用户名: 密码: 验证码:
氨氯地平及左旋氨氯地平对高血压内皮功能影响的实验研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
血管内皮功能的改变在动脉粥样硬化形态学改变之前,就参与了损伤的进展及随后的临床并发症,与高血压等心血管疾病关系密切。内皮功能受损时,血管舒张因子分泌减少,血管收缩因子分泌增加,这促进了血管平滑肌细胞的增殖,导致血管壁增厚和血管结构重塑,动脉弹性下降,外周阻力升高,促进高血压及其并发症的发生发展。另外,高血压引起的血流切应力和内分泌环境的变化也可引起内皮功能受损。因此逆转高血压内皮功能不全不仅是降压之外的新靶点,同时也是阻止动脉粥样硬化发生发展的重要环节,内皮功能不全检测就更强调无创、易操作及快捷。指尖脉搏容积测定(Pulse amplitude volume,PAV)是随着指尖检测内皮功能的迅猛发展而新近出现的检测手段,但尚无相关的临床应用的报道。
     氨氯地平(Amlodlpine)作为第三代钙通道阻滞剂,是临床应用最为广泛的降压药物之一。氨氯地平是由左旋氨氯地平(S(-)-amlodipine)和右旋氨氯地平(R(-)-amlodipine)以1:1的比例构成的外消旋混合物,其降压作用主要来自左旋体,其效用是右旋体的1000倍。但除了降压本身的血管功能保护作用外,因为右旋体的存在是否使氨氯地平与左旋氨氯地平相比具有额外的内皮功能保护作用尚不清楚。
     本研究通过检测这两种药物治疗前后高血压患者血管内皮功能的变化,探讨两者在取得相同降压效果的情况下是否具有相同的内皮保护作用,同时探讨PAV与FMD检测高血压内皮功能的相关性及一致性;并进一步通过两种药物干预体外培养的人脐静脉内皮细胞,探讨两者影响NO的水平及其机制。方法:
     1临床试验
     采取随机、交叉设计,选择原发性高血压病病人24例,随机分为A组及B组,A组服用苯磺酸氨氯地平(辉瑞制药)5mg1/日,B组服用苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平(施慧达药业)2.5mg1/日,均为晨起服药,治疗6周后经过2周清洗期,待患者血压及心率恢复到第一次清洗期水平后再将两药交叉继续用药6周。在基线期和每个治疗期结束时,受试者会接受采血以及血管功能检测,检测前8小时禁食并禁止吸烟、饮酒及咖啡。
     检测项目包括:全自动动脉硬化检测仪(欧姆龙科林VP1000)检测脉搏传导速度(Pulse wave velocity,PWV)及踝臂指数(Ankle-branchial index,ABI);内皮功能诊断仪(SY2000,吉林圣晔尔科技有限公司)检测指尖脉搏容积(PAV);彩色超声诊断仪(PHLIP IE33型,美国)检测肱动脉血流介导的血管扩张功能(Flow mediated dilation,FMD);化学法检测一氧化氮(Nitric oxide,NO);酶联免疫吸附剂测定(Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay,Elisa)法检测血清内皮型一氧化氮合酶(Endothelial nitric oxide synthase,eNOS)、内皮素(Endothelin,ET)及血管性血友病因子(von Willebrand Factor, vWF)。
     2、体外细胞培养实验
     体外培养人脐静脉内皮细胞(Human Umbilical Vein EndothelialCells,HUVEC),进行以下检测:
     2.1化学法检测在eNOS抑制剂Nw-nitro-L-arginine (L-NA)存在或缺失时,氨氯地平及左旋氨氯地平作用25分钟对内皮细胞NO水平的影响。
     2.2化学法检测在0、5、15及25分钟四个时间点,经氨氯地平、左旋氨氯地平或蛋白激酶C(Protein kinase C,PKC)抑制剂Ro31-8220处理后内皮细胞产生NO的水平。
     2.3蛋白质印迹法(Wsetern blot,WB)检测在0、5、15及25分钟四个时间点,经氨氯地平或左旋氨氯地平处理后内皮细胞eNOS在Ser1177、Thr495及PKC磷酸化的程度。
     2.4Wsetern blot法检测在0、5、15及25分钟四个时间点,经PKC抑制剂Ro31-8220处理后内皮细胞eNOS在Ser1177及Thr495磷酸化的程度。结果:
     1临床试验结果:
     1.1经氨氯地平及左旋氨氯地平治疗后,与基线期相比患者收缩压、舒张压及心率均有明显下降,且均有显著的统计学差异(P<0.01);但两种药物相比,收缩压、舒张压及心率数值接近,且无统计学差异(P>0.05)
     1.2与基线期相比,两种药物治疗后PAV、FMD及ABI均有明显增加,均达到统计学差异(P<0.05);PWV均有明显下降,均达到统计学差异(P<0.01);NMD数值变化不大,亦无统计学差异(P>0.05);氨氯地平治疗后与左旋氨氯地平治疗后相比,PAV、FMD、PWV及ABI测值均稍高,但均未达到统计学差异(P>0.05);其中在FMD上两者相比有接近统计学差异的趋势(P=0.053)。
     1.3与基线期相比,两种药物治疗后NO及eNOS均有明显增加,均达到统计学差异(P<0.01);ET-1及vWF均有明显下降,均达到统计学差异(P<0.01);氨氯地平治疗后与左旋氨氯地平治疗后相比,NO及eNOS水平均稍高,ET-1及vWF水平均稍低,但均未达到统计学差异(P>0.05),其中在NO上两者相比有接近统计学差异的趋势(P=0.064)。
     1.4在基线期、氨氯地平治疗后及左旋氨氯地平治疗后这三个节点,PAV与FMD测值均有显著的相关性(P<0.01),氨氯地平治疗后与基线期PAV测值的差值ΔPAV(0.24±0.16、0.18±0.15)及左旋氨氯地平后与基线期FMD测值的差值ΔFMD(2.3±1.7%、1.6±1.2%)亦具有显著的相关性(P<0.01)。对PAV及FMD诊断高血压内皮功能不全进行一致性检验,结果示Kappa=0.647,P<0.001,有统计学意义。
     2体外细胞培养实验结果:
     2.1在eNOS抑制剂Nw-nitro-L-arginine (L-NA,300mmol/l)存在时,氨氯地平及左旋氨氯地平处理25分钟后NO测值与L-NA组相比数值接近,且均无统计学差异(P>0.05);两种药物之间测值相近,亦无统计学差异(P>0.05)。在L-NA缺失时,氨氯地平及左旋氨氯地平处理25分钟后NO测值与对照组相比均有明显升高,有统计学差异(P<0.01),氨氯地平组NO测值高于左旋氨氯地平组,有统计学差异(P<0.05)。
     2.2经氨氯地平(1μmol/l)处理5、15及25分钟后NO水平逐渐增加,在25分钟达到最高值,15及25分钟时NO水平与对照组相比均有明显升高,且均达到统计学差异(P<0.01);经左旋氨氯地平(1μmol/l)处理5、15及25分钟后NO测值均增加,在15分钟达到最高值,5、15及25分钟时NO水平与对照组相比均达到的统计学差异(P<0.01);氨氯地平组与左旋氨氯地平组相比,除5分钟外,15及25分钟时NO水平均是前者较高,其中25分钟时两者达到统计学差异(P<0.05)。内皮细胞经PKC途径抑制剂Ro31-8220(30nmol/l)处理5、15及25分钟后NO测值也逐渐增加,在25分钟达到最高值,15及25分钟时NO测值与对照组相比均有显著的统计学差异(P<0.01)。
     2.3氨氯地平对内皮细胞的刺激引起eNOS在Ser1177磷酸化和Thr495去磷酸化的增长,并且作用在5、15及25分钟逐渐加强,在25分钟达到峰值;左旋氨氯地平对eNOS在Ser1177磷酸化和Thr495去磷酸化作用不大,在5、15及25分钟这三个时间点未表现出明显的趋势。
     2.4氨氯地平可以使PKC本身磷酸化减弱,并且作用在5、15及25分钟逐渐加强,在25分钟达到峰值;左旋氨氯地平对PKC去磷酸化作用不大,在5、15及25分钟这三个时间点未表现出明显的趋势
     2.5PKC抑制剂Ro31-8220对内皮细胞的刺激引起eNOS在Ser1177磷酸化和Thr495去磷酸化的增长,并且作用在5、15及25分钟逐渐加强,在25分钟达到峰值。
     结果小结:
     1、在检测治疗前后高血压患者内皮功能改善上,PAV与FMD具有明显的相关性;在诊断高血压患者内皮功能不全上,PAV与FMD具有较好的一致性。
     2、在取得相似的降压效果时,氨氯地平及左旋氨氯地平均具有良好的内皮保护作用,虽然两药治疗后各项指标相比均无统计学差异,但前者似乎有更好内皮保护作用的趋势。
     3、在体外培养细胞中,氨氯地平及左旋氨氯地平均可以时间依赖性的提高NO水平,左旋氨氯地平组达到峰值较早,但氨氯地平组峰值水平较高。
     4、氨氯地平可通过PKC途径对eNOS在Ser1177及Thr495磷酸化产生影响有从而使eNOS活化,而左旋氨氯地平对PKC影响不大,也不能对eNOS在Ser1177及Thr495的磷酸化程度产生影响。
     结论:
     1、氨氯地平及左旋氨氯地平都通过增加NO水平发挥良好的内皮保护作用,但程度和途径不同。
     2、PAV与FMD具有较好的相关性及一致性,可替代FMD进行内皮功能检测。
Before the development of atherosclerosis morphological changes, changes invascular endothelial function participates the progress of the injury and subsequentclinical complications, and has close relationship with hypertension and othercardiovascular diseases. Dysfunction of vascular endothelial reduces secretion ofvasodilator agent, but increase the vasoconstriction cytokine secretion. That promotesthe proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells, leading to vessel wall thickeningand vascular remodeling, decreased arterial elasticity, increased peripheral resistance,and promote the development of both hypertension and its complications. In addition,the high blood pressure caused by fluid shear stress and endocrine changes in theenvironment can cause Endothelial dysfunction, thus reversing the hypertensionendothelial dysfunction another treatment outside the buck has become a new target.The detection of hypertension endothelial function requires to be non-invasive, easyoperation and quickly. PAV is a new non-invasive way to test the endothelial functionwhen the fingertip detection of endothelial function develop rapidly, but there are norelevant clinical applications reported.
