山西省水土保持功能分区及生态脆弱性评价
|
摘要
随着新《中华人民共和国水土保持法》和《全国水土保持区划（试行）》的颁布和实施，不同区域的水土保持分区和生态功能成为新时期水土保持研究的重要内容，也是水土流失综合防治工作的基础，然而目前国家级水土保持区划应用于省级水土保持分区时欠精细，其区域类型及功能过于概化难利用。同时，新《水土保持法》中第一次在水土流失防治中提出了生态脆弱区的要求，而作为界定生态脆弱区基础的生态脆弱性评价，缺乏针对水土保持的评价方法与模式研究，不利于指导水土保持工作的科学开展。因此，需要基于水土保持生态功能，进行省级水土保持区划和生态脆弱性研究，为区域性水土保持区划和水土流失防治工作提供科学依据。
论文以地处黄土高原区的山西省为研究对象，继承全国水土保持区划的原则、指标、方法与成果，运用空间叠置技术和水土流失主导因子空间分析等方法，提出山西省水土保持二级分区体系，即水土保持战略格局区（一级区）和主导功能区（二级区）。山西省共划分为6个一级区，13个二级区，分别对一、二级水土保持分区的生态脆弱性进行评价；通过水土保持功能与脆弱性评价分析，充分反映了区域综合防治的重点并提出水土流失综合防治建议。山西省水土保持分区是在全国水土保持区划系统架构下进行的，可以与全国水土保持区划较好的衔接，克服了以往区划的独立性，使其能够更好的应用于水土保持规划及水土保持工作的统筹管理。
（1）山西省水土保持一级（战略格局）分区
参考山西省地貌类型图、山西省水系分布图、全国水土保持三级分区的专题图，结合山西省的县级行政分区，利用GIS技术平台对专题图进行空间叠置和格局分析，依据地貌特征指标（平均海拔）以及水热指标（≥10℃积温，多年平均降水量）等，划定由不同地貌类型的水土保持分区，即山西省水土保持一级分区。一级分区命名采用“地理位置+地貌类型”的方式。划分为6个一级区，具体为：
1）Ⅰ太行山西北部山地丘陵区
2）Ⅱ太行山西南部山地丘陵区
3）Ⅲ晋西北黄土丘陵沟壑区
4）Ⅳ汾河中游丘陵沟壑区
5）Ⅴ晋南丘陵阶地区
6）Ⅵ晋西南高塬沟壑区
（2）山西省水土保持二级（主导功能）分区
在一级分区的基础上，进一步依据微地貌类型、土壤类型、海拔（县级）、地面坡度、水土流失类型及其比例、气温条件、林草覆盖度等指标因子的空间分布状况，划分为13个二级区，结合山西省水土流失特点，提出了土壤保持、蓄水保水、拦沙减沙、农田防护、水源涵养、防风固沙、生态维护、人居环境维护等8种水土保持生态功能类型，并借鉴水土保持区划导则中的计算方法，对山西省各二级区进行了水土保持生态功能定位，并分析其分布格局特征。二级区命名采用“区域地理位置+优势（主要）地貌类型+水土保持主导功能”的方式，具体为：
1）Ⅰ-1雁北西部缓坡丘陵风沙防风固沙区
2）Ⅰ-2大同盆地及周边山地农田防护区
3）Ⅰ-3恒山五台山山地丘陵水源涵养区
4）Ⅱ-1太行山中段山地丘陵土壤保持区
5）Ⅱ-2长治盆地及周边山地水源涵养区
6）Ⅲ-1忻州西部缓坡丘陵风沙防风固沙区
7）Ⅲ-2汾河上游山地丘陵生态维护区
8）Ⅲ-3晋西黄土丘陵沟壑拦沙减沙区
9）Ⅳ-1太原晋中盆地及山前阶地人居环境维护区
10）Ⅳ-2临汾盆地北部丘陵阶地土壤保持区
11）Ⅴ-1晋城丘陵阶地蓄水保水区
12）Ⅴ-2晋南-中条山丘陵阶地土壤保持区
13）Ⅵ-1晋西南高塬沟壑土壤保持区
（3）山西省水土保持生态脆弱性评价
综合山西省自然、社会经济影响因素及其水土流失特点，选取多年平均气温、多年平均降雨量、多年平均暴雨日数、多年平均大风天数、林草覆盖率、耕垦指数、农村人口密度、国民生产总值、工矿业密度、粮食总产量、水土流失率、中度以上水土流失比、水土流失治理率、坡耕地面积比共14项指标，构建水土保持生态脆弱性评价指标体系，采用基于评价指标重要性赋值（专家评判打分）和建立判别矩阵检验的层次分析法（AHP），以县（市）为单元计算生态脆弱度，将脆弱性程度划分为轻度、中度、强度、极强度脆弱4个等级，进而评价不同县（市）的生态脆弱性等级，分析一、二级区不同水土保持功能区的生态脆弱性程度。
水土保持一级分区生态脆弱性评价结果：
1）生态脆弱性属于强度脆弱级的区域：Ⅰ太行山西北部山地丘陵区Ⅱ太行山西南部山地丘陵区Ⅲ晋西北黄土丘陵沟壑区
2）生态脆弱性属于轻-中度脆弱级的区域：Ⅳ汾河中游丘陵沟壑区3）生态脆弱性属于中-强度脆弱级的区域：Ⅴ晋南丘陵阶地区（中-强度脆弱）
4）生态脆弱性属于强度-极强度脆弱级的区域：Ⅵ晋西南高塬沟壑区
水土保持二级分区生态脆弱性评价结果：
1）生态脆弱性属于强度脆弱级的区域：Ⅰ-2大同盆地及周边山地农田防护区Ⅰ-3恒山五台山山地丘陵水源涵养区Ⅱ-1太行山中段山地丘陵土壤保持区Ⅱ-2长治盆地及周边山地水源涵养区Ⅲ-1忻州西部缓坡丘陵风沙防风固沙区Ⅲ-2汾河上游山地丘陵生态维护区
2）生态脆弱性属于强度-极强度脆弱级的区域：Ⅴ-1晋城丘陵阶地蓄水保水区Ⅵ-1晋西南高塬沟壑土壤保持区
3）生态脆弱性属于中度脆弱级的区域：Ⅳ-2临汾盆地北部丘陵阶地土壤保持区Ⅴ-2晋南-中条山丘陵阶地土壤保持区
4）生态脆弱性属于轻度脆弱级的区域：Ⅰ-1雁北西部缓坡丘陵风沙防风固沙区
5）生态脆弱性属于轻-中度脆弱级的区域：Ⅳ-1太原晋中盆地及山前阶地人居环境维护区
6）生态脆弱性属于极强度脆弱级的区域：Ⅲ-3晋西黄土丘陵沟壑拦沙减沙区
As the Law of the People's Republic of China on Soil and Water Conservation and theRegionalization of the National Soil and Water Conservation were promulgated andimplemented, regionalizations and ecological functions of soil and water conservationbecome the important contents of soil and water conservation works and the basis of soiland water loss control in the new era. However, it is too rough of the nationalregionalization to apply in the provincial dimention. By the first time, the Law of thePeople's Republic of China on Soil and Water Conservation proposed the demands ofecological vulnerability areas, but the research of ecological vulnerability evaluation wasnot enough in methods and modes exploration, which is not benefit to carry out the work ofsoil and water conservation. Therefore, it is necessary to do research on provincialregionalization and ecological vulnerability based on ecological functions of soil and waterconservation, which could offer scientific basis for the regionalization of soil and waterconservation and the control of soil and water loss.
Based on the principles, index, methods and chievements of the national regionalizationof soil and water conservation, we chose Shanxi province as the study area, and proposed thesystem of two-degree regionalization of soil and water conservation in Shanxi, by methods oftechnology of spatial overlaying and spatial analysis of dominant factor. By dividing Shanxiinto6first-degree regions and13second-degree regions, we evaluated the ecologicalvulnerability of the first-degree and second-degree regions; by analyzing the functions of soiland water conservation and vulnerability, the focus of soil and water loss control was showed,and the suggestions and measures were formed.
The achievements of the thesis are as follows:
(1) The first-degree regions of soil and water conservation in Shanxi
According to the mapof landform type, of basin distribution in Shanxi, and thethematic map of the national third-degree regions of soil and water conservation, combiningthe administrative division of Shanxi, the spatial overlaying and pattern analysis of thethematic map were done by GIS. By using index of altitude, cumulative temperature above10℃, and average precipitation,6first-degree regions were devided. The name offirst-degree region was defined as “geographic location and landform type”：
1) ⅠThe mountainous and hilly area in the north-west of Taihang Mountain
2) ⅡThe mountainous and hilly area in the south-west of Taihang Mountain
3) ⅢThe loess hilly and gully area in the north-west of Shanxi
4) ⅣThe hilly-gully area in the middle Fen river
5) ⅤThe hilly terrace in the south of Shanxi
6) ⅥThe loess gully area in Shanxi, Shanxi and Gansu
(2) The second-degree regions of of soil and water conservation in Shanxi
Based on the first-degree regions,13second-degree regions were divided in Shanxi byusing the index of reginal landform type, soil type, altitude in county dimention, surfaceslope, type and proportion of soil and water loss, temperature, and grass and forestcoverage.8ecological functions of soil and water conservation, which were soilconservation, wate holding and storage, sand interception and reduction, farmlandprotection, water conservation, wind prevention and sand fixationm, ecology maintaince,and living environment maintaince, were proposed. The ecological function roles ofsecond-degree regions were determined according to the methods in the guide of soil andwater conservation regionalizations.The name of second-degree region was defined as“geographic location and dominant landform type and dominant function of soil and waterconservation”：
1) Ⅰ-1The wind prevention, sand fixation and soil conservation regionof the hilly andsandy area in the west of the western Yanmenguan
2) Ⅰ-2The farmland protection and water storage region of themountainous area inDatong basin and its surrounding area
3) Ⅰ-3The water conservation and ecology maintenance region of the mountainous andhilly area of Heng Mountain and Wutai Mountain
4) Ⅱ-1The soil conservation and disaster prevention and mitigation region inmountainous and hilly area of the the middle of Taihang Mountain
5) Ⅱ-2The water conservation and ecology maintaince region of the mountainous areain Changzhi basin and its surrounding area
6) Ⅲ-1The wind prevention and sand fixation region of the hilly and sandy area in thewest of Xinzhou
7) Ⅲ-2The ecology maintaion and soil conservation region of the mountainous andhilly area in the upstream of Fen river
8) Ⅲ-3The sand interception and reduction, and disaster prevention and mitigationregion of the Loess hilly and gully area in the west of Shanxi
9) Ⅳ-1The living environment maintaince and soil conservation region of the Jinzhongbasin and piedmont terrace area in Taiyuan
10) Ⅳ-2The soil conservation and water storage region of the hilly terrace area in thenorth of Linfen basin
11) Ⅴ-1The water storage and soil retention region of the hilly terrace area in Jincheng
12) Ⅴ-2The soil conservation and farmland prevention region of the hilly terrace areain southern Shanxi and Zhongtiao Mountain
13) Ⅵ-1The soil conservation and water conservation region of the plateau and gullyarea in the south-west of Shanxi
(3) The ecological vulnerability evaluation of soil and water conservation in Shanxi
By analyzing the natural, social and economic factors and soil and water erosioncharacteristics in Shanxi, the index system of ecological vulnerability bevaluation ased on soiland water conservation was built; by the method of AHP, the evaluationg system ofecological vulnerability was established based on the uniti of county. Then, we analized andevaluated the ecological vulnerbilites of the first-degree and second-degree regions in Shanxi.
