用户名: 密码: 验证码:
针刺治疗儿童语言障碍的临床及实验研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
语言障碍(language disorder)是指口语、书面语、手势语等交
    流能力的缺陷。发生于儿童期的语言障碍包括发育性语言障碍、听
    力语言障碍、智力迟缓儿童的语言障碍,孤独症儿童语言障碍、脑性
    瘫痪儿童语言障碍等。本病发病率高、治疗难度大。本文从文献、临
    床、实验三方面对儿童语言障碍进行了研究。
    一、文献研究
     本文从《内经》、《难经》推本溯源,论述了传统中医学对语言障碍
    及其治疗的杰出贡献;从成人及儿童失语症的研究历史、语言功能的
    大脑定位及侧化的研究、语言的进化、发育、信息的处理等方面探讨
    了语言及其神经机制等现代研究进展;分别对儿童听力语言障碍、智
    力迟缓儿童语言障碍、孤独症儿童语言障碍、脑性瘫痪儿童语言障碍
    从发病原因、发病机理、诊断、治疗及预后等方面进行了现代研究概
    述。为本病的临床及实验研究打下了基础。
    二、临床研究
     由于引起儿童语言障碍的病因不同,本研究分别观察了针刺治疗对
    不同原因所致的儿童语言障碍的疗效,并进行了有关机理的探讨。
    (一)针刺治疗智力迟缓儿童语言障碍80例临床观察
     本组病例针刺组80例,总有效率77.5%;综合治疗组40例,总
    有效率82.5%;语言训练组52.5%。以针刺结合语言训练的综合组
    疗效最佳。针刺组疗效与语言障碍症状分类有关,C群疗效最好,B
    群、A群次之。针刺组总智商(FIQ)、言语智商(VIQ)、操作智商(PIQ)
    
     针刺治疗儿童语官障碍的临床及实验研究
    治疗前后自身比较及组间比较,均有明显提高,提示针刺通过提高智
    力迟缓)L童的智商改善语言及其他认知能力。
    (二)针刺治疗孤独症儿童语言障碍20例临床研究
     本组病例,针刺组 2 0例,总有效率 6 5%;药物对照组 10例,总
    有效率30%(P叩.01),针刺组疗效明显优于药物对照组。针刺对孤
    独症儿童语言障碍的图片词汇智商门 值)及社会适应行为商数(ADQ)
    有明显的改善作用。通过对本组患)L事件相关诱发电位的研究,提示
    针刺能有效地缩短孤独症儿童无任务 P3潜伏期,活跃 P3波幅,提高
    其认知能力。
    (三)针刺治疗脑性瘫痪儿童语言障碍76例临床观察
     本组病例针刺组 76例,总有效率 86.吕%,药物对照组 22例,总
    有效率 59.1%。针刺疗效与年龄有关,早期治疗疗效最好,6岁以内
    是治疗的最佳时期;其次,针刺疗效与语言障碍的类型有关,对语言
    迟缓、构音障碍疗效较好,对失语疗效较差。
    (四)针刺治疗儿童听力语言障碍60例临床观蔡
     本组病例针刺组 6 0例,总有效率 7 8.3%,药物对照组 3 6例,总
    有效率41.7%;针刺组患)L治疗后仍R阈值下降明显,与对照组相比
    P叩.05。对患儿脑干听觉诱发电位(肘旺)的研究表明:针刺能缩短
    患儿波潜伏期及波间期,从而改善患儿的听觉功能,改善语言障碍。
    三.实验研究
    (一)针刺对脑缺血大鼠幼鼠语言相关脑区及早基困表达的影响
     本研究通过双重结扎颈总动脉复制脑缺血动物模型,分别观察针
    刺治疗后语言相关脑区的C-fOS基固表达情况,结果正常组各脑区未
    见明显表达,假手术组亦未发现有明显表达,模型组动物各脑区有少
    量细胞中等水平的表达。针刺组诱导CJOS基因产物(fOS)在有关
    脑区明显表达,说明针刺治疗后GfOO基困表达的数目明显增高,呈
    较高水平表达。
    (二)针刺对脑缺血大鼠幼鼠语言相关脑区自由基损伤的影响
     2
    
     针刺治疗儿童语言障碍的临床及实验研究
     针刺对脑缺血幼龄大鼠语言相关脑区SOD、LPO、GSH千X具有一
    定的调节作用,针刺对模型动物针刺治疗后动物脑区与未经治疗的模
    型组比较SOD、LPO、GSH斗X含量均有明显升高,而u 显著下降。
    提示针刺增强脑内肥H-PX和 SOD的活性,清除 LPO,减轻了脂质过
    氧化对脑组织的损害。
Language barrier is the defect of tongue written
     language finger alphabet etc intercourse disability.
     Language barrier occur in childhood include developing language
     barrier, audition language barrier, slow intelligence children
     language barrier, autism children language barrier, children
     brain paralysis language barrier. The incidence of the disease
     is high , it is difficult to cure.
    