     As a third-generation calcium channel blocker, Amlodipine is one of the mostwidely used antihypertensive drugs in clinical application. Amlodipine is a racemicmixture of S(-)-amlodipine and the R(-)-amlodipine constituted the outer to the ratioof1:1, which antihypertensive effect mainly come from L-body and effect is1000-time stronger than that of R(-)-amlodipine. It is not clear that amlodipine has anadditional protective effect of endothelial functionit compared with S(-)-amlodipinebecause of the presence of R(-)-amlodipine.
     A clinical study was carried out to examine whether amlodipine andS(-)-amlodipine have similar protective effects on vascular endothelial function inaddition to the similar antihypertensive effects, and we explored the association andconsistency of PAV and FMD on testing of endothelial function in patitents withhypertension. Further, we explore both its protective effect of endothelial function byaffecting the level of NO and the mechanisms in cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells.
     Method
     1、Clinical trials
     We took a randomized and crossover design, chosen24cases of patients withessential hypertension and randomly divided into Group A and Group B,the formertaking amlodipine besylate5mg/d (Pfizer),the latter taking the benzenesulfonicS(-)-amlodipine of2.5mg/d(Shi Huida). The two groups were both early morningmedication and went through wash-out period about2weeks after6weekstreatment,then continued the treatment for6weeks crossing the two drugs after heartrate and blood pressure of patients returned to the level of the first wash-out period.Subjects, who were fasting and Prohibited smoking, drinking and coffee the nightbefore detection, will accept the detection of blood collection,and vascularfunction in the time of baseline and the end of each treatment.
     Test items include:Pulse wave velocity (PWV) and Ankle-branchial index(ABI)were tested by Omron Colin VP1000. Pulse amplitude volume(PAV)was testedby SY2000(Jilin saintyear company). Flow mediated dilation(FMD) of brachialartery was tested by Philips IE33(America). Nitric oxide(NO)was tested by Griessmethod. Endothelial nitric oxide synthas(eeNOS),Endothelin(ET)andvon WillebrandFactor(vWF)were tested by Elisa.
     2、Cell culture experiment
     We cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells in vitro for the followingchecks:
     2.1Griess method had been used to detect the endothelial cell NO levels at25minutes that affected by amlodipine or S(-)-amlodipine on presence or absence of theeNOS inhibitor Nw-nitro-L-arginine (L-NA).
     2.2Griess method had been used to detect respectively the endothelial cell NOlevels at0,5,15,25minutes that treated by amlodipine, S(-)-amlodipine or proteinkinase C(PKC)inhibitor Ro31-8220.
     2.3Wsetern blot(WB) had been used to detect respectively degree ofphosphorylation of eNOS Ser1177、eNOS Thr495and PKC in endothelial cells that thattreated by amlodipine or S(-)-amlodipine at0,5,15,25minutes.
     2.4Wsetern blot(WB) had been used to detect respectively degree of phosphorylation of eNOS Ser1177and Thr495in endothelial cells that treated by proteinkinase C(PKC)inhibitor Ro31-8220at0,5,15,25minutes.
     Result:
     1Results of clinical trials
     1.1After amlodipine and S(-)-amlodipine treatments, the patients’ SBP, DBPand HR significantly decreased compared with baseline data (P<0.01). However,there were no significant differences between the data of amlodipine andS(-)-amlodipine groups (P>0.05).
     1.2Compared with baseline,after treatment of the two drugs the PAV,FMD andABI were significantly increased,and there was a significant difference (P<0.05);PWV were significantly reduced, there were statistically significant (P<0.01);NMDlittle change in value, no significant difference (P>0.05)。In the amlodipine group andL-amlodipine group,PAV, FMD, PWV and ABI measured values are slightlyhigher,but it did not reach a statistically significant difference (P>0.05),Howevercomparing the two in the FMD approached statistical differences (P=0.053).
     1.3Compared with baseline,NO and eNOS have increased significantly aftertreatment of the two drugs,ang it was a significant difference(P<0.01);ET-1andvEGF were significantly reduced reach statistical significance (P<0.01). In theamlodipine group and S(-)-amlodipine group,NO and NOS were slightly higher, ET-1and vWF levels were slightly lower,but it did not reach a statistically significantdifference (P>0.05),However comparing the two in the NO approached statisticaldifferences (P=0.064).
     1.4At baseline,the time after the treatment of amlodipine orS(-)-amlodipine,PAV was strongly associated with FMD(P<0.01),and the differencebetween the baseline and the treatment ΔPAV(0.24±0.16、0.18±0.15)was stronglyassociated with ΔFMD(2.3±1.7%、1.6±1.2%). The consistency test of diagnostic testswas done between PAV and FMD, the result is Kappa=0.647,P<0.001.