The ecological vulnerability evaluation of first-degree regions:
1) Regions of severe vulnerablility:ⅠThe mountainous and hilly area in the north-west of Taihang MountainⅡThe mountainous and hilly area in the south-west of Taihang MountainⅢThe loess hilly and gully area in the north-west of Shanxi
2) Regions of mild-medium vulnerablility:ⅣThe hilly-gully area in the middle Fen river
3) Regions of medium-severe vulnerablility:ⅤThe hilly terrace in the south of Shanxi
4) Regions of severe-ultra severe vulnerablility:ⅥThe loess gully area in Shanxi, Shanxi and GansuThe ecological vulnerability evaluation of second-degree regions:
1) Regions of severe vulnerablility:Ⅰ-2The farmland protection and water storage region of the mountainous area inDatong basin and its surrounding areaⅠ-3The water conservation and ecology maintenance region of the mountainous andhilly area of Heng Mountain and Wutai Mountain Ⅱ-1The soil conservation and disaster prevention and mitigation region in mountainousand hilly area of the the middle of Taihang MountainⅡ-2The water conservation and ecology maintaince region of the mountainous area inChangzhi basin and its surrounding areaⅢ-1The wind prevention and sand fixation region of the hilly and sandy area in thewest of XinzhouⅢ-2The ecology maintaion and soil conservation region of the mountainous and hillyarea in the upstream of Fen river
2) Regions of severe-ultra severe vulnerablility:Ⅴ-1The water storage and soil retention region of the hilly terrace area in JinchengⅥ-1The soil conservation and water conservation region of the plateau and gully area inthe south-west of Shanxi
3) Regions of mild-medium vulnerablility:Ⅳ-2The soil conservation and water storage region of the hilly terrace area in the northof Linfen basinⅤ-2The soil conservation and farmland prevention region of the hilly terrace area insouthern Shanxi and Zhongtiao Mountain
4) Regions of mild-medium vulnerablility:Ⅰ-1The wind prevention, sand fixation and soil conservation region of the hilly andsandy area in the west of the western Yanmenguan
5) Regions of mild-medium vulnerablility:Ⅳ-1The living environment maintaince and soil conservation region of the Jinzhongbasin and piedmont terrace area in Taiyuan
6）Regions of ultra severe vulnerablility:Ⅲ-3The sand interception and reduction, and disaster prevention and mitigation regionof the Loess hilly and gully area in the west of Shanxi
论文以地处黄土高原区的山西省为研究对象，继承全国水土保持区划的原则、指标、方法与成果，运用空间叠置技术和水土流失主导因子空间分析等方法，提出山西省水土保持二级分区体系，即水土保持战略格局区（一级区）和主导功能区（二级区）。山西省共划分为6个一级区，13个二级区，分别对一、二级水土保持分区的生态脆弱性进行评价；通过水土保持功能与脆弱性评价分析，充分反映了区域综合防治的重点并提出水土流失综合防治建议。山西省水土保持分区是在全国水土保持区划系统架构下进行的，可以与全国水土保持区划较好的衔接，克服了以往区划的独立性，使其能够更好的应用于水土保持规划及水土保持工作的统筹管理。
（1）山西省水土保持一级（战略格局）分区
参考山西省地貌类型图、山西省水系分布图、全国水土保持三级分区的专题图，结合山西省的县级行政分区，利用GIS技术平台对专题图进行空间叠置和格局分析，依据地貌特征指标（平均海拔）以及水热指标（≥10℃积温，多年平均降水量）等，划定由不同地貌类型的水土保持分区，即山西省水土保持一级分区。一级分区命名采用“地理位置+地貌类型”的方式。划分为6个一级区，具体为：
1）Ⅰ太行山西北部山地丘陵区
2）Ⅱ太行山西南部山地丘陵区
3）Ⅲ晋西北黄土丘陵沟壑区
4）Ⅳ汾河中游丘陵沟壑区
5）Ⅴ晋南丘陵阶地区
6）Ⅵ晋西南高塬沟壑区
（2）山西省水土保持二级（主导功能）分区
在一级分区的基础上，进一步依据微地貌类型、土壤类型、海拔（县级）、地面坡度、水土流失类型及其比例、气温条件、林草覆盖度等指标因子的空间分布状况，划分为13个二级区，结合山西省水土流失特点，提出了土壤保持、蓄水保水、拦沙减沙、农田防护、水源涵养、防风固沙、生态维护、人居环境维护等8种水土保持生态功能类型，并借鉴水土保持区划导则中的计算方法，对山西省各二级区进行了水土保持生态功能定位，并分析其分布格局特征。二级区命名采用“区域地理位置+优势（主要）地貌类型+水土保持主导功能”的方式，具体为：
1）Ⅰ-1雁北西部缓坡丘陵风沙防风固沙区
2）Ⅰ-2大同盆地及周边山地农田防护区
3）Ⅰ-3恒山五台山山地丘陵水源涵养区
4）Ⅱ-1太行山中段山地丘陵土壤保持区
5）Ⅱ-2长治盆地及周边山地水源涵养区
6）Ⅲ-1忻州西部缓坡丘陵风沙防风固沙区
7）Ⅲ-2汾河上游山地丘陵生态维护区
8）Ⅲ-3晋西黄土丘陵沟壑拦沙减沙区
9）Ⅳ-1太原晋中盆地及山前阶地人居环境维护区
10）Ⅳ-2临汾盆地北部丘陵阶地土壤保持区
11）Ⅴ-1晋城丘陵阶地蓄水保水区
12）Ⅴ-2晋南-中条山丘陵阶地土壤保持区
13）Ⅵ-1晋西南高塬沟壑土壤保持区
（3）山西省水土保持生态脆弱性评价
综合山西省自然、社会经济影响因素及其水土流失特点，选取多年平均气温、多年平均降雨量、多年平均暴雨日数、多年平均大风天数、林草覆盖率、耕垦指数、农村人口密度、国民生产总值、工矿业密度、粮食总产量、水土流失率、中度以上水土流失比、水土流失治理率、坡耕地面积比共14项指标，构建水土保持生态脆弱性评价指标体系，采用基于评价指标重要性赋值（专家评判打分）和建立判别矩阵检验的层次分析法（AHP），以县（市）为单元计算生态脆弱度，将脆弱性程度划分为轻度、中度、强度、极强度脆弱4个等级，进而评价不同县（市）的生态脆弱性等级，分析一、二级区不同水土保持功能区的生态脆弱性程度。
水土保持一级分区生态脆弱性评价结果：
1）生态脆弱性属于强度脆弱级的区域：Ⅰ太行山西北部山地丘陵区Ⅱ太行山西南部山地丘陵区Ⅲ晋西北黄土丘陵沟壑区
2）生态脆弱性属于轻-中度脆弱级的区域：Ⅳ汾河中游丘陵沟壑区3）生态脆弱性属于中-强度脆弱级的区域：Ⅴ晋南丘陵阶地区（中-强度脆弱）
4）生态脆弱性属于强度-极强度脆弱级的区域：Ⅵ晋西南高塬沟壑区
水土保持二级分区生态脆弱性评价结果：
1）生态脆弱性属于强度脆弱级的区域：Ⅰ-2大同盆地及周边山地农田防护区Ⅰ-3恒山五台山山地丘陵水源涵养区Ⅱ-1太行山中段山地丘陵土壤保持区Ⅱ-2长治盆地及周边山地水源涵养区Ⅲ-1忻州西部缓坡丘陵风沙防风固沙区Ⅲ-2汾河上游山地丘陵生态维护区
2）生态脆弱性属于强度-极强度脆弱级的区域：Ⅴ-1晋城丘陵阶地蓄水保水区Ⅵ-1晋西南高塬沟壑土壤保持区
3）生态脆弱性属于中度脆弱级的区域：Ⅳ-2临汾盆地北部丘陵阶地土壤保持区Ⅴ-2晋南-中条山丘陵阶地土壤保持区
4）生态脆弱性属于轻度脆弱级的区域：Ⅰ-1雁北西部缓坡丘陵风沙防风固沙区
5）生态脆弱性属于轻-中度脆弱级的区域：Ⅳ-1太原晋中盆地及山前阶地人居环境维护区
6）生态脆弱性属于极强度脆弱级的区域：Ⅲ-3晋西黄土丘陵沟壑拦沙减沙区
As the Law of the People's Republic of China on Soil and Water Conservation and theRegionalization of the National Soil and Water Conservation were promulgated andimplemented, regionalizations and ecological functions of soil and water conservationbecome the important contents of soil and water conservation works and the basis of soiland water loss control in the new era. However, it is too rough of the nationalregionalization to apply in the provincial dimention. By the first time, the Law of thePeople's Republic of China on Soil and Water Conservation proposed the demands ofecological vulnerability areas, but the research of ecological vulnerability evaluation wasnot enough in methods and modes exploration, which is not benefit to carry out the work ofsoil and water conservation. Therefore, it is necessary to do research on provincialregionalization and ecological vulnerability based on ecological functions of soil and waterconservation, which could offer scientific basis for the regionalization of soil and waterconservation and the control of soil and water loss.
Based on the principles, index, methods and chievements of the national regionalizationof soil and water conservation, we chose Shanxi province as the study area, and proposed thesystem of two-degree regionalization of soil and water conservation in Shanxi, by methods oftechnology of spatial overlaying and spatial analysis of dominant factor. By dividing Shanxiinto6first-degree regions and13second-degree regions, we evaluated the ecologicalvulnerability of the first-degree and second-degree regions; by analyzing the functions of soiland water conservation and vulnerability, the focus of soil and water loss control was showed,and the suggestions and measures were formed.