     The article set about the study of children language
     barrier from three directionsliterature, clinic and
     e x per i men t.
    
    
     1. literature study
    
     From the original literature ((nei jing) ((nan jing ,the
     article discuss the great contribution of TCM to language
     barrier and its treatment. From the history of adult and
     children aphasia, the study of the brain orientation of language
     function ,language evolution developing ,deaLing with
     information, etc, we discuss the modern research advance of the
     language and nerve mechanism; to summarize the the modern
     research of children language barrier, audition language
     barrier, slow intelligence children language barrier, autism
     children language barrier, language barrier, audition language
     barrier, slow intelligence children language barrier ,autism
     children language barrier etc from
    
     etiology,diagnosis,pathology, treating and preventing. To
     found the basement of the clinic and experiment research.
    
    
    
    
     2. Clinic research.
    
     Because the cause of children language barrier is different
     the study observed the curative effect of pin treatment to
     children language barrier by different causes separately ,and
     discuss the related mechanism.
    
     2. 1
    
     Treating slow intelligence children language barrier by
     pin 80 cases , is general efficiency rate is are 77.5% in clinic
     observation. The colligated group efficiency rate is 82. 5%, the
     language training group efficiency rate is 52. 5%, and the effect
     of the colligated group is best.
    
     There are 80 cases in the pin group ,and the general
     efficiency rate is 77.5%,40 cases in colligate group, the
     general efficiency rate is 82.5%, the efficiency rate of
     Language training group is 52. 5%, and the effect of integrated
     pin treating and language training group is best. The effect
     of the pin group related to the sort of symptoms. The effect
     of Cluster C is best, and cluster B and C take the second place
     of the general intelligence quotient , language
    
     quotient ,operating quotient there are obvious increasing both
     in the compare of forendft treatment and different pin
     treating guoup. It suggest that pin treatment can improve the
     language and other perceive ability by improve the intelligence
     quotient of the slow intelligence children.
    
     2. 2
    
     The clinic study of 20 cases children by pin treating.
    
     There are 20 cases in the pin group , the general efficiency rate
     is 65%, 10 cases in the control group , the general efficiency
    
    
    
     rate is 30%, the effect of the pin group is obvious better than
     that of the control group (P<0. 01). the pin treating obviously
     improve the intelligence quotient of picture and word recognize
     and society adapt behavior of the children autism language
     barrier. The study of the induced electric point related to the
     children affairs suggest that pin treatment can shorten the
     no-wask P3 latent period o
引文
1.王自强校注.清,徐大椿《难经经释》.江苏科学技术出版社,1981.4
    2.谭一松等主编.灵柩经.北京:中国医药科技出版社,1998.135
    3.余瀛鳌等编选.明·张景岳著《景岳全书》精华本.北京:科学出版社,1997.38
    4.高素荣.失语症.北京:北京医科大学出版社,1993.6
    5.卢利亚,AP著,赵吉生 王志强译.神经语言学.北京:北京大学出版社,1987;50-102
    6.高素荣.失语症.北京:北京医科大学出版社,1993.7
    7. Basse L.Hemiplegia of early onset and the faculty of speech with special reference to the effects of hemispherectomy. Brain,1962;88:653
    8. Lennegerg EH.Biological foundations of language.New York.Jonh wiley.1967
    9. Krashen S.The critical period for language acquisition and its possible basis Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.1975;263:211-224
    10. Molfess D, et al. The ontogeny of brain lateralization for speech and nonspeech stimuli.Brain Lang.1975;2:256.
    11.杨雄里.脑科学的现代进展.上海:上海科技教育出版社,1998.100
    12.同11
    13.吴海生,蔡来舟主编.实用语言治疗学.北京:人民军医出版社,1995.28
    14.哈平安,刘艳红著.病理语言学.北京:北京师范大学出版社,1998.198
    15.郭延庆,等.孤独症诊断的历史进展.国外医学,精神病学分册,1998;1:24
    16.秦志宏,等.婴儿孤独症的研究进展.国外医学·儿科学分册,1996;3:130
    