     2Results of cell culture experiment:
     2.1In the presence of the eNOS inhibitor L-NA (300mmol/l), the NO level ofHUVECs treated with amlodipine and S(-)-amlodipine for25minutes was similar to the L-NA group, showing no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). The NOlevel of HUVECs was also similar between amlodipine and S(-)-amlodipine groupswith no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). In the absence of L-NA, the NOlevel of HUVECs treated with amlodipine and S(-)-amlodipine for25minutes wassignificantly higher than the control group (P<0.01). In addition, the NO level ofHUVECs was obviously higher in the amlodipine group than in the S(-)-amlodipinegroup, showing statistically significant differences (P<0.05).
     2.2After amlodipine treatment (1μmol/l) for5,15, and25minutes, the NO levelof HUVECs gradually increased and peaked at25minutes. As compared with that ofcontrol group, the NO level of HUVECs in the amlodipine group was higher at15min and25minutes, showing statistically significant differences (P<0.01). AfterS(-)-amlodipine treatment (1μmol/l) for5,15, and25minutes, the NO level ofHUVECs increased and peaked at15minutes. As compared with that of control group,the NO level of HUVECs in the S(-)-amlodipine group was significantly higher at5,15, and25minutes (P<0.01). Data comparison between the amlodipine andS(-)-amlodipine groups showed that the NO level of HUVECs was higher in theformer at15and25minutes but not5minutes, with statistically significant differenceobserved at25minutes only (P<0.05). After Ro31-8220treatment (30nmol/l) for5,15and25minutes, the NO level of HUVECs gradually increased and peaked at25minutes. As compared with control group, the NO level of HUVECs treated with Ro31-8220was significantly different at15and25minutes (P<0.01).
     2.3The stimulation of amlodipine in endothelial cells induced the increase ofSer1177phosphorylation and Thr495dephosphorylation at eNOS, the effect increasedwith the increase in culture time from5,15to25minutes, and it reached the highestvalue at25minutes; S(-)-amlodipine did not affect the phosphorylation of eNOSSer1177and Thr495at5,15or25minutes.
     2.4The stimulation of amlodipine induced the decrease of the phosphorylation ofPKC, the effect increased with the increase in culture time from5,15to25minutes,and it reached the highest value at25minutes; S(-)-amlodipine did not affect thephosphorylation of PKC at5,15or25minutes.
     2.5The stimulation of PKC inhibitor Ro31-8220in endothelial cells induced theincrease of Ser1177phosphorylation and Thr495dephosphorylation at eNOS,the effectincreased with the increase in culture time from5,15to25minutes, and it reached the highest value at25minutes
     Summary of results:
     1、There is significant correlation between PAV and FMD in detecting improvedendothelial function before and after the treatment of the hypertension; PAV has goodconsistency with FMD in the diagnosis of hypertension patients with endothelialdysfunction.
     2、With similar antihypertensive effect, both amlodipine and S(-)-amlodipinehave a good protective effects of endothelial cells. Though there is no significantdifference between the two drugs at these tests, amlodipine appears to have the trendof having a better endothelial protective effect.
     2、 In culturedendothelial cells, amlodipine and S(-)-amlodipine both timedependently increase the level of NO. The level of NO in S(-)-amlodipine groupreached the highest value earlier but which was higher in amlodipine group.
     4、 Amlodipine can activate eNOS though affecting the phosphorylation ofeNOS Ser1177and Thr495by PKC,but S(-)-amlodipine has little effect on thephosphorylation of PKC and the phosphorylation of eNOS Ser1177and Thr495.
     Conclusion
     1、Amlodipine and S(-)-amlodipine both have good effect on the protection ofendothelial cells through increasing the level of NO, but the degree and the pathwayare different.
     2、There are good correlation and consistency between PAV and FMD,PAV cantest the endothelial function instead of FMD.
引文
[1]Whitworth JA.2003World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society ofHypertension(ISH) statement on management of hypertension [J]. J Hypertens2003;21:1983–1992.
    [2]Bangalore S,Messerli FH, Kostis JB, et al. Cardiovascular protection usingbetablockers: a critical review of the evidence[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,50:563-72.
    [3]Williams B, Lacy PS, Thom SM, et al. Differential impact ofbloodpressure-lowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes:principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) study[J].Circulation,2006,113:1213-25.
    [4]Modena MG, Bonetti L, Coppi F, et al. Prognostic role of reversible endotheliald-ysfunction in hypertensive postmenopausal women[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2002,40:505–510.
    [5]Kitta Y, Obata JE, Nakamura T, et al. Persistent impairment of endothelialvasomotor function has a negative impact on outcome in patients with coronaryartery disease[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol2009,53:323–330.
    [6]Widlansky ME, Gokce N, Keaney JF Jr, et al. The clinical implications ofendothelial dysfunction[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2003,42:1149–1160.
    [7]Rubanyi GM. The role of endothelium in cardiovascular homeostasis anddiseases[J]. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol,1993,22:S1–S14.
    [8]Kawamoto A, Gwon HC, Iwaguro H, et al. Therapeutic potential of ex vivoexpanded endothelial progenitor cells for myocardial ischemia[J]. Circulation.2001,103:634–637.
    [9]Vanhoutte PM. How to assess endothelial function in human blood vessels[J]. JHypertension1999,17:1047-1058.
    [10]Simionescu M. Implications of early structural functional changes in theendothelium for vascular disease[J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol.2007,27(2):266-74.
    [11]Vita JA, Keaney JF. Endothelial function: a barometer for cardiovascular risk[J]?Circulation,2002,106:640-642.
    [12]Furchgott RF, Zawadzki JV. The obligatory role of the endothelial cells in therelaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetylcholine[J]. Nature,1980,288:373–376.
    [13]Griendling KK, FitzGerald GA. Oxidative stress and cardiovascular injury: Part I:Basic mechanisms and in vivo monitoring of ROS[J]. Circulation,2003,108:1912–1916.
    [14]Chen X, Touyz RM, Park JB, et al. Antioxidant effects of vitamins C and E areassociated with altered activation of vascular NADPH oxidase and superoxidedismutase in stroke-prone SHR[J]. Hypertension,2001,38:606–611.
    [15]Libby P, Ridker PM, Maseri A. Inflammation and atherosclerosis[J]. Circulation2002,105:1135–43.
    [16]Ross R. Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease[J]. N Engl J Med,1999,340:115–26.
    [17]Gokce N, Keaney JF Jr., Menzoian JO, et al. Risk stratification for postoperativecardiovascular events via noninvasive assessment of endothelial function[J].Circulation,2002,105:1567–72.
    [18]Panza JA, Casino PR, Kilcoyne CM, et al. Impaired endothelium-dependentvasodilation in patients with essential hypertension: evidence that the abnormalityis not at the muscarinic receptor level[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,1994,23:1610–1616.
    [19]Taddei S, Virdis A, Ghiadoni L, et al. The role of endothelium in humanhyperte-nsion[J]. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens,1998,7:203–209.
    [20]John S, Schmieder RE. Impaired endothelial function in arterial hypertension andhypercholesterolemia: potential mechanisms and differences[J]. J Hypertens,2000,18:363–374.
    [21]Zhang C, Hein TW, Wang W, et al. Upregulation of vascular arginase inhypertension decreases nitric oxide-mediated dilation of coronary arterioles[J].Hypertension,2004,44(6):935-43.
    [22]Taddei S, Virdis A, Ghiadoni L, et al. Vitamin C improves endothelium-dependentvasodilation by restoring nitric oxide activity in essential hypertension[J].Circulation.1998Jun9,97(22):2222-9.
    [23]Nitenberg A. Hypertension, endothelialdysfunction and cardiovascular risk[J].ArchMalCoeurVaiss,2006,99:915-921.
    [24]VinodMAA. Cardiovascular effects of asymmetric dimethy larginine[J].Circulation,2004,109(25):327.
