北京地区布朗忍冬的扦插繁殖及水分适应性研究
摘要
我国城市建筑物高度密集、人口稠密,导致城市绿化的面积相对较小,利用藤本植物进行垂直绿化,可迅速提高城市的绿地覆盖率,改善和美化城市生态环境。布朗忍冬Lonicera brownii是一种优良的藤本绿化植物,在北京地区已经引种成功,极具市场推广价值。如何降低其繁殖成本和缩短繁殖周期,了解其对北京地区不同水分条件下的生长和生理状况的响应状况,从而使布朗忍冬在北京及其周边地区更好的推广应用是目前急待解决的问题。
本课题在中国科学院植物研究所濒危及野生植物迁地保育的基础生物学创新研究组实验室完成,是中国科学院农业项目办公室项目“藤本植物环境绿化关键技术研究与示范项目”中的一部分。课题的重点是对布朗忍冬进行扦插繁殖技术和水分适应性研究,旨在为布朗忍冬的规模化繁殖和栽培适用范围提供理论技术支持。主要研究结果和结论如下:
1.布朗忍冬在夏秋两季都可进行扦插。秋季扦插,使用低浓度的IBA(低于250ppm)对插条生根率的影响不明显,使用IBA浓度高于250ppm时则抑制生根,建议秋季扦插可不使用激素处理;夏季扦插时,本试验中,使用低浓度(100ppm)的IBA处理能显著提高插条的生根率。
2.IBA处理不仅能缩短插条的生根时间;而且能明显提高插条节和节间处的生根数量,这可能有助于扦插后移栽成活。
3.秋季扦插,不使用IBA,扦插基质对布朗忍冬插条的生根情况没有明显影响;而使用IBA处理后,1/2沙+1/2蛭石的基质生根情况最好。
4.布朗忍冬的叶片相对含水量、生长速率、净光合速率(Pn)、实际光化学效率(ΦPSII)等与供水量呈明显正相关,而膜相对透性、MDA含量、SOD酶活性、脯氨酸含量等与供水量呈负相关,反映了其在一定的水分范围内能够有效地调节生长和生理状况,从而适应北京地区不同的水分条件。
The research has carried out the studies on cutting propagation and water adjustability in different water supply of Lonicera brownii, which has market potential and high application value in Beijing areas. The results are summarized as follows:
1.The cutting propagation can be carried out in summer and autumn. There isn’t significantly effect on rooting percent under lower IBA(under 250ppm) concentration in autumn, but higher concentrations suppress the growth of roots. Rooting percent is remarkably enhanced under the low IBA concentration treatment (100ppm) in summer.
2.Low concentration IBA(100ppm)treatment can not only shorten rooting time, but also increase roots number on node and internode evidently, which may enhance root quality.
3.In autumn,we obtain the best rooting status in 1/2 sand +1/2 vermiculite medium under different IBA treatments; but, media don’t significantly effect on rooting without IBA.
4.The leaf relative water content、growth ratio、net photosynthetic rate(Pn)、actual photosystem II efficiency (ΦPSII) etc is closely related to water supply; but the electrolyte leakage、MDA content、the SOD enzyme activity and the proline content is declining with the increasing water supply accordingly. Responses to different water supply show that Lonicera brownii has a certain extent adjustability.
本课题在中国科学院植物研究所濒危及野生植物迁地保育的基础生物学创新研究组实验室完成,是中国科学院农业项目办公室项目“藤本植物环境绿化关键技术研究与示范项目”中的一部分。课题的重点是对布朗忍冬进行扦插繁殖技术和水分适应性研究,旨在为布朗忍冬的规模化繁殖和栽培适用范围提供理论技术支持。主要研究结果和结论如下:
1.布朗忍冬在夏秋两季都可进行扦插。秋季扦插,使用低浓度的IBA(低于250ppm)对插条生根率的影响不明显,使用IBA浓度高于250ppm时则抑制生根,建议秋季扦插可不使用激素处理;夏季扦插时,本试验中,使用低浓度(100ppm)的IBA处理能显著提高插条的生根率。
2.IBA处理不仅能缩短插条的生根时间;而且能明显提高插条节和节间处的生根数量,这可能有助于扦插后移栽成活。
3.秋季扦插,不使用IBA,扦插基质对布朗忍冬插条的生根情况没有明显影响;而使用IBA处理后,1/2沙+1/2蛭石的基质生根情况最好。
4.布朗忍冬的叶片相对含水量、生长速率、净光合速率(Pn)、实际光化学效率(ΦPSII)等与供水量呈明显正相关,而膜相对透性、MDA含量、SOD酶活性、脯氨酸含量等与供水量呈负相关,反映了其在一定的水分范围内能够有效地调节生长和生理状况,从而适应北京地区不同的水分条件。
The research has carried out the studies on cutting propagation and water adjustability in different water supply of Lonicera brownii, which has market potential and high application value in Beijing areas. The results are summarized as follows:
1.The cutting propagation can be carried out in summer and autumn. There isn’t significantly effect on rooting percent under lower IBA(under 250ppm) concentration in autumn, but higher concentrations suppress the growth of roots. Rooting percent is remarkably enhanced under the low IBA concentration treatment (100ppm) in summer.
2.Low concentration IBA(100ppm)treatment can not only shorten rooting time, but also increase roots number on node and internode evidently, which may enhance root quality.
3.In autumn,we obtain the best rooting status in 1/2 sand +1/2 vermiculite medium under different IBA treatments; but, media don’t significantly effect on rooting without IBA.
4.The leaf relative water content、growth ratio、net photosynthetic rate(Pn)、actual photosystem II efficiency (ΦPSII) etc is closely related to water supply; but the electrolyte leakage、MDA content、the SOD enzyme activity and the proline content is declining with the increasing water supply accordingly. Responses to different water supply show that Lonicera brownii has a certain extent adjustability.
引文
1. 毕兆东,孙淑萍.基质与植物生长调节剂对食用仙人掌扦插繁殖的影响.东北农业大学学报,2003,34(3):360~362
2. 曹慧,等.水分胁迫对短枝型果树光合速率日变化的影响[J].山西农业科学,2000,28(3): 53～55
3. 曹慧,等.水分胁迫对短枝型苹果叶片活性氧清除酶类活性的影响[J].山西农业科学,2000, 28(4):48～51
4. 陈杰忠,等.水分胁迫对杧果成花效应及内源激素变化的影响[J].热带作物学报,2000,21(2): 74～79
5. 陈立松,等.水分胁迫对荔枝叶片超微结构的影响[J].福建农业大学学报,2001,30(2):171～ 174
6. 陈立讼,等.水分胁迫对荔枝叶片内源激素含量的影响[J].热带作物学报,1999,20(3):31～ 35
7. 陈善福,舒庆尧.植物耐干旱胁迫的生物学机理及其基因工程研究进展.植物学通报,1999, 16(5):555～560
8. 陈献男,等.水分胁迫对果梅光合色素和光合作用的影响[J].福建农业大学学报,2000,29(1): 35～39.