The achievements of the thesis are as follows:
(1) The first-degree regions of soil and water conservation in Shanxi
According to the mapof landform type, of basin distribution in Shanxi, and thethematic map of the national third-degree regions of soil and water conservation, combiningthe administrative division of Shanxi, the spatial overlaying and pattern analysis of thethematic map were done by GIS. By using index of altitude, cumulative temperature above10℃, and average precipitation,6first-degree regions were devided. The name offirst-degree region was defined as “geographic location and landform type”：
1) ⅠThe mountainous and hilly area in the north-west of Taihang Mountain
2) ⅡThe mountainous and hilly area in the south-west of Taihang Mountain
3) ⅢThe loess hilly and gully area in the north-west of Shanxi
4) ⅣThe hilly-gully area in the middle Fen river
5) ⅤThe hilly terrace in the south of Shanxi
6) ⅥThe loess gully area in Shanxi, Shanxi and Gansu
(2) The second-degree regions of of soil and water conservation in Shanxi
Based on the first-degree regions,13second-degree regions were divided in Shanxi byusing the index of reginal landform type, soil type, altitude in county dimention, surfaceslope, type and proportion of soil and water loss, temperature, and grass and forestcoverage.8ecological functions of soil and water conservation, which were soilconservation, wate holding and storage, sand interception and reduction, farmlandprotection, water conservation, wind prevention and sand fixationm, ecology maintaince,and living environment maintaince, were proposed. The ecological function roles ofsecond-degree regions were determined according to the methods in the guide of soil andwater conservation regionalizations.The name of second-degree region was defined as“geographic location and dominant landform type and dominant function of soil and waterconservation”：
1) Ⅰ-1The wind prevention, sand fixation and soil conservation regionof the hilly andsandy area in the west of the western Yanmenguan
2) Ⅰ-2The farmland protection and water storage region of themountainous area inDatong basin and its surrounding area
3) Ⅰ-3The water conservation and ecology maintenance region of the mountainous andhilly area of Heng Mountain and Wutai Mountain
4) Ⅱ-1The soil conservation and disaster prevention and mitigation region inmountainous and hilly area of the the middle of Taihang Mountain
5) Ⅱ-2The water conservation and ecology maintaince region of the mountainous areain Changzhi basin and its surrounding area
6) Ⅲ-1The wind prevention and sand fixation region of the hilly and sandy area in thewest of Xinzhou
7) Ⅲ-2The ecology maintaion and soil conservation region of the mountainous andhilly area in the upstream of Fen river
8) Ⅲ-3The sand interception and reduction, and disaster prevention and mitigationregion of the Loess hilly and gully area in the west of Shanxi
9) Ⅳ-1The living environment maintaince and soil conservation region of the Jinzhongbasin and piedmont terrace area in Taiyuan
10) Ⅳ-2The soil conservation and water storage region of the hilly terrace area in thenorth of Linfen basin
11) Ⅴ-1The water storage and soil retention region of the hilly terrace area in Jincheng
12) Ⅴ-2The soil conservation and farmland prevention region of the hilly terrace areain southern Shanxi and Zhongtiao Mountain
13) Ⅵ-1The soil conservation and water conservation region of the plateau and gullyarea in the south-west of Shanxi
(3) The ecological vulnerability evaluation of soil and water conservation in Shanxi
By analyzing the natural, social and economic factors and soil and water erosioncharacteristics in Shanxi, the index system of ecological vulnerability bevaluation ased on soiland water conservation was built; by the method of AHP, the evaluationg system ofecological vulnerability was established based on the uniti of county. Then, we analized andevaluated the ecological vulnerbilites of the first-degree and second-degree regions in Shanxi.
The ecological vulnerability evaluation of first-degree regions:
1) Regions of severe vulnerablility:ⅠThe mountainous and hilly area in the north-west of Taihang MountainⅡThe mountainous and hilly area in the south-west of Taihang MountainⅢThe loess hilly and gully area in the north-west of Shanxi
2) Regions of mild-medium vulnerablility:ⅣThe hilly-gully area in the middle Fen river
3) Regions of medium-severe vulnerablility:ⅤThe hilly terrace in the south of Shanxi
4) Regions of severe-ultra severe vulnerablility:ⅥThe loess gully area in Shanxi, Shanxi and GansuThe ecological vulnerability evaluation of second-degree regions:
1) Regions of severe vulnerablility:Ⅰ-2The farmland protection and water storage region of the mountainous area inDatong basin and its surrounding areaⅠ-3The water conservation and ecology maintenance region of the mountainous andhilly area of Heng Mountain and Wutai Mountain Ⅱ-1The soil conservation and disaster prevention and mitigation region in mountainousand hilly area of the the middle of Taihang MountainⅡ-2The water conservation and ecology maintaince region of the mountainous area inChangzhi basin and its surrounding areaⅢ-1The wind prevention and sand fixation region of the hilly and sandy area in thewest of XinzhouⅢ-2The ecology maintaion and soil conservation region of the mountainous and hillyarea in the upstream of Fen river
2) Regions of severe-ultra severe vulnerablility:Ⅴ-1The water storage and soil retention region of the hilly terrace area in JinchengⅥ-1The soil conservation and water conservation region of the plateau and gully area inthe south-west of Shanxi
3) Regions of mild-medium vulnerablility:Ⅳ-2The soil conservation and water storage region of the hilly terrace area in the northof Linfen basinⅤ-2The soil conservation and farmland prevention region of the hilly terrace area insouthern Shanxi and Zhongtiao Mountain
4) Regions of mild-medium vulnerablility:Ⅰ-1The wind prevention, sand fixation and soil conservation region of the hilly andsandy area in the west of the western Yanmenguan
5) Regions of mild-medium vulnerablility:Ⅳ-1The living environment maintaince and soil conservation region of the Jinzhongbasin and piedmont terrace area in Taiyuan
6）Regions of ultra severe vulnerablility:Ⅲ-3The sand interception and reduction, and disaster prevention and mitigation regionof the Loess hilly and gully area in the west of Shanxi
引文
2007S L.土壤侵蚀分类分级标准[S],2008.
艾晓燕,徐广军,韩守.论水土保持生态修复的特点与原则[J].中国水土保持,2010(3):44-45.
蔡海生,陈美球,赵小敏.脆弱生态环境脆弱度评价研究进展[J].江西农业大学学报,2003,25(2):270-275.
蔡强国,陆兆熊,王贵平.黄土丘陵沟壑区典型小省侵蚀产沙过程模型[J].地理学报,1996,51(2):108-117.
蔡强国.坡面侵蚀产沙模型的研究[J].地理研究,1988,7(4):94-102.
蔡运龙, Smit B.全球气候变化下中国农业的脆弱性与适应对策[J].地理学报,1996,51(3):202-212.
柴宗新.西南地区水土流失区划[J].山地研究,1995,13（2）:121-127.
陈明恒.论水土保持功能[J].城市建设理论研究(电子版),2013(7).
陈晓燕.不同尺度下紫色土水土流失效应分析[D].西南大学,2009.
春梅.基于景观格局的玉树州天然草地生态脆弱性分析[J].安徽农业科学,2012,40(15):8599-8600.
崔丽娟,张明祥.湿地评价研究概述[J].世界林业研究,2002,15(6):46-53.
房庆方,杨细平.区域协调和可持续发展:珠江三角洲经济区域市群规划及其实施[J].城市规划,1997(1):7-10.
傅伯杰,刘国华,陈利顶.中国生态区划方案[J].生态学报,2001,21(1):1-6.
傅庆林,罗永进,柴锡周.低丘红壤生态脆弱区特性的初步研究[J].浙江农业学报,1995,7(4):279-281.
甘露,陈刚才,万国江.贵州喀斯特山区农业生态环境的脆弱性及可持续发展对策[J].山地学报,2001,19(2):130-134.
高旺盛,董孝斌.黄土高原丘陵沟壑区脆弱农业生态系统服务评价[J]. JOURNAL OFNATURAL RESOURCES,2003,18(2).
高彦华,汪宏清,刘琪璟.生态恢复评价研究进展[J].江西科学,2003,21(3):168-174.
郭静,姚孝友,刘霞,张光灿,袁利,褚兴彬.不同生态修复措施下鲁中山区土壤的水文特征[J].浙江林学院学报,2008,25(3):342-349.
郭丽英,刘彦随,任志远.生态脆弱区土地利用格局变化及其驱动机制分析[J].资源科学,2005,27(2):128-133.
国务院水土保持委员会办公室.中国土壤侵蚀图及其有关资料.1958:31-32.
韩成军.关于青海省水土保持区划的思考[J].中国水土保持,2011（9）:45-47.
胡良军,邵明安.区域水土流失研究综述[J].山地学报,2001,19（1）:69-74.
黄方,刘湘南,张养贞. GIS支持下的吉林省西部生态环境脆弱态势评价研究[J].地理科学,2003,23(1):95-100.
黄淑芳.主成分分析及MAPINFO在生态环境脆弱性评价中的应用[J].福建地理,2002,17(1):47-49.
Jinghu P A N, Xiaofeng D.基于GIS的黑河省生态环境敏感性评价与分区[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(2):267-273.
焦居仁.生态修复的要点与思考[J].中国水土保持,2003(2):1-2.
焦有梅,张艳鹏.低碳经济时代的山西转型跨越发展[J].能源与节能,2011(4):23-25.
解明曙,庞薇.关于中国土壤侵蚀类型与侵蚀类型区的划分[J].中国水土保持,1993,5:8-10.
解运杰,王岩松,王玉玺.东北黑土区地域界定及其水土保持区划探析[J].水土保持通报,2005,25（1）:48-50.
Kochunov B,李国栋.脆弱生态的概念及分类[J].地理译报,1993,1:18-23.
Lin-de L I U, Yu-bao G A O.论中国北方农牧交错带的生态环境建设与系统功能整合[J].地球科学进展,2002,17(2):174-181.
兰安军,张百平,熊康宁.黔西南脆弱喀斯特生态环境空间格局分析[J].地理研究,2003,22(6):733-741.
兰安军,张百平,熊康宁,安裕伦.黔西南脆弱喀斯特生态环境空间格局分析[J].地理研究,2003,22(6):733-741.
李保国,张金柱,郭素平.河北省太行山片麻岩山地景观生态经济资源特征与利用研究[J].河北农业大学学报,2005,28(4):14-17.
李滨勇,陈海滨,唐海萍.基于AHP和模糊综合评判法的北疆各地州生态脆弱性评价[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2010(2):197-201.
李聪慧,姜志德,谢永生.水源区水土保持措施功能调整初探--以京津水源地冀北山区为例[J].中国水土保持,2012(1):11-13.
李果,王百田.区域生态修复的空间规划方法探讨[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(6):290-294.
李鹤,张平宇,程叶青.脆弱性的概念及其评价方法[J].地理科学进展,2008,27(2):18-25.
李欢.淮河流域水土保持区域研究[D].山东农业大学,2012.
李克让,陈育峰.全球气候变化影响下中国森林的脆弱性分析[J].地理学报,1996,51(S1):40-49.
李双成,吴绍洪,戴尔阜.生态系统响应气候变化脆弱性的人工神经网络模型评价[J].生态学报,2005,25(3).
李团胜,石铁矛.大城市区域的景观生态规划理论与方法[J].地理学与国土研究,1999,15(2):52-55.
李卫海,李阳兵,邵景安,谢静,丹文丽.基于景观尺度的城市生态健康时空过程[J].环境科学学报,2011,31(2).
李秀彬,马志尊,姚孝友,景可,朱会义.北方土石山区水土流失现状与综合治理对策[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,1:9-15.
李阳兵,邵景安,王世杰.岩溶生态系统脆弱性研究[J].地理科学进展,2006,25(5):1-9.