    [25]Daniele V, Elena D,Agostino V, et a.l Endothelium-dependent contractions andendothelial dysfunction in human hypertension[J]. Br J Pharmacol,2009June,157(4):527–536.
    [26]Penna C, Rastaldo R, Mancardi D, et al. Review Effect of endothelins on thecardiovascular system[J]. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown),2006Sep;7(9):645-52.
    [27]Wallace SM, Yasmin L, McEniery CM, et a.l Isolated systolic hypertension ischaracterized by increased aortic stiffness and endothelial dysfunction[J].Hypertension,2007,50:228-233.
    [28]Panza JA, Quyyumi AA, Brush JE, et al. Abnormal endothelium-dependentvascular relaxation in patients with essential hypertension[J]. N Engl J Med1990,323:22–27.
    [29]Panza JA, Casino PR, Kilcoyne CM, et al. Role of endothelium-derived nitricoxide in the abnormal endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation of patients withessential hypertension[J]. Circulation,1993,87:1468–1474.
    [30]Panza JA, Garcia CE, Kilcoyne CM, et al. Impaired endothelium-dependentvasodilation in patients with essential hypertension: evidence that nitric oxideabnormality is not localized to a single signal transduction pathway[J].Circulation,1995,91:1732–1738.
    [31]Benjamin EJ, Larson MG, Keyes MJ, et al. Clinical correlates and heritability offlow-mediated dilation in the community: the Framingham Heart Study[J].Circulation,2004,109:613–619.
    [32]Sander M, Chavoshan B, Victor RG. A large blood pressure-raising effect of nitricoxide synthase inhibition in humans[J]. Hypertension,1999,33:937–942.
    [33]Rossi R, Chiurlia E, Nuzzo A, et al. Flow-mediated vasodilation and the risk ofd-eveloping hypertension in healthy postmenopausal women[J]. J Am CollCardiol,2004,44:1636–1640.
    [34]Jurva JW, Phillips SA, Syed AQ, et al. The effect of exertional hypertensionevoked by weight lifting on vascular endothelial function[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2006,48(3):588–589.
    [35]Juonala M, Viikari JS, Ronnemaa T, et al. Elevated blood pressure in adolescentboys predicts endothelial dysfunction: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young FinnsStudy[J]. Hypertension,2006,48:424–430.
    [36]Shimbo D, Muntner P, Mann D, et al. Endothelial dysfunction and the risk ofhypertension: the MultiEthnic Study of Atherosclerosis[J]. Hypertension,2010,55:1210–1216.
    [37]Mancini GB, Henry GC, Macaya C, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzymeinhibition with quinapril improves endothelial vasomotor dysfunction in patientswith coronary artery disease. The TREND(Trial on Reversing ENdothelialDysfunction) Study[J]. Circulation,1996,94:258–265.
    [38]Prasad A, Husain S, Quyyumi AA. Abnormal flow-mediated epicardialvasomotion in human coronary arteries is improved by angiotensin-convertingenzyme inhibition: a potential role of bradykinin[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,1999,33:796–804.
    [39]Higashi Y, Sasaki S, Nakagawa K, et al. A comparison of angiotensin-convertingenzyme inhibitors, calcium antagonists, beta-blockers and diuretic agents onreactive hyperemia in patients with essential hypertension: a multicenter study[J].J Am Coll Cardiol,2000,35:284–291.
    [40]Prasad A, Tupas-Habib T, Schenke WH, et al. Acute and chronic angiotensin-1receptor antagonism reverses endothelial dysfunction in atherosclerosis[J].Circulation,2000,101:2349–2354.
    [41]Tzemos N, Lim PO, MacDonald TM. Nebivolol reverses endothelial dysfunctionin essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study[J].Circulation,2001,104:511–514.
    [42]Ghiadoni L, Huang Y, Magagna A, et al. Effect of acute blood pressure reductionon endothelial function in the brachial artery of patients with essentialhypertension[J]. J Hypertens,2001,19(3Pt2):547–551.
    [43]Modena MG, Bonetti L, Coppi F, et al. Prognostic role of reversible endothelialdysfunction in hypertensive postmenopausal women[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2002,40:505–510.
    [44]Kopkan L, Majid DS. Enhanced superoxide activity modulates renal function inNO-deficient hypertensive rats[J]. Hypertension,2006,47:568–572.
    [45]Majid DS, Kopkan L. Nitric oxide and superoxide interactions in the kidney andtheir implication in the development of salt-sensitive hypertension[J]. Clin ExpPharmacol Physiol,2007,34(9):946–952.
    [46]Smith SC Jr, Anderson JL, Cannon RO3rd, et al. AHA. CDC/AHA workshop onmarkers of inflammation and cardiovascular disease: application to clinical andpu-blic health practice: report from the clinical practice discussiongroup[J]. Circulation,2004,110: e550–e553.
    [47]Furchgott RF, Zawadzki JV. The obligatory role of endothelial cells in therelaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetylcholine[J]. Nature,1980,288(5789):373-6.
    [48]Knowles RG, Moncada S. Nitric oxide as a signal in blood vessels[J]. TrendsBiochem Sci,1992,17(10):399-402.
    [49]Moshage H, Kok B, Huizenga JR, et al. Nitrite and nitrate determinations inplasma: a critical evaluation[J]. Clin Chem,1995,41(6Pt1):892-6.
    [50]Green LC, Wagner DA, Glogowski J, et al. Analysis of nitrate, nitrite, and
    [15N]nitrate in biological fluids[J]. Anal Biochem,1982,126(1):131-8.
    [51]Tsikas D. Analysis of nitrite and nitrate in biological fluids by assays based on theGriess reaction: appraisal of the Griess reaction in the Larginine/nitric oxide areaof research[J]. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci,2007,851(1-2):51-70.
    [52]Brunner F, Bras-Silva C, Cerdeira AS, et al. Cardiovascular endothelins: essentialregulators of cardiovascular homeostasis[J]. Pharmacol Ther,2006,111(2):508-31.
    [53]Lerman A, Edwards BS, Hallett JW, et al. Circulating and tissue endothelinimmu-noreactivity in advanced atherosclerosis[J]. N Engl J Med,1991,325(14):997–1001.
    [54]Lerman A, Holmes DR Jr, Bell MR, et al. Endothelin in coronary endothelialdysfunction and early atherosclerosis in humans[J]. Circulation,1995,92(9):2426–2431.
    [55]Vaughan DE. PAI-1and atherothrombosis[J]. J Thromb Haemost,2005,3:1879–1883.
    [56]Sadler JE. von Willebrand factor: two sides of a coin[J]. J Thromb Haemost,2005,3(8):1702-9.
    [57]Wagner DD. Cell biology of von Willebrand factor[J]. Annu Rev Cell Biol,1990,6:217-46.
    [58]Sadler JE. Biochemistry and genetics of von Willebrand factor. Annu RevBiochem,1998,67:395-424.
    [59]Meyer AA, Kundt G, Steiner M, et al. Impaired flow-mediated vasodilation,carotid artery intima-media thickening, and elevated endothelial plasma markersin obese children: the impact of cardiovascular risk factors[J]. Pediatrics,2006,117:1560–1567.
    [60]Mannucci PM. Von Willebrand factor: a marker of endothelial damage[J]?Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol,1998,18:1359–1362.
    [61]Ridker PM, Brown NJ, Vaughan DE, et al. Established and emerging plasmabiomarkers in the prediction of first atherothrombotic events[J]. Circulation,2004,109:IV6–IV19.
    [62]Rifai N, Ridker PM. Inflammatory markers and coronary heart disease[J]. CurrOpin Lipidol,2002,13:383–389.