9. 程瑞平,等.水分胁迫对果树生长和叶中矿质元素含量的影响[J].植物生理学通讯,1992,28(1):32～34
10. 丛欣.重瓣榆叶梅的绿枝扦插繁殖研究.园艺学报,1991,18(3):278～280
11. 丛日春,胡雅君,刘洪庆.几种攀缘植物耐旱性研究.内蒙古林学院学报(自然科学版),1996, 18(3):33~38
12. 邓红英.毛乌素沙地优势植物种群对模拟降水量的影响.云南大学学报(自然科学版),2002, 24(1):75～80
13. 段晓梅.思茅师范高等专科学校学报,2003,19(3):4～7
14. 高新一,王玉英.植物无性繁殖实用技术.北京:金盾出版社,2003,71～88.
15. 郭卫东,沈向,李嘉瑞,等.植物抗旱分子机理.西北农业大学学报,1999,27(4):102～108
16. 郝乃斌,等.大豆育种应用基础与技术研究进展.南京:江苏科学出版社,1990,28～35
17. 何维明.水分因素对沙地柏实生苗水分和生长特征的影响,植物生态学报,2001,25(1):11～ 16
18. 侯建华,云锦凤,张东晖.羊草与灰色赖草及其杂交种的耐盐生理特性比较.2005,14(1): 73～77
19. 贾虎森,等.水分胁迫下苹果叶片的 H2O2 代谢[J].植物生理学报,2001,27(4):321～324
20. 贾虎森,等.水分胁迫下油梨幼苗活性氧代谢对光合作用的影响[J].热带作物学报,2001,21(1):48～55
21. 姬兰柱,肖冬梅,王淼.模拟水分胁迫对水曲柳光合速率及水分利用效率的影响.2005,16(3): 408～412
22. 姜闯道,高辉远,邹琦,蒋高明.田间大豆叶片生长过程中的光合特性及光破坏防御机制.植物生理与分子生物学学报,2004,30(4):428~434
23. 姜闯道,高辉远,邹琦.缺铁使大豆叶片激发能的耗散增加.植物生理与分子生物学学报,2002, 28(2):127~132
24. 黎裕.植物的渗透调节与其他生理过程的关系及其在作物改良中的应用.植物生理学通讯,1994,30(5):377～385
25. 李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术.北京:高等教育出版社,2000,258～260
26. 李吉跃.太行山区主要造林树种耐旱特性的研究.北京林业大学学报,1991,13(增 2):230～ 279
27. 李军等.从六个核桃无性系(种)叶的形态解剖比较其抗旱性.河南林业科技,1997,9:9～ 11
28. 李玲,余光辉,曾富华.水分胁迫下植物脯氨酸累积的分子机理.华南师大学学报(自然科学版),2003,1:126～134
29. 李树华,许兴,米海莉等.水分胁迫对牛心朴子植株生长及渗透调节物质积累的影响.西北植物学报,2003,23(4):592～596
30. 李小方,汤章城,何玉科.不定根的形态发生与调节机制.细胞生物学杂志.2001,(23)3:130～ 136
31. 梁松洁,张金政,张启翔等.北方地区藤本忍冬叶片表皮结构及其生态适应性比较研究.植物研究,2004,24(4):434~440
32. 林强,陈小青,莫现会,杨其保.几种植物激素处理对桑树硬枝扦插成活率的比较试验.广西蚕业,2002,39(4):5～7
33. 刘奉觉等.杨树水分生理研究.北京:北京农业大学出版社,1992
34. 刘家琼.超旱生植物珍珠的形态解剖和水分生理特征[J].生态学报,1983,3(1):15～20
35. 刘建伟等.不同杨树无性系光合作用与其抗旱能力的初步研究.林业科学,1994,30(1):83～ 87
36. 刘建伟等.水分胁迫下不同杨树无性系苗期的光合作用.林业科学研究,1993,6(1):65～69
37. 龙雅宜.园林植物栽培手册.北京:中国林业出版社,2004
38. 卢纹岱,等,SPSS for windows 从入门到精通.北京:电子工业出版社,1997
39. 罗华建,等.水分胁迫对枇杷光合特性的影响[J].果树科学,1999,16(2):126～130
40. 马兰春,等.干旱对苹果叶片形态解剖结构的影响[J].北京农学院学报,1996,11(2):27～ 29
41. 缪如槐,刘湘君.广东忍冬属植物的研究.中山大学学报,1989,28(4):74~80
42. 穆鼎,金波,杨孝汉.IBA 和营养雾对菊花插条生根的影响.园艺学报,1992,19(1):89～
90
43. 聂磊,等.水分胁迫对长期 UV～B 辐射下柚树苗生理特性的影响[J].植物资源与环境学报,2001,10(3):19～24
44. 潘东明,等.水分胁迫对龙眼幼苗多胺等生理生化指标的影响[J].福建农业大学学报,1997, 26(3):277～282
45. 潘秋红,等.Ca2+对水分胁迫条件下杧果叶片膜脂过氧化及膜保护系统的影响[J].热带作物学报 2000,21(6):30～36
46. 裴保华,等.三种灌木耐旱性的研究.林业科学研究,1993,6(6):597～602
47. 曲桂敏,等.水分胁迫对苹果叶片和新根显微结构的影响[J].园艺学报,1999,26(3):147～ 151.