李瑛,曾磊,赵贵章.基于层次分析法的苏贝淖省植被生态脆弱性评价[J].安徽农业科学,2012,40(24):12158-12160.
刘德,王玉俭,钱祖林.山东省水土保持普查要点及区划类型[J].水土保持研究,1994,1（2）:12-28.
刘国华,傅伯杰,陈利顶,郭旭东.中国生态退化的主要类型,特征及分布[J].生态学报,2000,20(1):13-19.
刘康,欧阳志云,王效科,徐卫华,苗鸿.甘肃省生态环境敏感性评价及其空间分布[J].生态学报,2003,23(12):2711-2718.
刘利.北京典型山地森林生态脆弱性的研究[D].北京林业大学,2011.
刘茹,张晶晶,雷蕾.岷江上游生态脆弱性的模糊评价[J].资源开发与市场,2006,22(6):500-501.
刘士余,左长清,孟菁玲.水土保持与国家生态安全[J].中国水土保持科学,2004,2(1):102-104.
刘贤词,王晓辉,邢巧.海南岛中部山区生态系统水土保持功能研究[J].绿色科技,2011(001):101-102.
刘新华,汤国安.中国地形起伏度的提取及在水土流失定量评价中的应用[J].水土保持通报,2001,21(1):57-59.
刘燕华,李秀彬.脆弱生态环境与可持续发展[M].商务印书馆,2001.
刘燕华,赵名茶.脆弱生态环境研究初探[J].生态环境综合整治与恢复技术研究(第二集),1995:1-10.
刘振乾,刘红玉.三江平原湿地生态脆弱性研究[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(2):241-244.
刘震.我国水土保持的目标与任务[J].中国水土保持科学,2003,1(4).
柳仲秋.水土保持功能研究[J].科学之友:下,2010(10):110-111.
卢亚灵,颜磊,许学工.环渤海地区生态脆弱性评价及其空间自相关分析[J].资源科学,2010,32(2).
罗承平,薛纪瑜.中国北方农牧交错带生态环境脆弱性及其成因分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,1995,9(1):1-7.
罗跃初,周忠轩,孙轶,邓红兵,张萍,吴钢.省生态系统健康评价方法[J].生态学报,2003,23(8):1606-1614.
吕昌河,程量.土地利用变化与生态服务功能冲突[J].干旱区研究,2007,24(3):302-306.
吕晓芳,王仰麟,张镱锂,申元村.宁夏中部生态脆弱区土地利用变化及沙漠化响应--以宁夏盐池县为例[J].地理研究,2007,26(6).
马万里,罗菊春.贺兰山森林生态系统的脆弱性及其生物多样性的保护[J].北京林业大学学报,2000,22(4):130-131.
马文银.湘西北喀斯特山地生态脆弱区农业可持续发展研究[J].邵阳学院学报:社会科学版,2002,1(2):114-116.
牛文元.生态环境脆弱带ECOTONE的基础判定[J].生态学报,1989,9(2):97-105.
欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国生态环境敏感性及其区域差异规律研究[J].生态学报,2000,20(1):9-12.
潘成忠,上官周平.土壤空间变异性研究评述[J].生态环境,2003,12(3):371-375.
乔青,高吉喜,王维.生态脆弱性综合评价方法与应用[J].环境科学研究,2008,21(5):117-123.
邱彭华,徐颂军,谢跟踪,唐本安,毕华,余龙师.基于景观格局和生态敏感性的海南西部地区生态脆弱性分析[J].生态学报,2007,4:000.
邱扬,傅伯杰.异质景观中水土流失的空间变异与尺度变异[J].生态学报,2004,24(2):330-337.
冉圣宏,金建君,薛纪渝.脆弱生态区评价的理论与方法[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(1):117-122.
任海军,任美丽.包头市水土保持生态修复有关问题的探讨[J].内蒙古水利,2008(4):75-77.
山西省计划委员会.山西国土资源概论[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1995.
商彦蕊.自然灾害综合研究的新进展--脆弱性研究[J].地域研究与开发,2000,19(2):73-77.
邵颂东,王礼先.国外土壤侵蚀研究的新进展[J].水土保持科技情报,2000(1):32-36.
史德明.加强水土保持是保障国家生态安全的战略措施[J].中国水土保持,2002(2):8-9.
史培军,王静爱,陈婧,叶涛,周洪建.当代地理学之人地相互作用研究的趋向--全球变化人类行为计划(IHDP)第六届开放会议透视[J].地理学报,2006,61(2):115-126.
束龙仓,柯婷婷,刘丽红,张蓉蓉,鲁程鹏.基于综合法的岩溶山区生态系统脆弱性评价[J].中国岩溶,2010.
水利部.国家统计局[J].2013.
苏维词,朱文孝.贵州喀斯特生态脆弱区的农业可持续发展[J].农业现代化研究,2000,21(4):201-204.
孙贵珍,王栓军.以科技进步促进河北太行山区土地资源可持续发展[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(18):504-506.
孙鸿烈.我国水土流失问题及防治对策[D].,2010.
孙武,南忠仁.生态脆弱带内部空间分异结构与脆弱度划分[J].生态学报,2002,22(4):445-451.
孙宪柱,王琦.辽东山区生态修复试点工作调查报告[J].水土保持应用技术,2007(5):25-27.
孙永军,周强,杨日红.黄河省土地荒漠化动态变化遥感研究[J].国土资源遥感,2008,20(2):74-78.
唐国平,李秀彬,刘燕华.全球气候变化下水资源脆弱性及其评估方法[J].地球科学进展,2000,15(3):313-317.
唐克丽.黄河流域的侵蚀与径流泥沙变化:1988年-1992年[M].中国科学技术出版社,1993.
陶希东,赵鸿婕.河西走廊生态脆弱性评价及其恢复与重建[J].干旱区研究,2002,19(4):7-12.
田光进,张增祥,赵晓丽,张国平,谭文彬.中国耕地土壤侵蚀空间分布特征及生态背景[J].生态学报,2002,22(1):10-16.
田亚平,刘沛林,郑文武.南方丘陵区的生态脆弱度评估[J].地理研究,2005,24(6):843-852.
万洪秀,孙占东,王润.博斯腾湖湿地生态脆弱性评价研究[J].干旱区地理,2006,29(2).
王国.我国典型脆弱生态区生态经济管理研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2001,9(4):9-12.
王海泽,张嘉治.生态脆弱区及其恢复技术[J].杂粮作物,2002,22(4):233-236.
王介勇,赵庚星,杜春先.基于景观空间结构信息的区域生态脆弱性分析--以黄河三角洲垦利县为例[J].干旱区研究,2005,22(3):317-321.
王静.岩溶山地生态脆弱性评价及治理措施研究[D].西南大学,2009.
王静爱,史培军,朱骊.中国主要自然致灾因子的区域分异[J].地理学报,1994,49(1):18-26.
王静爱,徐霞,刘培芳.中国北方农牧交错带土地利用与人口负荷研究[J].资源科学,1999,21(5):19-24.
王磊,刘得力,王红漪,魏婧华.平邑县水土保持生态修复工程成效与经验[J].中国水土保持,2006(5):28-29.车忠新,褚丽妹.辽东山区水土保持生态修复的实践与探讨[J].水土保持科技情报,2004(2):20-22.
王礼先.关于土壤侵蚀规律研究的目的与方法[J].中国水土保持,1983,6:007.
王莲芬,许树柏.层次分析法引论[M].1990.
王让会,樊自立.干旱区内陆河省生态脆弱性评价[J].生态学杂志,2001a,20(3):63-68.
王让会,宋郁东,樊自立,游先祥.新疆塔里木河省生态脆弱带的环境质量综合评价[J].环境科学,2001b,22(2):7-11.
王涛,屈建军,姚正毅,张伟民,拓万全,张景光,杨根生,陈广庭.北方农牧交错带风水蚀复合区水土流失现状与综合治理对策[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(1):28-36.
王万忠,焦菊英.中国的土壤侵蚀因子定量评价研究[J].水土保持通报,1996,16(5):1-20.
王效科,欧阳志云,肖寒,苗鸿,傅伯杰.中国水土流失敏感性分布规律及其区划研究[J].生态学报,2001,21(1):14-19.
王秀英,曹文洪.坡面土壤侵蚀产沙机理及数学模型研究综述[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1999,5(3):87-92.
王延平,刘霞,姚孝友,张光灿,董智,高鹏.山西省沂蒙山区水土保持生态脆弱性的AHP分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2010,8(3):20-27.
王岩,方创琳,张蔷.城市脆弱性研究评述与展望[J].地理科学进展,2013,32(5):755-768.
王玉俭.山东省水土保持区划探讨[J].水土保持通报,1990,5:003.
王治国,王春红.对我国水土保持区划与规划中若干问题的认识[J].中国水土保持科学,2007,5(1):105-109.
王治国.关于生态修复若干概念与问题的讨论(续)[J].中国水土保持,2004(11):20-21.
王治国.关于生态修复若干概念与问题的讨论[J].中国水土保持,2003(10):4-5.
韦红波,李锐,杨勤科.我国植被水土保持功能研究进展[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(4):489-496.
韦俊位.川中丘陵区坡面土壤侵蚀预测的人工智能建模研究[D].四川农业大学,2010.
魏晓,孙峰华.宁夏水土保持及区划研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,12（6）:119-121.
伍黎芝.生态脆弱区土地资源可持续利用问题:以三峡库区为例[J].中国土地科学,2000,14(2):13-16.
肖笃宁.生态脆弱区的生态重建与景观规划[J].中国沙漠,2003,23(1):6-11.
肖风劲,欧阳华.生态系统健康及其评价指标和方法[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(2).
肖荣波,欧阳志云,王效科,赵同谦.中国西南地区石漠化敏感性评价及其空间分析[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(5):551-554.
谢标,杨永岗.贵州省岩溶山区生态环境脆弱性及人为活动的影响:以息峰县为例[J].水土保持通报,1998,18(4):12-16.
徐福留,曹军,陶澍,傅明先,王维清.区域生态系统可持续发展敏感因子及敏感区分析[J].2000.
徐广才,康慕谊,贺丽娜,李亚飞,陈雅如.生态脆弱性及其研究进展[J].生态学报,2009,29(5):2578-2588.
杨传强,蔡强国,范昊明.土壤容许流失量研究的方法[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(4).
杨光华,包安明,陈曦.新疆博斯腾湖湿地生态质量的定量评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2009,23(2):119-124.
杨勤科,李锐.中国水土流失和水土保持定量研究进展[J].水土保持通报,1998,18(5):13-18.
杨勤业,张镱锂,李国栋.中国的环境脆弱形势和危急区域[J].地理研究,1992,11(4):1-10.
杨永峰.基于多重分析的山东省水土保持生态功能区划研究[D].北京林业大学,2009.
杨育武,汤洁.脆弱生态环境指标库的建立及其定量评价[J].环境科学研究,2002,15(4):46-49.
杨子生.云南省金沙江流域水土流失灾害区划研究[J].山地学报,2009（S1）.