    [63]Hwang SJ, Ballantyne CM, Sharrett AR, et al. Circulating adhesion moleculesVCAM-1, ICAM-1, and E-selectin in carotid atherosclerosis and incidentcoronary hear-t disease cases: the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities (ARIC)study[J]. Circulati-on,1997,16:96:4219–4225.
    [64]Ridker PM, Hennekens CH, Roitman-Johnson B, et al. Plasma concentration ofsoluble intercellular adhesion molecule1and risks of future myocardial infarctionin apparently healthy men[J]. Lancet,1998,10:351:88–92.
    [65]Cox DA, Vita JA, Treasure CB, et al. Atherosclerosis impairs flow-mediateddilation of coronary arteries in humans[J]. Circulation,1989,80:458–465.
    [66]Ludmer PL, Selwyn AP, Shook TL, et al. Paradoxical vasoconstriction induced byacetylcholine in atherosclerotic coronary arteries[J]. N Engl J Med,1986,315:1046–1051.
    [67]Hasdai D, Lerman A. The assessment of endothelial function in the cardiaccatheterization laboratory in patients with risk factors for atherosclerotic coronaryartery disease[J]. Herz,1999,24(7):544–547.
    [68]Subodh Verma, Michael R, Buchanan, et al. Endothelial Function Testing as aBiomarker of Vascular Disease[J]. Circulation,2003,108:2054-2059.
    [69]Tuttle JL, Nachreiner RD, Bhuller AS, et al. Shear level influences resistanceartery remodeling: wall dimensions, cell density, and eNOS expression[J]. Am JPhysiol Heart Circ Physiol,2001,281:H1380–H1389.
    [70]Vallance P, Collier J, Moncada S. Effects of endothelium-derived nitric oxide onperipheral arteriolar tone in man[J]. Lancet,1989,2:997–1000.
    [71]Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Gooch VM, et al. Noninvasive detection ofendothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk ofatherosclerosis[J]. Lancet,1992,340:1111–1115.
    [72]Thijssen DH, Black MA, Pyke KE, et al. Assessment of flow-mediated dilation inhumans:a methodological and physiologicalguideline[J]. Am J Physiol Heart CircPhysiol,2011Jan,300(1):H2-12.
    [73]Fathi R, Haluska B, Isbel N, et al. The relative importance of vascular structureand function in predicting cardiovascular events[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2004,43:616–623.
    [74]Frick M, Suessenbacher A, Alber HF, et al. Prognostic value of brachial arteryendothelial function and wall thickness. J Am Coll Cardiol,2005,46:1006–1010.
    [75]Yeboah J, Crouse JR, Hsu FC, et al. Brachial flow-mediated dilation predictsincident cardiovascular events in older adults: the Cardiovascular HealthStudy[J]. Circulation,2007,115:2390–2397.
    [76]Dawson EA, Whyte GP, Black MA, et al. Changes in vascular and cardiacfunction after prolonged strenuous exercise in humans[J]. J Appl Physiol,105,2008:1562–1568.
    [77]Harris RA, Padilla J, Hanlon KP, et al. The flow-mediated dilation response toacute exercise in overweight active and inactive men[J]. Obesity,2008,16:578–584.
    [78]Karatzi K, Papamichael C, Karatzis E, et al. Acute smoke-induced endothelialdysfunction is more prolonged in smokers than in non-smokers[J]. Int J Cardiol,2007,120:404–406.
    [79]Black MA, Cable NT, Thijssen DH, et al. Importance of measuring the timecourse of flow-mediated dilatation in humans[J]. Hypertension,2008,51:203–210.
    [80]Padilla J, Johnson BD, Newcomer SC, et al. Adjusting flow-mediated dilation forshear stress stimulus allows demonstration of endothelial dysfunction in apopulation with moderate cardiovascular risk[J]. J Vasc Res,2009,46:592–600.
    [81]Parker BA, Trehearn TL, Meendering JR. Pick your Poiseuille: normalizing theshear stimulus in studies of flow-mediated dilation[J]. J Appl Physiol,2009,107:1357–1359.
    [82]Thijssen DH, Bullens LM, van Bemmel MM, et al. Does arterial shear explain themagnitude of flow-mediated dilation? A comparison between young and olderhumans[J]. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol,2009,296:H57–H64.
    [83]Tomiyama H, Matsumoto C, Yamada J, et al. The relationships of cardiovasculardisease risk factors to flow-mediated dilatation in Japanese subjects free ofcardiovascular disease[J]. Hypertens Res,2008,31:2019–2025.
    [84]Bonetti PO, Barsness GW, Keelan PC, et al. Enhanced external counterpulsationimproves endothelial function in patients with symptomatic coronary arterydisease[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2003,41(10):1761–1768.
    [85]Hamburg NM, Keyes MJ, Larson MG, et al. Cross-sectional relations of digitalvascular function to cardiovascular risk factors in the Framingham Heart Study[J].Circulation,2008,117(19):2467–2474.
    [86]Targonski PV, Bonetti PO, Pumper GM, et al. Coronaryendothelial dysfunction isassociated with an increased risk of cerebrovascular events[J]. Circulation,2003,107(22):2805–2809.
    [87]Kuvin JT, Patel AR, Sliney KA, et al. Assessment of peripheral vascularendothelial function with finger arterial pulse wave amplitude[J]. Am Heart J,2003,146(1):168–174.
    [88]Rubinshtein R, Kuvin JT, Soffler M, et al. Assessment of endothelial function bynon-invasive peripheral arterial tonometry predicts late cardiovascular adverseevents[J]. Eur Heart J,2010,31(9):1142–1148.
    [89]Patvardhan EA, Heffernan KS, Ruan JM, et al. Assessment of vascularendothelial function with peripheral arterial tonometry: information at yourfingertips[J]? Cardiol Rev,2010,18(1):20–28.
    [90]Kuvin JT, Mammen A, Mooney P, et al. Assessment of peripheral vascularendothelial function in the ambulatory setting[J]. Vasc Med,2007,12(1):13–16.
    [91]Gul KM, Ahmadi N, Wang Z, et al. Digital thermal monitoring of vascularfunction: a novel tool to improve cardiovascular risk assessment[J]. Vasc Med,2009,14:143–148.
    [92]Ahmadi N, Usman N, Shim J, et al. Vascular dysfunction measured by fingertipthermal monitoring is associated with the extent of myocardial perfusion defect[J].J Nucl Cardiol,2009,16:431–439.
    [93]Yvonne-Tee GB, Rasool AH, Halim AS, et al. Method optimization on the use ofpostocclusive hyperemia model to assess microvascular function[J]. ClinHemorheol Microcirc,2008,38:119–133.
    [94]Newton DJ, Khan F, Belch JJ. Assessment of microvascular endothelial functionin human skin[J]. Clin Sci,2001,101:567-572.
    [95]Caballero AE, Arora S, Saouaf R, et al. Microvascular and macrovascularreactivity is reduced in subjects at risk for type2diabetes[J]. Diabetes,1999,48:1856–1862.
    [96]Rossi M, Taddei S, Fabbri A, et al. Cutaneous vasodilation to acetylcholine inpatients with essential hypertension[J]. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol.,1997,29:406–411.
    [97]Jadhav ST, Ferrell WR, Petrie JR, et al. Microvascular function, metabolicsyndrome, and novel risk factor status in women with cardiac syndrome X[J]. AmJ Cardiol,2006,97:1727–1731.
    [98]Khan F, Litchfield SJ, Stonebridge PA, et al. Lipid-lowering and skin vascularresponses in patients with hypercholesterolaemia and peripheral arterialobstructive disease[J]. Vasc Med,1999,4:233–238.
    [99]Cracowski JL, Minson CT, Salvat-Melis M, et al. Methodological issues in theassessment of skin microvascular endothelial function in humans[J]. TrendsPharmacol Sci,2006,27:503–508.