48. 施爱萍,张金政,张启翔,等.不同遮荫水平下四个玉簪品种的生长性状分析.植物研究,2004, 24(4):486~490
49. 汤章城.植物对水分胁迫的反应和适应.植物生理学通讯,1983,(4):1～7
50. 唐道城,张礼,王燕萍,李宗仁.白芥既油菜产量性状抗旱性及抗旱性鉴定指标研究初探.干旱地区农业研究,1999.9:62～66
51. 唐连顺,李广敏.水分胁迫下玉米叶肉细胞超微结构的变化及其与膜脂过氧化伤害的关系.植物学报,1994,36(增刊):43～49
52. 滕元文,等.果树气孔反应及其叶水势的调控[J].干旱地区农业研究,1993,11(4):60～64
53. 涂淑萍,傅波.攀缘植物在城市绿化中的应用研究.江西农业大学学报,1996,18(4):464~469
54. 王典章,叶春生,等.水控对冬小麦生长发育的影响.莱阳农学院报,1994,11(3):186～190
55. 王洪春.作物抗逆性机理与抗逆性鉴定技术.作物抗逆性鉴定的原理与技术.北京:北京农业大学出版社,1989
56. 王淼,代力民,姬兰柱等.干旱胁迫对蒙古柞表观资源利用率的影响.2002,13(3):275～280
57. 王世绩译,Kozlowski.TT 著.水分供应与树木的生长..林业文摘,1983,2:1～11
58. 汪月霞,孙国荣,王建波等.Nacl 胁迫下星星草幼苗 MDA 含量与膜透性及叶绿素荧光参数之间的关系.生态学报,2006,26(1):122～129
59. 王云龙,许振柱,周广胜.水分胁迫对羊草光合产物分配及其气体交换特征的影响,植物生态学报,2004,28(6):803～809
60. 肖春旺,董鸣,等.鄂尔多斯高原沙柳幼苗对模拟降水量变化的响应,生态学报,2001,21(1):171～176
61. 肖春旺,周广胜.毛乌素沙地中间锦鸡儿幼苗生长、气体交换和叶绿素荧光对模拟降水量变化的响应.2001,12(5):692～696
62. 徐炳声,胡嘉琪,王汉津.中国植物志,第 72 卷,科学出版社,1988
63. 许大全,张玉忠,张荣铣.植物光合作用的光抑制.植物生理学通讯,1992,28(4):237～243
64. 许旭旦,等译.Kramer.PJ 著.植物的水分关系,北京:科学出版社,1989
65. 严大义,等.葡萄水分胁迫反应的研究[J].葡萄栽培与酿酒,1994,71(4):14～16
66. 阎秀峰,孙国荣,肖玮.星星草光合蒸腾特性的季节变化.植物研究,1996,16(3):340～
345
67. 杨朝选,等.重水分胁迫下苹果树茎、叶水势的变化[J].果树学报,2002,19(2):71～74
68. 杨洪强,等.失水对苹果新根 ABA 含量和蛋白激酶的影响[J].园艺学报,2000,27(2):79～ 84
69. 杨敏生,等.优良白杨新品种 BL193 对水分胁迫的反应.河北林学院学报,1995,10(3):194～ 198
70. 姚澍晖,杨永明.忍冬嫩枝扦插快速生根试验.宁夏农学院学报,2003,24(2):91～92
71. 姚允聪,等.不同浇水处理过程中柿幼树 SOD、CAT 和膜脂过氧化作用的变化[J].北京农学院学报,1994,9(1):22～27
72. 于国泉,等.水分胁迫对板栗幼苗抗氧化酶及丙二醛的影响[J].北京农学院学报,1996,11(1): 48～52
73. 张福锁.环境胁迫与植物育种.北京:农业出版社,1993
74. 张金政,石雷,刘雪川.我国北方城市藤本花卉栽培及应用.中国园林,2002,18(1):75～77
75. 张金政,梁松洁,石雷.忍冬属植物资源的栽培及利用.中国园林,2004,20(101):53~56
76. 张守仁.叶绿素荧光动力学参数的意义及讨论.植物学通报,1999,16(4):444～448
77. 赵可夫,王韶唐.作物抗性生理.北京:农业出版社,1990
78. 赵雪宇,等.轻度水分胁迫下草莓叶片渗透性、弹性及冠层结构变化[J].北方园艺,1995,103(4):56～57
79. 郑开文,吴应祥,李嘉乐等译,H.T.哈特曼,D.E.凯斯特著.植物繁殖原理和技术.北京:中国林业出版社,1985
80. 郑西平.北京城市道路绿化现状及发展趋势的探讨.中国园林,2000,73(1):43～45
81. 中国科学院植物研究所植物生理生化研究室译,R.J.韦弗著.农业中的植物生长物质.北京:科学出版社,1979
82. 朱长山.河南省忍冬属植物的初步研究.河南农业大学学报,1995,29(1):38~44
83. Abrams M D,et al.Drought adaptations and responses in five genotypes of Fraxinu spennsyl vanica Marsh.:Photosyn thesis,water relations and leaf morphology. TreePhysiol.,1990,6(3):305～315
84. Arnon, D I.Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology, 1949, 24:1~15
85. Beadle, C. L.,M. M. Ludlow & J. L. Honeysett. Water relation . In:Hall, E. O., J. M. O. Scurlock & H. R. Bolhar Norderkampf eds. Photosynthesis and production in a changing environment. A field and laboratory manual. London :Chapman & Hall. 1993:113~128
86. Bethlenfalvay G J, et al. Glycine-Glomus-Bradyrhizobium symbiosis x. relationships between leaf gas exchange and plant and soil status in nodulated , mycorrhizal soybean under drought stress[J].Plant Physiol.,1990,94: 723～728.
87. Blackman PG,Davies WJ.Root to shoot communication in maize plants of the effects of soil drying. J Ezp Bot,1985:36～39
88. Blake T J et al. Stomatal control of water use efficiency in poplar clones and hybrids. Can.J.Bot..1984,62:1344～1351
89. Blom, A. J.,F. S. Chapin & H. A.Mooney. Resource limitation in plants——an economic analogy . Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1985,16:363~392.
90. Bouillenne R, M.Bouillenne-Walrand,Auxins et bouturage,Rpt.14th Int.Hort.Cong.Vol. Ⅰ pp. 1955:231～38
91. Bowler C,Van Montagu T,Inze D.Superoxide dismutase and stress tolerance.Ann.Rev.Plant Physiol. Plant Mol.Biol,1992,43:83～86
92. Boyer J S. Leaf enlargement and metabolic rates in corn , soybean, and sun flower at various leaf water potentials .Plant Physiol.,1970,46:233～235
93. Chen Z H, et al. Photosynthetic acclimation to water stress in citrus[J]. Acta Agricultural Universitatis Zhejiangensis,1992,18(2):113～118
94. Chin,T.Y., Meyer M.M.Jr.,and Beevers L.Abscisic acid stimulated rooting of stem cutting. Planta, 1969, 88:192～96
95. Christopher Brickell.The Royal Horticultural Society A-Z Encyclopedia Garden Plants,Covent Garden Books,1999:630～632.