    
    17.郭延庆,等.孤独症诊断的历史进展.国外医学·精神病学分册,1998;1:24
    18. Dclong T, Nohria C,Der. MedChild Neurol,1994; 36 (5):441-448
    19. Herault J, Petit E, Marineau J, et al. Am J Med Gend,1995; 60(4): 276-281
    20. Lotspeich LJ, Ciaranello RD.Int Rev Neurobiol,1993;35:87-129
    21. Lainhart JE, Piven J. Curr Opin Pediatr, 1995; 7(4):392-400
    22. Holttum JR,Minshew NJ, Sanders RS, ET AL. Biol Psychiatn,1992;32(12):1091-1101
    23. Klciman MD, Neff S, Rosman NP.Neurology,1992;42(10):753-760
    24. Hashimoto T,Tayama M, MoriK, et al.Neuropediatric,1989; 20 (3):142-146
    25. Bcrthicr ML, Baycs A,Tolosa ES. J Am Aced Child Adoks Psychiatry, 1993;32 (3):633-639
    26. Gaffney GR, Tsai LY, Kuperman S, et al. Am J Dis child, 1987;141(12):1330-1332
    27. Saitoh O, Courchcsnc E, Egaas B, et al. Am J Psychialty, 1990; 147 (6): 734-739
    28. Piven J, Berthier ML, Starkstein SE, et al. Am J Psychialty, 1990;147
    29.哈平安,刘艳红著.病理生理学.北京:北京师范大学出版社,1998.169
    30.洛娜·温著,孙敦科译.孤独症儿童家长及专业人员指南.辽宁:辽宁师范大学出版社,1998:20-21
    31.吴海生,蔡来舟主编.实用语言治疗学.北京:人民军医出版社,1995.31
    32.吴希如.脑发育异常及发育中的脑损伤.上海:上海科技教育出版社,1998.158
    33.哈平安,刘艳红主编.病理生理学.北京:北京师范大学出版社,1998.151
    34.吴海生,蔡来舟主编.实用语言治疗学.北京:人民军医出版社,1995.239
    35.李胜利.脑性瘫痪儿童语言障碍的治疗.中国实用儿科杂志,1996;2:74
    36. Who.Mental retardation:meetint the challenge.Geneva,1985,1-10.
    37.赖新生主编.三针疗法.北京:中国医药科技出版社,1998.14-46
    
    
    38.彭增福编著.靳三针疗法,上海:上海科学技术文献出版社,2000.20
    39.王永午,等.小儿智能培养与监测.北京:人民军医出版社,1993
    40.龚耀生,等.中国韦氏幼儿智力量表手册.长沙:湖南地图出版社,1992
    41.龚耀生,等.中国修订韦氏儿童智力量表手册.长沙:湖南地图出版社,1993.6
    42.姚树桥,等.儿童适应行为评定量表手册.湖南医科大学出版社,1994.
    43.邓明昱.咨询心理学.北京:中国科学技术出版社,1992.167
    44.陶国泰.婴儿孤独症的诊断和归属问题.中华神经精神科杂志,1982;151(2):104-107
    45.杨晓玲.儿童孤独症30例临床分析.中国心理卫生杂志,1990;4:(6):250-252
    46.李雪荣主编.现代儿童精神医学.湖南科学技术出版社1994.174-187
    47.杨晓玲.孤独症行为量表测试报告.中国心理卫生杂志,1993;7(6):279
    48.姚树桥.适应行为量表及其在精神科的应用 国外医学·精神病学分册,1989;(3):141-144
    49.姚树桥,龚耀生.适应行为评定量表的编制及城乡区域性常模的制定.心理科学,1993;1:239-42
    50.孙金涛.孤独症.国外医学·儿科学分册,1993;20(3):119
    51. Gillberg CJ.Child psychol psychiatry,1988; 29(3):257-266
    52. Bchrman RE, Vaughan VC Nclson.Textbook of pediatrics.13~(th) eds philadalphia:wbsaundcrs,co 1987:73
    53. Gillberg C, Acta psychiatr scand.1990; 81(3):209-215
    54. Smallcy SL, Psychiatr.Clin North Am.1991; 14(1): 125-139
    55. Gillberg IC, Gillberg CJ .Child Psychiatry.1989;30(4):631-638
    56.叶杉.维生素 B6 的临床新用途:治疗自闭症.The Journal of Pharmaceutical,1993;17(3):138
    57.李慧玲,周耿主编.孤独症儿童教育与训练文集.北京:北京出版社,1997.4
    58.黄春香,等.婴儿孤独症的临床特征.中国临床心理学杂志,1999;7(1):53
    