    [100]Ferrell WR, Ramsay JE, Brooks N, et al. Elimination of electrically inducediontophoretic artefacts: implications for non-invasive assessment of peripheralmicrovascular function[J]. J Vasc Res,2002,39:447–455.
    [101]Ramsay JE, Ferrell WR, Greer IA, et al. Factors critical to iontophoreticassessment of vascular reactivity: implications for clinical studies of endothelialdysfunction[J]. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol,2002,39:9–17.
    [102]Petrie JR, Ueda S, Morris AD, et al. How reproducible is bilateral forearmplethysmography[J]? Br J Clin Pharmacol,1998,45(2):131–139.
    [103]Roberts DH, Tsao Y, Breckenridge AM. The reproducibility of limb blood flowmeasurements in human volunteers at rest and after exercise by usingmercury-in-Silastic strain gauge plethysmography under standardizedconditions[J]. Clin Sci (Lond),1986,70(6):635–638.
    [104]Heitzer T, Baldus S, von KY, et al. Systemic endothelial dysfunction as an earlypredictor of adverse outcome in heart failure[J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol,2005,25:1174–1179.
    [105]De Vriese AS, Verbeuren TJ, Van de Voorde J, et al. Endothelial dysfunction indiabetes[J]. Br J Pharmacol,2000,130:963–974.
    [106]Liang YL, Shiel LM, Teede H, et al. Effects of blood pressure, smoking, andtheir interaction on carotid artery structure and function[J]. Hypertension,2001,37:6–11.
    [107]Tomiyama H, Yamashina A. Non-Invasive Vascular Function Tests: TheirPathophys-iological Background and Clinical Application[J]. Circ J,2010,74(1):24-33.
    [108]Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Asmar R, et al. Aortic stiffness is an independentpredictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients[J].Hypertension,2001,37:1236–1241.
    [109]Boutouyrie P, Tropeano AI, Asmar R, et al. Aortic stiffness is an independentpredictor of primary coronary events in hypertensive patients: a longitudinalstudy[J]. Hypertension,2002,39:10–15.
    [110]Yasmin, McEniery CM, Wallace S, et al. C-reactive protein is associated witharterial stiffness in apparently healthy individuals[J]. Arterioscler Thromb VascBiol,2004,24:969-74.
    [111]2007Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Forcefor the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society ofHypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)[J]. JHypertens,2007,25:1105–1187.
    [112]Sugawara J, Hayashi K, Yokoi T, et al. Brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity: Anindex of central arterial stiffness[J]? J Hum Hypertens,2005,19:401–406.
    [113]Mackenzie IS, Wilkinson IB, Cockcroft JR. Assessment of arterial stiffness inclinical practice[J]. QJM,2002,95:67–74.
    [114]Kullo IJ, Malik AR. Arterial ultrasonography and tonometry as adjuncts tocardiovascular risk stratification[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,49:1413-1426.
    [115]O’Rourke MF, Hashimoto J. Mechanical factors in arterial aging: A clinicalperspective[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2007,50:1–13.
    [116]Najeeb AS, Minghui Z. Arterial stiffness: a brief review[J]. Acta PharmacolSin,2010October,31(10):1267–1276.
    [117]Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, et al. Expert consensus document onarterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications[J]. Eur Heart J,2006,27:2588–605.
    [118]Wilkinson IB, Qasem A, McEniery CM, et al. Nitric oxide regulates local arterialdistensibility in vivo[J]. Circulation,2002,105:213-7.
    [119]Wilkinson IB, MacCallum H, Cockcroft JR, et al. Inhibition of basal nitric oxidesynthesis increases aortic augmentation index and pulse wave velocity in vivo[J].Br J Clin Pharmacol,2002,53:189-92.
    [120]Kingwell BA, Waddell TK, Medley TL, et al. Large artery stiffness predictsischemic threshold in patients with coronary artery disease[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2002,40:773–779.
    [121]London GM, Blacher J, Pannier B, et al. Arterial wave reflections and survival inend-stage renal failure[J]. Hypertension,2001,38:434–438.
    [122]Wilson AM, O’Neal D, Nelson CL, et al. Comparison of arterial assessments inlow and high vascular disease risk groups[J]. Am J Hypertens,2004,17:285-91.
    [123]Chowienczyk P, Kelly R, MacCallum H, et al. Photophlesymographicassessment of pulse wave reflection: blunted response to endotheliumdependentbeta2-adrenergic vasodilation in type II diabetes mellitus[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,1999,34:2007–14.
    [124]Ferro A, Queen LR, Priest RM, et al. Activation of nitric oxide synthase by beta2-adrenoceptors in human umbilical vein endothelium in vitro[J]. Br J Pharmacol,1999,126:1872–1880.
    [125]Sackner MA, Gummels E, Adams JA. Nitric oxide is released into circulationwith whole-body,periodic acceleration[J]. Chest,2005,127:30–39.
    [126]Hlimonenko I, Meigas K, Vahisalu R. Waveform analysis of peripheral pulsewave detected in the fingertip with photoplethysmograph[J]. Measure Sci Rev,2003,3:49–52.
    [127]Millasseau SC, Kelly RP, Ritter JM, et al. Determination of age-related increasesin large artery stiffness by digital pulse contour analysis[J]. Clin Sci(Lond),2002,103:371–377.
    [128]Meaume S, Benetos A, Henry OF, et al. Aortic pulse wave velocity predictscardiovascular mortality in subjects>70years of age[J]. Arterioscler ThrombVasc Biol,2001,21:2046–2050.
    [129]Laurent S, Katsahian S, Fassot C, et al. Aortic stiffness is an independentpredictor of fatal stroke in essential hypertension[J]. Stroke,2003,34:1203–1206.
    [130]Cohn JN, Finkelstein S, McVeigh GE, et al. Noninvasive pulse wave analysis forthe early detection of vascular disease[J]. Hypertension,1995,26:503-8.
    [131]Manning TS, Shykoff BE, Izzo JL Jr. Validity and reliability of diastolic pulsecontour analysis (windkessel model) in humans[J]. Hypertension,2002,39:963-8.
    [132]McVeigh GE, Burns DE, Finkelstein SM, et al. Reduced vascular compliance asa marker for essential hypertension[J]. Am J Hypertens,1991,4:245–251.
    [133]McVeigh GE, Bratteli CW, Morgan DJ, et al. Age-related abnormalities inarterial compliance identified by pressure pulse contour analysis: aging andarterial compliance[J]. Hypertension,1999,33:1392–1398.
    [134]Cohn JN, Finkelstein S, McVeigh G, et al. Noninvasive pulse wave analysis forthe early detection of vascular disease[J]. Hypertension,1995,26:503–508.
    [135]McVeigh GE, Morgan DJ, Finkelstein SM, et al. Vascular abnormalitiesassociated with long-term cigarette smoking identified by arterial waveformanalysis[J]. Am J Med,1997,102:227–231.
    [136]胡大一.重视踝臂指数,关注下肢外周动脉病[J].中国医药导刊,2005,7(1):29.
    [137]Ouriel K, McDonnell AE, Metz CE, et al. Critical Evaluation of Stress Testing inthe Diagnosis of Peripheral Vascular Disease[J]. Surgery,1982,91:686-693.
    [138]Kenneth O. Peripheral arterial disease[J]. Lancet,2001,358:1257-1264.
    [139]Anand V, Doobay, Sonia S, et al. Sensitivity and Specificity of the Ankle-Brachial Index to Predict Future Cardiovascular Outcomes:A SystematicReview[J]. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol,2005,25:1463-1469.