96. Dickmann D I et al.Photosynthesis, water relations and growth of two hybrid Populus genotypes during a severe drought.Can.J.For.Res.,1992,22(8):1092～1106
97. Don Ellison.An illustrated reference to Garden Plants of the World, Graphic Skills Pty Ltd and Cape Imaging Bureau,2002:356~358
98. Ellison D.An illustrated reference to garden plants of the world (M). Malaysia: Times Offset (M) Sdn Bhd, 2002:356~357
99. Filella I,Llusi J,Pinol J.Leaf gas exchange and fluorescence of Phillyrea latifolia,Pistacia lentiscus and Quercus ilex saplings in severe drought and high temperature conditions Environ Exp Bot,1998,39:213～220
100. Genty B , Briantais J M,Baker N R..The relationship between the quantum yield of non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluoresce and the rate of photosystem Ⅱ photochemistry in leaves. Biochimica. Biophysica. Acta, 1989,990:87~92
101. Gowing D T., et al.A positive root-sourced signal as an indicator of soil drying in apple[J]. J Exp Bot., 1990, 41:1535～1540.
102. Hackett,W.P.The influence of auxin ,catechol,and methanolic tissue extracts on root initiation in aseptically cultured shoot apices of the juvenile and adult forms of Hedera helix.Jour.Amer.Soc.Hort.Sci. 1970,95:398～402
103. Hall AJ.Lemcoff J H,Trapani N.Water stress before and during flowering in maize and its effect on yield its components and their determinants. Maydica. 1981,26:19～30
104. Howard,B.H. Increase during winter in capacity for root regeneration in detached shoots of fruit tree rootstocks.Nature. 1965,208:912～913
105. Hsiao T C.Effect of drought and elevated CO2 on plant water use efficiency and productivity. In Tackson MB &Black CR eds. Interaction Stresses on plants in a Changing Climate.NATO ASI SeriesGlobal Environmental Change Volume Berlin:Springer-Verlag . 1993,435～465
106. Hsiao T C.Plant responses to water stress. Ann. Rev. Plant physiol. 1973,24:519～570
107. Hulsebosch R.J, Hoff A J, Shuvalov VA. Influence of KF, DCMU and removal of Ca2+ on the high-spin EPR signal of the cytochrome b-559 heme Fe (III) ligated by OH- in chloroplasts. Biochimica. Biophysica. Acta, 1996,1277: 103~106
108. Jones H G,Loton M T,Higgs K et al.Experimental control of water status in an apple orchard.J Hortical Sci,1983,58:301
109. Jones M Metal. Osmotic adjustment in expend and full expend edle aves of sunflower in response to water streess.Aust.J.PlantPhysiol.,1980,7:181～192
110. Jones M M et al. Osmotic adjustment in leaves of sorghumin response to water deficits. Plant Physiol., 1978,61:122～126
111. Kelliber F M et al.Stomatal resistance and growth of drought-stressed eastern cotton wood from a wet and dry site.Sil-vagegenet.,1980,29:166～171
112. Kelliher F M et al.Stomatal resistance, transpirations and growth of drought-stressed eastern cotton wood. Can. J.For.Res.,1980,10:447～451
113. Kelly J.The hillier gardener’s guide to trees & shrubs (M). Italy: Lego SPA for David & Charles and Justyn Willsmore Brunel House, 1995,380~384
114. Kenneth A,The Hillier Gardener’s Guide to Trees & Shrubs, Hillier nurseries, David & Charles and Justyn Willsmore ,1995,380~384.
115. Kenneth A. Beckett, Climbing Plants,Timber Press,1983,105~109.
116. Kwon K W et al. Temporal changes in tissue water relations of seedlings of Quercus acutissima, Q.albaandQ. stellata subjecte dt ochronic water stress.Can.J.For.Res.,1989,19:622～629
117. Lacono F,et al.Response of electron transport rate of water stress-affected grapevines Influence of leaf age[J].Vitis,2000,39(4):137～144
118. Lichtenthaler H K.Application of chlorophyll fluorescence in photosynthesis research, stress physiology, hydrobiology and remote sensing. Netherlands; Kluwer Academic Publishers,1988,63~69
119. Mahoney J M et al. Response of a hybrid poplar to water table decline in different substrates. Forest Ecology and Man-agement,1992,54(1-4):141～156
120. Mazzoleni S et al. Differential physiological and morphological responses of two hybrid Populus clones to water stress.Tree Physiol.,1988,4:61～70
121. Meier C E et al.Physiological response of loblollypine (PinustaedaL.) seedlings to drought stress: Osmotic adjust-mentand tissue lasticity. Journal Plant Physiology.,1992,140(6):754～760
122. Metcalfe J C et al. Leaf growth of Eucalyptus seedlings under water deficit. Tree Physiol., 1990,6(2):221～227
123. Methy M,Damesin C,Rambal S.Drought and photosystemⅡ activity in two Mediterrancean oaks.Ann Sci For,1996,53:255～262
124. Momen B et al. Tissue water elations of Quercus wislizeni seedlings: Drought resistance in a California evergreen oak. Acta Oecologica.,1992,13(1):127～136
125. Myers B J et al.Water stress and seedlings growth of two ecucalypt species from contrasting habitats. Tree Physiol .1989,5:207～218
126. Osmond C B.What is photoinhibition? Some insights from comparisons of shade and sun plants. In:Baker NR, Bowyer JR ed. Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis: from Molecular Mechanisms to the Field. Oxford: Bios Scientifi,1994,1~24
127. Palmroth S., Berninger F.& ikinmaa E. N.Correlations of pipe model parameters with climatic variables and stand chanacteristics. In: Mohren , G. J. , K. Kramer &. S. Sabate eds . Impacts of global change on tree physiology and forest ecosystems . Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1997.287~291.
128. Passioura J B.Root singals control leaf expansion in wheat seedling growing in drying soil.Austy J plant physiol,1988
129. Pearson ,R W.Soil environment and root development. In: Peirre ,W H ,D Kirkham , J Pesek , and R Shaw .eds .Plant environment and efficient water use , Madison : American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America,1966,95~126.