姚玉璧,张秀云,杨金虎.甘肃省脆弱生态环境定量评价及分区评述[J].水土保持通报,2007,27(5):120-126.
伊飞.黄河三角洲湿地生态脆弱性评价[D].中国地质大学(北京),2011.
尹辉,李景保,廖婷.湖南省澧水流域水土保持区划研究[J].水土保持通报,2009（3）:45-49.
於刑,曹明奎,李克让.全球气候变化背景下生态系统的脆弱性评价[J].地理科学进展,2005,24(1):61-69.
余新晓,吴岚,饶良懿,周健,李静锐,杨永强.水土保持生态服务功能价值估算[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(1):83-86.
袁金国,王卫,龙丽民.河北坝上生态脆弱区的土地退化及生态重建[J].干旱区资源与环境,2006,20(2):139-143.
苑涛,贾亚男.中国西南岩溶生态系统脆弱性研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(32):175-180.
张碧岭.江西省水土保持区划试探[J].南昌水专学报,1986,2:010.
张建军,陈文光,闫美华.包头市水土保持生态修复调研报告[J].内蒙古水利,2007(1):76-76.
张军涛,傅小锋.东北农牧交错生态脆弱区可持续发展研究[J].中国人口资源与环境,2006,15(5):58-62.
张兰生,方修琦,任国玉,索秀芬.我国北方农牧交错带的环境演变[J].地学前缘,1997,3.
张龙生,王建宏,尚立照.基于土地退化的甘肃省生态脆弱性评价研究[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(4):783-787.
张宁.宁夏水土保持生态修复试点工作简介[J].中国水土保持,2006(6):26-27.
张宁.宁夏水土保持生态修复试点工作简介[J].中国水土保持,2006(6):26-27.
张茹春,阳小兰,王瑞君.河北坝上内陆湖盆湿地生态脆弱性评价研究[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(36):18078-18079.
张义强,杨义成.香根草水土保持功能浅析[J].黑龙江科技信息,2008,31:095.
张永江,张瑞.水土保持规划中生态功能区的划分方法--以三川河流域为例[J].山西水土保持科技,2006(1):16-18.
张治华,徐建华,韩贵锋.生态敏感区划分指标体系研究[J].生态科学,2007,26(1):79-83.
赵东升,吴绍洪.气候变化情景下中国自然生态系统脆弱性研究[J]. ACTAGEOGRAPHICA SINICA,2013,68(5).
赵桂久.生态环境综合整治和恢复技术研究:第一集[M].北京科学技术出版社,1993.
赵哈林,赵学勇,张铜会,周瑞莲.北方农牧交错带的地理界定及其生态问题[J].地球科学进展,2002,17(5):739-747.
赵哈林,赵学勇,张铜会.我国北方农牧交错带沙漠化的成因,过程和防治对策[J].中国沙漠,2000,20(1):22-28.
赵红兵.生态脆弱性评价研究[D].山东大学,硕士论文,2007.
赵全科.鲁中南山地生态脆弱区生态农业建设:以沂蒙山区为例[J].山地学报,2000,18(3):253-257.
赵鑫.山西煤炭产业发展循环经济问题研究[D].山西财经大学,2012.
赵艳霞,何磊,刘寿东,刘文泉,何勇,张建平.农业生态系统脆弱性评价方法[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(5):754-758.
赵艺学.基于水土流失态势的山西省生态脆弱性分区研究[J].水土保持学报,2004,17(4):71-74.
赵跃龙,张玲娟.脆弱生态环境定量评价方法的研究[J].地理科学,1998,18(1):73-79.
赵跃龙.中国脆弱生态环境类型分布及其综合整治[M].中国环境科学出版社,1999.中国科学院黄土高原综合科学考察队.黄河中游黄土高原水土保持土地合理利用区划.
北京:中国科学技术出版社,1958:35-42.
中科院《中国自然地理》编辑委员会.中国自然地理总论[M].北京：科学出版杜，1985，257-339.
钟晓娟,孙保平,赵岩,李锦荣,周湘山,王引乾,邱一丹,冯磊.基于主成分分析的云南省生态脆弱性评价[J].生态环境学报,2011,20(1):109-113.
周嘉慧,黄晓霞.生态脆弱性评价方法评述[J].云南地理环境研究,2008,20(1):55-59.
周劲松.山地生态系统的脆弱性与荒漠化[J].自然资源学报,1997,12(1).
周立华,马永欢,马绍休.中国北方农牧交错带风水蚀复合区的粮食与退耕还林(草)问题[J].中国沙漠,2007,27(4):552-557.
朱震达.土地荒漠化问题研究现状与展望[J].地理研究,1994,13(1):104-113.
朱震达.中国的脆弱生态带与土地荒漠化[J].中国沙漠,1991,11(4):11-22.
邹胜章,张文慧,梁彬.西南岩溶区表层岩溶带水脆弱性评价指标体系的探讨[J].地学前缘,2005,12(U04):152-158.
左太安,苏维词,张凤太,宋增伟.三峡库区(重庆段)森林水土保持服务功能价值研究[J].林业经济问题,2008,28(5):410-413.
Amore E, Modica C, Nearing M A, Santoro V C. Scale effect in USLE and WEPP applicationfor soil erosion computation from three Sicilian basins[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2004,293(1):100-114.
Anderson J M. Ecology of environmental science-resources and environmental scienceseries[J]. Edward Arnold (Ltd.),1981:87-95.
Antle J M, Capalbo S M, Elliott E T. Adaptation, spatial heterogeneity, and the vulnerabilityof agricultural systems to climate change and CO2fertilization: an integrated assessmentapproach[J]. Climatic Change,2004,64(3):289-315.
Bagarello F. Pseudobosons, Riesz bases, and coherent states[J]. Journal of mathematicalphysics,2010,51(2):023531.
Bochet M V, Jacquiaud C, Valantin M A, Katlama C, Deray G. Renal insufficiency inducedby ritonavir in HIV-infected patients[J]. The American journal of medicine,1998,105(5).Boix-Fayos C, Martínez-Mena M, Arnau-Rosalén E, Calvo-Cases A, Castillo V, Albaladejo J.Measuring soil erosion by field plots: understanding the sources of variation[J]. Earth-ScienceReviews,2006,78(3):267-285.
Boren J C, Engle D M, Masters R E. Vegetation cover type and avian species changes onlandscapes within a wildland-urban interface[J]. Ecological modelling,1997,103(2):251-266.
Chen L, Tian H, Fu B, Zhao X. Development of a new index for integrating landscapepatterns with ecological processes at watershed scale[J]. Chinese Geographical Science,2009,19(1):37-45.
Clements F E. Research methods in ecology[M]. University Publishing Company,1905.Cutter S L. The vulnerability of science and the science of vulnerability[J]. Annals of theAssociation of American Geographers,2003,93(1):1-12.
De Roo A P J, Offermans R J E, Cremers N. LISEM: A single‐event, physically basedhydrological and soil erosion model for drainage basins. II: Sensitivity analysis, validationand application[J]. Hydrological processes,1996,10(8):1119-1126.
De Roo A P J, Wesseling C G, Ritsema C J. LISEM: A SINGLE‐EVENT PHYSICALLYBASED HYDROLOGICAL AND SOIL EROSION MODEL FOR DRAINAGE BASINS. I:
THEORY, INPUT AND OUTPUT[J]. Hydrological processes,1996,10(8):1107-1117.
De Vente J, Poesen J. Predicting soil erosion and sediment yield at the basin scale: scaleissues and semi-quantitative models[J]. Earth-Science Reviews,2005,71(1):95-125.di Castri F, Hansen A J. The environment and development crises as determinants of
landscape dynamics[M]//Landscape Boundaries. Springer New York,1992:3-18.
Downing T E. Towards a vulnerability science[J]. IHDP Newsletter Update,2000,3.
Flanagan D C, Nearing M A. USDA-Water Erosion Prediction Project: Hillslope profile andwatershed model documentation[J]. NSERL Rep,1995,10.
Forman R T T, Godron M. Landscape EcologyWiley[J]. New York,1986:619.
Foster G R, Lane L J. User requirements: USDA, water erosion prediction project (WEPP)Draft6.3[J]. NSERL report,1987.
Govers G, Van Oost K, Poesen J. Responses of a semi-arid landscape to human disturbance: asimulation study of the interaction between rock fragment cover, soil erosion and land usechange[J]. Geoderma,2006,133(1):19-31.
Haegens R M A P. Taxonomy, phylogeny, and biogeography of Baccaurea, Distichirhops,and Nothobaccaurea (Euphorbiaceae)[M]. Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, UniversiteitLeiden Branch,2000.
Holland M M. SCOPE/MAB technical consultations on landscape boundaries: report of aSCOPE/MAB workshop on ecotones[J]. Biology International, Special,1988(17):47-106.
Kates R W,Clark W C, Corell R, Hall J M, Jaeger CC. Sustainability science[M].International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis,2001.
Kline V M, Cottam G. Vegetation response to climate and fire in the driftless area ofWisconsin[J]. Ecology,1979,60(5):861-868.
Knisel W G. CREAMS: A field-scale model for chemicals, runoff and erosion fromagricultural management systems[J]. USDA Conservation Research Report,1980(26).
Laflen J M, Elliot W J, Simanton J R. WEPP: Soil erodibility experiments for rangeland andcropland soils[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,46(1):39-44.
Lane L J, Renard K G, Foster G R, JM Laflen. Development and application of modern soilerosion prediction technology-The USDA experience[J]. Soil Research,1992,30(6):893-912.
Leys A, Govers G, Gillijns K. Scale effects on runoff and erosion losses from arable landunder conservation and conventional tillage: The role of residue cover[J]. Journal ofhydrology,2010,390(3):143-154.
McHugh M. Soil erosion in the UK: Assessing the impacts and developing indicators[J].
OCDE, Agricultural Impacts on Soil Erosion and Soil Biodiversity: Developing Indicators forPolicy Analysis, Paris, France, www. oecd. org/tad/env/indicateurs,2003.
Millward A A, Mersey J E. Adapting the RUSLE to model soil erosion potential in amountainous tropical watershed[J]. Catena,1999,38(2):109-129.
Morgan R P C. Soil erosion and conservation[M]. John Wiley&Sons,2009.
Nearing M A, Govers G, Norton L D. Variability in soil erosion data from replicated plots[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1999,63(6):1829-1835.
Odum E P, Odum H T, Andrews J. Fundamentals of ecology[M]. Philadelphia: Saunders,1971.
Pimentel, David, ed. World soil erosion and conservation[M]. Cambridge:CambridgeUniversity Press,1993.
Renard K G, Foster G R, Weesies G A. RUSLE: Revised universal soil loss equation[J].Journal of soil and Water Conservation,1991,46(1):30-33.
Renschler C S, Mannaerts C, Diekkrüger B. Evaluating spatial and temporal variability in soilerosion risk-rainfall erosivity and soil loss ratios in Andalusia, Spain[J]. Catena,1999,34(3):209-225.
