位论文,2008
    [187]孙冰,企业技术创新动力研究,哈尔滨工程大学博士学位论文,2003
    [188]唐晓华,技术创新的资源与激励的不匹配性及其治理,中国工业经济,2004.
    [189]陶锋,知识溢出、吸收能力与创新绩效,暨南大学博士学位论文,2009
    [190]吴晓冰,集群企业网络特征,知识获取及创新绩效关系研究,浙江大学博士学位论文,2009
    [191]文嫮,嵌入全球价值链的中国地方产业网络升级机制的理论与实践研究,华东师范大学博士学位论文,2005
    [192]吴晓兵,集群企业创新网络特征、知识获取及创新绩效,浙江大学博士学位论文,2009
    [193]王伟光,中国工业行业技术创新和创新效率差异研究,中国社会科学研究生院博士学位论文,2002
    [194]王莉,动态环境下企业网络、组织学习和绩效关系研究,山东大学博士论文,2008
    [195]魏后凯,市场竞争、经济绩效与产业集中.经济管理出版社,2003
    [196]魏守华等,内生创新努力、本土技术溢出与长三角高技术产业创新绩效,中国工业经济,2009年2月。
    [197]威廉姆森,资本主义经济制度[M]北京:商务印书馆,2004
    [198]王兴明、汪和平.技术消化吸收系统的构建.科学学与科学技术管理.2006(9),pp.98-101。
    [199]汪和平、钱省三、胡建兵.我国技术引进后消化吸收结果定量评价模型.科学学研究.2005(12),pp.110-112。
    [200]熊世权,知识视角下中国汽车供应商关系对供应商绩效影响研究,重庆大学博士学位论文,2009
    [201]肖小勇,基于企业网络的组织间知识转移研究,中南大学博士论文2005
    [202]杨瑞龙、聂辉华,不完全契约理论:一个综述[J],经济研究,2006
    [203]杨东进,刘人怀,自主GVC模式:中国汽车产业升级的可靠路径,管理工程学报,2008
    [204]严海宁,市场结构及其影响因素对企业技术创新的作用研究,华中科技大学博士论文,2009
    [205]余东华,芮明杰,模块化、企业价值网络与企业边界变动,中国工业经济,2005
    [206]杨其静,从完全合同理论到不完全合同理论[J],教学与研究,2003
    [207]张晓燕,跨国公司之公司之间的知识转移研究,复旦大学博士论文,2005
    [208]张维迎,博弈论与信息经济学,上海:上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1996
    [209]周煜,全球价值链下中国汽车企业的组织行为与升级路径研究,华中科技大学博士学位 论文2008
    [210]周任重,契约理论发展演化与应用研究述评,改革与战略,2010
    [211]周任重,引进技术消化、吸收和创新研究,科技管理研究,2009
    [212]钟笑寒,劳动力流动与工资差异,中国社会科学,2006年第1期
    [213]张琰,模块化分工条件下网状产业链知识创新研究,复旦大学博士论文,2009
    [214]张宏,企业纵向社会资本与企业竞争优势,2007浙江大学博士学位论文
    [215]张瑛,模块化分工条件网络状产业链知识创新研究,复旦大学博士学位论文,2008
    [216]张文宣,全球价值链的理论及其实践应用,西北大学博士学位论文,2008
    [217]张雷,产业链纵向关系治理模式研究—及对中国汽车产业链的实证分析,复旦大学博士学位论文,2007
    [218]朱卫平,陈林,产业升级的内涵与模式研究以广东产业升级为例,经济学家,2011
    [219]朱亚丽,基于社会网络视角的企业间知识转移影响因素实证研究,浙江大学博士学位论文,2009

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700