130. Ranney T Getal.Responseof five temperate deciduous tree species to water stree. Tree Physiol., 1990,6(4):439～448
131. Rappaport,J.The influence of leaves and growth substances on the rooting response of cuttings, Natuurw Tijdschr.,1940.21:356～59
132. Rhizopoulou S et al.Influence of soil drying on root development , water relations and leaf growth of Ceratonia siliqua L.Oecolgia, 1991,88(1): 41～47
133. Rhoden baugh E J et al.Water stress photosynthesis and early growth patterns of cutting of three Populus clones. TreePhysiol.,1993,13(3):213～226
134. Riegern M et al.Comparison of drought resistance among Prunus species from divergent habitats.TreePhysiol.1992,11(4):369～380
135. Sankarapandian R.,Krishnadoss D.,Muppidathi N.,Chidambaram S.Variability studies in grain sorghum for certain physiological characters under water stress conditions.Crop Improvement1993,20(1):45～50
136. Save R,Biel C,Domingo R,Ruiz-Snchez M C,Torrecillas A.Some physiological and morphological characteristics of citrus plants for drought resistance.Plant Sci,1995,110:167～172
137. Schaplinski T J et al. Water stress tolerance and late-senson organic solute accumulation in hybridpoplar. Can.J.Bot.,1989,67:1981～1988
138. Seiler J R etal. ,Physiological and morphological responses of three half-sibfamilies of loblolly pine to water-stress conditioning. Forest Sci.,1988,34(2):487～495
139. Seiler J R et al. Photosynthesis and transpiration of loblolly pine seedlings as influenced by moisture-stress condition-ing. Forest Sci.,1985,31(3):742～749
140. Shinozaki,P.M., Yoda K., Hozumi K.& Kira. T.A quantitative analysis of plant from——the pipe model theory I Basic analysis .Japanese Journal of Ecology,1964,14:97~105.
141. Staffs of the L. H. Bailey Hortorium ,Hortus Third ,Connurl University press,1976
142. Tan W X et al.Drough ttolereance in faster and slower growing black spruce (Piceamariana) progenies .Osmotic adjustment and changes of solube carbonhy drates and amino acids under osmotic stress. Physiol.Plant,1992,85(4):645～651
143. The Reader’s Digest Association, Encyclopaedia of Garden plants and Flowers, The Reader’s Digest Association Far East Ltd.1989,417～418
144. Tomazewski,M.The mechanism of synergistic effects between auxin and some natural phenolic substances.In Nitsch,1964,335～351
145. Torrecillas A,Alarcon J J,Domingo R et al Strategies for drought resistance in leaves of two almond cultivars.Plant Sci.1996,118:135～143
146. Torrecillas A,Galego R,Perez-Pastor A et al.Gas exchange and water relations of young apricot plants under drougtht conditions.J Agr Sci.1999,132:445-452
147. Van Volkenburgh E.Regulation of dicotyledonous leaf growth., physiology of cell expansion during plant growth. Amer. Soc. Plant Physiol.,193～201
148. Westgate M E and Boyer T S.Osmotic adjustment and the inhibition OG leaf : net and silk growth at low water potentials in maize ,Planta ,1986,164:640～649
149. Wright , I. J. & M. Westoby.Differences in seedling growth behaviour among species trait correlations across species , Journal of Ecology.1999,87:85~97 .
150. Wurr D C E,Hand D W,Edmondson R N et al. Climate change:a response surface study of the effects of CO2 and temperature on the growth of beetroot,carrots and onions.J Agr Sci,1998,131:125～133
151. Yang L et al.Effects water stress on the chloroplasts in leaves of Citrus medica var. sarcofactyls[J]. Chinese Agri SciBulletin,2001,17(1):20～22
2. 曹慧,等.水分胁迫对短枝型果树光合速率日变化的影响[J].山西农业科学,2000,28(3): 53～55
3. 曹慧,等.水分胁迫对短枝型苹果叶片活性氧清除酶类活性的影响[J].山西农业科学,2000, 28(4):48～51
4. 陈杰忠,等.水分胁迫对杧果成花效应及内源激素变化的影响[J].热带作物学报,2000,21(2): 74～79
5. 陈立松,等.水分胁迫对荔枝叶片超微结构的影响[J].福建农业大学学报,2001,30(2):171～ 174
6. 陈立讼,等.水分胁迫对荔枝叶片内源激素含量的影响[J].热带作物学报,1999,20(3):31～ 35
7. 陈善福,舒庆尧.植物耐干旱胁迫的生物学机理及其基因工程研究进展.植物学通报,1999, 16(5):555～560
8. 陈献男,等.水分胁迫对果梅光合色素和光合作用的影响[J].福建农业大学学报,2000,29(1): 35～39.
9. 程瑞平,等.水分胁迫对果树生长和叶中矿质元素含量的影响[J].植物生理学通讯,1992,28(1):32～34
10. 丛欣.重瓣榆叶梅的绿枝扦插繁殖研究.园艺学报,1991,18(3):278～280
11. 丛日春,胡雅君,刘洪庆.几种攀缘植物耐旱性研究.内蒙古林学院学报(自然科学版),1996, 18(3):33~38
12. 邓红英.毛乌素沙地优势植物种群对模拟降水量的影响.云南大学学报(自然科学版),2002, 24(1):75～80
13. 段晓梅.思茅师范高等专科学校学报,2003,19(3):4～7
14. 高新一,王玉英.植物无性繁殖实用技术.北京:金盾出版社,2003,71～88.