    [140]Stefan Lange, Hans Joachim, Trampisch, et al. Excess1-yeas cardiovascular riskin elderly primary care patients with a low ankle-brachial index(ABI)and highhomocysteine level[J]. Atherosclerosis,2005,178:351-357.
    [141] Hooi JD, Kester AD, Stoffers HE, et al. Asymptomatic peripheral arterialocclusive disease predicted cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in a7-yearfollow-up study[J]. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,2004,57:294-300.
    [142]Jorgensen B, Simonsen S, Endresen K, et al. Restenosis and clinical outcome inpatients treated with amlodipine after angioplasty:results from the coronaryangioplasty amlodipine restenosis study(CAPARES)[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2000,35(3):592–599.
    [143]Sever PS, Poulter NR, Elliott WJ, et al. Blood pressure reduction is not the onlydeterminant of outcome[J]. Circulation,2006,113(23):2754-2774.
    [144]Formica RN, Friedman AL, Lorber MI, et al. A randomized trial comparinglosartanwith amlodipine as initial therapy for hypertension in the earlypost-transplant period[J]. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation,2006,21(5):1389-1394.
    [145]Bojarski J. Stereoselective chromatography of cardiovascular drugs: anupdate[J].J Biochem Biophys Methods,2002,54(1/3):197-220.
    [146]John E, Arrowsmith SF, Campbell PE, et al. Long-acting dihydropyridinecalcium antagonists1,2-alkoxymethyl derivatives incorporating basicsubstituents[J]. J MedChem,1986,29(9):1696-702.
    [147]Zhang XP, Loke KE, Mital S, et al. Paradoxical release of nitric oxide by anL-type calcium channel antagonist,the R+enantiomer of amlodipine[J]. JCardiovasc Pharmacol,2002,39:208-214.
    [148]Lanfen H, Leitold M. Enantioselective disposition of oral amlodipine in healthyvolunteers[J]. Chirality,1994,6:531-536.
    [149]Basile J. The role of existing and newer calcium channel blockers in thetreatment of hypertension[J]. J Clin Hypertens,2004,6:621–9.
    [150]Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group.Major outcomes in high-risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic: TheAntihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial(ALLHAT)[J]. JAMA,2002,288:2981–97.
    [151]Julius S, Kjeldsen SE, Weber M, et al. Outcomes in hypertensive patients at highcardiovascular risk treated with regimens based on valsartan or amlodipine: theVALUE randomised trial[J]. Lancet,2004,363:2022–31.
    [152]Dahl f B, Sever PS, Poulter NR, et al. Prevention of CV events withantihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versusatenolol adding bendrofl umethiazide as required, in the AngloScandinavianCardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): amulticenter randomized controlled trial[J]. Lancet,2005,366:895–906.
    [153]Kim SA, Park S, Chung N, et al. Efficacy and safety profiles of a newS(-)-amlodipine nicotinate formulation versus racemic amlodipine besylate inadult Korean patients with mild to moderate hypertension: an8-week,multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, phase III,noninferiority clinical trial[J]. Clin Ther,2008May,30(5):845-57.
    [154]Kim BH, Kim JR, Kim MG, et al.Pharmacodynamic (hemodynamic) andpharmacokinetic comparisons of S(-)-amlodipine gentisate andracemateamlodipine besylate in healthy Korean male volunteers: twodouble-blind, randomized, two-period, two-treatment, two-sequence,double-dummy, single-dose crossover studies[J],2010Jan,32(1):193-205.
    [155]Oh GC, Lee HY, Kang HJ, et al. Quantification of pedal edema during treatmentwith S(-)-amlodipine nicotinate versus amlodipine besylate in female Koreanpatients with mild to moderate hypertension: a12-week, multicenter, randomized,double-blind, active-controlled, phase IV clinical trial[J]. Clin Ther,2012Sep,34(9):1940-7.
    [156]Sierkova VK, Kuz'minova NV, Alshantti IS. Comparative estimation ofefficiency and safety of racemic amlodipine and its S-enantiomer in hypertensivepatients[J]. Lik Sprava,2009Apr-Jun,(3-4):39-44.
    [157]Thacker HP. S(-)-amlodipine--the2007clinical review[J]. J Indian MedAssoc,2007Apr,105(4):180-2
    [158]胡大一,赵秀丽,孙宁,等.苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平与苯磺酸氨氯地平治疗原发性轻中度高血压的随机、双盲平行研究[J].中国医刊,2002,37:46-47.
    [159]于华.苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平联用卡托普利治疗老年高血压病70例疗效观察[J].中国现代药物应用,2009,3:88-89.
    [160]方志高.左旋氨氯地平治疗高血压及逆转左心室肥厚140例[J].中国新药杂志,2002,11:958-960.
    [161]Opie LH. Review Pharmacological differences between calcium antagonists[J].Eur Heart J,1997Jan,18:A71-9.
    [162]Deanfield JE, Detry JM, Lichtlen PR, et al. Amlodipine reduces transientmyocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease: double-blindCircadian Anti-Ischemia Program in Europe (CAPE Trial)[J]. J Am CollCardiol,1994,24(6):1460–1467.
    [163] Pitt B, Byington RP, Furberg CD, et al. Effect of amlodipine on the progressionof atherosclerosis and the occurrence of clinical events(PREVEN)[J].Circulation,2000,102(13):1503–1510.
    [164]Jamerson K, Weber MA, Bakris GL, et al. Benazepril plus amlodipine orhydrochlorothiazide for hypertension in high-risk patients[J]. N Engl J Med,2008,359(23):2417–2428.
    [165]蔡丽娥,王大海,王学军.苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平治疗自发性不稳定型心绞痛临床观察[J].中国地方病防治杂志,2008,23(6):475-476.
    [166]方志高,冯湘君.左旋氨氯地平治疗高血压合并心绞痛的疗效分析[J].心脑血管病防治,2004,4(4):27-29.
    [167]郑银香.左旋氨氯地平治疗冠心病心绞痛临床观察[J].浙江临床医学,2003,5(10):779-780.
    [168]Packer M, O’Connor CM, Ghali JK, et al. Effect of amlodipine on morbidity andmortality in severe chronic heart failure. Prospective Randomized AmlodipineSurvival Evaluation Study Group[J]. N Engl J Med,1996,335(15):1107–1114.
    [169]Ogihara T, Nakao K, Fukui T, et al. Effects of candesartan compared withamlodipine in hypertensive patients with high cardiovascular risks: candesartanantihypertensive survival evaluation in Japan trial[J]. Hypertension,2008,51:393–398.
    [170]胡荣权,林振,李树裕,等.不同时间服用左旋氨氯地平对老年高血压合并心衰患者的影响[J].海南医学院学报,2012,3:473-475.
    [171]段朝龙.左旋氨氯地平联合依那普利对高血压合并心衰患者的临床疗效观察[J].中国医药导报,2012,27:80-81
    [172]Beltman FW, Heesen WF, Smit AJ, et al. Effects of amlodipine and lisinopril onleft ventricular mass and diastolic function in previously untreated patients withmild to moderate diastolic hypertension[J]. Blood Press,1998,7:109–17.
    [173]Terpstra WF, May JF, Smit AJ, et al. Long-term effects of amlodipine andlisinopril on left ventricular mass and diastolic function in elderly, previouslyuntreated hypertensive patients: the ELVERA trial[J]. J Hypertens,2001,19:303–9.
    [174]方志高.左旋氨氯地平治疗高血压及逆转左心室肥厚140例[J].中国新药杂志,2002,11(12):958.
    [175]杨顺昱.苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平片治疗原发性高血压合并左室肥厚的临床研究[J].华夏医学,2009,22(1):66-68.