Robinson D A. Agricultural practice, climate change and the soil erosion hazard in parts ofsoutheast England[J]. Applied Geography,1999,19(1):13-27.
Sadeghi S H, Moosavi V, Karami A, Behnia N. Soil erosion assessment and prioritization ofaffecting factors at plot scale using the Taguchi method[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2012,448:174-180.
Shi Z H, Cai C F, Ding S W, Wang T W, Chow T L. Soil conservation planning at the smallwatershed level using RUSLE with GIS: a case study in the Three Gorge Area of China[J].Catena,2004,55(1):33-48.
Stevens P A, Reynolds B, Emmett B A. Critical appraisal of state and pressures and controlson the sustainable use of soils in Wales (Final Report)[J]. Environment Agency/NationalAssembly for Wales,2002.
Tefera B, Sterk G. Land management, erosion problems and soil and water conservation inFincha’a watershed, western Ethiopia[J]. Land use policy,2010,27(4):1027-1037.
Ursula Kaly, Lino Briguglio, Helena McLeod, Susana Schmall, Craig Pratt and Reginald PalEnvironmental Vulnerability Index (EVI) to summarise national environmental vulnerabilityprofiles[M]. Suva, Fiji: South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission,1999.Valentin C, Poesen J, Li Y. Gully erosion: impacts, factors and control[J]. Catena,2005,63(2):132-153.
Wang G, Gertner G, Singh V. Spatial and temporal prediction and uncertainty of soil lossusing the revised universal soil loss equation: a case study of the rainfall–runoff erosivity Rfactor[J]. Ecological Modelling,2002,153(1):143-155.
Ward P J, van Balen R T, Verstraeten G, Renssen H, Vandenberghe J. The impact of land useand climate change on late Holocene and future suspended sediment yield of theMeusecatchment[J]. Geomorphology,2009,103(3):389-400.
Weisberg P J, Baker W L. Spatial variation in tree regeneration in the forest-tundra ecotone,Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,1995,25(8):1326-1339.
Weltzin J F, McPherson G R. Implications of precipitation redistribution for shifts intemperate savanna ecotones[J]. Ecology,2000,81(7):1902-1913.
Xu X L, Ma K M, Fu B J, Song C J, Liu W. Influence of three plant species with differentmorphologies on water runoff and soil loss in a dry-warm river valley, SW China[J]. Forestecology and management,2008,256(4):656-663.
Zhu M. Soil erosion risk assessment with CORINE model: case study in the DanjiangkouReservoir region, China[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment,2012,26(6):813-822.
艾晓燕,徐广军,韩守.论水土保持生态修复的特点与原则[J].中国水土保持,2010(3):44-45.
蔡海生,陈美球,赵小敏.脆弱生态环境脆弱度评价研究进展[J].江西农业大学学报,2003,25(2):270-275.
蔡强国,陆兆熊,王贵平.黄土丘陵沟壑区典型小省侵蚀产沙过程模型[J].地理学报,1996,51(2):108-117.
蔡强国.坡面侵蚀产沙模型的研究[J].地理研究,1988,7(4):94-102.
蔡运龙, Smit B.全球气候变化下中国农业的脆弱性与适应对策[J].地理学报,1996,51(3):202-212.
柴宗新.西南地区水土流失区划[J].山地研究,1995,13（2）:121-127.
陈明恒.论水土保持功能[J].城市建设理论研究(电子版),2013(7).
陈晓燕.不同尺度下紫色土水土流失效应分析[D].西南大学,2009.
春梅.基于景观格局的玉树州天然草地生态脆弱性分析[J].安徽农业科学,2012,40(15):8599-8600.
崔丽娟,张明祥.湿地评价研究概述[J].世界林业研究,2002,15(6):46-53.
房庆方,杨细平.区域协调和可持续发展:珠江三角洲经济区域市群规划及其实施[J].城市规划,1997(1):7-10.
傅伯杰,刘国华,陈利顶.中国生态区划方案[J].生态学报,2001,21(1):1-6.
傅庆林,罗永进,柴锡周.低丘红壤生态脆弱区特性的初步研究[J].浙江农业学报,1995,7(4):279-281.
甘露,陈刚才,万国江.贵州喀斯特山区农业生态环境的脆弱性及可持续发展对策[J].山地学报,2001,19(2):130-134.
高旺盛,董孝斌.黄土高原丘陵沟壑区脆弱农业生态系统服务评价[J]. JOURNAL OFNATURAL RESOURCES,2003,18(2).
高彦华,汪宏清,刘琪璟.生态恢复评价研究进展[J].江西科学,2003,21(3):168-174.
郭静,姚孝友,刘霞,张光灿,袁利,褚兴彬.不同生态修复措施下鲁中山区土壤的水文特征[J].浙江林学院学报,2008,25(3):342-349.
郭丽英,刘彦随,任志远.生态脆弱区土地利用格局变化及其驱动机制分析[J].资源科学,2005,27(2):128-133.
国务院水土保持委员会办公室.中国土壤侵蚀图及其有关资料.1958:31-32.
韩成军.关于青海省水土保持区划的思考[J].中国水土保持,2011（9）:45-47.
胡良军,邵明安.区域水土流失研究综述[J].山地学报,2001,19（1）:69-74.
黄方,刘湘南,张养贞. GIS支持下的吉林省西部生态环境脆弱态势评价研究[J].地理科学,2003,23(1):95-100.
黄淑芳.主成分分析及MAPINFO在生态环境脆弱性评价中的应用[J].福建地理,2002,17(1):47-49.
Jinghu P A N, Xiaofeng D.基于GIS的黑河省生态环境敏感性评价与分区[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(2):267-273.
焦居仁.生态修复的要点与思考[J].中国水土保持,2003(2):1-2.
焦有梅,张艳鹏.低碳经济时代的山西转型跨越发展[J].能源与节能,2011(4):23-25.
解明曙,庞薇.关于中国土壤侵蚀类型与侵蚀类型区的划分[J].中国水土保持,1993,5:8-10.
解运杰,王岩松,王玉玺.东北黑土区地域界定及其水土保持区划探析[J].水土保持通报,2005,25（1）:48-50.
Kochunov B,李国栋.脆弱生态的概念及分类[J].地理译报,1993,1:18-23.
Lin-de L I U, Yu-bao G A O.论中国北方农牧交错带的生态环境建设与系统功能整合[J].地球科学进展,2002,17(2):174-181.
兰安军,张百平,熊康宁.黔西南脆弱喀斯特生态环境空间格局分析[J].地理研究,2003,22(6):733-741.
兰安军,张百平,熊康宁,安裕伦.黔西南脆弱喀斯特生态环境空间格局分析[J].地理研究,2003,22(6):733-741.
李保国,张金柱,郭素平.河北省太行山片麻岩山地景观生态经济资源特征与利用研究[J].河北农业大学学报,2005,28(4):14-17.
李滨勇,陈海滨,唐海萍.基于AHP和模糊综合评判法的北疆各地州生态脆弱性评价[J].北京师范大学学报:自然科学版,2010(2):197-201.
李聪慧,姜志德,谢永生.水源区水土保持措施功能调整初探--以京津水源地冀北山区为例[J].中国水土保持,2012(1):11-13.
李果,王百田.区域生态修复的空间规划方法探讨[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(6):290-294.
李鹤,张平宇,程叶青.脆弱性的概念及其评价方法[J].地理科学进展,2008,27(2):18-25.
李欢.淮河流域水土保持区域研究[D].山东农业大学,2012.
李克让,陈育峰.全球气候变化影响下中国森林的脆弱性分析[J].地理学报,1996,51(S1):40-49.
李双成,吴绍洪,戴尔阜.生态系统响应气候变化脆弱性的人工神经网络模型评价[J].生态学报,2005,25(3).
李团胜,石铁矛.大城市区域的景观生态规划理论与方法[J].地理学与国土研究,1999,15(2):52-55.
李卫海,李阳兵,邵景安,谢静,丹文丽.基于景观尺度的城市生态健康时空过程[J].环境科学学报,2011,31(2).
李秀彬,马志尊,姚孝友,景可,朱会义.北方土石山区水土流失现状与综合治理对策[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,1:9-15.
李阳兵,邵景安,王世杰.岩溶生态系统脆弱性研究[J].地理科学进展,2006,25(5):1-9.
李瑛,曾磊,赵贵章.基于层次分析法的苏贝淖省植被生态脆弱性评价[J].安徽农业科学,2012,40(24):12158-12160.
刘德,王玉俭,钱祖林.山东省水土保持普查要点及区划类型[J].水土保持研究,1994,1（2）:12-28.
刘国华,傅伯杰,陈利顶,郭旭东.中国生态退化的主要类型,特征及分布[J].生态学报,2000,20(1):13-19.
刘康,欧阳志云,王效科,徐卫华,苗鸿.甘肃省生态环境敏感性评价及其空间分布[J].生态学报,2003,23(12):2711-2718.
刘利.北京典型山地森林生态脆弱性的研究[D].北京林业大学,2011.
刘茹,张晶晶,雷蕾.岷江上游生态脆弱性的模糊评价[J].资源开发与市场,2006,22(6):500-501.
刘士余,左长清,孟菁玲.水土保持与国家生态安全[J].中国水土保持科学,2004,2(1):102-104.
刘贤词,王晓辉,邢巧.海南岛中部山区生态系统水土保持功能研究[J].绿色科技,2011(001):101-102.
刘新华,汤国安.中国地形起伏度的提取及在水土流失定量评价中的应用[J].水土保持通报,2001,21(1):57-59.
刘燕华,李秀彬.脆弱生态环境与可持续发展[M].商务印书馆,2001.
刘燕华,赵名茶.脆弱生态环境研究初探[J].生态环境综合整治与恢复技术研究(第二集),1995:1-10.
刘振乾,刘红玉.三江平原湿地生态脆弱性研究[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(2):241-244.
刘震.我国水土保持的目标与任务[J].中国水土保持科学,2003,1(4).
柳仲秋.水土保持功能研究[J].科学之友:下,2010(10):110-111.
卢亚灵,颜磊,许学工.环渤海地区生态脆弱性评价及其空间自相关分析[J].资源科学,2010,32(2).
罗承平,薛纪瑜.中国北方农牧交错带生态环境脆弱性及其成因分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,1995,9(1):1-7.
罗跃初,周忠轩,孙轶,邓红兵,张萍,吴钢.省生态系统健康评价方法[J].生态学报,2003,23(8):1606-1614.
吕昌河,程量.土地利用变化与生态服务功能冲突[J].干旱区研究,2007,24(3):302-306.
吕晓芳,王仰麟,张镱锂,申元村.宁夏中部生态脆弱区土地利用变化及沙漠化响应--以宁夏盐池县为例[J].地理研究,2007,26(6).
马万里,罗菊春.贺兰山森林生态系统的脆弱性及其生物多样性的保护[J].北京林业大学学报,2000,22(4):130-131.
马文银.湘西北喀斯特山地生态脆弱区农业可持续发展研究[J].邵阳学院学报:社会科学版,2002,1(2):114-116.