15. 郭卫东,沈向,李嘉瑞,等.植物抗旱分子机理.西北农业大学学报,1999,27(4):102～108
16. 郝乃斌,等.大豆育种应用基础与技术研究进展.南京:江苏科学出版社,1990,28～35
17. 何维明.水分因素对沙地柏实生苗水分和生长特征的影响,植物生态学报,2001,25(1):11～ 16
18. 侯建华,云锦凤,张东晖.羊草与灰色赖草及其杂交种的耐盐生理特性比较.2005,14(1): 73～77
19. 贾虎森,等.水分胁迫下苹果叶片的 H2O2 代谢[J].植物生理学报,2001,27(4):321～324
20. 贾虎森,等.水分胁迫下油梨幼苗活性氧代谢对光合作用的影响[J].热带作物学报,2001,21(1):48～55
21. 姬兰柱,肖冬梅,王淼.模拟水分胁迫对水曲柳光合速率及水分利用效率的影响.2005,16(3): 408～412
22. 姜闯道,高辉远,邹琦,蒋高明.田间大豆叶片生长过程中的光合特性及光破坏防御机制.植物生理与分子生物学学报,2004,30(4):428~434
23. 姜闯道,高辉远,邹琦.缺铁使大豆叶片激发能的耗散增加.植物生理与分子生物学学报,2002, 28(2):127~132
24. 黎裕.植物的渗透调节与其他生理过程的关系及其在作物改良中的应用.植物生理学通讯,1994,30(5):377～385
25. 李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术.北京:高等教育出版社,2000,258～260
26. 李吉跃.太行山区主要造林树种耐旱特性的研究.北京林业大学学报,1991,13(增 2):230～ 279
27. 李军等.从六个核桃无性系(种)叶的形态解剖比较其抗旱性.河南林业科技,1997,9:9～ 11
28. 李玲,余光辉,曾富华.水分胁迫下植物脯氨酸累积的分子机理.华南师大学学报(自然科学版),2003,1:126～134
29. 李树华,许兴,米海莉等.水分胁迫对牛心朴子植株生长及渗透调节物质积累的影响.西北植物学报,2003,23(4):592～596
30. 李小方,汤章城,何玉科.不定根的形态发生与调节机制.细胞生物学杂志.2001,(23)3:130～ 136
31. 梁松洁,张金政,张启翔等.北方地区藤本忍冬叶片表皮结构及其生态适应性比较研究.植物研究,2004,24(4):434~440
32. 林强,陈小青,莫现会,杨其保.几种植物激素处理对桑树硬枝扦插成活率的比较试验.广西蚕业,2002,39(4):5～7
33. 刘奉觉等.杨树水分生理研究.北京:北京农业大学出版社,1992
34. 刘家琼.超旱生植物珍珠的形态解剖和水分生理特征[J].生态学报,1983,3(1):15～20
35. 刘建伟等.不同杨树无性系光合作用与其抗旱能力的初步研究.林业科学,1994,30(1):83～ 87
36. 刘建伟等.水分胁迫下不同杨树无性系苗期的光合作用.林业科学研究,1993,6(1):65～69
37. 龙雅宜.园林植物栽培手册.北京:中国林业出版社,2004
38. 卢纹岱,等,SPSS for windows 从入门到精通.北京:电子工业出版社,1997
39. 罗华建,等.水分胁迫对枇杷光合特性的影响[J].果树科学,1999,16(2):126～130
40. 马兰春,等.干旱对苹果叶片形态解剖结构的影响[J].北京农学院学报,1996,11(2):27～ 29
41. 缪如槐,刘湘君.广东忍冬属植物的研究.中山大学学报,1989,28(4):74~80
42. 穆鼎,金波,杨孝汉.IBA 和营养雾对菊花插条生根的影响.园艺学报,1992,19(1):89～
90
43. 聂磊,等.水分胁迫对长期 UV～B 辐射下柚树苗生理特性的影响[J].植物资源与环境学报,2001,10(3):19～24
44. 潘东明,等.水分胁迫对龙眼幼苗多胺等生理生化指标的影响[J].福建农业大学学报,1997, 26(3):277～282
45. 潘秋红,等.Ca2+对水分胁迫条件下杧果叶片膜脂过氧化及膜保护系统的影响[J].热带作物学报 2000,21(6):30～36
46. 裴保华,等.三种灌木耐旱性的研究.林业科学研究,1993,6(6):597～602
47. 曲桂敏,等.水分胁迫对苹果叶片和新根显微结构的影响[J].园艺学报,1999,26(3):147～ 151.
48. 施爱萍,张金政,张启翔,等.不同遮荫水平下四个玉簪品种的生长性状分析.植物研究,2004, 24(4):486~490
49. 汤章城.植物对水分胁迫的反应和适应.植物生理学通讯,1983,(4):1～7
50. 唐道城,张礼,王燕萍,李宗仁.白芥既油菜产量性状抗旱性及抗旱性鉴定指标研究初探.干旱地区农业研究,1999.9:62～66
51. 唐连顺,李广敏.水分胁迫下玉米叶肉细胞超微结构的变化及其与膜脂过氧化伤害的关系.植物学报,1994,36(增刊):43～49
52. 滕元文,等.果树气孔反应及其叶水势的调控[J].干旱地区农业研究,1993,11(4):60～64
53. 涂淑萍,傅波.攀缘植物在城市绿化中的应用研究.江西农业大学学报,1996,18(4):464~469
54. 王典章,叶春生,等.水控对冬小麦生长发育的影响.莱阳农学院报,1994,11(3):186～190
55. 王洪春.作物抗逆性机理与抗逆性鉴定技术.作物抗逆性鉴定的原理与技术.北京:北京农业大学出版社,1989
56. 王淼,代力民,姬兰柱等.干旱胁迫对蒙古柞表观资源利用率的影响.2002,13(3):275～280
57. 王世绩译,Kozlowski.TT 著.水分供应与树木的生长..林业文摘,1983,2:1～11
58. 汪月霞,孙国荣,王建波等.Nacl 胁迫下星星草幼苗 MDA 含量与膜透性及叶绿素荧光参数之间的关系.生态学报,2006,26(1):122～129
59. 王云龙,许振柱,周广胜.水分胁迫对羊草光合产物分配及其气体交换特征的影响,植物生态学报,2004,28(6):803～809
60. 肖春旺,董鸣,等.鄂尔多斯高原沙柳幼苗对模拟降水量变化的响应,生态学报,2001,21(1):171～176
61. 肖春旺,周广胜.毛乌素沙地中间锦鸡儿幼苗生长、气体交换和叶绿素荧光对模拟降水量变化的响应.2001,12(5):692～696
62. 徐炳声,胡嘉琪,王汉津.中国植物志,第 72 卷,科学出版社,1988
63. 许大全,张玉忠,张荣铣.植物光合作用的光抑制.植物生理学通讯,1992,28(4):237～243
64. 许旭旦,等译.Kramer.PJ 著.植物的水分关系,北京:科学出版社,1989
65. 严大义,等.葡萄水分胁迫反应的研究[J].葡萄栽培与酿酒,1994,71(4):14～16
66. 阎秀峰,孙国荣,肖玮.星星草光合蒸腾特性的季节变化.植物研究,1996,16(3):340～
345
67. 杨朝选,等.重水分胁迫下苹果树茎、叶水势的变化[J].果树学报,2002,19(2):71～74
68. 杨洪强,等.失水对苹果新根 ABA 含量和蛋白激酶的影响[J].园艺学报,2000,27(2):79～ 84
69. 杨敏生,等.优良白杨新品种 BL193 对水分胁迫的反应.河北林学院学报,1995,10(3):194～ 198
70. 姚澍晖,杨永明.忍冬嫩枝扦插快速生根试验.宁夏农学院学报,2003,24(2):91～92
71. 姚允聪,等.不同浇水处理过程中柿幼树 SOD、CAT 和膜脂过氧化作用的变化[J].北京农学院学报,1994,9(1):22～27
72. 于国泉,等.水分胁迫对板栗幼苗抗氧化酶及丙二醛的影响[J].北京农学院学报,1996,11(1): 48～52
73. 张福锁.环境胁迫与植物育种.北京:农业出版社,1993
74. 张金政,石雷,刘雪川.我国北方城市藤本花卉栽培及应用.中国园林,2002,18(1):75～77
75. 张金政,梁松洁,石雷.忍冬属植物资源的栽培及利用.中国园林,2004,20(101):53~56
76. 张守仁.叶绿素荧光动力学参数的意义及讨论.植物学通报,1999,16(4):444～448
77. 赵可夫,王韶唐.作物抗性生理.北京:农业出版社,1990
78. 赵雪宇,等.轻度水分胁迫下草莓叶片渗透性、弹性及冠层结构变化[J].北方园艺,1995,103(4):56～57
79. 郑开文,吴应祥,李嘉乐等译,H.T.哈特曼,D.E.凯斯特著.植物繁殖原理和技术.北京:中国林业出版社,1985
80. 郑西平.北京城市道路绿化现状及发展趋势的探讨.中国园林,2000,73(1):43～45
81. 中国科学院植物研究所植物生理生化研究室译,R.J.韦弗著.农业中的植物生长物质.北京:科学出版社,1979
82. 朱长山.河南省忍冬属植物的初步研究.河南农业大学学报,1995,29(1):38~44
83. Abrams M D,et al.Drought adaptations and responses in five genotypes of Fraxinu spennsyl vanica Marsh.:Photosyn thesis,water relations and leaf morphology. TreePhysiol.,1990,6(3):305～315
84. Arnon, D I.Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiology, 1949, 24:1~15
85. Beadle, C. L.,M. M. Ludlow & J. L. Honeysett. Water relation . In:Hall, E. O., J. M. O. Scurlock & H. R. Bolhar Norderkampf eds. Photosynthesis and production in a changing environment. A field and laboratory manual. London :Chapman & Hall. 1993:113~128
86. Bethlenfalvay G J, et al. Glycine-Glomus-Bradyrhizobium symbiosis x. relationships between leaf gas exchange and plant and soil status in nodulated , mycorrhizal soybean under drought stress[J].Plant Physiol.,1990,94: 723～728.