    [176]陈静苗,邵力飞.左旋氨氯地平对高血压病患者左心室肥厚的影响[J].海峡医学,2010,22(9):148-149.
    [177]Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM, Libby P, et al. CAMELOT Investigators. Effect ofantihypertensive agents on cardiovascular events in patients with coronarydisease and normal blood pressure: the CAMELOT study: a randomizedcontrolled trial[J]. JAMA,2004,292(18):2217–2225.
    [178]Klag MJ, Whelton PK, Randall BL, et al. Blood pressure and end-stage renaldisease in men[J]. N Engl J Med,1996,334(1):13–18.
    [179]Arulkumaran N, Diwakar R, Tahir Z, et al. Pulse pressure and progression ofchronic kidney disease[J]. J Nephrol,2010,23(2):189–193.
    [180]Wright JT, Bakris G, Greene T, et al. Effect of blood pressure lowering andantihypertensive drug class on progression of hypertensive kidney disease:results from the AASK trial[J]. JAMA,2002,288(19):2421–2431.
    [181]Martinez-Martin FJ, Rodriguez-Rosas H, Peiro-Martinez I, et al.Olmesartan/amlodipine vs olmesartan/hydrochlorothiazide in hypertensivepatients with metabolic syndrome: the OLAS study[J]. J Hum Hypertens,2011,25(6):346–353.
    [182]贾建朋,靳红英,吕彦宗,等.苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平对原发性高血压患者血浆内皮素及肾功能的影响[J].河北医药,2009,31(13):1609-1610.
    [183]王宏,陈海生.左旋氨氯地平对高血压患者的降压疗效及肾保护作用[J].疑难病杂志,2006,5(6):440-441.
    [184]胡志耕.依那普利与左旋氨氯地平联合治疗对高血压微量蛋白尿的影响[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2008,6(1):92.
    [185]李修奎,冯爱萍,于平,等.左旋氨氯地平和苯那普利联合治疗慢性肾脏病轻中度蛋白尿的临床观察[J].实用临床医学,2006,7(6):47.
    [186]陈海生,刘卓敏.左旋氨氯地平与厄贝沙坦对高血压疾病早期肾小球滤过率、α-微球蛋白的影响[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2008,6(7):769.
    [187]Wang JG, Li Y, Franklin SS, et al. Prevention of stroke and myocardial infarctionby amlodipine and angiotensin receptor blockers. A quantitative overview[J].Hypertension,2007,50(1):181–188.
    [188]张雪羽,陈兰英,张秀丽.苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平联用脑复康治疗血管性痴呆的临床研究[J].中国药房,2008,19(8):607-608.
    [189]毛翔.马来酸左旋氨氯地平对缺血性脑卒中合并高血压干预效果的临床研究[J].中国医疗前沿,2010,20:57-58.
    [190]吕志华,刘玲玉,陈斌,等.苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平调控卒中后血压的临床优势[J].医药导报,2007,26(5):514-515.
    [191]Kwang KK, Michael JQ, Seung HH, et al. Distinct vascular and metaboliceffects of different classes of anti-hypertensive drugs[J]. Int J Cardiol,2010April1,140(1):73–81.
    [192]王佐兵,段永强,余辉,等.左旋氨氯地平对高血压患者胰岛素抵抗的改善作用[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志,2009,23(10):1014-1016.
    [193]丁树珊,刘培良.左旋氨氯地平对高血压疾病病人胰岛素抵抗的影响[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2006,4(3):274.
    [194]张荷,刘坤申,高仁果,等.左旋氨氯地平和氨氯地平对高血压患者内皮功能及血清胆固醇影响[J].中国新药与临床杂志,2003,22(6):337-340.
    [195]崔万福,陈雪莲.苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平对原发性高血压患者血糖与血脂的影响[J].黑龙江医学杂志,2010,33(2):93.
    [196]Zhou MS, Jaimes EA, Raij L. Inhibition of oxidative stress and improvement ofendothelial function by amlodipine in angiotensin II-infused rats[J]. Am JHypertens,2004,17:167-71.
    [197]Berkels R, Taubert D, Bartels H, et al. Amlodipine increases endothelial nitricoxide by dual mechanisms[J]. Pharmacology,2004,70:39–45.
    [198]Schiffrin EL, Pu Q, Park JB. Effect of amlodipine compared to atenolol on smallarteries of previouslyuntreated essential hypertensive patients[J]. Am J Hypertens,2002,15(2Pt1):105–10.
    [199]Mason RP, Marche P, Hintze TH. Novel vascular biology of third-generationL-type calcium channel antagonists ancillary actions of amlodipine[J].Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol,2003Dec,23(12):2155-63.
    [200]Taddei S, Virdis A, Ghiadoni L, et al. Age-related reduction of NO availabilityand oxidative stress in humans[J]. Hypertension,2001,38(2):274–279..
    [201]Zhang X, Hintze TH. Amlodipine releases nitric oxide from canine coronarymicrovessels: an unexpected mechanism of action of a calcium channel-blockingagent[J]. Circulation,1998,97:576–80.
    [202]Lenasi H, Kohlstedt K, Fichtlscherer B, et al. Amlodipine activates theendothelial nitric oxide synthase by altering phosphorylation on Ser1177andThr495[J]. Cardiovasc Res,2003,59:844–53.
    [203]Batova S, DeWever J, Godfraind T, et al. The calcium channel blockeramlodipine promotes the unclamping of eNOS from caveolin in endothelialcells[J]. Cardiovasc Res,2006,71:478–85.
    [204]杜寿龙,薛亚军,袁长玲,等.左旋氨氯地平对高血压疾病病人血管内皮功能的影响[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2007,5(10):935.
    [205]玄继昌.左旋氨氯地平对高血压患者颈动脉内膜-中膜厚度及血管内皮依赖性舒张功能的影响[J].中国实用医药,2008,3(19):42.
    [206]王睿,吕吉元,张明升,等.左旋氨氯地平对自发性高血压大鼠内皮功能的保护作用[J].中西医结合心脑血管病杂志,2009,7(6):674.
    [207]Jun Zou, Yan Li, Hong-Qi Fan, et al. Effects of dihydropyridine calcium channelblockers on oxidized low-density lipoprotein induced proliferation and oxidativestress of vascular smooth muscle cells[J]. BMC Research Notes,2012,5:168.
    [208]Lawes CM, Vander Hoorn S, Rodgers A. Global burden of blood--pressure-related disease[J]. Lancet,2008,371:1513–1518.
    [209]Wu Y, Huxley R, Li L, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control ofhypertension in China: data from the China National Nutrition and Health Survey2002[J]. Circulation,2008,118(25):2679–2686.
    [210]Meng XJ, Dong GH, Wang D, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, control,and risk factors associated with hypertension in urban adults from33communities of China: the CHPSNE study[J]. J Hypertens,2011,29(7):1303–1310.
    [211]He J, Gu D, Chen J, et al. Premature deaths attributable to blood pressure inChina: a prospective cohort study[J]. Lancet,2009,374(9703):1765–1772.
    [212]González, Juanatey JR, Cordero A. Benefits of delapril in hypertensive patientsalong the cardiovascular continuum[J]. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther,2013Mar,11(3):271-81.
    [213]中国医师协会心血管内科医师分会,中国老年学学会心脑血管病专业委员会.苯磺酸左旋氨氯地平临床应用专家共识[J].中华内科学杂志,2010,49(11):987-989.
    [214]Stoner L, Tarrant MA, Fryer S, et al. How should flow-mediated dilation benormalized to its stimulus[J]? Clin Physiol Funct Imaging,2013Jan,33(1):75-8.
    [215]Higashi Y. Mechanisms of impairment of endothelial cell[J]. NihonRinsho,2012Sep,70(9):1519-23.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700