牛文元.生态环境脆弱带ECOTONE的基础判定[J].生态学报,1989,9(2):97-105.
欧阳志云,王效科,苗鸿.中国生态环境敏感性及其区域差异规律研究[J].生态学报,2000,20(1):9-12.
潘成忠,上官周平.土壤空间变异性研究评述[J].生态环境,2003,12(3):371-375.
乔青,高吉喜,王维.生态脆弱性综合评价方法与应用[J].环境科学研究,2008,21(5):117-123.
邱彭华,徐颂军,谢跟踪,唐本安,毕华,余龙师.基于景观格局和生态敏感性的海南西部地区生态脆弱性分析[J].生态学报,2007,4:000.
邱扬,傅伯杰.异质景观中水土流失的空间变异与尺度变异[J].生态学报,2004,24(2):330-337.
冉圣宏,金建君,薛纪渝.脆弱生态区评价的理论与方法[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(1):117-122.
任海军,任美丽.包头市水土保持生态修复有关问题的探讨[J].内蒙古水利,2008(4):75-77.
山西省计划委员会.山西国土资源概论[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1995.
商彦蕊.自然灾害综合研究的新进展--脆弱性研究[J].地域研究与开发,2000,19(2):73-77.
邵颂东,王礼先.国外土壤侵蚀研究的新进展[J].水土保持科技情报,2000(1):32-36.
史德明.加强水土保持是保障国家生态安全的战略措施[J].中国水土保持,2002(2):8-9.
史培军,王静爱,陈婧,叶涛,周洪建.当代地理学之人地相互作用研究的趋向--全球变化人类行为计划(IHDP)第六届开放会议透视[J].地理学报,2006,61(2):115-126.
束龙仓,柯婷婷,刘丽红,张蓉蓉,鲁程鹏.基于综合法的岩溶山区生态系统脆弱性评价[J].中国岩溶,2010.
水利部.国家统计局[J].2013.
苏维词,朱文孝.贵州喀斯特生态脆弱区的农业可持续发展[J].农业现代化研究,2000,21(4):201-204.
孙贵珍,王栓军.以科技进步促进河北太行山区土地资源可持续发展[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(18):504-506.
孙鸿烈.我国水土流失问题及防治对策[D].,2010.
孙武,南忠仁.生态脆弱带内部空间分异结构与脆弱度划分[J].生态学报,2002,22(4):445-451.
孙宪柱,王琦.辽东山区生态修复试点工作调查报告[J].水土保持应用技术,2007(5):25-27.
孙永军,周强,杨日红.黄河省土地荒漠化动态变化遥感研究[J].国土资源遥感,2008,20(2):74-78.
唐国平,李秀彬,刘燕华.全球气候变化下水资源脆弱性及其评估方法[J].地球科学进展,2000,15(3):313-317.
唐克丽.黄河流域的侵蚀与径流泥沙变化:1988年-1992年[M].中国科学技术出版社,1993.
陶希东,赵鸿婕.河西走廊生态脆弱性评价及其恢复与重建[J].干旱区研究,2002,19(4):7-12.
田光进,张增祥,赵晓丽,张国平,谭文彬.中国耕地土壤侵蚀空间分布特征及生态背景[J].生态学报,2002,22(1):10-16.
田亚平,刘沛林,郑文武.南方丘陵区的生态脆弱度评估[J].地理研究,2005,24(6):843-852.
万洪秀,孙占东,王润.博斯腾湖湿地生态脆弱性评价研究[J].干旱区地理,2006,29(2).
王国.我国典型脆弱生态区生态经济管理研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2001,9(4):9-12.
王海泽,张嘉治.生态脆弱区及其恢复技术[J].杂粮作物,2002,22(4):233-236.
王介勇,赵庚星,杜春先.基于景观空间结构信息的区域生态脆弱性分析--以黄河三角洲垦利县为例[J].干旱区研究,2005,22(3):317-321.
王静.岩溶山地生态脆弱性评价及治理措施研究[D].西南大学,2009.
王静爱,史培军,朱骊.中国主要自然致灾因子的区域分异[J].地理学报,1994,49(1):18-26.
王静爱,徐霞,刘培芳.中国北方农牧交错带土地利用与人口负荷研究[J].资源科学,1999,21(5):19-24.
王磊,刘得力,王红漪,魏婧华.平邑县水土保持生态修复工程成效与经验[J].中国水土保持,2006(5):28-29.车忠新,褚丽妹.辽东山区水土保持生态修复的实践与探讨[J].水土保持科技情报,2004(2):20-22.
王礼先.关于土壤侵蚀规律研究的目的与方法[J].中国水土保持,1983,6:007.
王莲芬,许树柏.层次分析法引论[M].1990.
王让会,樊自立.干旱区内陆河省生态脆弱性评价[J].生态学杂志,2001a,20(3):63-68.
王让会,宋郁东,樊自立,游先祥.新疆塔里木河省生态脆弱带的环境质量综合评价[J].环境科学,2001b,22(2):7-11.
王涛,屈建军,姚正毅,张伟民,拓万全,张景光,杨根生,陈广庭.北方农牧交错带风水蚀复合区水土流失现状与综合治理对策[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(1):28-36.
王万忠,焦菊英.中国的土壤侵蚀因子定量评价研究[J].水土保持通报,1996,16(5):1-20.
王效科,欧阳志云,肖寒,苗鸿,傅伯杰.中国水土流失敏感性分布规律及其区划研究[J].生态学报,2001,21(1):14-19.
王秀英,曹文洪.坡面土壤侵蚀产沙机理及数学模型研究综述[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1999,5(3):87-92.
王延平,刘霞,姚孝友,张光灿,董智,高鹏.山西省沂蒙山区水土保持生态脆弱性的AHP分析[J].中国水土保持科学,2010,8(3):20-27.
王岩,方创琳,张蔷.城市脆弱性研究评述与展望[J].地理科学进展,2013,32(5):755-768.
王玉俭.山东省水土保持区划探讨[J].水土保持通报,1990,5:003.
王治国,王春红.对我国水土保持区划与规划中若干问题的认识[J].中国水土保持科学,2007,5(1):105-109.
王治国.关于生态修复若干概念与问题的讨论(续)[J].中国水土保持,2004(11):20-21.
王治国.关于生态修复若干概念与问题的讨论[J].中国水土保持,2003(10):4-5.
韦红波,李锐,杨勤科.我国植被水土保持功能研究进展[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(4):489-496.
韦俊位.川中丘陵区坡面土壤侵蚀预测的人工智能建模研究[D].四川农业大学,2010.
魏晓,孙峰华.宁夏水土保持及区划研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,12（6）:119-121.
伍黎芝.生态脆弱区土地资源可持续利用问题:以三峡库区为例[J].中国土地科学,2000,14(2):13-16.
肖笃宁.生态脆弱区的生态重建与景观规划[J].中国沙漠,2003,23(1):6-11.
肖风劲,欧阳华.生态系统健康及其评价指标和方法[J].自然资源学报,2002,17(2).
肖荣波,欧阳志云,王效科,赵同谦.中国西南地区石漠化敏感性评价及其空间分析[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(5):551-554.
谢标,杨永岗.贵州省岩溶山区生态环境脆弱性及人为活动的影响:以息峰县为例[J].水土保持通报,1998,18(4):12-16.
徐福留,曹军,陶澍,傅明先,王维清.区域生态系统可持续发展敏感因子及敏感区分析[J].2000.
徐广才,康慕谊,贺丽娜,李亚飞,陈雅如.生态脆弱性及其研究进展[J].生态学报,2009,29(5):2578-2588.
杨传强,蔡强国,范昊明.土壤容许流失量研究的方法[J].水土保持研究,2004,11(4).
杨光华,包安明,陈曦.新疆博斯腾湖湿地生态质量的定量评价[J].干旱区资源与环境,2009,23(2):119-124.
杨勤科,李锐.中国水土流失和水土保持定量研究进展[J].水土保持通报,1998,18(5):13-18.
杨勤业,张镱锂,李国栋.中国的环境脆弱形势和危急区域[J].地理研究,1992,11(4):1-10.
杨永峰.基于多重分析的山东省水土保持生态功能区划研究[D].北京林业大学,2009.
杨育武,汤洁.脆弱生态环境指标库的建立及其定量评价[J].环境科学研究,2002,15(4):46-49.
杨子生.云南省金沙江流域水土流失灾害区划研究[J].山地学报,2009（S1）.
姚玉璧,张秀云,杨金虎.甘肃省脆弱生态环境定量评价及分区评述[J].水土保持通报,2007,27(5):120-126.
伊飞.黄河三角洲湿地生态脆弱性评价[D].中国地质大学(北京),2011.
尹辉,李景保,廖婷.湖南省澧水流域水土保持区划研究[J].水土保持通报,2009（3）:45-49.
於刑,曹明奎,李克让.全球气候变化背景下生态系统的脆弱性评价[J].地理科学进展,2005,24(1):61-69.
余新晓,吴岚,饶良懿,周健,李静锐,杨永强.水土保持生态服务功能价值估算[J].中国水土保持科学,2008,6(1):83-86.
袁金国,王卫,龙丽民.河北坝上生态脆弱区的土地退化及生态重建[J].干旱区资源与环境,2006,20(2):139-143.
苑涛,贾亚男.中国西南岩溶生态系统脆弱性研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(32):175-180.
张碧岭.江西省水土保持区划试探[J].南昌水专学报,1986,2:010.
张建军,陈文光,闫美华.包头市水土保持生态修复调研报告[J].内蒙古水利,2007(1):76-76.
张军涛,傅小锋.东北农牧交错生态脆弱区可持续发展研究[J].中国人口资源与环境,2006,15(5):58-62.
张兰生,方修琦,任国玉,索秀芬.我国北方农牧交错带的环境演变[J].地学前缘,1997,3.
张龙生,王建宏,尚立照.基于土地退化的甘肃省生态脆弱性评价研究[J].中国沙漠,2010,30(4):783-787.
张宁.宁夏水土保持生态修复试点工作简介[J].中国水土保持,2006(6):26-27.
张宁.宁夏水土保持生态修复试点工作简介[J].中国水土保持,2006(6):26-27.
张茹春,阳小兰,王瑞君.河北坝上内陆湖盆湿地生态脆弱性评价研究[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(36):18078-18079.
张义强,杨义成.香根草水土保持功能浅析[J].黑龙江科技信息,2008,31:095.
张永江,张瑞.水土保持规划中生态功能区的划分方法--以三川河流域为例[J].山西水土保持科技,2006(1):16-18.
张治华,徐建华,韩贵锋.生态敏感区划分指标体系研究[J].生态科学,2007,26(1):79-83.
赵东升,吴绍洪.气候变化情景下中国自然生态系统脆弱性研究[J]. ACTAGEOGRAPHICA SINICA,2013,68(5).
赵桂久.生态环境综合整治和恢复技术研究:第一集[M].北京科学技术出版社,1993.