87. Blackman PG,Davies WJ.Root to shoot communication in maize plants of the effects of soil drying. J Ezp Bot,1985:36～39
88. Blake T J et al. Stomatal control of water use efficiency in poplar clones and hybrids. Can.J.Bot..1984,62:1344～1351
89. Blom, A. J.,F. S. Chapin & H. A.Mooney. Resource limitation in plants——an economic analogy . Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1985,16:363~392.
90. Bouillenne R, M.Bouillenne-Walrand,Auxins et bouturage,Rpt.14th Int.Hort.Cong.Vol. Ⅰ pp. 1955:231～38
91. Bowler C,Van Montagu T,Inze D.Superoxide dismutase and stress tolerance.Ann.Rev.Plant Physiol. Plant Mol.Biol,1992,43:83～86
92. Boyer J S. Leaf enlargement and metabolic rates in corn , soybean, and sun flower at various leaf water potentials .Plant Physiol.,1970,46:233～235
93. Chen Z H, et al. Photosynthetic acclimation to water stress in citrus[J]. Acta Agricultural Universitatis Zhejiangensis,1992,18(2):113～118
94. Chin,T.Y., Meyer M.M.Jr.,and Beevers L.Abscisic acid stimulated rooting of stem cutting. Planta, 1969, 88:192～96
95. Christopher Brickell.The Royal Horticultural Society A-Z Encyclopedia Garden Plants,Covent Garden Books,1999:630～632.
96. Dickmann D I et al.Photosynthesis, water relations and growth of two hybrid Populus genotypes during a severe drought.Can.J.For.Res.,1992,22(8):1092～1106
97. Don Ellison.An illustrated reference to Garden Plants of the World, Graphic Skills Pty Ltd and Cape Imaging Bureau,2002:356~358
98. Ellison D.An illustrated reference to garden plants of the world (M). Malaysia: Times Offset (M) Sdn Bhd, 2002:356~357
99. Filella I,Llusi J,Pinol J.Leaf gas exchange and fluorescence of Phillyrea latifolia,Pistacia lentiscus and Quercus ilex saplings in severe drought and high temperature conditions Environ Exp Bot,1998,39:213～220
100. Genty B , Briantais J M,Baker N R..The relationship between the quantum yield of non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluoresce and the rate of photosystem Ⅱ photochemistry in leaves. Biochimica. Biophysica. Acta, 1989,990:87~92
101. Gowing D T., et al.A positive root-sourced signal as an indicator of soil drying in apple[J]. J Exp Bot., 1990, 41:1535～1540.
102. Hackett,W.P.The influence of auxin ,catechol,and methanolic tissue extracts on root initiation in aseptically cultured shoot apices of the juvenile and adult forms of Hedera helix.Jour.Amer.Soc.Hort.Sci. 1970,95:398～402
103. Hall AJ.Lemcoff J H,Trapani N.Water stress before and during flowering in maize and its effect on yield its components and their determinants. Maydica. 1981,26:19～30
104. Howard,B.H. Increase during winter in capacity for root regeneration in detached shoots of fruit tree rootstocks.Nature. 1965,208:912～913
105. Hsiao T C.Effect of drought and elevated CO2 on plant water use efficiency and productivity. In Tackson MB &Black CR eds. Interaction Stresses on plants in a Changing Climate.NATO ASI SeriesGlobal Environmental Change Volume Berlin:Springer-Verlag . 1993,435～465
106. Hsiao T C.Plant responses to water stress. Ann. Rev. Plant physiol. 1973,24:519～570
107. Hulsebosch R.J, Hoff A J, Shuvalov VA. Influence of KF, DCMU and removal of Ca2+ on the high-spin EPR signal of the cytochrome b-559 heme Fe (III) ligated by OH- in chloroplasts. Biochimica. Biophysica. Acta, 1996,1277: 103~106
108. Jones H G,Loton M T,Higgs K et al.Experimental control of water status in an apple orchard.J Hortical Sci,1983,58:301
109. Jones M Metal. Osmotic adjustment in expend and full expend edle aves of sunflower in response to water streess.Aust.J.PlantPhysiol.,1980,7:181～192
110. Jones M M et al. Osmotic adjustment in leaves of sorghumin response to water deficits. Plant Physiol., 1978,61:122～126
111. Kelliber F M et al.Stomatal resistance and growth of drought-stressed eastern cotton wood from a wet and dry site.Sil-vagegenet.,1980,29:166～171
112. Kelliher F M et al.Stomatal resistance, transpirations and growth of drought-stressed eastern cotton wood. Can. J.For.Res.,1980,10:447～451
113. Kelly J.The hillier gardener’s guide to trees & shrubs (M). Italy: Lego SPA for David & Charles and Justyn Willsmore Brunel House, 1995,380~384
114. Kenneth A,The Hillier Gardener’s Guide to Trees & Shrubs, Hillier nurseries, David & Charles and Justyn Willsmore ,1995,380~384.