    
    59.陶国泰.孤独症的诊断和早期发现与早期干预.中国实用儿科杂志,1997;12(6):364
    60.景学医.婴儿孤独症16例临床分析.河南诊断与治疗杂志,1999:13(1):7
    61.Volkmar FR,et al.An examination of social typologies autism.J.Am Acad.
    62.贾美秀,等.孤独症儿童智力水平及社会适应能力的比较研究.中国心理卫生杂志,1998;12(2):88
    63.林庆.小儿脑性瘫痪的定义、诊断条件及分型.中华儿科杂志1989;27(3):162-2
    64.昊海生主编.实用语言治疗学.北京:人民军医出版社,1995:270
    65.于海波.针灸治疗小儿脑瘫的临床和实验研究(博士学位论文):1997.968
    66.冷同嘉.耳鼻咽喉常见病及防治.北京:煤炭工业出版社,1991.8-15
    67.冯又连.浅析我国小儿耳聋现状及早期干预.中国农村医学,1996;24(5):47
    68.董泽宏,等.聪耳汤治疗青少年感音神经性耳聋35例.新中医,1995;(7):18
    69.朱利相.耳聋与中医脏腑的关系.新中医,1980;(4):41
    70.齐兵,等.816例药物中毒性耳聋脑干诱发电位分析.新疆医学,1993;23(2):111-112
    71.王奇.听觉诱发电位Ⅰ波起源的实验研究.临床耳鼻咽喉杂志,1998;2(3):153
    72.李友云,等.药物中毒性耳聋儿童脑干听觉诱发电位研究.当代医师杂志,1996;(11):44
    73.李胜利,等.庆大霉素和卡那霉素耳中毒后雏鸡耳蜗毛细胞的再生.中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志,1994:29(2):89-90
    74.Ben Ari Y,Anikszteijn L,Bregestorski P.Protein kinase C modulation of NMDA currents:an important link for LTP induction.TINS,1992;15:333-339
    
    
    75. Smironra T, Stinnakre J,Malle J. Characterization of a presynaptic glutamate receptor.Science,1993;262:430
    76.吴太真,等.学习与记忆的神经生物学,北京:北京医科大学、协和医科大学联合出版社.1984.330
    77.彭增福,等.电针治疗对精神发育迟滞儿童无任务P3影响的初步研究.中国针灸,1998;(4):202
    78.邵郊.学习和记忆的神经基础.北京:北京大学出版社,1993.208
    79. Courchesne E, et al.In:Halliday Am(EDS),A textbook of clinical neurophysiology,Chichester:John-wiley and sons.1987:645-676
    80.童新,等.实验性大鼠脑缺血乳头体病理。神经降压素和生长抑素改变及机制研究.1992;9(4):193-195
    81. Grepel V,Represa A,Boaudoin M, et al.Hippocampal damage induced by ischemia and intra-amygdoloid kainate injection:effects on N-methyl-D-aspargate NC1-12-thyeny11-cycloexi1)piperidinne and glycine binding sites. Neuroscience,1989,31:605
    82.谢瑶,等.全脑暂时性缺血诱导原癌基因蛋白(FOS)在大鼠海马结构表达的特征.解剖学杂志,1994;17(4):344-348
    83.杜诚.大鼠全脑缺血过程中原癌基因c-fos的表达.中国医学科学院学报,1992;(4):256
    84.应赛霞.c-fos蛋白在沙鼠全脑缺血再灌注时海马中等表达及其与电针抗缺血关系的探讨.上海医科大学学报,1994;21(4):311-314
    85.于海波.针灸治疗小儿脑瘫的临床和实验研究(博士学位论文) 1997.57
    86. Domopouols HB. Control of free radicals in biological systems. Fed Proc.1973;32:1903-1908
    87.张艳艳,等.沙土鼠脑缺血后脑组织匀浆及血浆中SOD、MDA的含量改变及其意义.临床神经病学杂志,1994;7(6):361-364
    
    
    88.金石,等.尼莫地平和硫氮卓酮对大鼠脑缺血再灌流期自由基损伤后保护作用研究.临床脑电学杂志,1994;3(3):167-169
    89.刘晓宏,等.实验性脑缺血后CuZn-SOD和Mn-SOD的免疫组化研究.中风与神经疾病杂志,1994;11(4):19
    90.韩玉昆主编.新生儿缺氧缺血性脑病,人民卫生出版社,2000.38

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700