赵哈林,赵学勇,张铜会,周瑞莲.北方农牧交错带的地理界定及其生态问题[J].地球科学进展,2002,17(5):739-747.
赵哈林,赵学勇,张铜会.我国北方农牧交错带沙漠化的成因,过程和防治对策[J].中国沙漠,2000,20(1):22-28.
赵红兵.生态脆弱性评价研究[D].山东大学,硕士论文,2007.
赵全科.鲁中南山地生态脆弱区生态农业建设:以沂蒙山区为例[J].山地学报,2000,18(3):253-257.
赵鑫.山西煤炭产业发展循环经济问题研究[D].山西财经大学,2012.
赵艳霞,何磊,刘寿东,刘文泉,何勇,张建平.农业生态系统脆弱性评价方法[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(5):754-758.
赵艺学.基于水土流失态势的山西省生态脆弱性分区研究[J].水土保持学报,2004,17(4):71-74.
赵跃龙,张玲娟.脆弱生态环境定量评价方法的研究[J].地理科学,1998,18(1):73-79.
赵跃龙.中国脆弱生态环境类型分布及其综合整治[M].中国环境科学出版社,1999.中国科学院黄土高原综合科学考察队.黄河中游黄土高原水土保持土地合理利用区划.
北京:中国科学技术出版社,1958:35-42.
中科院《中国自然地理》编辑委员会.中国自然地理总论[M].北京：科学出版杜，1985，257-339.
钟晓娟,孙保平,赵岩,李锦荣,周湘山,王引乾,邱一丹,冯磊.基于主成分分析的云南省生态脆弱性评价[J].生态环境学报,2011,20(1):109-113.
周嘉慧,黄晓霞.生态脆弱性评价方法评述[J].云南地理环境研究,2008,20(1):55-59.
周劲松.山地生态系统的脆弱性与荒漠化[J].自然资源学报,1997,12(1).
周立华,马永欢,马绍休.中国北方农牧交错带风水蚀复合区的粮食与退耕还林(草)问题[J].中国沙漠,2007,27(4):552-557.
朱震达.土地荒漠化问题研究现状与展望[J].地理研究,1994,13(1):104-113.
朱震达.中国的脆弱生态带与土地荒漠化[J].中国沙漠,1991,11(4):11-22.
邹胜章,张文慧,梁彬.西南岩溶区表层岩溶带水脆弱性评价指标体系的探讨[J].地学前缘,2005,12(U04):152-158.
左太安,苏维词,张凤太,宋增伟.三峡库区(重庆段)森林水土保持服务功能价值研究[J].林业经济问题,2008,28(5):410-413.
Amore E, Modica C, Nearing M A, Santoro V C. Scale effect in USLE and WEPP applicationfor soil erosion computation from three Sicilian basins[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2004,293(1):100-114.
Anderson J M. Ecology of environmental science-resources and environmental scienceseries[J]. Edward Arnold (Ltd.),1981:87-95.
Antle J M, Capalbo S M, Elliott E T. Adaptation, spatial heterogeneity, and the vulnerabilityof agricultural systems to climate change and CO2fertilization: an integrated assessmentapproach[J]. Climatic Change,2004,64(3):289-315.
Bagarello F. Pseudobosons, Riesz bases, and coherent states[J]. Journal of mathematicalphysics,2010,51(2):023531.
Bochet M V, Jacquiaud C, Valantin M A, Katlama C, Deray G. Renal insufficiency inducedby ritonavir in HIV-infected patients[J]. The American journal of medicine,1998,105(5).Boix-Fayos C, Martínez-Mena M, Arnau-Rosalén E, Calvo-Cases A, Castillo V, Albaladejo J.Measuring soil erosion by field plots: understanding the sources of variation[J]. Earth-ScienceReviews,2006,78(3):267-285.
Boren J C, Engle D M, Masters R E. Vegetation cover type and avian species changes onlandscapes within a wildland-urban interface[J]. Ecological modelling,1997,103(2):251-266.
Chen L, Tian H, Fu B, Zhao X. Development of a new index for integrating landscapepatterns with ecological processes at watershed scale[J]. Chinese Geographical Science,2009,19(1):37-45.
Clements F E. Research methods in ecology[M]. University Publishing Company,1905.Cutter S L. The vulnerability of science and the science of vulnerability[J]. Annals of theAssociation of American Geographers,2003,93(1):1-12.
De Roo A P J, Offermans R J E, Cremers N. LISEM: A single‐event, physically basedhydrological and soil erosion model for drainage basins. II: Sensitivity analysis, validationand application[J]. Hydrological processes,1996,10(8):1119-1126.
De Roo A P J, Wesseling C G, Ritsema C J. LISEM: A SINGLE‐EVENT PHYSICALLYBASED HYDROLOGICAL AND SOIL EROSION MODEL FOR DRAINAGE BASINS. I:
THEORY, INPUT AND OUTPUT[J]. Hydrological processes,1996,10(8):1107-1117.
De Vente J, Poesen J. Predicting soil erosion and sediment yield at the basin scale: scaleissues and semi-quantitative models[J]. Earth-Science Reviews,2005,71(1):95-125.di Castri F, Hansen A J. The environment and development crises as determinants of
landscape dynamics[M]//Landscape Boundaries. Springer New York,1992:3-18.
Downing T E. Towards a vulnerability science[J]. IHDP Newsletter Update,2000,3.
Flanagan D C, Nearing M A. USDA-Water Erosion Prediction Project: Hillslope profile andwatershed model documentation[J]. NSERL Rep,1995,10.
Forman R T T, Godron M. Landscape EcologyWiley[J]. New York,1986:619.
Foster G R, Lane L J. User requirements: USDA, water erosion prediction project (WEPP)Draft6.3[J]. NSERL report,1987.
Govers G, Van Oost K, Poesen J. Responses of a semi-arid landscape to human disturbance: asimulation study of the interaction between rock fragment cover, soil erosion and land usechange[J]. Geoderma,2006,133(1):19-31.
Haegens R M A P. Taxonomy, phylogeny, and biogeography of Baccaurea, Distichirhops,and Nothobaccaurea (Euphorbiaceae)[M]. Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, UniversiteitLeiden Branch,2000.
Holland M M. SCOPE/MAB technical consultations on landscape boundaries: report of aSCOPE/MAB workshop on ecotones[J]. Biology International, Special,1988(17):47-106.
Kates R W,Clark W C, Corell R, Hall J M, Jaeger CC. Sustainability science[M].International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis,2001.
Kline V M, Cottam G. Vegetation response to climate and fire in the driftless area ofWisconsin[J]. Ecology,1979,60(5):861-868.
Knisel W G. CREAMS: A field-scale model for chemicals, runoff and erosion fromagricultural management systems[J]. USDA Conservation Research Report,1980(26).
Laflen J M, Elliot W J, Simanton J R. WEPP: Soil erodibility experiments for rangeland andcropland soils[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,1991,46(1):39-44.
Lane L J, Renard K G, Foster G R, JM Laflen. Development and application of modern soilerosion prediction technology-The USDA experience[J]. Soil Research,1992,30(6):893-912.
Leys A, Govers G, Gillijns K. Scale effects on runoff and erosion losses from arable landunder conservation and conventional tillage: The role of residue cover[J]. Journal ofhydrology,2010,390(3):143-154.
McHugh M. Soil erosion in the UK: Assessing the impacts and developing indicators[J].
OCDE, Agricultural Impacts on Soil Erosion and Soil Biodiversity: Developing Indicators forPolicy Analysis, Paris, France, www. oecd. org/tad/env/indicateurs,2003.
Millward A A, Mersey J E. Adapting the RUSLE to model soil erosion potential in amountainous tropical watershed[J]. Catena,1999,38(2):109-129.
Morgan R P C. Soil erosion and conservation[M]. John Wiley&Sons,2009.
Nearing M A, Govers G, Norton L D. Variability in soil erosion data from replicated plots[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1999,63(6):1829-1835.
Odum E P, Odum H T, Andrews J. Fundamentals of ecology[M]. Philadelphia: Saunders,1971.
Pimentel, David, ed. World soil erosion and conservation[M]. Cambridge:CambridgeUniversity Press,1993.
Renard K G, Foster G R, Weesies G A. RUSLE: Revised universal soil loss equation[J].Journal of soil and Water Conservation,1991,46(1):30-33.
Renschler C S, Mannaerts C, Diekkrüger B. Evaluating spatial and temporal variability in soilerosion risk-rainfall erosivity and soil loss ratios in Andalusia, Spain[J]. Catena,1999,34(3):209-225.
Robinson D A. Agricultural practice, climate change and the soil erosion hazard in parts ofsoutheast England[J]. Applied Geography,1999,19(1):13-27.
Sadeghi S H, Moosavi V, Karami A, Behnia N. Soil erosion assessment and prioritization ofaffecting factors at plot scale using the Taguchi method[J]. Journal of Hydrology,2012,448:174-180.
Shi Z H, Cai C F, Ding S W, Wang T W, Chow T L. Soil conservation planning at the smallwatershed level using RUSLE with GIS: a case study in the Three Gorge Area of China[J].Catena,2004,55(1):33-48.
Stevens P A, Reynolds B, Emmett B A. Critical appraisal of state and pressures and controlson the sustainable use of soils in Wales (Final Report)[J]. Environment Agency/NationalAssembly for Wales,2002.
Tefera B, Sterk G. Land management, erosion problems and soil and water conservation inFincha’a watershed, western Ethiopia[J]. Land use policy,2010,27(4):1027-1037.
Ursula Kaly, Lino Briguglio, Helena McLeod, Susana Schmall, Craig Pratt and Reginald PalEnvironmental Vulnerability Index (EVI) to summarise national environmental vulnerabilityprofiles[M]. Suva, Fiji: South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission,1999.Valentin C, Poesen J, Li Y. Gully erosion: impacts, factors and control[J]. Catena,2005,63(2):132-153.
Wang G, Gertner G, Singh V. Spatial and temporal prediction and uncertainty of soil lossusing the revised universal soil loss equation: a case study of the rainfall–runoff erosivity Rfactor[J]. Ecological Modelling,2002,153(1):143-155.
Ward P J, van Balen R T, Verstraeten G, Renssen H, Vandenberghe J. The impact of land useand climate change on late Holocene and future suspended sediment yield of theMeusecatchment[J]. Geomorphology,2009,103(3):389-400.
Weisberg P J, Baker W L. Spatial variation in tree regeneration in the forest-tundra ecotone,Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,1995,25(8):1326-1339.
Weltzin J F, McPherson G R. Implications of precipitation redistribution for shifts intemperate savanna ecotones[J]. Ecology,2000,81(7):1902-1913.
Xu X L, Ma K M, Fu B J, Song C J, Liu W. Influence of three plant species with differentmorphologies on water runoff and soil loss in a dry-warm river valley, SW China[J]. Forestecology and management,2008,256(4):656-663.
Zhu M. Soil erosion risk assessment with CORINE model: case study in the DanjiangkouReservoir region, China[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment,2012,26(6):813-822.