115. Kenneth A. Beckett, Climbing Plants,Timber Press,1983,105~109.
116. Kwon K W et al. Temporal changes in tissue water relations of seedlings of Quercus acutissima, Q.albaandQ. stellata subjecte dt ochronic water stress.Can.J.For.Res.,1989,19:622～629
117. Lacono F,et al.Response of electron transport rate of water stress-affected grapevines Influence of leaf age[J].Vitis,2000,39(4):137～144
118. Lichtenthaler H K.Application of chlorophyll fluorescence in photosynthesis research, stress physiology, hydrobiology and remote sensing. Netherlands; Kluwer Academic Publishers,1988,63~69
119. Mahoney J M et al. Response of a hybrid poplar to water table decline in different substrates. Forest Ecology and Man-agement,1992,54(1-4):141～156
120. Mazzoleni S et al. Differential physiological and morphological responses of two hybrid Populus clones to water stress.Tree Physiol.,1988,4:61～70
121. Meier C E et al.Physiological response of loblollypine (PinustaedaL.) seedlings to drought stress: Osmotic adjust-mentand tissue lasticity. Journal Plant Physiology.,1992,140(6):754～760
122. Metcalfe J C et al. Leaf growth of Eucalyptus seedlings under water deficit. Tree Physiol., 1990,6(2):221～227
123. Methy M,Damesin C,Rambal S.Drought and photosystemⅡ activity in two Mediterrancean oaks.Ann Sci For,1996,53:255～262
124. Momen B et al. Tissue water elations of Quercus wislizeni seedlings: Drought resistance in a California evergreen oak. Acta Oecologica.,1992,13(1):127～136
125. Myers B J et al.Water stress and seedlings growth of two ecucalypt species from contrasting habitats. Tree Physiol .1989,5:207～218
126. Osmond C B.What is photoinhibition? Some insights from comparisons of shade and sun plants. In:Baker NR, Bowyer JR ed. Photoinhibition of Photosynthesis: from Molecular Mechanisms to the Field. Oxford: Bios Scientifi,1994,1~24
127. Palmroth S., Berninger F.& ikinmaa E. N.Correlations of pipe model parameters with climatic variables and stand chanacteristics. In: Mohren , G. J. , K. Kramer &. S. Sabate eds . Impacts of global change on tree physiology and forest ecosystems . Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1997.287~291.
128. Passioura J B.Root singals control leaf expansion in wheat seedling growing in drying soil.Austy J plant physiol,1988
129. Pearson ,R W.Soil environment and root development. In: Peirre ,W H ,D Kirkham , J Pesek , and R Shaw .eds .Plant environment and efficient water use , Madison : American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America,1966,95~126.
130. Ranney T Getal.Responseof five temperate deciduous tree species to water stree. Tree Physiol., 1990,6(4):439～448
131. Rappaport,J.The influence of leaves and growth substances on the rooting response of cuttings, Natuurw Tijdschr.,1940.21:356～59
132. Rhizopoulou S et al.Influence of soil drying on root development , water relations and leaf growth of Ceratonia siliqua L.Oecolgia, 1991,88(1): 41～47
133. Rhoden baugh E J et al.Water stress photosynthesis and early growth patterns of cutting of three Populus clones. TreePhysiol.,1993,13(3):213～226
134. Riegern M et al.Comparison of drought resistance among Prunus species from divergent habitats.TreePhysiol.1992,11(4):369～380
135. Sankarapandian R.,Krishnadoss D.,Muppidathi N.,Chidambaram S.Variability studies in grain sorghum for certain physiological characters under water stress conditions.Crop Improvement1993,20(1):45～50
136. Save R,Biel C,Domingo R,Ruiz-Snchez M C,Torrecillas A.Some physiological and morphological characteristics of citrus plants for drought resistance.Plant Sci,1995,110:167～172
137. Schaplinski T J et al. Water stress tolerance and late-senson organic solute accumulation in hybridpoplar. Can.J.Bot.,1989,67:1981～1988
138. Seiler J R etal. ,Physiological and morphological responses of three half-sibfamilies of loblolly pine to water-stress conditioning. Forest Sci.,1988,34(2):487～495
139. Seiler J R et al. Photosynthesis and transpiration of loblolly pine seedlings as influenced by moisture-stress condition-ing. Forest Sci.,1985,31(3):742～749
140. Shinozaki,P.M., Yoda K., Hozumi K.& Kira. T.A quantitative analysis of plant from——the pipe model theory I Basic analysis .Japanese Journal of Ecology,1964,14:97~105.
141. Staffs of the L. H. Bailey Hortorium ,Hortus Third ,Connurl University press,1976
142. Tan W X et al.Drough ttolereance in faster and slower growing black spruce (Piceamariana) progenies .Osmotic adjustment and changes of solube carbonhy drates and amino acids under osmotic stress. Physiol.Plant,1992,85(4):645～651
143. The Reader’s Digest Association, Encyclopaedia of Garden plants and Flowers, The Reader’s Digest Association Far East Ltd.1989,417～418
144. Tomazewski,M.The mechanism of synergistic effects between auxin and some natural phenolic substances.In Nitsch,1964,335～351
145. Torrecillas A,Alarcon J J,Domingo R et al Strategies for drought resistance in leaves of two almond cultivars.Plant Sci.1996,118:135～143
146. Torrecillas A,Galego R,Perez-Pastor A et al.Gas exchange and water relations of young apricot plants under drougtht conditions.J Agr Sci.1999,132:445-452
147. Van Volkenburgh E.Regulation of dicotyledonous leaf growth., physiology of cell expansion during plant growth. Amer. Soc. Plant Physiol.,193～201
148. Westgate M E and Boyer T S.Osmotic adjustment and the inhibition OG leaf : net and silk growth at low water potentials in maize ,Planta ,1986,164:640～649
149. Wright , I. J. & M. Westoby.Differences in seedling growth behaviour among species trait correlations across species , Journal of Ecology.1999,87:85~97 .
150. Wurr D C E,Hand D W,Edmondson R N et al. Climate change:a response surface study of the effects of CO2 and temperature on the growth of beetroot,carrots and onions.J Agr Sci,1998,131:125～133
151. Yang L et al.Effects water stress on the chloroplasts in leaves of Citrus medica var. sarcofactyls[J]. Chinese Agri SciBulletin,2001,17(1):20～22